AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026260265
Cite this article
19
Download
438
Views
Related Info Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Silk fibroin-reinforced bioink for high-fidelity 3D printing and tissue regeneration

Xinrang Zhai1,2 Miner Hu3 Yao Chen1 Linran Song1 Xihao Pan4 Xianzhu Zhang5 Wei Dong2* Jianjun Ma1* Wei Wei1,6*
Show Less
1 Department of Orthopedics, Center for Regenerative and Aging Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, International School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China
2 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
3 Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescent’s Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4 Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
5 Department of Sports Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
6 Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Lung Cancer, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China
Received: 14 April 2026 | Revised: 9 July 2026 | Accepted: 17 July 2026 | Published online: 17 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Digital light processing (DLP) three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing technique that fabricates objects layer by layer using digitally projected light patterns. It effectively addresses the demand for complex geometries and is widely adopted in the biological field. However, traditional macromolecular bioinks still suffer from printing inaccuracies due to light scattering and runaway free-radical reactions. In this study, we introduced silk fibroin (SF) into the conventional poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA)/chitosan methacrylate (CSMA) bioink to enhance the precision of DLP 3D printing. The incorporation of SF achieved a significant improvement in mechanical property (alcohol-induced β-sheet formation increased the compressive modulus from 9.5 kPa to 208.1 kPa) and anti-swelling performance (volume swelling ratio from about 366.5% to 144.6%) of cell-free PEGDA/CSMA/SF hydrogel via alcohol treatment, meeting the enhanced mechanical requirements and addressing the commonly neglected issue of geometric deformation of 3D-printed hydrogels caused by swelling in moist environments. Ethanol treatment induced SF β-sheet structure formation and reduced PEGDA/CSMA/SF hydrogel pore size (from about 78.3 μm to 23.6 μm), thereby enhancing the hydrogel network crosslinking. The PEGDA/CSMA/SF bioink exhibited antibacterial potential, inhibiting Escherichia coli by about 41.3% and Staphylococcus aureus by about 45.8% within 12 h in vitro. The porous scaffolds were printed with a designed PEGDA/CSMA/SF bioink and effectively accelerated defect repair in rat full-thickness skin wound models (about 19.1% of the untreated control group). Histological analysis revealed that the PEGDA/CSMA/SF hydrogel scaffold promoted angiogenesis and collagen deposition, upregulated vascular endothelial growth factor A expression, and downregulated tumor necrosis factor-α expression. The straightforward approach of introducing SF into traditional bioinks represents a promising strategy for DLP 3D printing in tissue regeneration.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
3D printing
Silk fibroin
High precision
Anti-swelling
Wound repair
Funding
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ25H060001).
Conflict of interest
Wei Wei is an Editorial Board Member of this journal, but was not in any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. The authors declare no competing interests.
References
  1. Wang Q, Liu Y, Zhang S, et al. Exosome-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(6):0114. doi: 10.36922/ijb.0114
  2. Yu W, Liu X, Liu Y, Chen X, Ge S, Dong Z. 3D printing of phase-separating hydrogels with tunable microachitecture for mechanoregulated bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2026;36(30). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202523349
  3. Andreu A, Lee H, Kang J, Yoon YJ. Self-healing materials for 3D printing. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(30):2315046. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202315046
  4. Elder B, Neupane R, Tokita E, Ghosh U, Hales S, Kong YL. Nanomaterial patterning in 3D printing. Adv Mater. 2020;32(17):1907142. doi: 10.1002/adma.201907142
  5. Pal S, Gavhane UA, Asha SK. Biocompatible PVAc-g-PLLA acrylate polymers for DLP 3D printing with tunable mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(45):62594-62605. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c11285
  6. Zhang N, Lu Y, Li J, et al. DLP 3D printing of hyperelastic photocurable perivascular scaffolds enabling patient-specific vascular remodeling. Acta Biomater. 2025;203:381-398. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.07.048
  7. Xu Z, Zhang Q, Fan C, et al. A gel microparticle-based self-thickening strategy for 3D printing high-modulus hydrogels skeleton cushioned with PNAGA hydrogel mimicking anisotropic mechanics of meniscus. Bioact Mater. 2023;26:64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.020
  8. Yang X, Yao L, Sun X, Wang L, Xiao J. Low-temperature DLP 3D printing of low-concentration collagen methacryloyl for the fabrication of durable and bioactive personalized scaffolds. Chem Eng J. 2024;497:155650. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155650
  9. Yuan H, Xiao P, Sarmento B, Chen G, Cui W. Synovial lubrication factors-recruiting biomimetic polyphenolized hyaluronic acid for promoting cartilage repair. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(42):2406668. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202406668
  10. Hong H, Seo YB, Kim DY, et al. Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;232:119679. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679
  11. Ye J, Li F, Wen Z, et al. Multichannel 3D-printed bioactive scaffold combined with small interfering RNA delivery to promote neurological recovery after spinal cord injury. Research (Wash D C). 2025;8:0951. doi: 10.34133/research.0951
  12. Na K, Shin S, Lee H, et al. Effect of solution viscosity on retardation of cell sedimentation in DLP 3D printing of gelatin methacrylate/silk fibroin bioink. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;61:340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.032
  13. He Y, Wang F, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang D, Huang X. A photocurable hybrid chitosan/acrylamide bioink for DLP based 3D bioprinting. Mater Des. 2021;202:109588. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109588
  14. Yang M, Chu L, Zhuang Y, et al. Multi-material digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting of heterogeneous hydrogel constructs with perfusable networks. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(32):2316456. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202316456
  15. Wei Q, Liu D, Chu G, et al. TGF-β1-supplemented decellularized annulus fibrosus matrix hydrogels promote annulus fibrosus repair. Bioact Mater. 2023;19:581-593. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.04.025
  16. Li X, Xing R, Xu C, et al. Immunostimulatory effect of chitosan and quaternary chitosan: a review of potential vaccine adjuvants. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;264:118050. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118050
  17. Rezaei FS, Sharifianjazi F, Esmaeilkhanian A, Salehi E. Chitosan films and scaffolds for regenerative medicine applications: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;273:118631. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118631
  18. Zanon M, Cue-López R, Martínez-Campos E, et al. Bioderived dyes-mediated vat photopolymerization 3D printing of chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Addit Manuf. 2023;69:103553. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103553
  19. Cheng F, Zhang X, Dai J, et al. Digital light processing-printed nanozyme-integrated hydrogels enable spatiotemporal immunomodulation and repair of infected wounds. Acta Biomater. 2026;214:254-270. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2026.03.013
  20. Shen Y, Tang H, Huang X, et al. DLP printing photocurable chitosan to build bio-constructs for tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;235:115970. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115970
  21. Miri AK, Nieto D, Iglesias L, et al. Microfluidics-enabled multimaterial maskless stereolithographic bioprinting. Adv Mater. 2018;30(27):1800242. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800242
  22. He N, Wang X, Shi L, et al. Photoinhibiting via simultaneous photoabsorption and free-radical reaction for high-fidelity light-based bioprinting. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):3063. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38838-2
  23. Ma Y, Wei W, Gong L, et al. Biomacromolecule-based agent for high-precision light-based 3D hydrogel bioprinting. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2022;3(8):100985. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100985
  24. Zhan Y, Fu W, Xing Y, Ma X, Chen C. Advances in versatile anti-swelling polymer hydrogels. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;127:112208. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112208
  25. Pan X, Li R, Li W, et al. Silk fibroin hydrogel adhesive enables sealed-tight reconstruction of meniscus tears. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):2651. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47029-6
  26. Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, Wang X. Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(4):457-470. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043
  27. Fei Y, Wang X, Ling Z, et al. Angiogenic apoptotic vesicle-laden silk fibroin/sodium alginate hydrogel for pulp regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2025;33:102060. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102060
  28. Wu D, Li J, Wang C, et al. Injectable silk fibroin peptide nanofiber hydrogel composite scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2024;25:100962. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.100962
  29. Su D, Yao M, Liu J, Zhong Y, Chen X, Shao Z. Enhancing mechanical properties of silk fibroin hydrogel through restricting the growth of β-sheet domains. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(20):17489-17498. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04623
  30. Hasturk O, Jordan KE, Choi J, Kaplan DL. Enzymatically crosslinked silk and silk-gelatin hydrogels with tunable gelation kinetics, mechanical properties and bioactivity for cell culture and encapsulation. Biomaterials. 2020;232:119720. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119720
  31. Kaewpirom S, Teangtam W, Monthatong M, Boonsang S. Modification of silk fibroin film structure: from silkworm diet to material properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;317:144855. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144855
  32. Li H, Ma T, Zhang J, et al. Boosting corrosion resistance and osteogenic activity of magnesium-based implants with metal ions chelated silk fibroin coating via binary solvent system. Chem Eng J. 2024;485:149905. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.149905
  33. Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T, Wang X, Lovett ML, Kaplan DL. Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(10):1612-1631. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.379
  34. Hu H, Zhai X, Li W, et al. A photo-triggering double cross-linked adhesive, antibacterial, and biocompatible hydrogel for wound healing. iScience. 2022;25(7):104619. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104619
  35. Zhang X, Yang D, Nie J. Chitosan/polyethylene glycol diacrylate films as potential wound dressing material. Int J Biol Macromol. 2008;43(5):456-462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.08.010
  36. Zhai X, Hu M, Song L, et al. Silk fibroin based bioinks for high-precision digital light processing 3D printing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;310(pt 1):143248. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143248
  37. Wang H, Zhang Y, Shao H, Hu X. A study on the flow stability of regenerated silk fibroin aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromol. 2005;36(1-2):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.03.011
  38. Yu K, Zhang X, Sun Y, et al. Printability during projection-based 3D bioprinting. Bioact Mater. 2022;11:254-267. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.021
  39. Zakeri S, Vippola M, Levänen E. A comprehensive review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in stereolithography. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101177. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101177
  40. You S, Wang P, Schimelman J, Hwang HH, Chen S. High-fidelity 3D printing using flashing photopolymerization. Addit Manuf. 2019;30:100834. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100834
  41. Priya S, Choudhari M, Tomar Y, et al. Exploring polysaccharide-based bio-adhesive topical film as a potential platform for wound dressing application: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;327:121655. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121655
  42. Kulkarni G, Guha Ray P, Byram PK, Kaushal M, Dhara S, Das S. Tailorable hydrogel of gelatin with silk fibroin and its activation/crosslinking for enhanced proliferation of fibroblast cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:4073-4083. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.016
  43. Liang R, Shen X, Xie C, et al. Silk gel recruits specific cell populations for scarless skin regeneration. Appl Mater Today. 2021;23:101004. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101004
  44. Chen Z, Cheng J, Wang M, et al. In situ forming silk fibroin hydrogel dressing accelerates acute wound healing via immunomodulation and extracellular matrix regeneration. J Control Release. 2025;387:114228. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114228
  45. Guan Q, Hou S, Wang K, et al. Micropore structure engineering of injectable granular hydrogels via controlled liquid-liquid phase separation facilitates regenerative wound healing in mice and pigs. Biomaterials. 2025;318:123192. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123192
  46. Tetik-Elsherbiny N, Elsherbiny A, Setya A, et al. RNF20-mediated transcriptional pausing and VEGFA splicing orchestrate vessel growth. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024;3(10):1199-1216. doi: 10.1038/s44161-024-00546-5
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing