The future of 3D bioprinting: From functional tissues to standardized manufacturing and clinical translation
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has evolved from demonstrating the feasibility of fabricating complex tissue architectures to engineering increasingly functional biological constructs. However, advances in biological functionality have not been matched by comparable progress in standardized evaluation, manufacturing consistency, and clinical translation. Here, we propose a Bioprinting 1.0 to 5.0 evolutionary framework that describes the progression of the field from engineering feasibility and biological compatibility to biological functionality, standardized manufacturing, and clinical translation. We discuss emerging standardization efforts across extrusion-, jetting-, and vat photopolymerization–based bioprinting and highlight the need for quantitative, reproducible benchmarks spanning bio-ink properties, printing performance, construct quality, and biological function. We further examine the manufacturing, safety, regulatory, and clinical requirements needed to translate functional bioprinted tissues into therapeutic products. This framework provides a roadmap for advancing 3D bioprinting from laboratory-scale demonstrations toward reproducible and clinically translatable tissue engineering.
- Ng WL, Bartolo P. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for systemic diseases and localized injuries. Mil Med Res. 2026;13(1):100006. doi: 10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100006
- He C, He J, Wu C, et al. 3D printing for tissue/organ regeneration in China. Bio-Des Manuf. 2025;8(2):169-242. doi: 10.1631/bdm.2400309
- Murphy JF, Lavelle M, Asciak L, et al. Biofabrication and biomanufacturing in Ireland and the UK. Bio-Des Manuf. 2024;7(6):825-856. doi: 10.1007/s42242-024-00316-z
- Gao L, Liu Z, Dikovsky D, et al. Innovation leading development: a glimpse into three-dimensional bioprinting in Israel. Bio-Des Manuf. 2024;7(3):358-382. doi: 10.1007/s42242-024-00275-5
- Sun X, Ren W, Xie L, et al. Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for transplantation and drug screening. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2384662. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2384662
- Yuan X, Wang Z, Che L, et al. Recent developments and challenges of 3D bioprinting technologies. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2):1752. doi: 10.36922/ijb.1752
- Hidaka M, Kojima M, Zhang C, Okano Y, Sakai S. Experimental and numerical approaches for optimizing conjunction area design to enhance switching efficiency in single-nozzle multi-ink bioprinting systems. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(5):4091. doi: 10.36922/ijb.4091
- Gharraei R, Bergstrom D, Chen XD. Multi-material bioprinting using a helical mixer for fabricating fibers with controlled composition. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(5):231-265. doi: 10.36922/IJB025140119
- Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM. Together but not scrambled: a perspective on chaotic printing/bioprinting. Aggregate. 2024;5(4):e548. doi: 10.1002/agt2.548
- Lombardi L, Scalzone A, Ausilio C, Gentile P, Tammaro D. Optimizing nozzle design in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting to minimize mechanical stress and enhance cell viability. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(4):315-327. doi: 10.36922/IJB025190182
- Zhu H, Li R, Li S, et al. Multi-physical field control piezoelectric inkjet bioprinting for 3D tissue-like structure manufacturing. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(3):2120. doi: 10.36922/ijb.2120
- Jing S, Lian L, Hou Y, et al. Advances in volumetric bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2024;16(1):012004. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad0978
- Wei Q, An Y, Zhao X, Li M, Zhang J, Cui N. Optimal design of multi-biomaterials mixed extrusion nozzle for 3D bioprinting considering cell activity. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2025;20(1):e2438897. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2438897
- Ma D, Liu J, Lu WW, Liu W, Ruan C. Dynamic bioinks for tissue/organ bioprinting: principle, challenge, and perspective. Prog Mater Sci. 2026;155:101527. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101527
- Wu Y, Ganguly S, Tang XS. 3D bioprinting of anisotropic filler-reinforced polymer nanocomposites: synthesis, assembly, and multifunctional applications. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2):1637. doi: 10.36922/ijb.1637
- Wu D, Pang S, Röhrs V, et al. Man vs. machine: automated bioink mixing device improves reliability and reproducibility of bioprinting results compared to human operators. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10:380. doi: 10.36922/ijb.1974
- Ng WL, Yeow CHE, Huang X, Lee S, Yeong WY. Physically crosslinked gelatin bio-inks with enhanced printability, degradation and mechanical robustness for multi-modal bioprinting. Interdiscip Med. 2025;3(4):e20250058. doi: 10.1002/inmd.20250058
- Synofzik J, Heene S, Jonczyk R, Blume C. Ink-structing the future of vascular tissue engineering: a review of the physiological bioink design. Bio-Des Manuf. 2024;7(2):181-205. doi: 10.1007/s42242-024-00270-w
- Cheng C, Williamson EJ, Chiu GT-C, Han B. Engineering biomaterials by inkjet printing of hydrogels with functional particulates. Med-X. 2024;2(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s44258-024-00024-4
- Suntornnond R, Ng WL, Shkolnikov V, Yeong WY. A facile method to fabricate cell-laden hydrogel microparticles of tunable sizes using thermal inkjet bioprinting. Droplet. 2024;3(4):e144. doi: 10.1002/dro2.144
- Iyer KS, Bao L, Zhai J, et al. Microgel-based bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2025;48:273-293. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.02.003
- Wang Q, Chen K, Zhang Y, et al. Nanostructured GelMA colloidal gels as bioinks for freeform multi-mode 3D printing: better replacement for the classical GelMA polymeric inks. Bioact Mater. 2025;53:188-204. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.010
- Li L, Wu W, Zhu Q, et al. Advanced cell-adaptable hydrogels for bioprinting. Bioact Mater. 2025;53:831-854. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.044
- Ng WL, Vyas C, Huang B, Yeong WY, Bartolo P. Advanced bioprinting strategies for fabrication of biomimetic tissues and organs. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2025;7(6):062006. doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/adeee0
- Bertassoni LE. Bioprinting of complex multicellular organs with advanced functionality—recent progress and challenges ahead. Adv Mater. 2022;34(3):2101321. doi: 10.1002/adma.202101321
- Cai H, Cai Y, Ding Z, et al. Microporous 3D bioprinting: a novel technology for biofabrication. Bio-Des Manuf. 2025;8(5):847-876. doi: 10.1631/bdm.2400490
- Lu C, Gao C, Qiao H, et al. Spheroid construction strategies and application in 3D bioprinting. Bio-Des Manuf. 2024;7(5):800-818. doi: 10.1007/s42242-024-00273-7
- Budharaju H, Sundaramurthi D, Sethuraman S. Embedded 3D bioprinting—an emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic & large vascularized tissue constructs. Bioact Mater. 2024;32:356-384. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.012
- Heo G, Kim W, Kim G. Comb-assisted 3D bioprinting for highly aligned 3D muscle bioconstructs with enhanced cellular mechanotransduction. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2025;20(1):e2499440. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2025.2499440
- Yi H, Niu Z, Cao H, Luo J, An J, Chua CK. Embedded 3D printing: material-structure-function deep integration. Mater Today. 2026;93:103227. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2026.103227
- Agarwal T, Onesto V, Banerjee D, et al. 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation. Biofabrication. 2025;17(4):042003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a
- Martín Compaired P, Pérez MÁ, García-Gareta E. An experimental workflow for bioprinting optimization: application to a custom-made biomaterial ink. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(3):397-415. doi: 10.36922/IJB025120094
- Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, Melchels F, Groll J, Jungst T. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044107. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8
- Fu Z, Naghieh S, Xu C, Wang C, Sun W, Chen X. Printability in extrusion bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3):033001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab
- Gugliandolo SG, Prioglio E, Moscatelli D, Colosimo BM. A new solution for in situ monitoring of shape fidelity in extrusion-based bioprinting via thermal imaging. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(3):394-407. doi: 10.36922/ijb.2021
- Schwab A, Levato R, D'Este M, Piluso S, Eglin D, Malda J. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):11028-11055. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
- Ng WL, Shkolnikov V. Optimizing cell deposition for inkjet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2):2135. doi: 10.36922/ijb.2135
- Xu HQ, Liu JC, Zhang ZY, Xu CX. A review on cell damage, viability, and functionality during 3D bioprinting. Mil Med Res. 2022;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40779-022-00429-5
- McCauley PJ, Fromen CA, Bayles AV. Cell viability in extrusion bioprinting: the impact of process parameters, bioink rheology, and cell mechanics. Rheol Acta. 2025;64(9):497-515. doi: 10.1007/s00397-025-01504-z
- Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, Goh GL, Suntornnond R, Yeong WY. Controlling droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: key factors to achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(1):424. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424
- Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(3):312-319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3413
- Ng WL, Xu Y, Liu F, Bartolo P. Advanced cell-instructive bio-inks: engineering multiscale niches for functional tissue formation. Bioact Mater. 2027; 69:358-394. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.10.002
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO/WD 26013: Biotechnology — Bioprinting — Requirements for the Printing Process. International Organization for Standardization; 2026. Accessed August 2026. https://www.iso.org/standard/92306.html
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993-1:2025: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. International Organization for Standardization; 2025. Accessed August 2026. https://www.iso.org/standard/10993-1
- Jergitsch M, Mateos-Timoneda MA. 3D extrusion bioprinting: rational bioink design and advanced fabrication techniques. Trends Biotechnol. 2025;44(2):378-388. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.06.008
- ASTM International. ASTM WK92859: New Test Method for Printability of Bioinks and Material Inks Used in Laminar Flow Extrusion Bioprinting. ASTM International; 2026. Accessed August 2026. https://www.astm.org/membership-participation/technical-committees/workitems/workitem-wk92859
- Ng WL, Shkolnikov V. Jetting-based bioprinting: process, dispense physics, and applications. Bio-Des Manuf. 2024;7(5):771-799. doi: 10.1007/s42242-024-00285-3
- Ng WL, Paula CTB, Serra AC, Coelho JFJ, Bartolo P. Vat photopolymerization-based bioprinting: shaping next-generation tissues with light. Interdiscip Med. 2025;e70078. doi: 10.1002/inmd.70078
- Nieto D, de Mora AJ, Kalogeropoulou M, Bhusal A, Miri AK, Moroni L. Bottom-up and top-down VAT photopolymerization bioprinting for rapid fabrication of multi-material microtissues. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2):1017. doi: 10.36922/ijb.1017
- ASTM International. ASTM WK83109: New Guide for Additive Manufacturing — Design — Vat Photopolymerization. ASTM International; 2026. Accessed August 2026. https://www.astm.org/membership-participation/technical-committees/workitems/workitem-wk83109
- ASTM International. ASTM WK78224: New Test Method for Additive Manufacturing — Vat Photopolymerization — Next Generation Tensile Test Method. ASTM International; 2026. Accessed August 2026. https://www.astm.org/membership-participation/technical-committees/workitems/workitem-wk78224
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 21560:2020: General Requirements of Tissue-Engineered Medical Products. International Organization for Standardization; 2020. Accessed September 2026. https://www.iso.org/standard/71086.html
- Ng WL, Goh GL, Goh GD, Sheuan TJJ, Yeong WY. Progress and opportunities for machine learning in materials and processes of additive manufacturing. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34):2310006. doi: 10.1002/adma.202310006
- Wang Y, Bai H, Ren Y, Yang Y, Wang J. Artificial intelligence-augmented bioprinting systems: data-driven optimization and future applications in pharmacological research. Int J Bioprint. 2025;11(6):1-22. doi: 10.36922/IJB025350349
- Guan J, Sun Y, Yao EJ, et al. Machine learning-assisted stiffness prediction in high-cell-density bioprinting. Bio-Des Manuf. 2025:1-15. doi: 10.1631/bdm.2400454
- Zhang C, Elvitigala KCML, Mubarok W, Okano Y, Sakai S. Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation framework for as-extruded cell viability in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2400330. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2400330
- Zhang Z, Zhou X, Fang Y, Xiong Z, Zhang T. AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: from bench to bedside. Bioact Mater. 2025;45:201-230. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.021
- Matavosian AA, Bonassar LJ. Reimagining bioprinters: real-time monitoring for quality control of bioprinted constructs and future vision. Biofabrication. 2025;17(4):042008. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ae11d4
- Ng WL, An J, Chua CK. Process, material, and regulatory considerations for 3D printed medical devices and tissue constructs. Engineering. 2024;36:146-166. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.028
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Tissue & tissue products. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Accessed September 2026. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/tissue-tissue-products
- European Union. EC/1394/2007: Regulation on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products. European Union; 2007. Accessed September 2026. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/1394/oj/eng
