AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ac.3428
Submit to AC
Cite this article
15
Download
381
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Using extended reality technologies in modern museums

Charis Avlonitou1 ,  Eirini Papadaki1*
Show Less
1 Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Crete Prefecture, Greece
AC, 3428 https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.3428
Submitted: 16 April 2024 | Accepted: 23 May 2024 | Published: 3 October 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

This study explores the nature, core features, and evolution of extended reality (XR) technologies in the 21st century, focusing on their potential in the museum context. It examines academic research and representative examples of cultural heritage enhancement from international museum practices. The specific characteristics and properties of each technology within XR’s broader scope, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality, are identified and analyzed. In addition, the study explores designs or case studies of these technologies’ application in the museum environment, including the emerging Metaverse, which blends VR and AR within the same broader conceptual framework. Furthermore, the study examines why these innovative technologies resonate with museums and assesses their impact on relational communication between modern museums and the public, particularly younger audiences. It also highlights limitations or obstacles to their widespread adoption of XR technologies in museums, while outlining future prospects for their integration. Overall, the study provides a comprehensive overview of XR’s use in museums, focusing on how these technologies enhance cultural values. It offers reflection and suggestions for authors and museum professionals regarding the design and implementation of XR technologies in modern museums.

Keywords
Extended reality
Virtual reality
Augmented reality
Mixed reality
Metaverse
Modern museum
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Margetis G, Apostolakis KC, Ntoa S, Papagiannakis G, Stephanidis C. X-Reality museums: Unifying the virtual and real world towards realistic virtual museums. Appl Sci. 2021;11(1):338. doi: 10.3390/app11010338

 

  1. Gloor R, Corness G, Marshack R, Paolucci A. Can you feel what i feel? Leveraging Aesthetics in Visual and Spatial Audio VR Experience. In: Proceedings of EVA London 2023 (EVA 2023). doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.21

 

  1. Bird JM, Smart PA, Harris DJ, Phillips LA, Giannachi G, Vine SJ. A magic leap in tourism: Intended and realized experience of head-mounted augmented reality in a museum context. J Travel Res. 2023;62(7):1427-1447. doi: 10.1177/00472875221134031

 

  1. YiFei L, Othman MK. Investigating the behavioural intentions of museum visitors towards VR: A systematic literature review. Comput Hum Behav. 2024;155:108167. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108167

 

  1. Ochanji S. Survey: Quest 2 accounted for 80% of headset sales in 2021. Virtual Reality Times; 2022. Available from: https://virtualrealitytimes.com/2022/03/27/survey-quest-2- accounted-for-80-of-headset-sales-in-2021 [Last accessed on 2024 May 07].

 

  1. Stein S. Best VR Headset of 2024. Available from: https:// www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/best-vr-headset [Last accessed 2024 May 05].

 

  1. PwC. A Decade of Digital: Keeping Pace with Transformation. Global Digital IQ® Survey; 2017. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/ee/et/publications/pub/pwc-digital-iq-report.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].

 

  1. Cipresso P, Giglioli IA, Raya MA, Riva G. The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: A network and cluster analysis of the literature. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086

 

  1. Grand View Research. Augmented Reality Market Size; 2024. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/ industry-analysis/augmented-reality-market [Last accessed 2024 May 02].

 

  1. NGI. Next Generation Internet-Interactive Technologies; 2019. [Brochure]. Available from: https://digital-strategy. ec.europa.eu/en/library/next-generation-internet-brochure [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 03].

 

  1. Scarles C, Treharne H, Casey M, Zainal-Abidin H, Bailey E. Digital Futures: Augmented Reality in Arts and Heritage; 2019. Available from: https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-05/digital-futures-augmented-reality-in-arts-and-heritage.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 06].

 

  1. Silva M, Teixeira L. Developing an eXtended Reality platform for Immersive and Interactive Experiences for Cultural Heritage: Serralves Museum and Coa Archeologic Park. In: 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), Recife, Brazil; 2020. p. 300-302. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct51615.2020.00084

 

  1. Sobhaeerooy R. Exploring the Effect of Immersive Extended Reality versus 2D Virtual Tour on Potential Museum Visitors’ Memorability and Intention to Visit. [Thesis, Dalhousie University]; 2023. Available from: https://dalspace.library. dal.ca/handle/10222/83250 [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 27].

 

  1. Gaugne R, Barreau JB, Lécuyer F, Nicolas T, Normand JM, Gouranton V. eXtended Reality for Cultural Heritage. In: D’Amico S, Venuti V, editors. Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 1405-1437. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-60016-7_48

 

  1. Nisiotis L, Alboul L. Initial Evaluation of an Intelligent Virtual Museum Prototype Powered by AI, XR and Robots. In: International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12980. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 290-305. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87595-4_21

 

  1. Trunfio M, Jung T, Campana S. Mixed reality experiences in museums: Exploring the impact of functional elements of the devices on visitors’ immersive experiences and post-experience behaviours. Inform Manage. 2022;59(7-8):103698. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103698

 

  1. Pedersen I, Gale N, Mirza-Babaei P, Reid S. More than meets the eye: The benefits of augmented reality and holographic displays for digital cultural heritage. J Comput Cult Herit. 2017;10(2):11. doi: 10.1145/3051480

 

  1. Hutson J, Hutson P. Museums and the metaverse: Emerging technologies to promote inclusivity and engagement. Fac Scholarsh. 2023;452. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.110044

 

  1. Rizvic S, Mijatovic B, Boskovic D, Ivkovic-Kihic I. Workflow of Extended Reality Applications for Museum Exhibitions. In: 2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom), Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2022. p. 189-194. doi: 10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900866

 

  1. Fan X, Jiang X, Deng N. Immersive technology: A meta-analysis of augmented/virtual reality applications and their impact on tourism experience. Tour Manage. 2022;91:104534. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104534

 

  1. Meyer B. As We May Learn: The Coming Fusion of Maker Technologies, Spatial Computing, and IoT. MW2020: MuseWeb; 2020. Availble from: https://mw20.museweb. net/paper/as-we-may-learn-the-coming-fusion-of-maker-technologies-spatial-computing-and-iot [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 10].

 

  1. Hammady R, Ma M, AL-Kalha Z, et al. A framework for constructing and evaluating the role of MR as a holographic virtual guide in museums. Virtual Real. 2021;25:895-918. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00497-9

 

  1. Lu SE, Moyle B, Reid S, et al. Technology and museum visitor experiences: A four stage model of evolution. Inform Technol Tour. 2023;25(2):151-174. doi: 10.1007/s40558-023-00252-1

 

  1. Hooper-Greenhill E. Changing values in the art museum; Rethinking communication and learning. Int J Herit Stud. 2000;6(1):9-31. doi: 10.1080/135272500363715

 

  1. Omran W, Ramos RF, Casais B. Virtual reality and augmented reality applications and their effect on tourist engagement: A hybrid review. J Hospitality Tourism Technol. 2023;15:497-518. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-11-2022-0299

 

  1. Jiang Q, Chen J, Wu Y, Gu C, Sun J. A study of factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of augmented reality in museums. Systems. 2022;10(3):73. doi: 10.3390/systems10030073

 

  1. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row; 1990. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224927532_flow_ the_psychology_of_optimal_experience [Last accessed on 2024 May 07].

 

  1. Zhang R, Rahman AA. Dive in the flow experience: Millennials’ tech-savvy, satisfaction and loyalty in the smart museum. Curr Issues Tourism. 2022;25(22):3694-3708. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2070459

 

  1. Yang S. Storytelling and user experience in the cultural metaverse. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e14759. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14759.

 

  1. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 76; 1998. p. 97-105. Available from: https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 07].

 

  1. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. The experience economy: Past, present and future. In: Elgar E, Sundbo J, Sørensen F. Handbook on the Experience Economy. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013. doi: 10.4337/9781781004227.00007

 

  1. Kirova V. Value co-creation and value co-destruction through interactive technology in tourism: The case of ‘La Cité du Vin’ wine museum, Bordeaux, France. Curr Issues Tour. 2021;24(5):637-650. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1732883

 

  1. Neuhofer B, Buhalis D, Ladkin A. Experiences, co-creation and technology: A conceptual approach to enhance tourism experiences. In: CAUTHE 2013: Tourism and Global Change: On the Edge of Something Big; 2013. Available from: https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/ informit.514738387022651

 

  1. Allen W. Six Ways that Agencies Can Influence Behaviors; 2018Available from: https://learningforsustainability.net/ post/6es-policy-framework [Last accessed on 2024 May 06].
  2. Aizen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

 

  1. Hunicke R, LeBlanc M, Zubek R. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. AAAI Workshop- Technical Report; 2004. p. 1. Available from: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/228884866_mda_a_formal_ approach_to_game_design_and_game_research [Last accessed on 2024 May 06].

 

  1. Guo Xin T. The Framework of a Game Design (MDA Framework); 2022. Available from: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/360018773_the_framework_of_a_game_ design_mda_framework [Last accessed on 2024 May 07].

 

  1. Efrani M, El-Nasr M, Milam D, et al. The Effect of Age, Gender, and Previous Gaming Experience on Game Play Performance. Canada: Simon Fraser University; 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15231-3_33

 

  1. Azadvar A, Canossa A. UPEQ: Ubisoft Perceived Experience Questionnaire: A Self-determination Evaluation Tool for Video Games. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. doi: 10.1145/3235765.3235780

 

  1. Nowak KL, Biocca F. The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users’ Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2003;12(5):481-494. doi: 10.1162/105474603322761289

 

  1. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J. Development of a New Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments- Presence; 2000. Available from: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/239665832_development_of_a_new_ cross-media_presence_questionnaire_the_itc-sense_of_ presence_inventory [Last accessed on 2024 Mai 08].

 

  1. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J. A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2001;10:282-297. doi: 10.1162/105474601300343612

 

  1. Vorderer P, Wirth W, Gouveia FR, et al. MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): Short Documentation and Instructions for Application. Report to the European Community, Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661); 2004 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26232.42249

 

  1. Petronela SU, Sandu I. Museums in the life of the public. Int J Conserv Sci. 2016;7:87-92.

 

  1. Hite R, Childers G, Hoffman J. Cultural-historical activity theory as an integrative model of socioscientific issue based learning in museums using extended reality technologies. Int J Sci Educ Part B. 2024:1-6. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2024.2324854

 

  1. Spence J, Darzentas DP, Huang Y, Cameron HR, Beestin E, Benford S. VRtefacts: Performative Substitutional Reality with Museum Objects. In: DIS’20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. p. 627-640. doi: 10.1145/3357236.3395459

 

  1. Howes, D. (2014). Introduction to sensory museology. Senses Soc., 2014;9(3):259-267. doi: 10.2752/174589314X14023847039917

 

  1. Reading A, Bjork J, Hanlon J, Jakeman N. The labour of place: Memory and extended reality (XR) in migration museums. Mem Stud., 2021;14(3):606-621. doi: 10.1177/17506980211010697

 

  1. Anastasovitis E, Ververidis D, Nikolopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. Digiart: Building New 3d Cultural Heritage Worlds. United States: IEEE; 2017. doi: 10.1109/3DTV.2017.8280406

 

  1. Cesário V, Coelho A, Nisi V. Enhancing Museums’ Experiences through Games and Stories for Young Audiences. Germany: Springer; 2017. p. 351-354. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71027-3_41

 

  1. Karittevli E, Kokkinos N, Ioannides M, Efstathiou K. Reviving The Past: Visualising Cultural Heritage in Dynamic user Interfaces. Eva Berlin; 2023. Elektonische Medien and Kunst, Kultur und Historie. Proceedings. p. 84-92. Available from: https://eva-berlin-conference.de/wp-content/ uploads/2024/01/EVA_2023_Konferenzband.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 May 07].

 

  1. Sandheinrich P, Hutson J. Haptic preservation of cultural ephemera: An extended reality solution using stereoscopic experience replication for Victorian parlor culture. Metaverse Basic Appl Res. 2023;2:48. doi: 10.56294/mr202348

 

  1. Banfi F, Brumana R, Stanga C. Extended reality and informative models for the architectural heritage: From scan-to-BIM process to virtual and augmented reality. Virtual Archaeol Rev. 2019;10(21):14-30. doi: 10.4995/var.2019.11923

 

  1. Shahab H, Mohtar M, Ghazali E, Rauschnabel PA, Geipel A. Virtual reality in museums: Does it promote visitor enjoyment and learning? Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2023;39(18):3586-3603. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2099399

 

  1. Vital R, Sylaiou S, Koukoulis K, Koukoulis K, Dafiotis P, Fidas C. Comparison of extended reality platforms and tools for viewing and exhibiting art. Dig Appl Archaeol Cult Herit. 2023;31:e00298 doi: 10.1016/j.daach.2023.e00298

 

  1. Xin M. Augmented Reality (AR) in Art Museums: Reconfiguring and Mediating the Museum Dynamics. [Essay (Master)]; 2018. Available from: https://essay.utwente. nl/75104/(12-12-23). [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 09].

 

  1. Zhang W, Liu X. Virtual museum scene design based on VRAR realistic interaction under PMC artificial intelligence model. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. 2023;9(1). doi: 10.2478/amns.2023.1.00200

 

  1. Komarac T, Došen DO. Understanding virtual museum visits: Generation Z experiences. Museum Manage Curatorship. 2023;39:357-376. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2023.2269129

 

  1. Gao Z, Yang S, Yang X, Pan H. Symbiotic Hands: A Virtual Reality Interactive System that Traverses Reality. In: Proceedings of EVA London 2023 (EVA 2023); 2023b. doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.27

 

  1. Sutherland IE. The Ultimate Display; 1965. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar. or g / p ape r / the - u l timat e - d i spl ay - suthe r l and / dce55f83dd425c68e5d1c1714dd0c8bbb43e54d9 [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 12].

 

  1. MAO. Anteprima La Città Proibita Vr-Oculus Rift; 2016. Available from: https://www.maotorino.it/it/evento/anteprima-la-citta-proibita-vr-oculus-rift [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 08].

 

  1. Gao Z, Braud TC, Guljajeva V. VR-driven museum opportunities: digitized archives in the age of the metaverse. Artnodes. 2023a;32:1-14. doi: 10.7238/artnodes.v0i32.402462

 

  1. Tate. Modigliani VR: The Ochre Atelier; 2017. Available from: https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/ modigliani/modigliani-vr-ochre-atelier [Last accessed on 2024 May 01].

 

  1. HTC VIVE. Mona Lisa: Beyond the Glass at The Louvre I HTC VIVE ARTS; 2019. Available from: https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=au_upzhzhwk [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].

 

  1. Katz B. The Louvre’s First VR Experience Lets Visitors Get Close to the ‘Mona Lisa’; 2019. Available from: https:// www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/louvres-first-vr-experience-lets-visitors-get-close-mona-lisa-180972435 [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 07].

 

  1. V and A. Curious Alice: The VR experience|Behind the Scenes [youtube]; 2021. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=j1maAW2F2Ug [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 24].

 

  1. Bonis B, Stamos J, Vosinakis, Andreou I, Panayiotopoulos T. A platform for virtual museums with personalized content. Multimed Tools Appl. 2009;42:139-159. doi: 10.1007/s11042-008-0231-2

 

  1. Gao Z. Envisioning an Immersive Multi-Screen VR System for Museum Archive Browsing. In: Proceedings of EVA London 2023 (EVA 2023); 2023. doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.26

 

  1. Herbert K. On Denmark’s Jutland Coast an Elegant New Museum Counters a Nazi Monolith; 2017. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2017/jun/24/tirpitz-museum-west-jutland-denmark-hitler-atlantic-wall [Last accessed on 2024 May 03].

 

  1. Sylaiou S, Liarokapis F, Kostas K, Petros P. Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. J Cult Herit. 2009;10:520-528. doi: 10.1016/J.CULHER.2009.03.003

 

  1. Tsichritzis D, Gibbs SJ. Virtual Museums and Virtual Realities. International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting; 1991. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ virtual-museums-and-virtual-realities-tsichritzis-gibbs/70c 98add32e3b0b39f2909f4538282b1083c61b8 [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 02].

 

  1. Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S, Orús C. The influence of scent on virtual reality experiences: The role of aroma-content congruence. J Bus Res. 2021;123:289-301. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4128176

 

  1. Calvi L, Vermeeren A. Digitally enriched museum experiences-what technology can do. Museum Manage Curatorship. 2023;39:335-356. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2023.2235683

 

  1. Lee HK, Park S, Lee Y. A proposal of virtual museum metaverse content for the MZ generation. Digit Creat. 2022;33(2):79-95. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2022.2063903

 

  1. Longo MC, Faraci R. Next-generation museum: A metaverse journey into the culture. SINERGIE Ital J Manage. 2023;41(1). doi: 10.7433/s120.2023.08

 

  1. Weech S, Kenny S, Barnett-Cowan M. Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: A review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158

 

  1. Conrad P. Ready to Plunge in? The Rise and Rise of Immersive art. The Guardian; 2023. Available from: https://www. theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/jan/28/immersive-art-exhibitions-popular-david-hockney-van-gogh-dali-london [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 04].

 

  1. Jones J. David Hockney: Bigger and Closer Review-an Overwhelming Blast of Passionless Kitsch. The Guardian; 2023. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/ artanddesign/2023/feb/21/david-hockney-bigger-and-closer-review-immersive-exhibition-lightroom [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 07].

 

  1. Dossis MF, Kazanidis I, Valsamidis SI, et al. Proposed Open Source Framework for Interactive IoT Smart Museums. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics; 2018. doi: 10.1145/3291533.3291586

 

  1. Recupero A, Talamo A, Triberti S, Modesti C. Bridging museum mission to visitors’ experience: Activity, meanings, interactions, technology. Front Psychol. 2019;10:(1-10):2092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02092

 

  1. Mason M. The MIT museum glassware prototype: Visitor experience exploration for designing smart glasses. J Comput Cult Herit. 2016;9(3):1-28. doi: 10.1145/2872278

 

  1. Milgram P, Kishino F. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems E77- D(12). p1321-1329. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/ reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1254334 [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 11].

 

  1. Komianos V. Immersive applications in museums: An analysis of the use of XR technologies and the provided functionality based on systematic literature review. Int J Inform Vis. 2022;6(1):60-73. doi: 10.30630/joiv.6.1.708

 

  1. Marques D. The Visitor Experience Using Augmented Reality on Mobile Devices in Museum Exhibitions. [Thesis]; 2017. Available from: https://sigarra.up.pt/fcup/en/pub_geral. pub_view?pi_pub_base_id=206445 [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 06].

 

  1. Kosmopoulos D, Styliaras G. A survey on developing personalized content services in museums. Pervasive Mobile Comput. 2018;47:54-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.05.002

 

  1. Fernandes N, Casteleiro-Pitrez J. Augmented reality in Portuguese museums: A grounded theory study on the museum professionals’ perspectives. Multimodal Technol Interact. 2023;7(9):87. doi: 10.3390/mti7090087

 

  1. Teunen, F. Utilizing Apple Vision Pro at a Museum; 2024. Available from: https://www.wintor.com/post/ utilizing-apple-vision-pro-at-a-museum [Last accessed on 2024 May 05].

 

  1. Gordon L. The ‘Perceptual Enclosure’ of Apple’s Vision Pro. Artreview. Available from: https://artreview.com/the-perceptual-enclosure-of-apples-vision-pro [Last accessed on 2024 May 04].

 

  1. Jebb L. Face Time: How the Art World is Preparing to Work with the Apple Vision Pro; 2024. Available from: https:// www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/02/02/face-time-how-the-art-world-is-preparing-to-work-with-the-apple-vision-pro [Last accessed on 2024 May 05].

 

  1. Leue MC, Jung T, Tom Dieck D. Google glass augmented reality: generic learning outcomes for art galleries. In: Tussyadiah I, Inversini A, editors. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. Cham: Springer; 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_34

 

  1. Cerquetti M. More is better! Current issues and challenges for museum audience development: A literature review. Eur J Cult Manage Policy. 2016;6(1).

 

  1. Germak C, Di Salvo A, Abbate L. Augmented Reality Experience for Inaccessible Areas in Museums. In: Proceedings of EVA London 2021 (EVA 2021); 2021. doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2021.7

 

  1. Sugiura A, Kitama T, Toyoura M, Mao X. The use of augmented reality technology in medical specimen museum tours. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12:561-571. doi: 10.1002/ase.1822

 

  1. Sellers D. How to Avoid Motion Sickness with the Apple Vision Pro; 2024. Available from: https://appleworld.today/ how-to-avoid-motion-sickness-with-the-apple-vision-pro [Last accessed on 2024 May 02].

 

  1. Bowen JP, Giannini T, Masson T, Gaia G, Diprose G. The Digital Lens. Proceedings of EVA London 2023 (EVA 2023); 2023. doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.1

 

  1. Tussyadiah IP, Jung TH, Tom Dieck MC. Embodiment of wearable augmented reality technology in tourism experiences. J Travel Res. 2018;57(5):597-611. doi: 10.1177/0047287517709090

 

  1. Giannakidis Α. Digital Technologies as Tools at the Disposal of the local Community [Οιψηφιακέςτεχνολογίεςωςερ γαλείαστηδιάθεσητηςτοπικήςκοινωνίας. In: Poulios, I, Alivizatou, M, Arabatzis, G, Giannakidis, A, Karachalis, N, Mascha, E, et al, editors. Πολιτισμική Διαχείριση, Τοπική Κοινωνία και Βιώσιμη Ανάπτυξη]; 2016. p. 134-140. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/2394 (26-12-2023) [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05] [Article in Greek].

 

  1. Katifori A, Karvounis M, Kourtis V, et al. CHESS: Personalized storytelling experiences in museums. In: Mitchell A, Fernández-Vara C, Thue D, editors. Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8832, Cham: Springer; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12337-0_28.

 

  1. Vayanou M, Katifori V, Kourtis V, et al. Interactive Experiences in the Stedelijk Museum a Living Lab Experiment with the CHESS Framework. Conference: 2015 Digital Heritage. Granada, Spain; 2015. p. 353-356. doi: 10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7413900.

 

  1. De Angeli D, O’Neill E. A Smartphone Headset for Augmented-reality Experiences in Museums. MW2015: Museums and the Web 2015; 2015. Available from: https:// mw2015.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/a-smartphone-headset-for-augmented-reality-experiences-in-museums [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 15].

 

  1. GuidiGO. Google Glass for Museums; 2014. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7YGD1If9z4 [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 12].

 

  1. Corine B. GuidiGO New Storytelling Platform Enhances Keith Haring Exhibition at the de Young Museum through Google Glass. Available from: https://blog.guidigo.com/blog/ guidigo-new-storytelling-platform-enhances-keith-haring-exhibition-at-the-de-young-museum-through-google-glass [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 01].

 

  1. Harrington M. Virtual Dioramas Inside and Outside Museums with the AR Perpetual Garden App. MW19: MW 2019; 2019. Available from: https://mw19.mwconf.org/ paper/virtual-dioramas-inside-and-outside-of-museums-with-the-ar-perpetual-garden-app [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 09].

 

  1. Liestøl G. Museums, artefacts and cultural heritage sites. J Med Innov. 2021;7:19-28. doi: 10.5617/jomi.8792

 

  1. Patil MS, Limbekar MS, Mane MA, Potnis MN. Smart Guide-an Approach to the Smart Museum Using Android; 2018. Available from: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V5/i2/ IRJET-V5I2147.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 08].

 

  1. Paliokas I, Patenidis AT, Mitsopoulou EE, et al. A gamified augmented reality application for digital heritage and tourism. Appl Sci. 2020;10:7868. doi: 10.3390/app10217868

 

  1. Trunfio M, Campana S, Magnelli A. Measuring the impact of functional and experiential mixed reality elements on a museum visit. Curr Issues Tour. 2020;23(16):1990-2008. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1703914

 

  1. ANTO. MuseumsQuartier Wien as an Interactive Work of Art. Austrian National Tourist Office; 2020. Available from: https://press.austria.info/uk/arts-culture/2019-arts-culture/ museumsquartier-wien-as-an-interactive-work-of-art [Last accessed: 2024 Apr 06].

 

  1. AGO. Seeing Impressionism in 3D; 2019. Available from: https://ago.ca/agoinsider/seeing-impressionism-3d [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 07].

 

  1. AGO. Anthropocene in 3-D; 2018. Available from: https:// ago.ca/agoinsider/anthropocene-3-d [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 04].

 

  1. Ryffel M, Zünd F, Aksoy Y, et al. AR Museum: A Mobile Augmented Reality Application for Interactive Painting Recoloring; 2017. Available from: https://studios. disneyresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ ar-museum-a-mobile-augmented-reality-application-for-interactive-painting-recoloring.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 May 06].

 

  1. Brondi R, Carrozzino M. ARTworks: An Augmented Reality Interface as an Aid for Restoration Professionalsin. In: Salento AVR 2015, Second International Conference on Augmented and Virtual Reality; 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22888-4_28

 

  1. Zhang X, Yang D, Yow CH, et al. Metaverse for cultural heritages. Electronics. 2022;11(22):3730. doi: 10.3390/electronics11223730

 

  1. Kim JG. A study on metaverse culture contents matching platform. Int J Adv Cult Technol. 2021;9(3):232-223.

 

  1. Giannini Τ, Bowen JP, Michaels C, Smith CH. Digital Art and Identity Merging Human and Artificial Intelligence: Enter the Metaverse. In: Proceedings of EVA London 2022; 2022. doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2022.1

 

  1. Giannini T, Bowen JP. Museums and the Metaverse: New signs of computational art and life; 2023. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/438t2

 

  1. Choi EJ, Lee YS. A study on the planning of minhwa museum utilizing the metaverse platform: Focusing on zepeto case. J Korea Game Soc. 2021;21(6):63-74.

 

  1. Huddleston T Jr. Bill Gates Says the Metaverse will Host Most of Your Office Meetings Within ‘Two or Three Years’-here’s What it Will Look Like; 2021. Available from: https://www. cnbc.com/2021/12/09/bill-gates-metaverse-will-host-most-virtual-meetings-in-a-few-years.html [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 10].

 

  1. Bowen J, Giannini T. The Digital Future for Museums. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2019 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97457-6_28.

 

  1. Hadziselimovic A. Open Justice Transformations Impacting Extended Reality (XR) Environments. EVA BERLIN 2023. Elektonische Medien and Kunst, Kultur und Historie, Proceedings; 2023. p56-66. doi: 10.1080/14794713.2023.2198535

 

  1. Urban R, Twidale M. A Second Life for Your Museum: 3D Multi-User Virtual Environments and Museums. In: Proceedings of Museums and the Web, San Francisco; 2007. Available from: https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/ mw2007/papers/urban/urban [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 10].

 

  1. Thawonmas R, Fukumoto A. Frame Extraction Based on Displacement Amount for Automatic Comic Generation from Metaverse Museum Visit Log. Berlin: Springer; 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22158-3_16

 

  1. Choi H, Kim S. A content service deployment plan for metaverse museum exhibitions-centering on the combination of beacons and HMDs. Int J Inform Manage. 2017;37(1B):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.017
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept