AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ac.3688
Submit to AC
Cite this article
33
Download
653
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

 Immersive and virtual exhibitions: A reflection on… art?

Miriam López-Rodríguez1* ,  Vicente Rodríguez-Pérez2 ,  Ana F. López Rodríguez3
Show Less
1 Local Coordinator, European Campus of City-Universities EC2U Alliance, Vice-Rectorate for International Relations, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
2 Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
3 Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of León, León, Spain
AC, 3688 https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.3688
Submitted: 17 May 2024 | Accepted: 22 July 2024 | Published: 3 October 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

This paper explores the conceptualization and evolution of virtual exhibitions and immersive art experiences, highlighting their distinctions and similarities. Virtual exhibitions, conducted online or through digital media, offer a platform for showcasing artworks to a global audience without physical constraints. They employ multimedia elements to engage viewers and provide flexibility in exploration. Conversely, immersive art experiences create environments that envelop the viewer, stimulating multiple senses and often incorporating advanced technologies, such as virtual reality and augmented reality. These experiences aim to evoke emotional responses and facilitate active engagement with the artwork. While proponents argue that virtual exhibitions and immersive art experiences democratize access to art and offer new avenues for artistic expression, critics have raised concerns about their impact on authenticity, viewer engagement, and art commercialization. Philosophical and cultural perspectives, including phenomenology and postmodern theory, shed light on the complexities of these art forms and their relationship with reality and simulation. This paper, further, examines the social and business implications of virtual exhibitions and immersive art experiences, noting their growing popularity and influence on the art market. It discusses the viewpoints of artists, critics, and scholars, both supportive and critical, regarding technology’s role in art and its effects on the viewer’s experience. Virtual exhibitions and immersive art experiences represent an evolving landscape in the art world, offering opportunities for innovation and debate. Their impact on the perception and consumption of art remains a subject of ongoing discussion. The paper concludes with a review of successful virtual exhibitions, highlighting their role in expanding access to art and cultural experiences globally.

Keywords
Augmented reality
Immersive art
Virtual reality
Virtual exhibitions
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Linde A. Understanding of the self through phenomenology in art and architecture. J Undergrad Res. 2017;19(1):1-8.

 

  1. Baudrillard J. Simulacres et Simulation. Paris: Galilee; 1985.

 

  1. Li J, Wider W, Ochiai Y, Fauzi MA. A bibliometric analysis of immersive technology in museum exhibitions: Exploring user experience. Front Virtual Real. 2023;4:1240562. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2023.1240562

 

  1. Foo S. Online virtual exhibitions: Concepts and design considerations. DESIDOC J Libr Inform Technol. 2008;28(4):22-34. doi: 10.14429/djlit.28.4.194

 

  1. Bitgood S, Ellingsen E, Patterson D. Toward an objective description of the visitor immersion experience. Visit Behav. 1990;5(2):11-14.

 

  1. Psotka J. Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instr Sci.1995;23(5/6):405-431. doi: 10.1007/BF00896880

 

  1. Birney BA. Using rotating guides to interpret immersion exhibits: A solution to public display problems. Curr Trends Audience Res. 1990;4:1-3.

 

  1. Harvey ML, Loomis RJ, Bell PA, Marino M. The influence of museum exhibit design on immersion and psychological flow. Environ Behav. 1998;30(5):601-627. doi: 10.1177/001391659803000502

 

  1. Dede C. The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. Educ Technol. 1995;35(5):46-52.

 

  1. Jones J, Wageman S. The promise of immersion environments. Curr Trends Audience Res Eval. 2000;13:103-112.

 

  1. Koran JJ Jr., Lehman JR, Shafer LD, Koran ML. The relative effects of pre- and postattention directing devices on learning from a “walk-through” museum exhibit. J Res Sci Teach. 1983;20(4):341-346. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200408

 

  1. Stickler JC. Total immersion: New technology creates new experiences. Soc Stud Sci. 1995;47(1):36-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0033.1995.tb01222

 

  1. Beardsley J. Earthworks and Beyond: Contemporary Art in the Landscape. 4th ed. New York: Abbeville Press; 2006.

 

  1. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. The Experience Economy: Competing for Customer Time, Attention, and Money. New York: Harvard Business Review Press; 2020.

 

  1. Wiener A. Letter from Silicon Valley. The Rise of “Immersive” Art. Why are Tech-Centric, Projection-based Exhibits Suddenly Everywhere? The New Yorker Web Site. https:// www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-silicon-valley/ the-rise-and-rise-of-immersive-art [Last accessed on 2022 Feb 10].

 

  1. Mathias N. Meta-artistic immersion in digital exhibitions. History - mobilization - spectatorship. J Aesthet Cult. 2022;14(1). doi: 10.1080/20004214.2022.2129160

 

  1. Vi CT, Ablart D, Gatti E, Velasco C, Obrist M. Not just seeing, but also feeling art: Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition. Int J Hum Computer Stud. 2017;108:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.004

 

  1. Spence C. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attent Percept Psychophys. 2011;73:971-995. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7

 

  1. Seah SA, Plasencia DM, Bennett PD, et al. SensaBubble: A Chrono-sensory Mid-air Display of Sight and Smell. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2014. p. 2863-2872.

 

  1. Seifi H, MacLean K. Exploiting haptic facets: Users’ sensemaking schemas as a path to design and personalization of experience. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2017;107(9): 38-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.003

 

  1. Murer M, Aslan I, Tscheligi M. LOLLio: Exploring Taste as Playful Modality. In: International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 2013. p. 299-302. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:18108099 [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 10].

 

  1. Marín-Morales J, Higuera-Trujillo JL, Greco A, et al. Real vs. Immersive-virtual emotional experience: Analysis of psycho-physiological patterns in a free exploration of an art museum. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223881

 

  1. Benjamin W, Underwood JA. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Vol. 56. United Kingdom: Penguin Books; 2008.

 

  1. Krauss R. The cultural logic of the late capitalist museum. October. 1990;54:4. doi: 10.2307/778666

 

  1. Kraynak J. Contemporary Art and the Digitization of Everyday Life. United States: University of California Press; 2020.

 

  1. Haacke H, Alberro A. Working Conditions: The Writings of Hans Haacke. United States: The MIT Press; 2016.

 

  1. Serota N. Experience or Interpretation: The Dilemma of Museums of Modern Art. London: Thames and Hudson; 1996.

 

  1. Panero J. My Jerry Saltz problem. Vol. 29. New Criterion; 2010. p. 30. https://newcriterion.com/article/my-jerry-saltz-problem [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 14].

 

  1. Rea N. ‘I Don’t Want Them to Replicate My Work’: Marina Abramović’s First Show after a Brush with Death Tests the Afterlife of Her Performance. Art and Exhibitions; 2023. Available from: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/marina-abramovic-royal-academy-2023-2365822 [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 17].

 

  1. Perl J. The Chilliest Mystique. The New York Review; 2023. Available from: https://www.nybooks.com/ articles/2023/05/11/the-chilliest-mystique-signals-how-video-transformed-the-world [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 17].

 

 

  1. Khan N. Seeing, Naming, Knowing. The Brooklyn Rail; 2019. Available from: https://brooklynrail.org/2019/03/art/ seeing-naming-knowing [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 18].

 

  1. Kusama Y. Infinity Mirror Rooms - Tate Modern. Available from: https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/ yayoi-kusama-infinity-mirror-rooms [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 17].

 

  1. Buijze B. The Immersive Environments of Ólafur Elíasson. GIBL Magazine; 2023. Available from: http://www. getinspiredbylight.com/gibl-architecture-magazine-one/ the-immersive-environments-of-olafur-eliasson [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 19].

 

  1. Peers A. How Rachel Rossin Employs Virtual Reality to Create Art. Galerie, Winter; 2017. Available from: https:// galeriemagazine.com/rachel-rossin-employs-virtual-reality-create-art [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 20].

 

  1. Davis J. The Art Effect. Available from: https://thearteffect. org/team/joshua-davis [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 17].

 

  1. Hockney D. The Arrival of Spring, Normandy. Royal Academy of Arts; 2020. Available from: https://www. royalacademy.org.uk/exhibition/david-hockney [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 28].

 

  1. Jerram L. Museum of Moon. Available from: https:// my-moon.org [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 28].

 

  1. Museo Thyssen Bornemisza. Visitas Virtuales. Thyssen Multimedia. Available from: https://www.museothyssen. org/thyssenmultimedia/visitas-virtuales [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 28].

 

  1. Nippon America. Available from: https://www.alantlmolina. com/nipponamericaen [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 28].

 

  1. Tate Modern Exhibition. Yayoi Kusama: Infinity Mirror Rooms. Available from: https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/ tate-modern/yayoi-kusama-infinity-mirror-rooms [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 28].

 

  1. René Magritte - La Traición de las imágenes. Centre Pompidou. https://www.centrepompidou.fr/es/programa/ agenda/evento/c65EMjd [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 26].

 

  1. Impressionists on the Water Search: Impressionists on the water. Available from: https://press.philamuseum.org/ most-extensive-exhibition-of-impressionism-and-post-impressionism-ever-to-be-assembled-from-collection [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 26].

 

  1. Van Gogh, La Noche Estrellada: Últimos Días De La Exposición Inmersiva En El Atelier Des Lumières. Available from: https://www.sortiraparis.com/arts-culture/exposition/ articles/182535-van-gogh-la-nuit-etoilee-deniers-jours-de-l-exposition-immersive-a-l-atelier-des-lumieres [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 26].

 

  1. Rain Room - MoMA. The Museum of Modern Art; 2013. Available from: https://www.moma.org/calendar/ exhibitions/1352 [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 19].

 

  1. Art Science Museum, Singapore Sensory Odyssey - Exhibitions in Singapore. Available from: https://www.marinabaysands. com/museum.html [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 20].

 

  1. Dreams of Dali Dreams of Dalí - Salvador Dalí Museum. St. Petersburg. Available from: https://thedali.org/dreams-of-dali-2 [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 21].

 

  1. Teamlab. Available from: https://www.teamlab.art/e/asianart [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 21].

 

  1. Monet and Friends. Basel: National Gallery; 2021. Available from: https://www.nga.gov [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 23].
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept