AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ IJB026390421
Cite this article
3
Download
35
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Engineering three-dimensional-printed gelatin hydrogels for flexible bioelectronics: Printing, conductive networks, and biomedical applications

Shanshan Bai1,2† ,  Jiameng Yang3† ,  Ximin Yuan3 ,  Zhiqing Lian4* ,  Zhu Xin1,2,5*
Show Less
1 Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning , China
2 Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning , China
3 State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems & Liangzhu Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang , China
4 Department of Ultrasound, Wafangdian Central Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning , China
5 Molecular Oncology Laboratory, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois , United States
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 23 September 2026 | Revised: 15 October 2026 | Accepted: 20 October 2026 | Published online: 12 November 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Printed Biomedical Devices-Series2)
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Flexible bioelectronics require compliant materials that maintain electrical function and stable contact with moving tissues. Gelatin-based hydrogels offer thermoreversible association, chemical adaptability, and compatibility with several three-dimensional (3D) printing routes, but their processing and operating requirements are closely coupled. This review connects gelatin chemistry and ink rheology with printing, conductive-network design, mechanical durability, and biointerface performance. Extrusion, vat photopolymerization, embedded printing, and volumetric fabrication are compared in terms of formulation compatibility and structural stabilization. Ionic, nanofiller, conducting polymer, and multinetwork approaches are evaluated according to their charge-transport mechanisms and associated trade-offs. Comparisons with related reviews and representative quantitative measurements clarify both the scope of the synthesis and the limits of cross-study performance comparisons. Biomedical examples connect these principles with sensing, cardiac and neural interfaces, and regeneration. Gelatin-containing functional devices are distinguished from sacrificial gelatin processing and non-gelatin engineering analogs. Priorities include reliable multi-material interfaces, reporting of cyclic electrical and mechanical stability, application-specific validation, and data-assisted optimization of formulation and processing.

Keywords
Gelatin
Three-dimensional printing
Flexible bioelectronics
Conductive hydrogel
Sensors
Funding
This work was supported by the Heilongjiang Province Key Research and Development Program (2022XJ03C07), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LMS26E050008), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (GZC20250947).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Hu L, Chee PL, Sugiarto S, et al. Hydrogel‐Based Flexible Electronics. Adv Mater. 2023;35(14). doi: 10.1002/adma.202205326
  2. Yuan X, Kong W, Xia P, et al. Implantable Wet‐Adhesive Flexible Electronics with Ultrathin Gelatin Film. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(42). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202404824
  3. Lu Y, Yang G, Wang S, et al. Stretchable graphene–hydrogel interfaces for wearable and implantable bioelectronics. Nat Electron. 2023;7(1):51-65. doi: 10.1038/s41928-023-01091-y
  4. Li Z, Wang B, Lu J, et al. Highly Stretchable, Self-Healable, and Conductive Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel for Long‐Lasting Wearable Tactile Sensors. Adv Sci. 2025;12(30). doi: 10.1002/advs.202502678
  5. Wang Z, Lin Z, Mei X, et al. Engineered Living Systems Based on Gelatin: Design, Manufacturing, and Applications. Adv Mater. 2025;37(22):2416260. doi: 10.1002/adma.202416260
  6. Yuan X, Wu P, Gao Q, Xu J, Guo B, He Y. Multifunctionally wearable monitoring with gelatin hydrogel electronics of liquid metals. Mater Horiz. 2022;9(3):961-972. doi: 10.1039/d1mh02030g
  7. Wang Y, Yue H, Liu A, et al. Dual crosslinkable bioink for direct and embedded 3D bioprinting at physiological temperature. Mater Today. 2025;85:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2025.02.005
  8. Wang Q, Chen K, Zhang Y, et al. Nanostructured GelMA colloidal gels as bioinks for freeform multi-mode 3D printing: better replacement for the classical GelMA polymeric inks. Bioact Mater. 2025;53:188-204. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.010
  9. Zhu J, Wei Y, Yang G, et al. Peptide-based rigid nanorod-reinforced gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for osteochondral regeneration and additive manufacturing. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62540-0
  10. Riffe MB, Davidson MD, Seymour G, et al. Multi‐Material Volumetric Additive Manufacturing of Hydrogels using Gelatin as a Sacrificial Network and 3D Suspension Bath. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34). doi: 10.1002/adma.202309026
  11. Ribezzi D, Zegwaart J, Van Gansbeke T, et al. Multi-material Volumetric Bioprinting and Plug‐and‐play Suspension Bath Biofabrication via Bioresin Molecular Weight Tuning and via Multiwavelength Alignment Optics. Adv Mater. 2025;37(13). doi: 10.1002/adma.202409355
  12. Liang X, Zhang M, Chong CM, et al. Recent Advances in the 3D Printing of Conductive Hydrogels for Sensor Applications: A Review. Polymers. 2024;16(15):2131. doi: 10.3390/polym16152131
  13. Tran CM, Yue Z, Qin C, et al. 3D Printing of Conducting Polymer Hydrogels for Electrostimulation-Assisted Tissue Engineering. Adv Mater. 2025;37(36):2507779. doi: 10.1002/adma.202507779
  14. Baniasadi H, Abidnejad R, Fazeli M, et al. Innovations in hydrogel-based manufacturing: A comprehensive review of direct ink writing technique for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;324:103095. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103095
  15. Tan H, Li X, Li L, et al. Recent advances in the design of hydrogels: Renaissance of the Hofmeister effect. Prog Polym Sci. 2025;166:101989. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2025.101989
  16. Xie M, Shi Y, Zhang C, et al. In situ 3D bioprinting with bioconcrete bioink. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30997-y
  17. Brown NC, Ames DC, Mueller J. Multimaterial extrusion 3D printing printheads. Nat Rev Mater. 2025;10(11):807-825. doi: 10.1038/s41578-025-00809-y
  18. Youn KI, Park JH, Mandakhbayar N, et al. Jammed Microfiber Inks Enable Aligned 3D Printing for Epigenetic Muscle Regeneration. Adv Fiber Mater. 2026;8(4):1575-1594. doi: 10.1007/s42765-026-00694-2
  19. Serafin A, Culebras M, Oliveira JM, Koffler J, Collins MN. 3D printable electroconductive gelatin-hyaluronic acid materials containing polypyrrole nanoparticles for electroactive tissue engineering. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. 2023;6(3):109. doi: 10.1007/s42114-023-00665-w
  20. Hardman D, George Thuruthel T, Iida F. Self-healing ionic gelatin/glycerol hydrogels for strain sensing applications. npg Asia Mater. 2022;14(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41427-022-00357-9
  21. Yin H, Ding Y, Zhai Y, Tan W, Yin X. Orthogonal programming of heterogeneous micro-mechano-environments and geometries in three-dimensional bio-stereolithography. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06685-1
  22. Khan K, Hussain MI, Tareen AK, Asghar A, Hamza M, Chen Z. Advances in vat photopolymerization 3D printing: Multifunctional materials, process innovations, and emerging applications. Mater Sci Eng: R: Rep. 2026;167:101120. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2025.101120
  23. Sun Y, Cui J, Feng S, et al. Projection Stereolithography 3D Printing High-Conductive Hydrogel for Flexible Passive Wireless Sensing. Adv Mater. 2024;36(25). doi: 10.1002/adma.202400103
  24. Zhu C, Gemeda HB, Duoss EB, Spadaccini CM. Toward Multiscale, Multimaterial 3D Printing. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34). doi: 10.1002/adma.202314204
  25. Finnegan SG, Kinsey AM, Boydston AJ. Selective infusion of spatially controlled domains via vat photopolymerization 3D-printing for chemically diverse multimaterial parts. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66128-6
  26. Meyer KV, Winkler S, Bahnemann J. 3D-printed microfluidic cell culture devices and hydrogel integration: Trends, challenges, and solutions. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(2):34-54. doi: 10.36922/ijb.4718
  27. Tordi P, Tamayo A, Jeong Y, Bonini M, Samorì P. Multiresponsive Ionic Conductive Alginate/Gelatin Organohydrogels with Tunable Functions. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(52). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202410663
  28. Song W, Chen H, Lu P, et al. Polymeric ionic liquid modifier as ion-induced crosslinker and functional enhancer: Facile fabrication of multifunctional gelatin hydrogels for flexible electronics. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;318:145296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145296
  29. Li L, Wang X, You X, et al. Super stretchable gelatin/poly (ionic liquid) hydrogel enabled by weak hydrogen bonds and microphase separation towards multifunctional and self-powered sensors. Nano Energy. 2025;138:110875. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110875
  30. Cui D, Sun Y, Li T, et al. Mechanically robust polyacrylamide/gelatin ionic hydrogels reinforced by sodium alginate for wearable device applications. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. 2025;8(3). doi: 10.1007/s42114-025-01286-1
  31. Wei Y, Lu Y, Kuang Y, et al. Gelatin-stabilized liquid metal for conductive hydrogels with multifunctional sensing applications and energy harvesting. Nano Res. 2026;19(8):94908692. doi: 10.26599/nr.2026.94908692
  32. Zhou H, Yang M, He W, et al. A thermoresponsive bioadhesive MXene hydrogel for intelligent brain-machine interaction sensing. Matter. 2025;8(9):102150. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2025.102150
  33. Montazerian H, Davoodi E, Wang C, et al. Boosting hydrogel conductivity via water-dispersible conducting polymers for injectable bioelectronics. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59045-1
  34. Zhu R, Zhu D, Zheng Z, Wang X. Tough double network hydrogels with rapid self-reinforcement and low hysteresis based on highly entangled networks. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45485-8
  35. Kumankuma‐Sarpong J, Chang C, Hao J, et al. Entanglement Added to Cross‐Linked Chains Enables Tough Gelatin‐Based Hydrogel for Zn Metal Batteries. Adv Mater. 2024;36(30). doi: 10.1002/adma.202403214
  36. Zeng Q, Qiao B, Xiao X, Li L. Self-Adhesive Gelatin/Slide‐Ring Double‐Network Hydrogel for Human Motion Sensing and Morse Code Communication. Small. 2025;21(22). doi: 10.1002/smll.202412665
  37. Wang Z, Xu L, Liu W, et al. Tough, self-healing, adhesive double network conductive hydrogel based on gelatin-polyacrylamide covalently bridged by oxidized sodium alginate for durable wearable sensors. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;276:133802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133802
  38. Wu R, Zhu T, Ni Y, et al. UV‐Cured Dense Double Network Hydrogel via Multiple Dynamic Crosslinking for Stable Amphibious Motion Sensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;36(3). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202515120
  39. Firdaus DF, Kuswoyo A, Garcia-Sampedro A, et al. High-performance ionic conductive 3d-printed cell-free hydrogel for soft tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. 2026;9(2):174. doi: 10.1007/s42114-026-01691-0
  40. Wu M, Wang X, Xia Y, et al. Stretchable freezing-tolerant triboelectric nanogenerator and strain sensor based on transparent, long-term stable, and highly conductive gelatin-based organohydrogel. Nano Energy. 2022;95:106967. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.106967
  41. Ren C, Chen W, Liao Y, et al. Reinforcing Gelatin Hydrogels via In Situ Phase Separation and Enhanced Interphase Bonding for Advanced 3D Fabrication. Adv Mater. 2024;37(6). doi: 10.1002/adma.202416432
  42. Yuan X, Zhu Z, Xia P, et al. Tough Gelatin Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering. Adv Sci. 2023;10(24). doi: 10.1002/advs.202301665
  43. Guo X, Zhang L, Zhuo H, et al. Robust zwitterionic hydrogels enabled by consolidated supramolecular networks and spatially hierarchical structures. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-64498-5
  44. Li Y, Jiang F, Li X, et al. An ultrastretchable and multifunctional hydrophobic/electrostatic dual-crosslinked hydrogel for self-healing flexible touch panel and sensor. npj Flex Electron. 2025;9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41528-025-00422-7
  45. Qiao Z, Chen Y, Pan H, et al. Environment-tolerant, inherently conductive and self-adhesive gelatin-based supramolecular eutectogel for flexible sensor. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;282:137219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137219
  46. Tordi P, Tamayo A, Jeong Y, et al. Fully Bio-Based Gelatin Organohydrogels via Enzymatic Crosslinking for Sustainable Soft Strain and Temperature Sensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;36(23). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202520762
  47. Zhang X, Lin Y, Shen S, et al. Intrinsic Anti-Freezing, Tough, and Transparent Hydrogels for Smart Optical and Multi-Modal Sensing Applications. Adv Mater. 2025;37(8). doi: 10.1002/adma.202413856
  48. He K, Cai P, Ji S, et al. An Antidehydration Hydrogel Based on Zwitterionic Oligomers for Bioelectronic Interfacing. Adv Mater. 2023;36(8). doi: 10.1002/adma.202311255
  49. Tian Z, Gu R, Xie W, et al. Hydrogen bonding-mediated phase-transition gelatin-based bioadhesives to regulate immune microenvironment for diabetic wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2025;46:434-447. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.014
  50. Li T, Qi H, Zhao C, et al. Robust skin-integrated conductive biogel for high-fidelity detection under mechanical stress. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55417-1
  51. Bai M, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. Bioinspired adaptive lipid-integrated bilayer coating for enhancing dynamic water retention in hydrogel-based flexible sensors. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54879-7
  52. Yuan X, Kong W, Shao Y, et al. AI-feedback bioelectronics promote infectious wound healing. Cell Biomat. 2026;2(2):100191. doi: 10.1016/j.celbio.2025.100191
  53. Ershad F, Rao Z, Maharajan S, et al. Bioprinted optoelectronically active cardiac tissues. Sci Adv. 2025;11(4). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt7210
  54. Lee J, Choi Y, Song J, et al. Nerve-Mimetic Adhesive Hydrogel Electroceuticals: Tailoring In Situ Physically Entangled Domains in Singular Polymers. ACS Nano. 2024;18(51):34949-34961. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c13097
  55. Wu Q, Xia P, Kong W, et al. A battery scaffold for tissue regeneration. Cell Biomater. 2026;2(4):100308. doi: 10.1016/j.celbio.2025.100308
  56. Kong W, Chen H, Yuan X, et al. A biohydrogel battery. Cell Biomater. 2026;2(1):100189. doi: 10.1016/j.celbio.2025.100189
  57. Cristallini C, Rossin D, Vanni R, et al. A biodegradable, microstructured, electroconductive and nano-integrated drug eluting patch (MENDEP) for myocardial tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2025;50:246-272. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.04.008
  58. Yao K, Hong G, Yuan X, et al. 3D Printing of Tough Hydrogel Scaffolds with Functional Surface Structures for Tissue Regeneration. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024;17(1). doi: 10.1007/s40820-024-01524-z
  59. Cao R, Chen G, Wang L, et al. 4D Printed Hydrogel Expanders for Personalized and Accelerated Soft Tissue Regeneration. Adv Mater. 2025;38(6). doi: 10.1002/adma.202512662
  60. Landau S, Kieda J, Khosravi R, et al. Cell driven elastomeric particle packing in composite bioinks for engineering and implantation of stable 3D printed structures. Bioact Mater. 2025;44:411-427. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.10.008
  61. Lim MH, Kang TW, Kim JG, Park SH, Cho YS, Kim MS. Material–process integration and degradation engineering of biodegradable polymers in additive manufacturing. Int J Bioprint. 2026;12(3):026110096. doi: 10.36922/IJB026110096
  62. Yang H, Chen Q, Chen T, et al. Predictive design of stretchable electrodes with strain-insensitive performance via robotics- and machine learning-integrated workflow. Nat Commun. 2026;17(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68484-3
  63. Yao Z, Zhang S, Guan Z, et al. Flexible self-powered electronics: Materials design, structure engineering, and multifunctional integration. Matter. 2026;9(6):102724. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2026.102724
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing