The application and prospects of 3D printable microgel in biomedical science and engineering
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology is one of the most advanced techniques currently applied in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine and has developed rapidly in the past few years. Despite many breakthroughs, there are still several challenges of 3D bioprinting technology awaiting to be addressed, and one of them is the urgency of optimizing bioinks (natural or synthetic hydrogel), which are critical elements in 3D bioprinting, for specific properties. Different from traditional hydrogels, microgels, which are a new type of bioink, are micron-sized gels with excellent mechanical and biological properties, which make them great candidates for applications in 3D bioprinting. Different from the dense and limited pore size of traditional hydrogels, the pore structure of microgel is adjustable, enabling better cell loading before 3D bioprinting, and the printed pores are conducive to the exchange of metabolic substances and cell migration. The “bottom-up” modular microgel has stronger customizable characteristics, and it can freely adjust its mechanical properties, such as hardness, toughness, and rheological properties. In this review, we review the application of microgels in the field of biomedicine and discuss the future development of microgels in 3D bioprinting.
Mao AS, Mooney DJ, 2015, Regenerative medicine: Current therapies and future directions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112:14452–14459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508520112
Lin L, Jiang S, Yang J, et al., 2022, Application of 3D-bioprinted nanocellulose and cellulose derivative-based bio-inks in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Bioprint, 9. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.637
Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al., 2013, 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater, 25:5011–5028. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042
Zhang YS, Yue K, Aleman J, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng, 45:148–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8
Takagi D, Lin W, Matsumoto T, et al., 2019, High-precision three-dimensional inkjet technology for live cell bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 5. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i2.208
Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, 2016, 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 34:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A, 2013, Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J Biomed Mater Res A, 101:272–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34326
Sun D, Chang C, Li S, et al., 2006, Near-field electrospinning. Nano Lett, 6:839–842. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0602701
Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials, 76:321–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A, et al., 2019, 3D bioprinting: From benches to translational applications. Small, 15: e1805510. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805510
Raman R, Bhaduri B, Mir M, et al., 2016, High-resolution projection microstereolithography for patterning of neovasculature. Adv Healthc Mater, 5:610–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500721
Gao D, Yao D, Leist SK, et al., 2019, Mechanisms and modeling of electrohydrodynamic phenomena. Int J Bioprint, 5. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.166
Barner-Kowollik C, Bastmeyer M, Blasco E, et al., 2017, 3D laser micro- and nanoprinting: challenges for chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 56:15828–15845. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201704695
Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, et al., 2011, Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 98:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31831
Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, et al., 2010, Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials, 31:7250–7256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055
Castilho M, Feyen D, Flandes-Iparraguirre M, et al., 2017, Melt electrospinning writing of poly-hydroxymethylglycolide-co-ε-caprolactone-based scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700311
Wu Y, 2021, Electrohydrodynamic jet 3D printing in biomedical applications. Acta Biomater, 128:21–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.036
Kiran ASK, Veluru JB, Merum S, et al., 2018, Additive manufacturing technologies: An overview of challenges and perspective of using electrospraying. Nanocomposites, 4:190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2018.1558499
Rastogi P, Kandasubramanian B, 2019, Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 11:042001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
Seoane-Viaño I, Januskaite P, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, et al., 2021, Semi-solid extrusion 3D printing in drug delivery and biomedicine: Personalised solutions for healthcare challenges. J Control Release, 332:367–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.027
Zhang B, Cristescu R, Chrisey DB, et al., 2020, Solvent-based extrusion 3D printing for the fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 6:211. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.211
Panwar A, Tan LP, 2016, Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules, 21:685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060685
Ji S, Guvendiren M, 2017, Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023
Kyle S, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, et al., 2017, ‘Printability’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing: State-of-the-art. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1700264. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700264
Du C, Huang W, 2022, Progress and prospects of nanocomposite hydrogels in bone tissue engineering. Nanocomposites, 8:102–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2022.2076025
Yang Y, Jia Y, Yang Q, et al., 2023, Engineering bio-inks for 3D bioprinting cell mechanical microenvironment. Int J Bioprint, 9:632. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.632
Daly AC, Riley L, Segura T, et al., 2020, Hydrogel microparticles for biomedical applications. Nat Rev Mater, 5:20–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0148-6
Feng Q, Li D, Li Q, et al., 2022, Microgel assembly: Fabrication, characteristics and application in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Bioact Mater, 9:105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.020
Xavier JR, Thakur T, Desai P, et al., 2015, Bioactive nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: A growth-factor-free approach. ACS Nano, 9:3109–3118. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn507488s
Annabi N, Nichol JW, Zhong X, et al., 2010, Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 16:371–383. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0639
Butcher AL, Offeddu GS, Oyen ML, 2014, Nanofibrous hydrogel composites as mechanically robust tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol, 32:564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.09.001
Cheng W, Zhang J, Liu J, et al., 2020, Granular hydrogels for 3D bioprinting applications. VIEW, 1:20200060. https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20200060
Xin S, Deo KA, Dai J, et al., 2021, Generalizing hydrogel microparticles into a new class of bioinks for extrusion bioprinting. Sci Adv, 7:eabk3087. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk3087
Adnan MM, Dalod ARM, Balci MH, et al., 2018, In situ synthesis of hybrid inorganic–polymer nanocomposites. Polymers (Basel), 10:1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10101129
Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, et al., 2017, Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application. Biofabrication, 9:034103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96
Zhang H, Cong Y, Osi AR, et al., 2020, Direct 3D printed biomimetic scaffolds based on hydrogel microparticles for cell spheroid growth. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1910573. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910573
Franco CL, Price J, West JL, 2011, Development and optimization of a dual-photoinitiator, emulsion-based technique for rapid generation of cell-laden hydrogel microspheres. Acta Biomater, 7:3267–3276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.011
Truong N, Lesher-Pérez SC, Kurt E, et al., 2019, Pathways governing polyethylenimine (PEI) polyplex transfection in microporous annealed particle (MAP) scaffolds. Bioconjug Chem, 30:476–486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00696
Pittermannová A, Ruberová Z, Zadražil A, et al., 2016, Microfluidic fabrication of composite hydrogel microparticles in the size range of blood cells. RSC Adv, 6:103532–103540. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA23003B
Nisisako T, Torii T, 2008, Microfluidic large-scale integration on a chip for mass production of monodisperse droplets and particles. Lab Chip, 8:287–293. https://doi.org/10.1039/b713141k
Kamperman T, Trikalitis VD, Karperien M, et al., 2018, Ultrahigh-throughput production of monodisperse and multifunctional janus microparticles using in-air microfluidics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:23433–23438. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b05227
Chen Z, Lv Z, Zhang Z, et al., 2021, Advanced microfluidic devices for fabricating multi-structural hydrogel microsphere. Exploration, 1:20210036. https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20210036
Chung CHY, Cui B, Song R, et al., 2019, Scalable production of monodisperse functional microspheres by multilayer parallelization of high aspect ratio microfluidic channels. Micromachines (Basel), 10:592. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090592
Headen DM, García JR, García AJ, 2018, Parallel droplet microfluidics for high throughput cell encapsulation and synthetic microgel generation. Microsyst Nanoeng, 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2017.76
Mao AS, Shin J-W, Utech S, et al., 2017, Deterministic encapsulation of single cells in thin tunable microgels for niche modeling and therapeutic delivery. Nat Mater, 16:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4781
Schuler F, Schwemmer F, Trotter M, et al., 2015, Centrifugal step emulsification applied for absolute quantification of nucleic acids by digital droplet RPA. Lab Chip, 15:2759–2766. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00291E
Azimi-Boulali J, Madadelahi M, Madou MJ, et al., 2020, Droplet and particle generation on centrifugal microfluidic platforms: A review. Micromachines, 11:603. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11060603
Kim S, Yim S-G, Chandrasekharan A, et al., 2020, On-site fabrication of injectable 131I-labeled microgels for local radiotherapy. J Controlled Release, 322:337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.046
Agarwal R, Singh V, Jurney P, et al., 2012, Scalable imprinting of shape-specific polymeric nanocarriers using a release layer of switchable water solubility. ACS Nano, 6:2524–2531. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2049152
Li M, Mei J, Friend J, et al., 2022, Acousto-photolithography for programmable shape deformation of composite hydrogel sheets. Small, 18: e2204288. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202204288
Helgeson ME, Chapin SC, Doyle PS, 2011, Hydrogel microparticles from lithographic processes: Novel materials for fundamental and applied colloid science. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci, 16:106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2011.01.005
Gramlich WM, Kim IL, Burdick JA, 2013, Synthesis and orthogonal photopatterning of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with thiol-norbornene chemistry. Biomaterials, 34:10.1016/j. biomaterials.2013.08.089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.089
Bahney CS, Lujan TJ, Hsu CW, et al., 2011, Visible light photoinitiation of mesenchymal stem cell-laden bioresponsive hydrogels. Eur Cell Mater, 22:43–55.
Gansau J, Kelly L, Buckley CT, 2018, Influence of key processing parameters and seeding density effects of microencapsulated chondrocytes fabricated using electrohydrodynamic spraying. Biofabrication, 10:035011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacb95
Naqvi SM, Vedicherla S, Gansau J, et al., 2016, Living cell factories: Electrosprayed microcapsules and microcarriers for minimally invasive delivery. Adv Mater, 28:5662–5671. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503598
Sinclair A, O’Kelly MB, Bai T, et al., 2018, Self-healing zwitterionic microgels as a versatile platform for malleable cell constructs and injectable therapies. Adv Mater, 30: e1803087. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803087
Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, et al., 2015, Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv, 1:e1500758. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758
Ding A, Jeon O, Cleveland D, et al., 2022, Jammed micro-flake hydrogel for four-dimensional living cell bioprinting. Adv Mater, 34: e2109394. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202109394
Xin S, Wyman OM, Alge DL, 2018, Assembly of PEG microgels into porous cell-instructive 3D scaffolds via thiol-ene click chemistry. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:e1800160. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800160
Riley L, Schirmer L, Segura T, 2019, Granular hydrogels: Emergent properties of jammed hydrogel microparticles and their applications in tissue repair and regeneration. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 60:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2018.11.001
Highley CB, Song KH, Daly AC, et al., 2018, Jammed microgel inks for 3D printing applications. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6:1801076. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801076
Yang J, Zhang YS, Yue K, et al., 2017, Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 57:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036
Griffin DR, Weaver WM, Scumpia P, et al., 2015, Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nat Mater, 14:737–744. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4294
Song K, Ren B, Zhai Y, et al., 2021, Effects of transglutaminase cross-linking process on printability of gelatin microgel-gelatin solution composite bioink. Biofabrication, 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac3d75
Sheikhi A, de Rutte J, Haghniaz R, et al., 2019, Microfluidic-enabled bottom-up hydrogels from annealable naturally-derived protein microbeads. Biomaterials, 192:560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.040
Caldwell AS, Campbell GT, Shekiro KMT, et al., 2017, Clickable microgel scaffolds as platforms for 3D cell encapsulation. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:10.1002/adhm.201700254. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700254
Xin S, Chimene D, Garza JE, et al., 2019, Clickable PEG hydrogel microspheres as building blocks for 3D bioprinting. Biomater Sci, 7:1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm01286e
Li F, Truong VX, Fisch P, et al., 2018, Cartilage tissue formation through assembly of microgels containing mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater, 77:48–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.015
Jiang W, Li M, Chen Z, et al., 2016, Cell-laden microfluidic microgels for tissue regeneration. Lab Chip, 16:4482–4506. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc01193d
Harada A, Kobayashi R, Takashima Y, et al., 2011, Macroscopic self-assembly through molecular recognition. Nat Chem, 3:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.893
Hsu R, Chen P, Fang J, et al., 2019, Adaptable microporous hydrogels of propagating NGF‐gradient by injectable building blocks for accelerated axonal outgrowth. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6:1900520. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900520
Han YL, Yang Y, Liu S, et al., 2013, Directed self-assembly of microscale hydrogels by electrostatic interaction. Biofabrication, 5:035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035004
Li CY, Wood DK, Hsu CM, et al., 2011, DNA-templated assembly of droplet-derived PEG microtissues. Lab Chip, 11:2967–2975. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20318e
Hu Y, Mao AS, Desai RM, et al., 2017, Controlled self-assembly of alginate microgels by rapidly binding molecule pairs. Lab Chip, 17:2481–2490. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc00500h
Matsunaga YT, Morimoto Y, Takeuchi S, 2011, Molding cell beads for rapid construction of macroscopic 3D tissue architecture. Adv Mater, 23:H90–H94. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201004375
Gurkan UA, Tasoglu S, Kavaz D, et al., 2012, Emerging technologies for assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater, 1:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200011
Inamdar NK, Borenstein JT, 2011, Microfluidic cell culture models for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 22:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.05.512
Du Y, Lo E, Ali S, et al., 2008, Directed assembly of cell-laden microgels for fabrication of 3D tissue constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105:9522. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801866105
Zamanian B, Masaeli M, Nichol JW, et al., 2010, Interface-directed self-assembly of cell-laden microgels. Small, 6:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200902326
Fernandez JG, Khademhosseini A, 2010, Micro-masonry: Construction of 3D structures by microscale self-assembly. Adv Mater, 22:2538–2541. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903893
Xu F, Wu CM, Rengarajan V, et al., 2011, Three-dimensional magnetic assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv Mater, 23:4254–4260. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201101962
Tasoglu S, Yu CH, Gungordu HI, et al., 2014, Guided and magnetic self-assembly of tunable magnetoceptive gels. Nat Commun, 5:4702. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5702
Xu F, Finley TD, Turkaydin M, et al., 2011, The assembly of cell-encapsulating microscale hydrogels using acoustic waves. Biomaterials, 32:7847–7855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.010
Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho D-W, et al., 2018, A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication, 11:013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52
Parak A, Pradeep P, du Toit LC, et al., 2019, Functionalizing bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications. Drug Discov Today, 24:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.012
Skardal A, 2018, Perspective: “Universal” bioink technology for advancing extrusion bioprinting-based biomanufacturing. Bioprinting, 10: e00026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00026
Le LV, Mohindra P, Fang Q, et al., 2018, Injectable hyaluronic acid based microrods provide local micromechanical and biochemical cues to attenuate cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction. Biomaterials, 169:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.042
Sideris E, Griffin DR, Ding Y, et al., 2016, Particle hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid building blocks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2:2034–2041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00444
Seymour AJ, Shin S, Heilshorn SC, 2021, 3D printing of microgel scaffolds with tunable void fraction to promote cell infiltration. Adv Healthc Mater, 10:e2100644. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100644
Dumont CM, Carlson MA, Munsell MK, et al., 2019, Aligned hydrogel tubes guide regeneration following spinal cord injury. Acta Biomater, 86:312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.052
Hu Z, Ma C, Rong X, et al., 2018, Immunomodulatory ECM-like microspheres for accelerated bone regeneration in diabetes mellitus. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:2377–2390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18458
Hoare TR, Kohane DS, 2008, Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. Polymer, 49:1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027
Li J, Mooney DJ, 2016, Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater, 1:16071. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
Bi D, Zhang J, Chakraborty B, et al., 2011, Jamming by shear. Nature, 480:355–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10667
Menut P, Seiffert S, Sprakel J, et al., 2012, Does size matter? Elasticity of compressed suspensions of colloidal- and granular-scale microgels. Soft Matter, 8:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SM06355C
Flégeau K, Puiggali-Jou A, Zenobi-Wong M, 2022, Cartilage tissue engineering by extrusion bioprinting utilizing porous hyaluronic acid microgel bioinks. Biofabrication, 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac6b58
Kessel B, Lee M, Bonato A, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinting of macroporous materials based on entangled hydrogel microstrands. Adv Sci (Weinh), 7:2001419. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001419
Zhao D, Liu Y, Liu B, et al., 2021, 3D printing method for tough multifunctional particle-based double-network hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 13:13714–13723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c01413
Caliari SR, Vega SL, Kwon M, et al., 2016, Dimensionality and spreading influence MSC YAP/TAZ signaling in hydrogel environments. Biomaterials, 103:314–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.061
Askari M, Naniz MA, Kouhi M, et al., 2021, Recent progress in extrusion 3D bioprinting of hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration: A comprehensive review with focus on advanced fabrication techniques. Biomater Sci, 9:535–573. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00973C
Mohan TS, Datta P, Nesaei S, et al., 2022, 3D coaxial bioprinting: Process mechanisms, bioinks and applications. Prog Biomed Eng, 4:022003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac631c
Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2016, Design and printing strategies in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: A review. Adv Healthc Mater, 5:2856–2865. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435
Luo Y, Lode A, Gelinsky M, 2013, Direct plotting of three-dimensional hollow fiber scaffolds based on concentrated alginate pastes for tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 2:777–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200303
Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, et al., 2012, Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication, 4:035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005
Ouyang L, Yao R, Chen X, et al., 2015, 3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions. Biofabrication, 7:015010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015010
Feng Q, Gao H, Wen H, et al., 2020, Engineering the cellular mechanical microenvironment to regulate stem cell chondrogenesis: Insights from a microgel model. Acta Biomater, 113:393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.046
Kharkar PM, Kiick KL, Kloxin AM, 2015, Design of thiol-and light-sensitive degradable hydrogels using Michael-type addition reactions. Polym Chem, 6:5565–5574. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY00750J
Madl CM, LeSavage BL, Dewi RE, et al., 2017, Maintenance of neural progenitor cell stemness in 3D hydrogels requires matrix remodelling. Nat Mater, 16:1233–1242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat5020
Webber MJ, Appel EA, Meijer EW, et al., 2016, Supramolecular biomaterials. Nat Mater, 15:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4474
Zhu D, Wang H, Trinh P, et al., 2017, Elastin-like protein-hyaluronic acid (ELP-HA) hydrogels with decoupled mechanical and biochemical cues for cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials, 127:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.010
Morgan FLC, Moroni L, Baker MB, 2020, Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 9:1901798. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901798
Tu Y, Chen N, Li C, et al., 2019, Advances in injectable self-healing biomedical hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 90:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.057
Feng Q, Li D, Li Q, et al., 2022, Assembling microgels via dynamic cross-linking reaction improves printability, microporosity, tissue-adhesion, and self-healing of microgel bioink for extrusion bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 14:15653–15666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c01295
Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M, 2008, Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J Cell Sci, 121:255–264. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.006064
Goor OJGM, Hendrikse SIS, Dankers PYW, et al., 2017, From supramolecular polymers to multi-component biomaterials. Chem Soc Rev, 46:6621–6637. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00564d
Jk M, G O, Vm W, 2014, Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15:771–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3902
Costantini M, Colosi C, Święszkowski W, et al., 2018, Co-axial wet-spinning in 3D bioprinting: State of the art and future perspective of microfluidic integration. Biofabrication, 11:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aae605
Khalil S, Sun W, 2009, Bioprinting endothelial cells with alginate for 3D tissue constructs. J Biomech Eng, 131:111002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3128729
Rajaram A, Schreyer D, Chen D, 2014, Bioplotting alginate/ hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds with structural integrity and preserved schwann cell viability. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 1:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2014.0006
Rocca M, Fragasso A, Liu W, et al., 2018, Embedded multimaterial extrusion bioprinting. SLAS Technol, 23:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630317742071
Cui X, Li J, Hartanto Y, et al., 2020, Advances in extrusion 3D bioprinting: A focus on multicomponent hydrogel-based bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater, 9:e1901648. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901648
Jin Y, Chai W, Huang Y, 2017, Printability study of hydrogel solution extrusion in nanoclay yield-stress bath during printing-then-gelation biofabrication. Mater Sci Eng C, 80:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.144
Compaan AM, Song K, Chai W, et al., 2020, Cross-linkable microgel composite matrix bath for embedded bioprinting of perfusable tissue constructs and sculpting of solid objects. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12:7855–7868. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b15451
Bhattacharjee T, Zehnder SM, Rowe KG, et al., 2015, Writing in the granular gel medium. Sci Adv, 1:e1500655. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500655
Miller JS, Stevens KR, Yang MT, et al., 2012, Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat Mater, 11:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3357
Cho EC, Kim J-W, Fernandez-Nieves A, et al., 2008, Highly responsive hydrogel scaffolds formed by three-dimensional organization of microgel nanoparticles. Nano Lett, 8:168–172. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl072346e
Debord JD, Eustis S, Debord SB, et al., 2002, Color-tunable colloidal crystals from soft hydrogel nanoparticles. Adv Mater, 14:658–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(20020503)14:9<658:: AID-ADMA658>3.0.CO;2-3
Dimitriou CJ, Ewoldt RH, McKinley GH, 2013, Describing and prescribing the constitutive response of yield stress fluids using large amplitude oscillatory shear stress (LAOStress). J Rheol, 57:27–70. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4754023
Zhang YS, Xia Y, 2015, Multiple facets for extracellular matrix mimicking in regenerative medicine. Nanomedicine (Lond), 10:689–692. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.15.10
Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM, 2009, Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater, 8:457–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2441
Rice JJ, Martino MM, De Laporte L, et al., 2013, Engineering the regenerative microenvironment with biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater, 2:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200197
Harre U, Schett G, 2017, Cellular and molecular pathways of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunopathol, 39:355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-017-0634-0
Latourte A, Kloppenburg M, Richette P, 2020, Emerging pharmaceutical therapies for osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 16:673–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-00518-6
Jiang Y, 2022, Osteoarthritis year in review 2021: Biology. Osteoarthr Cartil, 30:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.11.009
Jeon O, Bin Lee Y, Hinton TJ, et al., 2019, Cryopreserved cell-laden alginate microgel bioink for 3D bioprinting of living tissues. Mater Today Chem, 12:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.009
Zhu Y, Sun Y, Rui B, et al., 2022, A photoannealed granular hydrogel facilitating hyaline cartilage regeneration via improving chondrogenic phenotype. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 14:40674–40687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c11956
Chai N, Zhang J, Zhang Q, et al., 2021, Construction of 3D printed constructs based on microfluidic microgel for bone regeneration. Compos Part B Eng, 223:109100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109100
Díaz del Moral S, Barrena S, Muñoz-Chápuli R, et al., 2020, Embryonic circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Angiogenesis, 23:531–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-020-09732-y
Filipowska J, Tomaszewski KA, Niedźwiedzki Ł, et al., 2017, The role of vasculature in bone development, regeneration and proper systemic functioning. Angiogenesis, 20:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-017-9541-1
Latacz E, Caspani E, Barnhill R, et al., 2020, Pathological features of vessel co-option versus sprouting angiogenesis. Angiogenesis, 23:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-019-09690-0
Parthiban SP, Athirasala A, Tahayeri A, et al., 2021, BoneMA-synthesis and characterization of a methacrylated bone-derived hydrogel for bioprinting of in-vitro vascularized tissue constructs. Biofabrication, 13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abb11f
Sousa AMM, Meyer KA, Santpere G, et al., 2017, Evolution of the human nervous system function, structure, and development. Cell, 170:226–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.036
Varadarajan SG, Hunyara JL, Hamilton NR, et al., 2022, Central nervous system regeneration. Cell, 185:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.029
Kajtez J, Wesseler MF, Birtele M, et al., 2022, Embedded 3D printing in self‐healing annealable composites for precise patterning of functionally mature human neural constructs. Adv Sci (Weinh), 9:2201392. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201392
Hsu C-C, George JH, Waller S, et al., 2021, Increased connectivity of hiPSC-derived neural networks in multiphase granular hydrogel scaffolds. Bioact Mater, 9:358–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.008
Yang J, Hsu C-C, Cao T-T, et al., 2023, A hyaluronic acid granular hydrogel nerve guidance conduit promotes regeneration and functional recovery of injured sciatic nerves in rats. Neural Regen Res, 18:657–663. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.350212
Molley TG, Jalandhra GK, Nemec SR, et al., 2021, Heterotypic tumor models through freeform printing into photostabilized granular microgels. Biomater Sci, 9:4496– 4509. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1bm00574j
Zeng Y, Zhu L, Han Q, et al., 2015, Preformed gelatin microcryogels as injectable cell carriers for enhanced skin wound healing. Acta Biomater, 25:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.042
Brodu N, Dijksman JA, Behringer RP, 2015, Spanning the scales of granular materials through microscopic force imaging. Nat Commun, 6:6361. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7361
Roozbahani MM, Borela R, Frost JD, 2017, Pore size distribution in granular material microstructure. Materials (Basel), 10:1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111237
Jones AC, Arns CH, Hutmacher DW, et al., 2009, The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth. Biomaterials, 30:1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.056
Schaller FM, Kapfer SC, Hilton JE, et al., 2015, Non-universal Voronoi cell shapes in amorphous ellipsoid packs. EPL, 111:24002. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/111/24002
Jeon O, Lee YB, Jeong H, et al., 2019, Individual cell-only bioink and photocurable supporting medium for 3D printing and generation of engineered tissues with complex geometries. Mater Horiz, 6:1625–1631. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9mh00375d
Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al., 2014, 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater, 26:3124–3130. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506
Bertassoni LE, Cecconi M, Manoharan V, et al., 2014, Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab Chip, 14:2202–2211. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00030g
Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S, 2019, Osteoarthritis. Lancet, 393:1745–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9
Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ, 2021, The immunology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Immunol, 22:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-00816-x
Armiento AR, Stoddart MJ, Alini M, et al., 2018, Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology. Acta Biomater, 65:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.021
Chijimatsu R, Saito T, 2019, Mechanisms of synovial joint and articular cartilage development. Cell Mol Life Sci, 76(20):3939–3952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03191-5
Hodgkinson T, Kelly DC, Curtin CM, et al., 2022, Mechanosignalling in cartilage: An emerging target for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 18:67–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-021-00724-w
Stenekes RJ, Franssen O, van Bommel EM, et al., 1998, The preparation of dextran microspheres in an all-aqueous system: Effect of the formulation parameters on particle characteristics. Pharm Res, 15:557–561. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011925709873
Xu Q, Hashimoto M, Dang TT, et al., 2009, Preparation of monodisperse biodegradable polymer microparticles using a microfluidic flow-focusing device for controlled drug delivery. Small, 5:1575–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801855
Bardin D, Kendall MR, Dayton PA, et al., 2013, Parallel generation of uniform fine droplets at hundreds of kilohertz in a flow-focusing module. Biomicrofluidics, 7:34112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4811276
Rolland JP, Maynor BW, Euliss LE, et al., 2005, Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape-specific nanobiomaterials. J Am Chem Soc, 127:10096–10100. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja051977c
Pregibon DC, Toner M, Doyle PS, 2007, Multifunctional encoded particles for high-throughput biomolecule analysis. Science, 315:1393–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134929
Pancholi K, Ahras N, Stride E, et al., 2009, Novel electrohydrodynamic preparation of porous chitosan particles for drug delivery. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 20: 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3638-4
Qayyum AS, Jain E, Kolar G, et al., 2017, Design of electrohydrodynamic sprayed polyethylene glycol hydrogel microspheres for cell encapsulation. Biofabrication, 9:025019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa703c