AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.4385
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
78
Download
713
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

3D-printed scaffold of dopamine methacrylate oligomer grafted on PEGDMA incorporated with collagen hydrolysate for engineering cartilage tissue

Kitipong Pasanaphong1 ,  Acharee Suksuwan1 ,  Narongrit Srikaew3 ,  Ruedee Hemstapat4 ,  Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk5 ,  Sutee Wangtueai6 ,  Nanthaphong Khamthong7 ,  Sani Boonyagul1 ,  Phavit Wongsirichot8 ,  Nuttapol Tanadchangsaeng1*
Show Less
1 College of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
2 The Halal Science Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
3 Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
4 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
5 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
6 School of Agro-Industry, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
7 College of Oriental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
8 Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
IJB, 4385 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.4385
Submitted: 30 July 2024 | Accepted: 5 September 2024 | Published: 5 September 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

This study demonstrated the synthesis and characterization of dopamine methacrylate (DMA), oligomers of dopamine methacrylate (ODMA), and their integration with polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PEGDMA) to enhance 3D-printing scaffold fabrication for tissue engineering, using digital light processing (DLP) technology. The results confirm the successful synthesis of DMA, as evidenced by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and its subsequent conversion to ODMA. The obtained ODMA was then combined with PEGDMA (1.25–10% w/v ODMA) to optimize scaffold printability. The morphological characteristics of the ODMA/PEGDMA scaffolds were assessed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Furthermore, using FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the chemical stability and biological compatibility of collagen hydrolysate (CH) derived from tuna tendon were studied and compared after sterilization. An in vitro fibroblast viability test was conducted using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay to assess the biocompatibility of CH with cells. Sterilization did not adversely affect the chemical composition of CH, maintaining its compatibility with fibroblast cells. Subsequently, ODMA/PEGDMA/CH composite scaffolds were fabricated using a DLP 3D printer, and their efficacy in supporting chondrocyte viability and proliferation were examined at 24, 48, and 72 h using PrestoBlue® assay. Mixing ODMA with PEGDMA significantly enhanced the printability of the scaffolds. Our tri-component 3D-printed scaffolds significantly enhanced human cartilage stem/progenitor cell (CSPC) viability and proliferation compared to a 24-well culture plate. These scaffolds excel in both mechanical properties, crucial for bearing physiological loads, and biological properties that promote cell growth and proliferation. This dual enhancement underscores their superior performance and positions them as frontrunners in the development of advanced solutions for cartilage engineering, potentially revolutionizing medical treatments.  

Keywords
3D-printed scaffold
Dopamine methacrylate oligomer
Collagen hydrolysate
Digital light processing 3D printer
Cartilage tissue engineering
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) via the Invention to Business (I-2B) Program (contract number: N82A670613). This research was also supported by Rangsit University. This research project was funded by Fundamental Fund 2023, Chiang Mai University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
  1. Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 2009; 1:461-468. doi: 10.1177/1941738109350438
  2. Wojcieszek A, Kurowska A, Majda A, Liszka H, Gądek A. The impact of chronic pain, stiffness and difficulties in performing daily activities on the quality of life of older patients with knee osteoarthritis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416815
  3. Putti V. Arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 1921;3(9):421-430.
  4. Bugbee WD, Pallante-Kichura AL, Görtz S, Amiel D, Sah R. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in cartilage repair: graft storage paradigm, translational models, and clinical applications. J Orthop Res. 2016;34:31-38. doi: 10.1002/jor.22998
  5. Redondo ML, Beer AJ, Yanke AB. Cartilage restoration: microfracture and osteochondral autograft transplantation. J Knee Surg. 2018;31:231-238. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1618592
  6. Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR. Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2053-2063. doi: 10.1177/0363546508328414
  7. Davies RL, Kuiper NJ. Regenerative medicine: a review of the evolution of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) therapy. Bioengineering. 2019;6:22. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering6010022
  8. Gille J, Behrens P, Schulz AP, Oheim R, Kienast B. Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: a clinical follow-up at 15 years. Cartilage. 2016;7(4): 309-315. doi: 10.1177/1947603516638901
  9. Chang LR, Marston G, Martin A. Anatomy, cartilage. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. doi: 10.1177/1947603516638901
  10. Gan D, Xu T, Xing W, et al. Mussel-inspired dopamine oligomer intercalated tough and resilient gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels for cartilage regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(10):1716-1725. doi: 10.1039/C8TB01664J
  11. Killion JA, Geever LM, Devine DM, Kennedy JE, Higginbotham CL. Mechanical properties and thermal behaviour of PEGDMA hydrogels for potential bone regeneration application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:1219-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.004
  12. Burke G, Barron V, Geever T, Geever L, Devine DM, Higginbotham CL. Evaluation of the materials properties, stability and cell response of a range of PEGDMA hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;99:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.003
  13. Husár B, Hatzenbichler M, Mironov V, Liska R, Stampfl J, Ovsianikov A. Photopolymerization-based additive manufacturing for the development of 3D porous scaffolds. In: Dubruel P, Van Vlierberghe S (eds.) Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration. Woodhead Publishing; 2014. doi: 10.1533/9780857098104.2.149
  14. Liu H, Yang Y, Liu Y, Cui L, Fu L, Li B. Various bioactive peptides in collagen hydrolysate from salmo salar skin and the combined inhibitory effects on atherosclerosis in vitro and in vivo. Food Res Int. 2022;157:111281. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111281
  15. Larder CE, Iskandar MM, Kubow S. Collagen hydrolysates: a source of bioactive peptides derived from food sources for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Medicines. 2023;10:50. doi: 10.3390/medicines10090050
  16. Li H, Dai J, Wang Z, et al. Digital light processing (DLP)- based (bio)printing strategies for tissue modeling and regeneration. Aggregate. 2023;4:e270. doi: 10.1002/agt2.270
  17. Zhang J, Hu Q, Wang S, Tao J, Gou M. Digital light processing based three-dimensional printing for medical applications. Int J Bioprint. 2020;6:242.
  18. Sultan MT, Lee OJ, Lee JS, Park CH. Three-dimensional digital light-processing bioprinting using silk fibroin-based bio-ink: recent advancements in biomedical applications. Biomedicines. 2022;10:3224. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123224
  19. Chanmangkang S, Maneerote J, Surayot U, Panya A, You S, Wangtueai S. Physicochemical and biological properties of collagens obtained from tuna tendon by using the ultrasound-assisted extraction. J Agric Food Res. 2024;15:100984. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.100984
  20. Tangchitphisut P, Srikaew N, Numhom S, Liao M, et al. Infrapatellar fat pad: an alternative source of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis. 2016; 2016: 4019873. doi: 10.1155/2016/4019873
  21. Ritian J, Teng X, Liao M, et al. Release of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory peptides from salmon (Salmo salar) skin collagen based on digestion–intestinal absorption in vitro. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2021;56:3507-3518. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14977
  22. Xiong X, Qu SX, Liu YM. Synthesis and characterization of dopamine graft compound N-methacryloyl 3,4-dihydroxyl-phenylamine. J Phys Conf Series. 2013;419:2047. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/419/1/012047
  23. Hu H, Wang L, Xu B, et al. Construction of a composite hydrogel of silk sericin via horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed graft polymerization of poly-PEGDMA. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020; 108(6):2643-2655. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34596
  24. Lin X, Zhao X, Xu C, Wang L, Xia Y. Progress in the mechanical enhancement of hydrogels: Fabrication strategies and underlying mechanisms. J Polym Sci. 2022;60: 2525-2542.doi: 10.1002/pol.20220154
  25. Sai KP, Babu M. Studies on Rana tigerina skin collagen. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2001; 128:81-90. doi: 10.1016/s1096-4959(00)00301-8
  26. Hsu B-L, Weng Y-M, Liao Y-H, Chen W. Structural investigation of edible zein films/coatings and directly determining their thickness by FT-Raman spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:5089-5095. doi: 10.1021/jf0501490
  27. Kittiphattanabawon P, Benjakul S, Sinthusamran S, Kishimura H. Gelatin from clown featherback skin: Extraction conditions. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2016;66:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.029
  28. Payne KJ, Veis A. Fourier transform ir spectroscopy of collagen and gelatin solutions: Deconvolution of the amide I band for conformational studies. Biopolymers. 1988;27:1749-1760. doi: 10.1002/bip.360271105
  29. Zhang Y, Chen Z, Liu X, Shi J, Chen H, Gong Y. SEM, FTIR and DSC investigation of collagen hydrolysate treated degraded leather. J Cult Herit. 2021;48:205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2020.11.007
  30. Schmidt MM, Fontoura AMd, Vidal AR, et al. Characterization of hydrolysates of collagen from mechanically separated chicken meat residue. Food Sci Technol. 2020;40:355-362. doi: 10.1590/fst.14819
  31. Monaco G, Cholas R, Salvatore L, Madaghiele M, Sannino A. Sterilization of collagen scaffolds designed for peripheral nerve regeneration: Effect on microstructure, degradation and cellular colonization. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;71:335-344. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.030
  32. Pasanaphong K, Jittrontrum P, Srikaew N, et al. Effect of sterilization methods on collagen hydrolysate obtained from tuna tendon. Appl Sci. 2024;14:6201. doi: 10.3390/app14146201
  33. Grandis RAD, Miotto LN, Genaro LE, et al. In vitro evaluation of acellular collagen matrices derived from porcine pericardium: influence of the sterilization method on its biological properties. Materials. 2021; 14:6255. doi: 10.3390/ma14216255
  34. Wang H-C, Lin T-H, Hsu C-C, Yeh M-L. Restoring osteochondral defects through the differentiation potential of cartilage stem/progenitor cells cultivated on porous scaffolds. Cells. 2021;10:3536. doi: 10.3390/cells10123536
  35. Jia L, Zhang P, Ci Z, et al. Immune-inflammatory responses of an acellular cartilage matrix biomimetic scaffold in a xenotransplantation goat model for cartilage tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:667161. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.667161
  36. Bourdon B, Cassé F, Gruchy N, et al. Marine collagen hydrolysates promote collagen synthesis, viability and proliferation while downregulating the synthesis of pro-catabolic markers in human articular chondrocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:3693. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073693
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept