AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026050035
CASE STUDY

Neuromodulation with a 3D-printed, patient-specific hand orthotic in stroke: A proof-of-concept fMRI case series on clinical application

Zikai Hua1* Zhipeng Li1 Ying Zhang2,3*
Show Less
1 School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
2 Department of Rehabilitation, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China
3 Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
Received: 28 January 2026 | Revised: 15 March 2026 | Accepted: 23 March 2026 | Published online: 24 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing in Clinical Application)
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing holds great promise for creating patient-specific rehabilitative devices. While previous studies have demonstrated that behavioral interventions can induce cortical reorganization in stroke, direct evidence that a device alone—specifically, a patient-specific 3D-printed orthotic—can modulate brain function remains lacking. This proof-of-concept case series bridges this gap by integrating a complete digital workflow—from upper limb 3D scanning to stereolithography (SLA) fabrication of a custom hand orthotic—with longitudinal multimodal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess cortical reorganization in chronic stroke. Four patients participated, with two index cases wearing the 3D-printed orthosis daily for four months alongside conventional rehabilitation, while two reference patients underwent conventional therapy only. Pre- and post-intervention neuroimaging revealed consistent, orthosis-associated neural changes: enhanced activity in the primary somatosensory cortex and greater functional integration within sensorimotor networks. Structural adaptations in motor regions were also observed in both index cases. Quantitatively, the index cases exhibited functional changes in nine brain regions and structural changes in six regions, substantially exceeding the minimal changes observed in the reference cases. This work provides the first direct evidence that a 3D-printed, patient-specific orthotic can drive targeted neuroplasticity independent of intensive behavioral coaching, validating its role not merely as a passive assistive device but as an active neuromodulatory tool. It establishes a translational framework for using objective neuroimaging biomarkers to guide the development and personalization of 3D-printed interventions in neurorehabilitation.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
3D printing
Additive manufacturing
Stroke rehabilitation
Neuromodulation
Functional MRI
Proof-of-concept study
Funding
This work was self-funded by the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
  1. Ledoux ED, Barth EJ. Design, modeling, and preliminary evaluation of a 3D-printed wrist–hand grasping orthosis for stroke survivors. Wearable Technol. 2024;5:e12. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2024.18
  2. Bose D, Gupta S, Chanda A. Scalable direct manufacturing of a functional multipurpose wrist-hand orthosis using 3D printing. Ann 3D Print Med. 2025;17:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.stlm.2025.100186
  3. Demeco A, Foresti R, Frizziero A, et al. The Upper Limb Orthosis in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients: The Role of 3D Printing. Bioengineering. 2023;10(11):1256. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10111256
  4. Gorelick PB. The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):417-418. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30030-4
  5. The GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016. New Engl. J. Med. 2018;379(25):2429-2437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa180449
  6. He Q, Wang W, Zhang Y, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2021: A systematic analysis for global burden of disease 2021. Stroke. 2024;55(12):2815- 2824. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048033
  7. Cantillo-Negrete J, Carino-Escobar RI, Carrillo-Mora P, et al. Brain-Computer Interface Coupled to a Robotic Hand Orthosis for Stroke Patients’ Neurorehabilitation: A Crossover Feasibility Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:656975. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.656975
  8. Vaughn S, Cournan M. World Health Organization Rehabilitation 2030: Call to Action Update. Rehabil Nurs J. 2024;49(5):143-146. doi: 10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000473
  9. Toth L, Schiffer A, Nyitrai M, et al. Developing an anti-spastic orthosis for daily home-use of stroke patients using smart memory alloys and 3D printing technologies. Mater Des. 2020;195:109029. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109029
  10. Oud TAM, Lazzari E, Gijsbers HJH, et al. Effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions: A scoping review. PloS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0260271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260271
  11. Yang YS, Tseng CH, Fang WC, Han IW, Huang SC. Effectiveness of a New 3D-Printed Dynamic Hand–Wrist Splint on Hand Motor Function and Spasticity in Chronic Stroke Patients. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4549. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194549
  12. Wang K, Shi Y, He W, et al. The research on 3D printing fingerboard and the initial application on cerebral stroke patient’s hand spasm. BioMedical Eng. 2018;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0522-4
  13. Schlaug G, Cassarly C, Feld JA, et al. Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in addition to constraint-induced movement therapy for post-stroke motor recovery (TRANSPORT2): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled triple-blind trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025;24(5):400-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00044-4
  14. Ang BWK, Yeow CH. Design and Characterization of a 3D Printed Soft Robotic Wrist Sleeve with 2 DoF for Stroke Rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft); April 14-18, Seoul, South Korea. IEEE; 2019:577-582. doi: 10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722771
  15. Zheng Y, Liu G, Yu L, Wang Y, Fang Y, Shen Y, et al. Effects of a 3D-printed orthosis compared to a low-temperature thermoplastic plate orthosis on wrist flexor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;34(2):194-204. doi: 10.1177/0269215519885174
  16. Cui Y, Cheng S, Chen X, Xu G, Ma N, Li H, et al. Advances in the clinical application of orthotic devices for stroke and spinal cord injury since 2013. Front Neurol. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1108320
  17. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, et al. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(1):4-12. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200101000-00003
  18. Lv H, Wang Z, Tong E, et al. Resting-state functional MRI: everything that nonexperts have always wanted to know. Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(8):1390-1399. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5527
  19. Wang X, Wang H, Xiong X, et al. Motor imagery training after stroke increases slow-5 oscillations and functional connectivity in the ipsilesional inferior parietal lobule. Neurorehabilit Neural Repair. 2020;34(4):321-332. doi: 10.1177/1545968319899919
  20. de Jesus Faria AST. Additive manufacturing of custom-fit orthoses for the upper limb. Master’s Thesis. Porto, Portugal: Universidade do Porto; 2017.
  21. Meier TB, Nycz CJ, Daudelin A, Fischer GS. The PneuHOPE Hand Exoskeleton: A Platform for Studying Brain Activation During Robot-Facilitated Hand Movement Using fMRI. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2025;7(1):85-93. doi: 10.1109/TMRB.2024.3503998
  22. Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J, et al. A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage. 2004;23(3):827-839. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.058
  23. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126(11):2476-2496. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg245
  24. Cramer SC. Treatments to promote neural repair after stroke. J Stroke. 2018;20(1):57-70. doi: 10.5853/jos.2017.02796
  25. Dobkin BH, Carmichael ST. The specific requirements of neural repair trials for stroke. Neurorehabilit Neural Repair 2016;30(5):470-478. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604400
  26. Buma FE, Raemaekers M, Kwakkel G, Ramsey NF. Brain Function and Upper Limb Outcome in Stroke: A Cross-Sectional fMRI Study. Cappello F, ed. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139746
  27. Kitago T, Liang J, Huang VS, et al. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabilit Neural Repair. 2013;27(2):99-109. doi: 10.1177/1545968312452631
  28. Manganotti P, Acler M, Formaggio E, et al. Changes in cerebral activity after decreased upper-limb hypertonus: an EMG-fMRI study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28(5):646- 652. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.12.023
  29. Schuster-Amft C, Henneke A, Hartog-Keisker B, et al. Intensive virtual reality-based training for upper limb motor function in chronic stroke: a feasibility study using a single case experimental design and fMRI. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(5):385-392. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.908963

30. Crofts A, Kelly ME, Gibson CL. Imaging functional recovery following ischemic stroke: clinical and preclinical fMRI studies. J Neuroimaging. 2020;30(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/jon.12668

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing