AccScience Publishing / JCBP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCBP025300056
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

The affective-neural triage scale: Development and validation of a mechanistically informed psychometric tool for personalized psychotherapy allocation

Christopher Lomas1*
Show Less
1 Therapy and Program, Delamere Health, Cuddington, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Received: 25 July 2025 | Revised: 7 August 2025 | Accepted: 12 August 2025 | Published online: 4 September 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Traditional diagnostic systems often provide limited guidance for psychotherapy selection, failing to adequately capture neurobiological heterogeneity. This underscores the critical need for mechanistically grounded assessment tools that link symptoms to distinct affective circuits. The present study psychometrically validates an adapted affective-neural triage scale (ANTS), a brief instrument designed to infer subcortical affective and cortical regulatory circuit activation for treatment matching. Unlike existing scales that merely quantify symptom burden, the ANTS framework directly links phenomenology to known brain dynamics. Utilizing a large public personality dataset (n = 19,719), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses interpreted higher-order traits as conceptual manifestations of fundamental primary affective systems. Neural targets were validated through meta-analytic and external functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence. Results confirmed a robust five-factor solution with excellent model fit (comparative fit index = 0.95; root mean square error of approximation = 0.04), demonstrating psychometric soundness. This adapted framework provides a foundation for transdiagnostic, neuroaffective psychotherapy triage, enabling clinicians to infer circuit dysregulation and select mechanistic interventions. Future work will assess clinical utility, longitudinal responsiveness, and digital integration.

Keywords
Neurobiology
Diagnostics
Psychotherapy
Affective neurology
Psychometrics
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Bugatti M, Owen J, Richardson Z, Rasmussen W, Newton D. Therapist perceptions of measurement-based care: Findings from a practice research group of private practitioners. Pract Innov. 2025;9(3):195–204. doi: 10.1037/pri0000238
  2. Brewer JA, Worhunsky PD, Gray JR, Tang YY, Weber J, Kober H. Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(50):20254-20259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112029108
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
  4. Ansell EB, Rando K, Tuit K, Guarnaccia J, Sinha R. Cumulative adversity and smaller gray matter volume in medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and insula regions. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.11.022
  5. Chen AC, Etkin A. Hippocampal network connectivity and activation differentiates post-traumatic stress disorder from generalized anxiety disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(10):1889-1898. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.122
  6. Frodl T, Carballedo A, Hughes MM, et al. Reduced expression of glucocorticoid-inducible genes GILZ and SGK-1: High IL-6 levels are associated with reduced hippocampal volumes in major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2(3):e88. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.14
  7. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):748-751. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
  8. Kozak MJ, Cuthbert BN. The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology. 2016;53(3):286-297. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12518
  9. Sanislow CA, Ferrante M, Pacheco J, Rudorfer MV, Morris SE. Advancing translational research using NIMH research domain criteria and computational methods. Neuron. 2019;101(5):779-782. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.024
  10. Panksepp J. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  11. Stein D, Hartford A. Ethical considerations in psychiatric genomics. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2025;48:265-279. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2025.01.005
  12. Ikemoto S. Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex. Brain Res Rev. 2007;56(1):27-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.05.004
  13. Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: Linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;35(1):4-26. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.129
  14. Solms M. The Hidden Spring: A Journey to the Source of Consciousness. United Kingdom: Profile Books; 2021
  15. Wager TD, Barrett LF, Bliss-Moreau E, Lindquist KA, Duncan S, Kober H. The neuroimaging of emotion. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF, editors. Handbook of Emotion. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 249-271.
  16. Bateman A, Fonagy P. Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry. 2010;9(1):11-15. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x
  17. Davis KL, Panksepp J, Normansell L. The affective neuroscience personality scales: Normative data and implications. Neuropsychoanalysis. 2003;5(1):57-69. doi: 10.1080/15294145.2003.10773410
  18. Montag C, Elhai JD, Davis KL. A comprehensive review of studies using the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales in the psychological and psychiatric sciences. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;125:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.019
  19. Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD. Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science. 2003;302(5643):290-292. doi: 10.1126/science.1089134
  20. Wager TD, Davidson ML, Hughes BL, Lindquist MA, Ochsner KN. Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation. Neuron. 2008;59(6):1037-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.006
  21. Clark LA, Watson D, Mineka S. Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(1):103-116. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.103
  22. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  23. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(3):272-299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  24. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  25. World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  26. Reid AM, Bolshakova MI, Guzick AG, et al. Common barriers to the dissemination of exposure therapy for youth with anxiety disorders. Community Mental Health J. 2017;53(4):432-437. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0108-9
  27. Montag C, Panksepp J. Primary emotional systems and personality: An evolutionary perspective. Front Psychol. 2017;8:464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00464
  28. Brienza L, Zennaro A, Vitolo E, Andò A. Affective neuroscience personality scales (ANPS) and clinical implications: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2023;320:178-195.doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.104
  29. Deris N, Montag C, Reuter M, Weber B, Markett S. Functional connectivity in the resting brain as biological correlate of the affective neuroscience personality scales. Neuroimage. 2017;147:423-431. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.063
  30. Roy AK, Shehzad Z, Margulies DS, et al. Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2009;45(2):614-626. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.030
  31. Montag C, Reuter M. Internet Addiction: Neuroscientific Approaches and Therapeutical Implications Including Smartphone Addiction. New York: Springer; 2014.
  32. René G. The Research Domain Criteria and the Social Practice of Psychiatric Science. Doctoral Dissertation. Canada: McGill University; 2023.
  33. Lanius RA, Vermetten E, Loewenstein RJ, et al. Emotion modulation in PTSD: Clinical and neurobiological evidence for a dissociative subtype. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(6): 640-647. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081168
  34. Shapiro F. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2018.
  35. Lehrer P, Kaur K, Sharma A, et al. Heart rate variability biofeedback improves emotional and physical health and performance: A systematic review and meta analysis. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020;45(3):109-129. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z
  36. Linehan MM. Dialectical behavior therapy for treatment of borderline personality disorder: Implications for the treatment of substance abuse. NIDA Res Monogr. 1993;137:201-216.
  37. Cicchetti D, Toth SL. Building bridges and crossing them: Translational research in developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18(3):619-622. doi: 10.1017/s0954579406060317
  38. Gilbert P. The Compassionate Mind. London, UK: Constable; 2009.
  39. Fonagy P, Luyten P. Attachment, mentalizing, and the self. In: Livesley WJ, Larstone R, editors. Handbook of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2nd edition. Guilford Press; 2018:123-140.
  40. Gilbert P. The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British J Clinic Psychol. 2014;53(1):6-41. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12043
  41. Siddiqui SV, Chatterjee U, Kumar D, Siddiqui A, Goyal N. Neuropsychology of prefrontal cortex. Indian J Psychiatry. 2008;50(3):202-208. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.43634
  42. Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, et al. Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(4):658-670. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.658
  43. Der-Avakian A, Markou A. The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005
  44. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
  45. Malchiodi CA. Handbook of Art Therapy. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
  46. Poldrack RA. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10(2):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
  47. Panksepp J, Biven L. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton; 2012.
  48. Church AT. Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. J Pers. 2000;68(4):651-703. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00112
  49. Panksepp J, Biven L. A meditation on the affective neuroscientific view of human and animalian MindBrains. In: Fotopoulou A, Pfaff D, Conway MA, editors. From the Couch to the Lab. Oxford University Press; 2012:145-175. doi: 10.1093/med/9780199600526.003.0009
  50. Nestor PG, Woodhull AA. Neuropsychology of social cognition: Culture, display rules, and emotional expressivity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024;46(9):811-827. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2428728
  51. McTeague LM, Rosenberg BM, Lopez JW, et al. Identification of common neural circuit disruptions in emotional processing across psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177(5):411-421. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18111271
Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Basic Psychosomatics, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4414 Print ISSN: 3060-8562, Published by AccScience Publishing