AccScience Publishing / DP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/DP025490047
ARTICLE

What is in a bottle? Thirty design strategies for luxurious packaging, transcending intellectual property to embrace intellectual capital

Marlena Jankowska1* Mirosław Pawełczyk1
Show Less
1 Institute of Law, Center for Design, Fashion and Advertisement Law, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship
2 Institute of Law, Research Center for Public Competition Law and Sectoral Regulations, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Received: 5 December 2025 | Revised: 19 March 2026 | Accepted: 24 March 2026 | Published online: 26 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study explores the nuanced role of intellectual property (IP) and intellectual capital (IC) in the premium beverage industry, focusing on bottle design as a strategic asset. By analyzing the ways brands like Maker’s Mark, Veuve Clicquot, and Glenfiddich differentiate themselves through unique bottle features, our study highlights how companies are building brand identity and consumer loyalty outside conventional IP protections. This approach emphasizes the importance of design strategy in the beverage industry and reflects broader trends in leveraging IC to create a competitive advantage. This study examines the strategic role of bottle design within premium and luxury beverage brands, aiming to uncover how companies use IC—such as design, brand equity, and consumer perception—to create value in areas not covered in traditional IP rights. The study examines how design elements shape consumer expectations and enhance brand prestige, illuminating the intersection of IP and brand identity. The study provides a novel perspective on the role of design strategy in the premium beverage industry, contributing to both academic and practical discourse on how brands build value outside traditional IP frameworks. It highlights how bottle design serves as an IC, shaping brand identity and consumer loyalty in ways that redefine value creation in competitive markets.

Keywords
Design
Strategies
Design Strategies
Intellectual property
Intellectual capital
Bottle design
Funding
This study was fully funded by the National Science Centre in Poland, grant “Brand Abuse: Brand as a New Personal Interest under the Polish Civil Code against an EU and US Backdrop,” grant holder: Marlena Maria Jankowska- Augustyn; grant number: 2021/43/B/HS5/01156. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. DCC. The fight for the shelf: how packaging became the frontline in brand battles. Available from: https://dcc.com/news-and-insights/the-fight-for-the-shelf-how-packaging-became-the-frontline-in-brand-battles/ [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  2. Artwork Flow. The impact of packaging design on brand identity. 2024. Available from: https://www.artworkflowhq.com/resources/packaging-design-brand-identity-guide [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  3. Lin SY, Yen J, Fang K. The influence of packaging-design benefits on brand equity: discussion from packaging design experts’ view. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Des. 2012;58(5):11-20. doi: 10.11247/jssdj.58.5_11
  4. Dean NL. The Man Behind the Bottle: The Origin and History of the Classic Contour Coca-Cola Bottle as Told by the Son of Its Creator. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris Corporation; 2010.
  5. Gersen JE, Hemphill CS. The Coca-Cola bottle: a fragile vessel for building a brand. In: Gersen J, Steckel J, eds. Legal Applications of Marketing Theory. NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 23-12. 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4232437
  6. Root A, inventor; The Coca-Cola Company, assignee. Bottle or similar article. US Design Patent USD48160. November 16, 1915. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/ USD48160S/en [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  7. Bodden V. The Story of Coca-Cola. Mankato, MN: The Creative Company; 2009.
  8. Justia Trademarks. Coca-Cola trademark. Available from: https://trademarks.justia.com/720/69/coca-cola-72069873. html [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  9. Lockhart B, Porter B. The dating game: tracking the Hobble- Skirt Coca-Cola bottle. Historic Glass Bottle Identification & Information Website. 2010;47.
  10. Klein DA. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009.
  11. Marr B, Roos G. A strategy perspective on intellectual capital. In: Marr B, ed. Perspectives on Intellectual Capital. London: Routledge; 2012:28-41.
  12. Bollen L, Vergauwen P, Schnieders S. Linking intellectual capital and intellectual property to company performance. Manag Decis. 2005;43(9):1161-1185. doi: 10.1108/00251740510626254
  13. Reitzig M. Strategic management of intellectual property. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2004;45(3):35-40.
  14. Landes WM, Posner RA. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003.
  15. Chamorro A, García-Gallego JM, Trindade-Carlos HDC. Study on the importance of wine bottle design on consumer choices. Br Food J. 2021;123(2):577-593. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2020-0244
  16. Gómez-Carmona D, Cruces-Montes S, Marín-Dueñas PP, Serrano-Domínguez C, Paramio A, Zayas García A. Do you see it clearly? The effect of packaging and label format on Google Ads. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2021;16(5):1648-1666. doi: 10.3390/jtaer16050093
  17. Liu C, Sharma C, Xu Q, Gonzalez Viejo C, Fuentes S, Torrico DD. Influence of label design and country of origin information in wines on consumers’ visual, sensory, and emotional responses. Sensors. 2022;22(6):2158. doi: 10.3390/s22062158
  18. Clement J. Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design. J Mark Manag. 2007;23(9-10):917-928. doi: 10.1362/026725707X250395
  19. Merdian P, Piroth P, Rueger-Muck E, Raab G. Looking behind eye-catching design: an eye-tracking study on wine bottle design preference. Int J Wine Bus Res. 2021;33(1):134- 151. doi: 10.1108/IJWBR-07-2019-0044
  20. van Hoek R, Lebigot D, Bagot A, Sexton S. Insight from industry: Moet Hennessy’s development of an innovative supplier diversity program in the wine and beverage industry. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2024;29(3):460-467. doi: 10.1108/SCM-01-2023-0041
  21. Syrett D. Bottle design and manufacture and related packaging. In: Steen DP, Ashurst PR, eds. Carbonated Soft Drinks: Formulation and Manufacture. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006:181-217.
  22. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 5027401. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/FR502024005027401 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  23. Maggioni E, Risso P, Olivero N, Gallace A. The effect of a container’s weight on the perception of mineral water. J Sens Stud. 2015;30(5):395-403. doi: 10.1111/joss.12166
  24. Liger-Belair G, Polidori G, Jeandet P. Recent advances in the science of champagne bubbles. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37(11):2490-2511. doi: 10.1039/B717798B
  25. Luo SJ, Fu YT, Korvenmaa P. A preliminary study of perceptual matching for the evaluation of beverage bottle design. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(2):219-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.01.007
  26. Ngo MK, Velasco C, Salgado A, Boehm E, O’Neill D, Spence C. Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: the case of shape and sound symbolism. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;28(1):361-369. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.004
  27. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 789448. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/brand/BT50000M00M789448 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  28. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 1473787. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/brand/FR501988001473787 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  29. Carvalho FM, Spence C. Methods for studying multisensory perception in consumer research. In: Ares G, Varela P, eds. Consumer Research Methods in Food Science. New York, NY: Humana; 2023:195-224. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3000-6_10
  30. Simmonds G, Spence C. Thinking inside the box: how seeing products on, or through, the packaging influences consumer perceptions and purchase behaviour. Food Qual Prefer. 2017;62:340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.11.010
  31. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 475854. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/brand/WO500000000475854 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  32. Sipos L, Nyitrai Á, Szabó D, Urbin Á, Nagy BV. Former and potential developments in sensory color masking – review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;111:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.050
  33. Jansson-Boyd CV, Bright P. Visual neuroscience. In: Jansson- Boyd CV, ed. Consumer Neuroscience. London: Academic Press; 2024:51-69. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-13581-1.00004-2
  34. Becker L, van Rompay TJL, Schifferstein HNJ, Galetzka M. Tough package, strong taste: the influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Qual Prefer. 2011;22(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.007
  35. Gislason S, Bruhn S, Christensen AM, Christensen MT, Hansen MG, Kha TT, Giacalone D. The influence of bottle design on perceived quality of beer: a conjoint analytic study. Beverages. 2020;6(4):64. doi: 10.3390/beverages6040064
  36. Schlintl C, Schienle A. Effects of coloring food images on the propensity to eat: a placebo approach with color suggestions. Front Psychol. 2020;11:589826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589826
  37. Maier MA, Hill RA, Elliot AJ, Barton RA. Color in achievement contexts in humans. In: Elliot AJ, Fairchild MD, Franklin A, eds. Handbook of Color Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016:568-584. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107337930.028
  38. Spence C. Eating with our eyes: on the color of flavor. In: Elliot AJ, Fairchild MD, Franklin A, eds. Handbook of Color Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015:603-618. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107337930.030
  39. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 011177862. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/EM500000011177862 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  40. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 010957751. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/EM500000010957751 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  41. Barber N, Almanza BA, Donovan JR. Motivational factors of gender, income and age on selecting a bottle of wine. Int J Wine Mark. 2006;18(3):218-232. doi: 10.1108/09547540610704774
  42. Sakarya A, Dortyol IT. Do we always drink the same coffee? The effect of weight and colour on takeaway coffee perception. Young Consum. 2021;23(1):72-89. doi: 10.1108/YC-03-2021-1292
  43. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 1056903. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/brand/AU502005001056903 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  44. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 814667. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/brand/AU501999000814667 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  45. Blackmore H, Hidrio C, Godineau P, Yeomans MR. The effect of implicit and explicit extrinsic cues on hedonic and sensory expectations in the context of beer. Food Qual Prefer. 2020;81:103855.doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103855
  46. Van Doorn G, Watson S, Timora J, Spence C. The influence of training and expertise on the multisensory perception of beer: a review. Food Qual Prefer. 2020;79:103778. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103778
  47. Blackmore H, Hidrio C, Yeomans MR. A taste of things to come: the effect of extrinsic and intrinsic cues on perceived properties of beer mediated by expectations. Food Qual Prefer. 2021;94:104326. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104326
  48. Tomic N, Smigic N, Udovicki B, Djekic I. Influence of drinking cups of different materials on emotional and acceptance responses, and perception of sensory attributes of soft drinks. Food Qual Prefer. 2024;120:105252. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105252
  49. Hsu L, Chen Y-J. Does coffee taste better with latte art? A neuroscientific perspective. Br Food J. 2021;123(5):1931- 1946. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0612
  50. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 018775736. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/EM500000018775736 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  51. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 1450203. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/FR501988001450203 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  52. Aktar T. Recent trends and challenges in sensory and perception science. In: Özogul F, ed. Technological Developments in Food Preservation, Processing, and Storage. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2020:166-187. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1924-0.ch009
  53. Spinelli S, Niedziela M. Emotion measurements and application to product and packaging development. In: Burgess P, ed. Integrating the Packaging and Product Experience in Food and Beverages. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2016:77-119. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100356-5.00005-X
  54. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 016706434. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/EM500000016706434 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  55. WIPO Global Brand Database. Registration No. 771923. Available from: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/similarname/ brand/CA501994000771923 [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  56. Silva-Paz RJ, Prada-Linarez TA, Rivera-Ashqui TA, Apaza- Humerez CR, Eccoña-Sota A, Verde-Lujan HE. Effect of label elements in bottled water: impact on consumer preferences, purchase intentions and health perception through affective sensory tests. Heliyon. 2024;10(15):e35106. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35106
  57. Kato T. Two sides of a pale colour: difference in attractiveness of a colour and product design colour for consumers. In: Reis JL, López EP, Moutinho L, Santos JPM, eds. Marketing and Smart Technologies. Singapore: Springer; 2023:419-430. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0333-7_30
  58. Schwarz E. Emotion index: when do emotions trigger buying impulses? In: Neuro-Advertising. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler; 2022:29-66. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-38633-7_3
  59. Schifferstein HNJ. The drinking experience: cup or content? Food Qual Prefer. 2009;20(3):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.11.003
  60. Spielmann N, Rossi P. Let’s drink to that! How wider glass rim leads to more pleasurable purchases. J Bus Res. 2024;175:114579. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114579
  61. Ferreira BM. Packaging texture influences product taste and consumer satisfaction. J Sens Stud. 2019;34(6):e12532. doi: 10.1111/joss.12532
  62. Motoki K, Spence C, Velasco C. When visual cues influence taste/flavour perception: a systematic review. Food Qual Prefer. 2023;111:104996. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104996
  63. Ozturk E, Kilic B, Cubero Dudinskaya E, Naspetti S, Solfanelli F, Zanoli R. Message in a bottle: an exploratory study on the role of wine-bottle design in capturing consumer attention. Beverages. 2023;9(2):36. doi: 10.3390/beverages9020036
  64. Wang C-Y, Chang F-Y. The influence of packaging color on taste expectations and perceptions. Color Res Appl. 2022;47(6):1426-1441. doi: 10.1002/col.22812
  65. Kpossa MR, Lick E. Visual merchandising of pastries in foodscapes: the influence of plate colours on consumers’ flavour expectations and perceptions. J Retail Consum Serv. 2020;52:101684. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.001
  66. Pereira CTM, de Medeiros AC, Ventura MB, Pereira DM, Bolini HMA. Do the colors of the label and the sweetening agent information influence the sensory expectations of consumers? A case study with skyr-type yogurt. Foods. 2022;11(2):167. doi: 10.3390/foods11020167
  67. Corona V, Vargas de la Cruz I, Lujan-Moreno GA, Albors- Garrigos J, García Segovia P, Rojas OG. Sensory expectations from aesthetic perceptions of coffee beverages presented in different mugs. J Culin Sci Technol. 2020;20(3):213-238. doi: 10.1080/15428052.2020.1824834
  68. Proi M, Dudinskaya EC, Naspetti S, Ozturk E, Zanoli R. The role of eco-labels in making environmentally friendly choices: an eye-tracking study on aquaculture products with Italian consumers. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4659. doi: 10.3390/su15054659
  69. Yang S-C, Peng L-H. Preliminary research into the sustainable responsibility of teaware design—a fs/QCA analysis of the influence of the smell and taste of tea through visual and tactile perception. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8884. doi: 10.3390/su13168884
  70. Orquin JL, Bagger MP, Lahm ES, Grunert KG, Scholderer J. The visual ecology of product packaging and its effects on consumer attention. J Bus Res. 2020;111:187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.043
  71. Yang S-C, Peng L-H, Hsu L-C. The influence of teacup shape on the cognitive perception of tea, and the sustainability value of the aesthetic and practical design of a teacup. Sustainability. 2019;11(24):6895. doi: 10.3390/su11246895
  72. Machiels CJA, Yarar N, Orth UR. Symbolic meaning in beverage packaging and consumer response. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM, eds. Trends in Beverage Packaging. London: Academic Press; 2019:73-104. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816683-3.00004-9
  73. O’Donoghue D. Johnnie Walker’s new look comes in world’s lightest whisky bottle. Diageo unveils Blue Label Ultra at London Design Festival. Diageo.com. 2024. Available from: https://www.diageo.com/en/news-and-media/press-releases/2024/johnnie-walker-unveils-worlds-lightest-whisky-glass-bottle [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].
  74. Moët & Chandon SA, assignee. Champagne glass. US Design Patent USD474648S1. May 20, 2003. https://patents. google.com/patent/USD474648S1/en [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].

75. Mikami M. Trademark dispute: “CLUB MOET” vs “Moët & Chandon”. MARKS IP LAW FIRM. Published 2024. Available from: https://marks-iplaw.jp/club-moet-vs-moet-chandon/ [Last accessed on May 7, 2026].

Share
Back to top
Design+, Electronic ISSN: 3060-8953 Published by AccScience Publishing