AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 10 / Issue 5 / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.2787
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
68
Download
788
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A preliminary investigation on the effect of ingredient flow speed in extrusion-based printing through experimental and theoretical approaches

Phoebe Xin Ni Leam1* ,  Aakanksha Pant1 ,  Jia An2 ,  Chen Huei Leo2,3 ,  U-Xuan Tan1,2 ,  Chee Kai Chua1,2
Show Less
1 Pillar of Engineering Product Development University of Technology and Design, Singapore
2 Centre for Healthcare Education, Entrepreneurship and Research @ SUTD (CHEERS) University of Technology and Design, Singapore
3 Cluster of Science, Mathematics and Technology University of Technology and Design, Singapore
IJB 2024, 10(5), 2787 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.2787
Submitted: 19 January 2024 | Accepted: 18 April 2024 | Published: 6 August 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Despite the widespread use of Foodini three-dimensional (3D) printers for 3D food printing, there is a lack of analysis regarding the effect of the ingredient flow speed in current food printing research. In this study, we utilized experimental and theoretical approaches to investigate the effect of printing parameters in the 3D extrusion process. In particular, the dot extrusion (no slicing required) and model extrusion (inclusive of text, shapes, 3D models, and clip art that require slicing) modes of operation were studied. In dot extrusion, the experimental results suggest that the amount of food material extruded over a fixed time is constant and independent of the internal nozzle geometry. However, this only applies to food materials ≥20 mL, and there is a lack of control over the extrusion rate for the dot extrusion mode. Moreover, varying the ingredient flow speed did not change the extrusion time. In model extrusion, the resolution of the print was only affected by the ingredient flow speed, and varying the printing speed did not affect the print resolution. A mathematical model was introduced to understand the complex relationship between the printing process parameters and the extrusion resolution. The model is unique as it accounts for the material properties of the food ink and the printer-specific controls (i.e., ingredient flow speed). In this research, the experimental and theoretical approaches were considered independent investigations and provided complementary insights, unlike the conventional prediction–validation relationship. Therefore, the findings of this study can be used as an alternative framework to understand future food printers. Overall, the preliminary findings underscore the complexity introduced by a novel printer process parameter, namely ingredient flow speed. The study offers valuable insights into Foodini-based extrusion printing and serves as a foundational guide for further exploration in this evolving field.

Keywords
3D food printing
Mathematical model
Extrusion-based printers
Shear-thinning materials
Funding
The authors would like to thank SUTD Kickstarter Initiative SKI_2021_02_05 for the funding support
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Joshi SC, Sheikh AA. 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2015;10(4): 175-185. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2015.1111519
  2. Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H, et al. Development of 3D bioprinting: from printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15(5):529-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.003
  3. Lee J-Y, An J, Chua CK. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today. 2017;7:120-133. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004
  4. Lee AY, An J, Chua CK. Two-way 4D printing: a review on the reversibility of 3D-printed shape memory materials. Engineering 2017;3(5):663-674. doi: 10.1016/j.Eng.2017.05.014
  5. Thangalakshmi S, Arora VK. Three-dimensional (3D) food printing and its process parameters. In: Sandhu K, Singh S, (eds) Food Printing: 3D Printing in Food Industry. Singapore: Springer; 2022:35-45. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-8121-9_3
  6. Pant A, Lee AY, Karyappa R, et al. 3D food printing of fresh vegetables using food hydrocolloids for dysphagic patients. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;114:106546-106546. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2020.106546
  7. Tejada-Ortigoza V, Cuan-Urquizo E. Towards the development of 3D-printed food: a rheological and mechanical approach. Foods. 2022;11(9):1191.
  8. Severini C, Azzollini D, Albenzio M, et al. On printability, quality and nutritional properties of 3D printed cereal based snacks enriched with edible insects. Food Res Int. 2018;106:666-676. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.034
  9. Liu Z, Bhandari B, Prakash S, et al. Creation of internal structure of mashed potato construct by 3D printing and its textural properties. Food Res Int. 2018;111:534-543. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.075
  10. Guénard-Lampron V, Masson M, Leichtnam O, et al. Impact of 3D printing and post-processing parameters on shape, texture and microstructure of carrot appetizer cake. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2021;72:102738. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102738
  11. Lee CP, Karyappa R, Hashimoto M. 3D printing of milk-based product. RSC Adv. 2020;10(50):29821-29828. doi: 10.1039/d0ra05035k
  12. Zhang L, Lou Y, Schutyser MAI. 3D printing of cereal-based food structures containing probiotics. Food Struct. 2018;18:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.foostr.2018.10.002
  13. Leroy JL, Ruel M, Frongillo EA, et al. Measuring the food access dimension of food security: a critical review and mapping of indicators. Food Nutr Bull. 2015;36(2):167-195. doi: 10.1177/0379572115587274
  14. Pant A, Leam PXN, Chua CK, et al. Valorisation of vegetable food waste utilising three-dimensional food printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2022;18(1). doi: 10.1080/17452759.2022.2146593
  15. Lee CP, Takahashi M, Arai S, et al. 3D printing of Okara Ink: the effect of particle size on the printability. ACS Food Sci Technol. 2021;1(11):2053-2061. doi: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00236
  16. Hussain S, Malakar S, Arora VK. Extrusion-based 3D food printing: technological approaches, material characteristics, printing stability, and post-processing. Food Eng Rev. 2022;14(1):100-119. doi: 10.1007/s12393-021-09293-w
  17. Voon SL, An J, Wong G, et al. 3D food printing: a categorised review of inks and their development. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2019;14(3):203-218. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2019.1603508
  18. Chen X, Zhang M, Tang T. Microwave-induced rapid shape change of 4D printed vegetable-based food. Foods. 2023;12(11):2158. doi: 10.3390/foods12112158
  19. Dick A, Bhandari B, Dong X, et al. Feasibility study of hydrocolloid incorporated 3D printed pork as dysphagia food. Food Hydrocoll. 2020;107:105940. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105940
  20. Lipton J, Arnold D, Nigl F, et al. Multi-material Food Printing with Complex Internal Structure Suitable for Conventional Post-processing. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin; 2010.
  21. Zhang Y, Lee AY, Pojchanun K, et al. Systematic engineering approach for optimization of multi-component alternative protein-fortified 3D printing food Ink. Food Hydrocoll. 2022;131:107803. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107803
  22. Liang Y, Chitrakar B, Liu Z, et al. Preparation and characterization of 3D-printed antibacterial hydrogel with benzyl isothiocyanate. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):671. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.671
  23. Suntornnond R, Tan EYS, An J, et al. A mathematical model on the resolution of extrusion bioprinting for the development of new bioinks. Materials. 2016;9(9):756. doi: 10.3390/ma9090756
  24. Lee JM, Yeong WY. A preliminary model of time-pressure dispensing system for bioprinting based on printing and material parameters. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2014; 10(1):3-8. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2014.979557
  25. Patel P, Mujmer K, Aswal VK, et al. Structure, rheology, and 3D printing of salt-induced κ-carrageenan gels. Mater Today Commun. 2023;35: 105807. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105807
  26. Maldonado-Rosas R, Pérez-Castillo JL, Cuan-Urquizo E, et al. The role of controlled voids shape on the flexural properties of 3D printed food: an approach for tailoring their mechanical properties. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024; 19(1). doi: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2284816
  27. Lee AY, Pant A, Hashimoto M, et al. 3D food printing – Asian snacks and desserts. Mater Today Proc. 2022; 70:611-615.
  28. Ahmadzadeh S, Clary T, Rosales A, et al. Upcycling imperfect broccoli and carrots into healthy snacks using an innovative 3D food printing approach. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;12(1):84-93. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3820
  29. Chow CY, Thybo CD, Sager VF, et al. Printability, stability and sensory properties of protein-enriched 3D-printed lemon mousse for personalised in-between meals. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;120:106943. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106943
  30. Gudjónsdóttir M, Napitupulu RJ, Petty Kristinsson HT. Low field NMR for quality monitoring of 3D printed surimi from cod by‐products: effects of the pH shift method compared with conventional washing. Magn Reson Chem. 2019;57(9):638-648. doi: 10.1002/mrc.4855
  31. Hamilton AN, Gibson KE. Transfer rates of Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and a human norovirus surrogate impacted by macronutrient composition of food inks in 3D food printing systems. Food Microbiol. 2023;113:104268. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104268
  32. Mirazimi F, Saldo J, Sepulcre F, et al. Enriched puree potato with soy protein for dysphagia patients by using 3D printing. Food Front. 2022;3(4):706-715. doi: 10.1002/fft2.149
  33. Tay JU, Zhou C, Lee HW, et al. 3D printing of salmon fillet mimic: imparting printability via high-pressure homogenization and post-printing texturization via transglutaminase. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;140: 108564. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108564
  34. Tan JD, Lee CP, Foo SY, et al. 3D printability and biochemical analysis of revalorized orange peel waste. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(5):776. doi: 10.18063/ijb.776
  35. Tian J, Chen J, Ye X, et al. Health benefits of the potato affected by domestic cooking: a review. Food Chem. 2016;202:165-175. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.120
  36. Beals KA. Potatoes, nutrition and health. Am J Potato Res. 2019;96(2):102-110. doi: 10.1007/s12230-018-09705-4
  37. Zhang Z, Zheng B, Tang Y, et al. Starch concentration is an important factor for controlling its digestibility during hot-extrusion 3D printing. Food Chem. 2022; 379:132180. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132180
  38. Liu Z, Zhang M, Yang C-h. Dual extrusion 3D printing of mashed potatoes/strawberry juice gel. Lwt. 2018;96:589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.014
  39. Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B, et al. Impact of rheological properties of mashed potatoes on 3D printing. J Food Eng. 2018;220:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.017
  40. Cui Y, Li C, Guo Y, et al. Rheological & 3D printing properties of potato starch composite gels. J Food Eng. 2022;313(1):110756. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110756
  41. Wu H, Sang S, Weng P, et al. Structural, rheological, and gelling characteristics of starch-based materials in context to 3D food printing applications in precision nutrition. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023;22(6):4217-4241. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13217
  42. Liu Y, Dong L, Li Y, et al. Soy protein isolate-citrus pectin composite hydrogels induced by TGase and ultrasonic treatment: potential targeted delivery system for probiotics. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;143(11): 108901. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108901
  43. Ma Y, Schutyser MAI, Boom RM, et al. Predicting the extrudability of complex food materials during 3D printing based on image analysis and gray-box data-driven modelling. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2021;73:102764. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102764
  44. Liu Z, Bhandari B, Prakash S, et al. Linking rheology and printability of a multicomponent gel system of carrageenan-xanthan-starch in extrusion based additive manufacturing. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;87:413-424. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.026
  45. Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B. Effect of gums on the rheological, microstructural and extrusion printing characteristics of mashed potatoes. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;117:1179-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.048
  46. Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B, et al. 3D printing: printing precision and application in food sector. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2017;69:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018
  47. Sun Y, Zhang M, Chen H. LF-NMR intelligent evaluation of rheology and printability for 3D printing of cookie dough pretreated by microwave. Lwt. 2020;132: 109752. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109752
  48. Tagliavini G, Solari F, Montanari R. CFD simulation of a co-rotating twin-screw extruder: validation of a rheological model for a starch-based dough for snack food. Int J Food Eng. 2017;14(2):20170116.
  49. Liu Z, Zhang M, Ye Y. Indirect prediction of 3D printability of mashed potatoes based on LF-NMR measurements. J Food Eng. 2020;287: 110137. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110137
  50. Huang M-s, Zhang M, Guo C-f. 3D printability of brown rice gel modified by some food hydrocolloids. J Food Process Preserv. 2020;44(7):e14502. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.14502
  51. Teng X, Zhang M, Bhandri B. 3D printing of Cordyceps flower powder. J Food Process Eng. 2019;42(6):e13179. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.13179
  52. Liu Y, Liang X, Saeed A, et al. Properties of 3D printed dough and optimization of printing parameters. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2019;54:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.03.008

 

 



Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept