AccScience Publishing / GPD / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/GPD025490080
Cite this article
10
Download
135
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Pharmacogenetic factors influencing cisplatin-based cancer treatment efficiency

Benny Beldrus Septer1,2 Dogfounianalo Somda3,4 Arsène Ngabo4,5 Amel Elbasyouni4* Boitumelo Tubutubu4 Shadrack Barmasai6 Titilayo Kèmi Sophia Nelly Adedjobi7,8 Joel Bidounga9 Abel Kolawole Oyebamiji10 Philip Joel Mwesigwa11 Samuel Mulondo12
Show Less
1 Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
2 Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
3 Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Training and Research Unit in Life and Earth Sciences, University Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
4 Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology & Innovation (PAUSTI), Nairobi, Kenya
5 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Université Officielle de Bukavu, Bukavu, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
6 Center for Virus Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
7 Laboratory of Biology and Molecular Typing in Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Atlantique, Bénin
8 Laboratory of Research in Biology Medical and Pharmaceutical, National University of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Abomey, Zou, Bénin
9 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Marien Ngouabi University, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
10 Department of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Ilesa, Ilesa, Osun State, Nigeria
11 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
12 Vaccine and Pharmaceutical Centre, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Organisation, Kampala, Uganda
Received: 4 December 2025 | Revised: 18 May 2026 | Accepted: 18 May 2026 | Published online: 21 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Cisplatin remains a cornerstone of chemotherapy for numerous solid tumors; however, its clinical utility is frequently compromised by substantial inter-individual variability in treatment response and the emergence of severe dose-limiting toxicities. This review systematically examines the primary pharmacogenetic and epigenetic factors that underpin these differential clinical outcomes. We evaluated key polymorphisms in genes governing drug metabolism and transport; specifically, those of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), copper transporters (CTR1, ATP7A/B), and solute carrier (SLC) transporters, which collectively dictate intracellular drug accumulation and inactivation. Furthermore, we analyzed the critical role of the DNA repair machinery, with a particular emphasis on the nucleotide excision repair pathway in mediating cisplatin resistance. Beyond traditional genetic variations, this review explored the emerging effect of epigenetic modifications and noncoding RNAs, including microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, and circular RNAs, in post-transcriptionally modulating cellular pathways associated with chemoresistance. The synthesis of these findings underscores the need to integrate robust pharmacogenetic profiling into clinical practice to transition oncology from a standardized protocol to a personalized therapeutic approach. Ultimately, identifying and validating these molecular markers can maximize therapeutic efficacy while mitigating adverse toxicities in individual patients.

Keywords
Cisplatin
Pharmacogenetics
Genetic polymorphisms
DNA repair
Noncoding RNAs
Epigenetic modifications
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Ho GY, Woodward N, Coward JIG. Cisplatin versus carboplatin: comparative review of therapeutic management in solid malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;102:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.014
  2. Mariconda A, Ceramella J, Catalano A, Saturnino C, Sinicropi MS, Longo P. Cisplatin, the timeless molecule. Inorganics. 2025;13(7):246. doi: 10.3390/inorganics13070246
  3. Shahsavani MB, Heidari M, Yousefi R, Moosavi‐Movahedi AA. Platinum‐based chemotherapeutics in the modern era: From classical DNA‐targeting mechanisms to next‐generation innovations in cancer therapy. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2025;106(6):e70208. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.70208
  4. Tanida S, Mizoshita T, Ozeki K, et al. Mechanisms of cisplatin-induced apoptosis and of cisplatin sensitivity: Potential of BIN1 to act as a potent predictor of cisplatin sensitivity in gastric cancer treatment. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:1-8. doi: 10.1155/2012/862879
  5. Elmorsy EA, Saber S, Hamad RS, et al. Advances in understanding cisplatin-induced toxicity: Molecular mechanisms and protective strategies. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2024;203:106939. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106939
  6. Roco Á, Cayún J, Contreras S, Stojanova J, Quiñones L. Can pharmacogenetics explain efficacy and safety of cisplatin pharmacotherapy? Front Genet. 2014;5. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00391
  7. Gupta P. Pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics and ayurgenomics for personalized medicine: A paradigm shift. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015;77(2):135. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.156543
  8. Naderi N, Jolfayi AG, Azimi A, Maleki M, Kalayinia S. Pharmacogenomics in cardiac therapy: Personalizing treatment for heart health. Biomed Pharm. 2025;190:118392. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118392
  9. Sadee W, Wang D, Hartmann K, Toland AE. Pharmacogenomics: Driving personalized medicine. Pharmacol Rev. 2023;75(4):789-814. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.122.000810
  10. Shriver SP, Adams D, McKelvey BA, et al. Overcoming barriers to discovery and implementation of equitable pharmacogenomic testing in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(10):1181-1192. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01748
  11. Yu X, Jia L, Tang Q, Zhou Q, Wang G, Wang S. Regulation of cisplatin resistance in lung cancer by epigenetic mechanisms. Clin Epigenetics. 2025;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01961-6
  12. Zhang J, Yu Q, Zhu W, Sun X. Recent advances in the role of circRNA in cisplatin resistance in tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 2025;32(5):497-506. doi: 10.1038/s41417-025-00899-4
  13. Crupi E, De Padua TC, Marandino L, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in the perioperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024;7(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.012
  14. Okawa T, Mizuno T, Hanabusa S, et al. Prediction model of acute kidney injury induced by cisplatin in older adults using a machine learning algorithm. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262021
  15. Dasari S, Bernard Tchounwou P. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:364-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.025
  16. Pervushin NV, Yapryntseva MA, Panteleev MA, Zhivotovsky B, Kopeina GS. Cisplatin resistance and metabolism: Simplification of complexity. Cancers. 2024;16(17):3082. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173082
  17. Townsend DM, Tew KD. The role of glutathione-S-transferase in anti-cancer drug resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22(47):7369-7375. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206940
  18. Malempati S, Agrawal N, Ravisankar D, et al. Role of GSTP1 functional polymorphisms in molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Hum Gene. 2024;42:201335. doi: 10.1016/j.humgen.2024.201335
  19. Romero A, Martín M, Oliva B, et al. Glutathione S-transferase P1 c.313A > G polymorphism could be useful in the prediction of doxorubicin response in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(7):1750-1756. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr483
  20. Saadat M. Evaluation of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) Ile105Val polymorphism and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus, a meta-analysis. EXCLI J. 2017;16:1188-1197. doi: 10.17179/EXCLI2017-828
  21. Khrunin A, Ivanova F, Moisseev A, et al. Pharmacogenomics of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients of different ethnic origins. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13(2):171-178. doi: 10.2217/pgs.11.140
  22. Jawad R, Mshimesh B, Al‑Mayah Q. Glutathione‑S‑transferase pi‑1 polymorphisms as predictors of the severity and onset of the development of cumulative oxaliplatin‑induced neurotoxicity in patients with colorectal cancer. World Acad Sci J. 2025;7(5):1-13. doi: 10.3892/wasj.2025.369
  23. Kim W, Cho YA, Kim DC, Lee KE. Association between genetic polymorphism of GSTP1 and toxicities in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15(4):439. doi: 10.3390/ph15040439
  24. Townsend DM, Tew KD, He L, King JB, Hanigan MH. Role of glutathione S-transferase Pi in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Biomed Pharm. 2009;63(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2008.08.004
  25. Alnasser SM. The role of glutathione S-transferases in human disease pathogenesis and their current inhibitors. Genes Dis. 2025;12(4):101482. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2024.101482
  26. Abada P, Howell SB. Regulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity by Cu influx transporters. Met-Based Drugs. 2010;2010:1-9. doi: 10.1155/2010/317581
  27. Kuo MT, Chen HHW, Song IS, Savaraj N, Ishikawa T. The roles of copper transporters in cisplatin resistance. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26(1):71-83. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9045-3
  28. Schoeberl A, Gutmann M, Theiner S, et al. The copper transporter CTR1 and cisplatin accumulation at the single-cell level by LA-ICP-TOFMS. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:1055356. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1055356
  29. Howell SB, Safaei R, Larson CA, Sailor MJ. Copper transporters and the cellular pharmacology of the platinum-containing cancer drugs. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;77(6):887-894. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.063172
  30. Xu L, Cao X, Deng Y, et al. Cuproptosis-related genes and agents: implications in tumor drug resistance and future perspectives. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1559236. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1559236
  31. Yao L, Jiang B, Xu D. Strategies to combat cancer drug resistance: focus on copper metabolism and cuproptosis. Cancer Drug Resist. 2025;8:15. doi: 10.20517/cdr.2025.41
  32. Kalayda GV, Wagner CH, Buß I, Reedijk J, Jaehde U. Altered localisation of the copper efflux transporters ATP7A and ATP7B associated with cisplatin resistance in human ovarian carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2008;8(1):175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-175
  33. Yoshizawa K, Nozaki S, Kitahara H, et al. Copper efflux transporter (ATP7B) contributes to the acquisition of cisplatin-resistance in human oral squamous cell lines. Oncol Rep. 2007;18(4):987-991. doi: 10.3892/or.18.4.987
  34. Pizzagalli MD, Bensimon A, Superti‐Furga G. A guide to plasma membrane solute carrier proteins. FEBS J. 2021;288(9):2784-2835. doi: 10.1111/febs.15531
  35. Brecht K, Schäfer AM, Meyer Zu Schwabedissen HE. Uptake transporters of the SLC21, SLC22A, and SLC15A families in anticancer therapy—Modulators of cellular entry or pharmacokinetics? Cancers. 2020;12(8):2263. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082263
  36. Ciarimboli G, Deuster D, Knief A, et al. Organic cation transporter 2 mediates cisplatin-induced oto- and nephrotoxicity and is a target for protective interventions. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(3):1169-1180. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090610
  37. Nieskens TTG, Peters JGP, Dabaghie D, et al. Expression of organic anion transporter 1 or 3 in human kidney proximal tubule cells reduces cisplatin sensitivity. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018;46(5):592-599. doi: 10.1124/dmd.117.079384
  38. Ahmed S, Eu-ahsunthornwattana J, Thamrongjirapat T, et al. EPHX1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms are associated with cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and prognosis in Thai cancer patients. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(6):e0324699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324699
  39. Selim MS, Kassem AB, El-Bassiouny NA, Salahuddin A, Abu El-Ela RY, Hamza MS. Polymorphic renal transporters and cisplatin’s toxicity in urinary bladder cancer patients: current perspectives and future directions. Med Oncol. 2023;40(2):80. doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01928-0
  40. Zazuli Z, Vijverberg S, Slob E, et al. Genetic variations and cisplatin nephrotoxicity: A systematic review. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1111. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01111
  41. Lanvers-Kaminsky C, Sprowl JA, Malath I, et al. Human OCT2 variant C.808G>T confers protection effect against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16(4):323-332. doi: 10.2217/pgs.14.182
  42. Zhang J, Zhou W. Ameliorative effects of SLC22A2 gene polymorphism 808 G/T and cimetidine on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in Chinese cancer patients. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(7):2289-2293. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.03.077
  43. Duan M, Ulibarri J, Liu KJ, Mao P. Role of nucleotide excision repair in cisplatin resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(23):9248. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239248
  44. Barba A, López-Vilaró L, Ferre M, et al. ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms predict the efficacy and toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(9):1121. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16091121
  45. Lee MS, Liu C yu, Su L, Christiani DC. Polymorphisms in ERCC1 and ERCC2/XPD genes and carcinogen DNA adducts in human lung. Lung Cancer. 2015;89(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.05.001
  46. Miras I, Vázquez-Gutierrez I, Estévez-García P, Muñoz- Galván S. DNA repair pathways in ovarian cancer: Implications for therapy and resistance. Biomed Pharm. 2025;193:118719. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118719
  47. Obiedat H, Alrabadi N, Sultan E, Al Shatti M, Zihlif M. The effect of ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphysims on response to cisplatin based therapy in osteosarcoma patients. BMC Med Genet. 2018;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12881-018-0627-4
  48. Psyrri A, Gkotzamanidou M, Papaxoinis G, et al. The DNA damage response network in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. ESMO Open. 2021;6(2):100075. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100075
  49. Chen LH, Shen TC, Li CH, et al. The significant interaction of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 genotypes and smoking to lung cancer risk. Cancer Genom Proteom. 2020;17(5):571-577. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20213
  50. Arora S, Kothandapani A, Tillison K, Kalman-Maltese V, Patrick SM. Downregulation of XPF–ERCC1 enhances cisplatin efficacy in cancer cells☆. DNA Repair. 2010;9(7):745-753. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.010
  51. Bellmunt J, Paz-Ares L, Cuello M, et al. Gene expression of ERCC1 as a novel prognostic marker in advanced bladder cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(3):522-528. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl435
  52. Du P, Li G, Wu L, Huang M. Perspectives of ERCC1 in early-stage and advanced cervical cancer: From experiments to clinical applications. Front Immunol. 2023;13:1065379. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1065379
  53. Friboulet L, Olaussen KA, Pignon JP, et al. ERCC1 isoform expression and DNA repair in non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1101-1110. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214271
  54. Kiss RC, Xia F, Acklin S. Targeting DNA damage response and repair to enhance therapeutic index in cisplatin-based cancer treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):8199. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158199
  55. Liu J, Zhang L, Mao P, et al. Functional characterization of a novel transcript of ERCC1 in chemotherapy resistance of ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(49):85759-85771. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20482
  56. Rocha CRR, Silva MM, Quinet A, Cabral-Neto JB, Menck CFM. DNA repair pathways and cisplatin resistance: an intimate relationship. Clinics. 2018;73:e478s. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e478s
  57. Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P, et al. DNA repair by ERCC1 in non–small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(10):983-991. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060570
  58. Sakamoto Y, Morizane C, Okusaka T, et al. Impact of ERCC1 on the outcomes of chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):33862. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07058-7
  59. Koutsoukos K, Andrikopoulou A, Dedes N, Zagouri F, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA. Clinical perspectives of ERCC1 in bladder cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8829. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228829
  60. Palomba G, Atzori F, Budroni M, et al. ERCC1 polymorphisms as prognostic markers in T4 breast cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Transl Med. 2014;12(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0272-4
  61. Tan LM, Qiu CF, Zhu T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and platinum-based chemotherapy treatment outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A Genetic epidemiology study based meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05642-0
  62. Woelfelschneider A, Popanda O, Lilla C, et al. A distinct ERCC1 haplotype is associated with mRNA expression levels in prostate cancer patients. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(9):1758-1764. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn067
  63. Yin M, Yan J, Martinez-Balibrea E, et al. ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms predict clinical outcomes of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies in gastric and colorectal cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1632-1640. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2169
  64. Zhang T, Ma SC, Zhao Y, Zhao D, Ling XL. Association between the ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism and clinical outcomes of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies in gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:641-648. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S80913
  65. Bradbury PA, Kulke MH, Heist RS, et al. Cisplatin pharmacogenetics, DNA repair polymorphisms, and esophageal cancer outcomes. Pharm Genom. 2009;19(8):613-625. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32832f3010
  66. Tamura D, Khan SG, Merideth M, et al. Effect of mutations in XPD(ERCC2) on pregnancy and prenatal development in mothers of patients with trichothiodystrophy or xeroderma pigmentosum. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(12):1308-1310. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.90
  67. Islam MdA, Mubashshira S, Rahman MdM, Kabir Y. Contribution of ERCC2 rs13181 (Lys751Gln) and rs1799793 (Asp312Asn) polymorphisms to the risk of bladder cancer in Bangladesh. Cancer Genet. 2024;288-289:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.11.002
  68. Zhang H, Li Y, Guo S, et al. Effect of ERCC2 rs13181 and rs1799793 polymorphisms and environmental factors on the prognosis of patients with lung cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12(10):6941-6953.
  69. Kulkarni A, McNeill DR, Gleichmann M, Mattson MP, Wilson DM. XRCC1 protects against the lethality of induced oxidative DNA damage in nondividing neural cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(15):5111-5121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn480
  70. Kothandapani A, Dangeti VSMN, Brown AR, et al. Novel role of base excision repair in mediating cisplatin cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(16):14564-14574. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.225375
  71. Slyskova J, Sabatella M, Ribeiro-Silva C, et al. Base and nucleotide excision repair facilitate resolution of platinum drugs-induced transcription blockage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(18):9537-9549. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky764
  72. Ruwali M. Role of genetic variations in determining treatment outcome in head and neck cancer. Eur Med J. 2017;2(4):114-121. doi: 10.33590/emj/10313625
  73. Yuan Z, Li J, Hu R, Jiao Y, Han Y, Weng Q. Predictive assessment in pharmacogenetics of XRCC1 gene on clinical outcomes of advanced lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):16482. doi: 10.1038/srep16482
  74. Zhang Y, Wang M, Gu D, et al. Association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms with the survival and clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer. DNA Cell Biol. 2013;32(3):111-118. doi: 10.1089/dna.2012.1840
  75. Zhao J, Zhi Z, Zhang M, et al. Predictive value of single nucleotide polymorphisms in XRCC1 for radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:3901- 3918. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S156175
  76. Permatasari L, Afifah N, Ishmatullah M, Intania R, Halimah E, Barliana M. Genetic navigation: A narrative review of XRCC1 polymorphism impact on platinum-based chemotherapy outcomes in NSCLC patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2025;17:383-395. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S501420
  77. Kang TH. Circadian rhythm of NER and ATR pathways. Biomolecules. 2021;11(5):715. doi: 10.3390/biom11050715
  78. Liu M, Qiu Z, Yang Q. Association between ERCC1 gene polymorphism (rs11615) and colorectal cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis of medical image fusion and safety applications. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:9988513. doi: 10.1155/2022/9988513
  79. Wang C, Deng G, Niu S, Meng X. Genetic polymorphisms of TRPA1 does affect risk of cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity in Chinese population. Transl Oncol. 2025;60:102486. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102486
  80. Dolan ME, El Charif O, Wheeler HE, et al. Clinical and genome-wide analysis of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult-onset cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(19):5757-5768. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3224
  81. Zhang X, Trendowski MR, Wilkinson E, et al. Pharmacogenomics of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicities: Hearing loss, tinnitus, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Cancer Med. 2022;11(14):2801-2816. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4644
  82. Iațentiuc A, Iațentiuc IM, Frăsinariu OE, et al. The role of genetic and non-genetic factors in the occurrence of cisplatin-associated ototoxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(10):4787. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104787
  83. Yang JJ, Lim JYS, Huang J, et al. The role of inherited TPMT and COMT genetic variation in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children with cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(2):252-259. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.121
  84. Zhou X, Ao X, Jia Z, et al. Non-coding RNA in cancer drug resistance: Underlying mechanisms and clinical applications. Front Oncol. 2022;12:951864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.951864
  85. Cui Y, Li G, Zhang X, Dai F, Zhang R. Increased MALAT1 expression contributes to cisplatin resistance in non‑small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(4):4821-4828. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9293
  86. Wang X, Zhang H, Bai M, et al. Exosomes serve as nanoparticles to deliver anti-miR-214 to reverse chemoresistance to cisplatin in gastric cancer. Mol Ther. 2018;26(3):774-783. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.01.001
  87. Long X, Song K, Hu H, et al. Long non-coding RNA GAS5 inhibits DDP-resistance and tumor progression of epithelial ovarian cancer via GAS5-E2F4-PARP1-MAPK axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1329-2
  88. Wang J, Ye C, Liu J, Hu Y. UCA1 confers paclitaxel resistance to ovarian cancer through miR-129/ABCB1 axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;501(4):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.104
  89. Wu Y, Wang T, Xia L, Zhang M. LncRNA WDFY3-AS2 promotes cisplatin resistance and the cancer stem cell in ovarian cancer by regulating hsa-miR-139-5p/SDC4 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01993-x
  90. Shang A, Wang W, Gu C, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP enhances IL-6 expression to potentiate immune escape of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the expression of PD-L1 in neutrophils. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1394-6
  91. Rupaimoole R, Lee J, Haemmerle M, et al. Long noncoding RNA ceruloplasmin promotes cancer growth by altering glycolysis. Cell Rep. 2015;13(11):2395-2402. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.047
  92. Yang H, Kong W, He L, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN. Cancer Res. 2008;68(2):425-433. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2488
  93. Sun C, Li N, Yang Z, et al. miR-9 regulation of BRCA1 and ovarian cancer sensitivity to cisplatin and PARP inhibition. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(22):1750-1758. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt302
  94. Sun C, Cao W, Qiu C, et al. MiR-509-3 augments the synthetic lethality of PARPi by regulating HR repair in PDX model of HGSOC. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-0844-0
  95. He L, Zhu W, Chen Q, et al. Ovarian cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-205 promotes metastasis by inducing angiogenesis. Theranostics. 2019;9(26):8206-8220. doi: 10.7150/thno.37455
  96. Zou Z, Zou R, Zong D, et al. miR‐495 sensitizes MDR cancer cells to the combination of doxorubicin and taxol by inhibiting MDR1 expression. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(9):1929-1943. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13114
  97. Xiao M, Guo J, Xie L, et al. Let-7e suppresses DNA damage repair and sensitizes ovarian cancer to cisplatin through targeting PARP1. Mol Cancer Res. 2020;18(3):436-447. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-1369
  98. Hamdy NM, Noureldein MH, Gouhar SA, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of exosomal circRNAs in cancer: decoding the circular code toward precision medicine. Cancer Cell Int. 2025;25(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-04053-w
  99. Li X, Liu H, Xing P, et al. Exosomal circRNAs: Deciphering the novel drug resistance roles in cancer therapy. J Pharm Anal. 2025;15(2):101067. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101067
  100. Li Q hui, Liu Y, Chen S, et al. circ-CSPP1 promotes proliferation, invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells by acting as a miR-1236-3p sponge. Biomed Pharm. 2019;114:108832. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108832
  101. Lin C, Xu X, Yang Q, Liang L, Qiao S. Circular RNA ITCH suppresses proliferation, invasion, and glycolysis of ovarian cancer cells by up-regulating CDH1 via sponging miR-106a. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01420-7
  102. Luo L, Gao Y, Sun X. Circ-ITCH correlates with small tumor size, decreased FIGO stage and prolonged overall survival, and it inhibits cells proliferation while promotes cells apoptosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2018;23(4):505-513. doi: 10.3233/CBM-181609
  103. Pan Y, Lin Y, Mi C. Cisplatin‐resistant osteosarcoma cell‐derived exosomes confer cisplatin resistance to recipient cells in an exosomal circ_103801‐dependent manner. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(4):858-868. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11532
  104. Ye H, Hu X, Wen Y, et al. Exosomes in the tumor microenvironment of sarcoma: from biological functions to clinical applications. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01609-0
  105. Shi Q, Ji T, Ma Z, Tan Q, Liang J. Serum exosomes-based biomarker circ_0008928 regulates cisplatin sensitivity, tumor progression, and glycolysis metabolism by miR-488/ HK2 axis in cisplatin-resistant nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2023;38(8):558-571. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2020.4490
  106. Lumpp T, Stößer S, Fischer F, Hartwig A, Köberle B. Role of Epigenetics for the efficacy of cisplatin. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):1130. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021130
  107. Dedes N, Liontos M, Haidopoulos D, et al. Epigenetics in ovarian cancer: A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Biomedicines. 2025;13(11):2820. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13112820
  108. He W, Zhu H, Zhang S, et al. Epigenetic editing of BRCA1 promoter increases cisplatin and olaparib sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells. Epigenetics. 2024;19(1):2357518. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2357518
  109. Natu A, Verma T, Khade B, et al. Histone acetylation: a key determinant of acquired cisplatin resistance in cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2024;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01615-5
  110. Almeida LO, Abrahao AC, Rosselli-Murai LK, et al. NFκB mediates cisplatin resistance through histone modifications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). FEBS Open Bio. 2014;4(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2013.12.003
  111. Oh SY, Kim J, Lee KY, et al. Chromatin remodeling-driven autophagy activation induces cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(8):589. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-06975-1
Share
Back to top
Gene & Protein in Disease, Electronic ISSN: 2811-003X Published by AccScience Publishing