AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB025180174
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Early Access

Neural cell responses to spinal implant biomaterials in a 3D bioprinted cell culture model

David J. Wen1† Javad Tavakoli1,2†* Joanne L. Tipper1,2*
Show Less
1 School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia
2 School of Engineering, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 29 April 2025 | Accepted: 10 June 2025 | Published online: 11 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioprinting of Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications)
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Spinal implants are vital for treating spinal disorders, yet wear particle-induced complications threaten their long-term success. Despite this, the direct effects of implant-derived particles on neural cells remain largely unexplored, especially given the limitations of conventional 2D culture models to capture such complex interactions. The current study introduces a novel in vitro platform consisting of a 3D bioprinted GelMA hydrogel embedded with neural cells (C6 astrocyte-like and NG108-15 neurons) and spinal implant biomaterial particles, designed to model the spinal cord microenvironment with enhanced physiological relevance. As the first of its kind, this cell-particle-laden system supports the evaluation of neural cell responses to spinal biomaterial particles, including polymers, PEEK-Optima and polyethylene Ceridust® 3615, zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) ceramic, and CoCrMo metal alloy. The bioprinted platform demonstrated excellent compatibility with various neural cell types and particle compositions, enabling a wide range of biological assays. Cell viability within the 3D model was comparable to traditional 2D cultures, affirming its ability to sustain cell survival while offering improved biomimicry. Biological assays assessing cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA damage provided critical insights into material-specific and time-dependent cellular responses. While no significant cytotoxic effects were observed in short-term cultures, distinct variations in ROS production and viability emerged based on biomaterial type and exposure duration. Overall, this versatile 3D bioprinted system presents a robust, scalable tool for mechanistic and toxicological studies of spinal implant wear particles under physiologically relevant conditions.

Keywords
Neural cells
Biomaterial particles
Bioprinting
C6 Astrocyte-like cells
NG108-15 cells
Cell viability
Reactive oxygen species
3D model
Funding
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing