AccScience Publishing / JCBP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/jcbp.4727
BRIEF REPORT

Association between concerns regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and the adverse event rate among healthcare workers

Isabel Hach1†* Bunila-Yuwang Francisca1,2† Wolfgang Hitzl3 Annette Sattler4 Stephan Kolb1 Cosima Brucker2
Show Less
1 Department of Education and Science, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
2 Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Germany
3 Department of Research and Innovation Management, Biostatistics and Publication of Clinical Trial Studies, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
4 Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
Submitted: 31 August 2024 | Revised: 31 October 2024 | Accepted: 12 November 2024 | Published: 12 December 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Healthcare workers must be vaccinated regularly. However, vaccination-related side effects can lead to sick leaves and decreased willingness to be vaccinated. Negative expectations can cause nocebo effects, potentially increasing the rates of adverse events (AEs). Herein, we evaluated the relationship between concerns regarding the vaccination course and the prevalence rate of AEs after the first and second doses of mRNA vaccines in 982 healthcare workers from the Nuremberg Hospital. Most of our participants were women (78%). Fatigue and headache were the most common systemic AEs. Healthcare workers who were worried about the vaccination process reported significantly more AEs after the first vaccine dose than those who were not worried (80% vs. 68%, P < 0.05). Thus, strategies to minimize concerns could reduce vaccination-related side effects and improve willingness to be vaccinated.

Keywords
Nocebo effects
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Pharmacovigilance
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Holzmann-Littig C, Frank T, Schmaderer C, et al. COVID-19 vaccines: Fear of side effects among German health care workers. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(5):689. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050689

 

  1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

 

  1. Yan Z, Yang M, Lai CL. COVID-19 vaccinations: A comprehensive review of their safety and efficacy in special populations. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(10):1097. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101097

 

  1. Mallah SI, Alawadhi A, Jawad J, et al. Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 prime-boost vaccinations: Homologous BBIBP-CorV versus heterologous BNT162b2 boosters in BBIBP-CorV-primed individuals. Vaccine. 2023;41(12):1925-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.032

 

  1. Cai C, Peng Y, Shen E, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Mol Ther. 2021;29(9):2794-2805. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.08.001

 

  1. Webster RK, Weinman J, Rubin GJ. A systematic review of factors that contribute to nocebo effects. Health Psychol. 2016;35(12):1334-1355. doi: 10.1037/hea0000416

 

  1. Hutchinson P, Moerman DE. The meaning response, “placebo,” and methods. Perspect Biol Med. 2018;61(3):361-378. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2018.0049

 

  1. Okaïs C, Gay C, Seon F, Buchaille L, Chary E, Soubeyrand B. Disease-specific adverse events following nonlive vaccines: A paradoxical placebo effect or a nocebo phenomenon? Vaccine. 2011;29(37):6321-6326. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.045

 

  1. Colloca L, Barsky AJ. Placebo and nocebo effects. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):554-561. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1907805

 

  1. Colloca L. The nocebo effect. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024;64:171-190. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022723-112425

 

  1. Haas JW, Bender FL, Ballou S, et al. Frequency of adverse events in the placebo arms of COVID-19 vaccine trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1):e2143955. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43955. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e221277. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1277

 

  1. Amanzio M, Mitsikostas DD, Giovannelli F, Bartoli M, Cipriani GE, Brown WA. Adverse events of active and placebo groups in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine randomized trials: A systematic review. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022;12:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100253

 

  1. Lee YH, Song GG. Nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;60(1):5-12. doi: 10.5414/CP204028

 

  1. Wartolowska K, Colloca L, Amanzio M. Editorial: The nocebo effect and its consequences for clinical trials and clinical practice. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1111324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1111324

 

  1. Bashar MA, Kamble B, Kumar S, Nandekar SV, Mathur SK. Assessment of safety and adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination and their predictors in first 30 days among healthcare workers of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India. Vaccine X. 2024;19:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100522

 

  1. Mitsikostas DD, Aravantinou-Fatorou K, Deligianni C, et al. Nocebo-prone behavior associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in healthcare workers. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(10):1179. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101179

 

  1. Mitsikostas DD, Deligianni CI. Q-No: A questionnaire to predict nocebo in outpatients seeking neurological consultation. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(3):379-381. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1959-2

 

  1. Du Prel JB, Röhrig B, Hommel G, Blettner M. Choosing statistical tests: part 12 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(19):343-348.doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0343

 

  1. Grobe T, Steinmann S. Gesundheitsreport 2019 - Pflegefall Pflegebranche? So geht’s Deutschlands Pflegekräften. Available from: https://www.gesundheitsreport-2019-data.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 28].

 

  1. Damerow S, Rommel A, Prütz F, et al. Developments in the health situation in Germany during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic for selected indicators of GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. J Health Monit. 2020;5:3-20. doi: 10.25646/7172.2. Erratum in: J Health Monit. 2021;5(4):20. doi: 10.25646/8384

 

  1. Nohl A, Brune B, Weichert V, Standl F, Stang A, Dudda M. COVID-19: Vaccination side effects and sick leave in frontline healthcare-workers-a web-based survey in Germany. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(3):411. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030411

 

  1. Müller MM, Baillès E, Blanch J, et al. Burnout among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal results from the international Cope-Corona survey study. J Psychosom Res. 2023;164:111102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111102. Erratum in: J Psychosom Res. 2023;167:111205. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111205

 

  1. Schug C, Geiser F, Hiebel N, et al. Sick leave and intention to quit the job among nursing staff in German hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041947

 

  1. Shafir R, Olson E, Colloca L. The neglect of sex: A call to action for including sex as a biological variable in placebo and nocebo research. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;116:106734. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106734

 

  1. Enck P, Klosterhalfen S. Does sex/gender play a role in placebo and nocebo effects? Conflicting evidence from clinical trials and experimental studies. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:160. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00160

 

  1. Paul E, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100012

 

  1. Chrissian AA, Oyoyo UE, Patel P, et al. Impact of COVID-19 vaccine-associated side effects on health care worker absenteeism and future booster vaccination. Vaccine. 2022;40(23):3174-3181. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.046

 

  1. Sternberg E. A self-fulfilling prophecy: Linking belief to behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1234:98-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06190.x

 

  1. Mertens M. The self-fulfilling prophecy in medicine. Theor Med Bioeth. 2024;45(5):363-385. doi: 10.1007/s11017-024-09677-z

 

  1. Pagnini F, Cavalera C, Volpato E, Banfi P. Illness expectations predict the development of influenza-like symptoms over the winter season. Complement Ther Med. 2020;50:102396. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102396

 

  1. Jepma M, Koban L, van Doorn J, Jones M, Wager TD. Behavioural and neural evidence for self-reinforcing expectancy effects on pain. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2(11):838-855. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0455-8
Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Basic Psychosomatics, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4414 Print ISSN: 3060-8562, Published by AccScience Publishing