AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026250258
Cite this article
15
Download
383
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Construction of a 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold functionalized with extracellular matrix and an MSC-affinity peptide for articular cartilage repair

Xinqiang Zhao1 Xiaoning Liu2 Zhen Huang3 Kun Ding1 Yantao Zhao4* Zhenggang Bi1*
Show Less
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
2 Department of Nurtrition, Women and Children’s Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266034, China
3 Department of Joint surgery, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China
4 Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
Received: 19 June 2026 | Revised: 10 July 2026 | Accepted: 13 July 2026 | Published online: 13 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Cartilage damage has emerged as a major clinical challenge due to the limited intrinsic regenerative capacity of articular cartilage. Current cartilage repair strategies often rely on exogenous cells and growth factors to promote tissue regeneration; however, their clinical translation is hindered by high costs, complex manufacturing processes, and potential immunogenicity. Thus, the development of high-performance acellular tissue-engineering scaffolds has attracted increasing attention. In this study, we engineered a biomimetic ternary composite scaffold consisting of polycaprolactone (PCL), a bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC)-affinity peptide, and cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) to facilitate efficient cartilage regeneration through synergistic multifunctional effects. PCL scaffolds with well-defined porous architectures and favorable mechanical properties were fabricated using three-dimensional (3D) printing. Following surface functionalization with the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-affinity peptide E7, the scaffolds were further coated with decellularized cartilage ECM. This biomimetic design enhances cell adhesion, selectively recruits endogenous MSCs, and provides the structural support required for tissue regeneration. Moreover, the bioactive components and biochemical cues retained within the ECM promote chondrogenic differentiation. In vitro studies demonstrated that E7-modified PCL (E7-PCL) significantly enhanced MSC adhesion and recruitment. The ECM/E7-modified composite scaffold further promoted stem-cell adhesion, proliferation, chondrogenic differentiation, and extracellular matrix deposition while maintaining excellent biocompatibility and mechanical integrity. In vivo, implantation of the ECM/E7-PCL (E/E7-P) scaffold resulted in markedly improved cartilage repair compared with ECM/PCL (E/P) scaffolds and untreated controls. Overall, these findings from in vitro and rabbit in vivo experiments indicate that E/E7-P represents a promising acellular tissue-engineering candidate for cartilage defect regeneration, pending further validation in more comprehensive experimental models.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Articular cartilage repair
BMSC affinity peptide
3D printing
Peptide-modified polycaprolactone
Cartilage tissue engineering
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Qiao Z, Lian M, Han Y, et al. Bioinspired stratified electrowritten fiber-reinforced hydrogel constructs with layer-specific induction capacity for functional osteochondral regeneration. Biomaterials. 2021;266:120385. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120385
  2. Richter DL, Tanksley JA, Miller MD. Osteochondral autograft transplantation: a review of the surgical technique and outcomes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2016;24(2):74-78. doi: 10.1097/jsa.0000000000000099
  3. Lin X, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Biomimetic multizonal scaffolds for the reconstruction of zonal articular cartilage in chondral and osteochondral defects. Bioact Mater. 2025;43:510-549. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.10.001
  4. Sherman SL, Thyssen E, Nuelle CW. Osteochondral autologous transplantation. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36(3):489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2017.02.006
  5. Wang Z, Li Z, Li Z, Wu B, Liu Y, Wu W. Cartilaginous extracellular matrix derived from decellularized chondrocyte sheets for the reconstruction of osteochondral defects in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2018;81:129-145. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.005
  6. Farr J, Gracitelli GC, Shah N, Chang EY, Gomoll AH. High failure rate of a decellularized osteochondral allograft for the treatment of cartilage lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2015-2022. doi: 10.1177/0363546516645086
  7. Ladegaard Skov A. Like cartilage, but simpler. Nature. 2015;517(7532):25-26. doi: 10.1038/517025a
  8. Hu X, Xu J, Li W, et al. Therapeutic “tool” in reconstruction and regeneration of tissue engineering for osteochondral repair. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2020;191(2):785-809. doi: 10.1007/s12010-019-03214-8
  9. Zhang B, Huang J, Narayan RJ. Gradient scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering and regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(36):8149-8170. doi: 10.1039/d0tb00688b
  10. Mendes LF, Katagiri H, Tam WL, et al. Advancing osteochondral tissue engineering: bone morphogenetic protein, transforming growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor signaling drive ordered differentiation of periosteal cells resulting in stable cartilage and bone formation in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0787-3
  11. Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BC, et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(6):612-632. doi: 10.1177/1747493018778713
  12. Aravamudhan A, Ramos DM, Nip J, et al. Osteoinductive small molecules: growth factor alternatives for bone tissue engineering. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(19):3420-3428. doi: 10.2174/1381612811319190008
  13. Xiao H, Huang W, Xiong K, et al. Osteochondral repair using scaffolds with gradient pore sizes constructed with silk fibroin, chitosan, and nano-hydroxyapatite. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:2011-2027. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S191627
  14. Yin L, Wu Y, Yang Z, et al. Characterization and application of size-sorted zonal chondrocytes for articular cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials. 2018;165:66-78. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.050
  15. Bauza-Mayol G, Quintela M, Brozovich A, et al. Biomimetic scaffolds modulate the posttraumatic inflammatory response in articular cartilage contributing to enhanced neoformation of cartilaginous tissue in vivo. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(1):2101127. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101127
  16. Liang C, Wang G, Liang C, et al. Hierarchically patterned triple-layered gelatin-based electrospun membrane functionalized by cell-specific extracellular matrix for periodontal regeneration. Dent Mater. 2024;40(1):90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.022
  17. Wang P, Zhao Z, Li Z, et al. Attenuation of osteoarthritis progression via locoregional delivery of Klotho-expressing plasmid DNA and tanshinone IIA through a stem cell-homing hydrogel. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02608-z
  18. Zhang G, He S, He X, et al. Local recruitment of autologous stem cells via a targeting microgel for precise cartilage repair without surgery. Adv Mater. 2025;37(33):2505544. doi: 10.1002/adma.202505544
  19. Gao F, Xu Z, Liang Q, et al. Osteochondral regeneration with 3D-printed biodegradable high-strength supramolecular polymer reinforced-gelatin hydrogel scaffolds. Adv Sci. 2019;6(15):1900867. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900867
  20. Deng C, Zhu H, Li J, et al. Bioactive scaffolds for regeneration of cartilage and subchondral bone interface. Theranostics. 2018;8(7):1940-1955. doi: 10.7150/thno.23674
  21. Castilho M, Mouser V, Chen M, Malda J, Ito K. Bi-layered micro-fibre reinforced hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019;95:297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.030
  22. Chen L, Deng C, Li J, et al. 3D printing of a lithium-calcium-silicate crystal bioscaffold with dual bioactivities for osteochondral interface reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2019;196:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.005
  23. Wang K, Liu L, Xie J, Shen L, Tao J, Zhu J. Facile strategy to generate aligned polymer nanofibers: effects on cell adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(2):1566-1574. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b16057
  24. Li S, Sun B, Li X, Yuan X. Characterization of electrospun core/shell poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)/poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) fibrous membranes and their cytocompatibility in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19(2):245-258. doi: 10.1163/156856208783432499
  25. Xu Y, Li D, Yin Z, et al. Tissue-engineered trachea regeneration using decellularized trachea matrix treated with laser micropore technique. Acta Biomater. 2017;58:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.010
  26. Fu L, Li P, Li H, et al. The application of bioreactors for cartilage tissue engineering: advances, limitations, and future perspectives. Stem Cells Int. 2021;2021:1-13. doi: 10.1155/2021/6621806
  27. Yang Z, Li H, Tian Y, et al. Biofunctionalized structure and ingredient mimicking scaffolds achieving recruitment and chondrogenesis for staged cartilage regeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:655440. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.655440
  28. Wang X, Song X, Li T, et al. Aptamer-functionalized bioscaffold enhances cartilage repair by improving stem cell recruitment in osteochondral defects of rabbit knees. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(10):2316-2326. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856355
  29. Huang H, Zhang X, Hu X, et al. A functional biphasic biomaterial homing mesenchymal stem cells for in vivo cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35(36):9608-9619. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.020
  30. Duan P, Pan Z, Cao L, et al. The effects of pore size in bilayered poly (lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds on restoring osteochondral defects in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(1):180-192. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34683.
  31. Pattnaik A, Sanket AS, Pradhan S, et al. Designing of gradient scaffolds and their applications in tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2023;296:122078. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122078.
  32. Zhu M, Jin J, Seddiqi H, Bakker AD. Novel three-dimensional preclinical model for investigating cartilage regeneration, incorporating physiological and pathological mechanical loading. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2025;31(10):367-379. doi: 10.1177/19373384251390654
  33. Chen M, Feng Z, Guo W, et al. PCL-MECM-based hydrogel hybrid scaffolds and meniscal fibrochondrocytes promote whole meniscus regeneration in a rabbit meniscectomy model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(44):41626-41639. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b13611
  34. Vikingsson L, Claessens B, Gómez-Tejedor JA, Gallego Ferrer G, Gómez Ribelles JL. Relationship between micro-porosity, water permeability and mechanical behavior in scaffolds for cartilage engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;48:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.021
  35. Shen C, Zhou Z, Li R, et al. Silk fibroin-based hydrogels for cartilage organoids in osteoarthritis treatment. Theranostics. 2025;15(2):560-584. doi: 10.7150/thno.103491
  36. Li S, Sun H, Lu Q, et al. Bionic ECM scaffolds for directional articular hyaline cartilage regeneration and long-term homeostasis maintenance. Biomater Adv. 2025;173:214292. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214292
  37. Mirmusavi MH, Ahmadian M, Karbasi S. Polycaprolactone-chitosan/multi-walled carbon nanotube: a highly strengthened electrospun nanocomposite scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;209:1801-1814. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.152
  38. Ghadirian S, Shariati L, Karbasi S. Evaluation of the effects of cartilage decellularized ECM in optimizing PHB-chitosan-HNT/chitosan-ECM core-shell electrospun scaffold: physicochemical and biological properties. Biomater Adv. 2025;172:214249. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214249
  39. Wei W, Ma Y, Yao X, et al. Advanced hydrogels for the repair of cartilage defects and regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(4):998-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.030
  40. Nordberg RC, Bielajew BJ, Takahashi T, Dai S, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. Recent advancements in cartilage tissue engineering innovation and translation. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024;20(6):323-346. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01118-4
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing