AccScience Publishing / DP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/dp.4491
Submit to DP
Cite this article
6
Download
251
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Rating the importance of material selection and sustainability criteria in building material selection

Serkan Yildiz1*
Show Less
1 Department of Real Estate and Development, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
DP 2025, 2(1), 4491 https://doi.org/10.36922/dp.4491
Submitted: 10 August 2024 | Revised: 15 January 2025 | Accepted: 23 January 2025 | Published: 17 February 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Material selection is one of the most critical steps in constructing a building that is safe, economical, esthetically pleasing, durable, and functional, and ensuring building sustainability has become an indispensable task nowadays. Multiple options are available for people interested in owning their own residential property: (1) Purchasing finished houses; (2) building their own houses, which entails selection and purchase of building materials; and (3) purchasing unfinished houses and carrying out large-scale renovations. In this study, a survey with 141 participants was conducted to identify the extent of importance our respondents attach to 11 material selection criteria and seven sustainability criteria for building material selection. The survey data were subjected to descriptive and inferential analyses, which revealed no significant difference in the participants’ opinions according to their demographic characteristics. Thus, the results were generalized by determining the relative importance of the criteria. Durability and availability of materials and availability of skilled labor force were identified as the most important material selection criteria. Durability, ease of maintenance, and energy efficiency were determined as the most important sustainability criteria. Although cost is viewed as one of the obstacles to sustainable building construction, more than half of the participants stated that they could bear an additional cost ranging from 5% to 15% for sustainable materials. By comprehensively depicting the perspective of non-professionals, the results of this study provide a crucial reference for the stakeholders of the construction industry.

Keywords
Building material
Inferential analysis
Relative importance
Sustainability
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Mehmood Z, Haneef I, Udrea F. Material selection for micro-electro-mechanical-systems (MEMS) using Ashby’s approach. Mater Des. 2018;157:412-430. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.058

 

  1. Ashby MF. Engineering materials and their properties. In: Ashby MF, editor. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2011. p. 31-56.

 

  1. Findik F. Materials selection and case studies. Period Eng Natl Sci. 2021;9(2):375-388. doi: 10.21533/pen.v9i2.1777

 

  1. WCED. Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations: World Commission on Environment and Development; 1987.

 

  1. Ilha MSO, Oliveira LR, Goncalves OM. Environmental assessment of residential buildings with an emphasis on water conservation. J Build Serv Eng Res Technol. 2009;30:15-26. doi: 10.1177/0143624408098274

 

  1. Al-Numan BSO. Construction industry role in natural resources depletion and how to reduce It. In: Natural Resources Deterioration in MENA Region: Land Degradation, Soil Erosion, and Desertification. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 93-109. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58315-5_6

 

  1. European Commission. Directorate-General for Energy and Transport. 2020 Vision: Saving Our Energy. Luxembourg: Office for official Publications of the European Communities; 2023.

 

  1. Tawalbeh LA, Delgado J, Solis S, Juarez T, Tietjen JD, Muheidat F. Energy consumption and carbon emissions data analysis: Case study and future predictions. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;220:616-623. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.03.078

 

  1. Akadiri PO, Fadiya OO. Empirical analysis of the determinants of environmentally sustainable practices in the UK construction industry. Constr Innov. 2013;13(4):352-373. doi: 10.1108/CI-05-2012-0025

 

  1. Harputlugil T, De Wilde P. The interaction between humans and buildings for energy efficiency: A critical review. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021;71:101828. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101828

 

  1. Zhang W, Wu Y, Calautit JK. A review on occupancy prediction through machine learning for enhancing energy efficiency, air quality and thermal comfort in the built environment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;167:112704. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112704

 

  1. Sahlol DG, Elbeltagi E, Elzoughiby M, Abd Elrahman M. Sustainable building materials assessment and selection using system dynamics. J Build Eng. 2021;35:101978. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101978

 

  1. Nassar KW, Thabet Y, Beliveau Y. A procedure for multi-criteria selection of building assemblies. Autom Constr. 2003;12(5):543-560. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00007-4

 

  1. Treloar GJ, Fay R, Ilozor BD, Love PED. Building materials selection: Greenhouse strategies for built facilities. Facilities. 2001;19(3/4):139-149. doi: 10.1108/02632770110381694

 

  1. Alibaba HZ, Özdeniz MB. A building elements selection system for architects. Build Environ. 2004;39(3):307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.010

 

  1. Wang W, Zmeureanu R, Rivard H. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Build Environ. 2005;40(11):1512-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017

 

  1. Al Jaber A, Martinez-Vazquez P, Baniotopoulos C. Barriers and enablers to the adoption of circular economy concept in the building sector: A systematic literature review. Buildings. 2023;13(11):2778. doi: 10.3390/buildings13112778

 

  1. Ramalhete PS, Senos AM, Aguiar C. Digital tools for material selection in product design. Mater Design. 2010;31(5):2275-2287. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.013

 

  1. Gonzalez MJ, Navarro JG. Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build Environ. 2006;41(17):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.006

 

  1. Godfaurd J, Clements-Croome D, Jeronimidis G. Sustainable building solutions: A review of lessons from the natural world. Build Environ. 2005;40:319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.05.011A

 

  1. Kibert CJ. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2008.

 

  1. Designing Buildings; 2021. Available from: https://www. designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/durability [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 15].

 

  1. Cabral MR, Blanchet P. Prioritizing indicators for material selection in prefabricated wooden construction. Buildings. 2023;14(1):63. doi: 10.3390/buildings14010063

 

  1. Patel KV, Vyas CM. Construction Materials Management on Project Sites. In: National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology; 2011. p. 1-5.

 

  1. Pitkänen A. The role of Material Management in Construction Projects: Investigating Material Inventories and Material Waste. Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT Master’s Programme in Supply Management, Master’s Thesis; 2024.

 

  1. Gudienė N, Banaitis A, Banaitienė N, Lopes J. Development of a conceptual critical success factors model for construction projects: A case of Lithuania. Procedia Eng. 2013;57:392-397. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.051

 

  1. Alawag AM, Alaloul WS, Liew MS, et al. Critical success factors influencing total quality management in industrialised building system: A case of Malaysian construction industry. Ain Shams Eng J. 2023;14(2):101877. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101877

 

  1. Akomah BB, Ahinaquah LK, Mustapha Z. Skilled labour shortage in the building construction industry within the central region. Balt J Real Estate Econ Construct Manage. 2020;8(1):83-92. doi: 10.2478/bjreecm-2020-0006

 

  1. Mathiyazhagan K, Gnanavelbabu A, Lokesh Prabhuraj B. A sustainable assessment model for material selection in construction industries perspective using hybrid MCDM approaches. J Adv Manage Res. 2019;16(2):234-259. doi: 10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0085

 

  1. Chen ZS, Yang LL, Chin KS, et al. Sustainable building material selection: An integrated multi-criteria large group decision making framework. Appl Soft Comput. 2021;113:107903. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107903

 

  1. Aydin YC, Mirzaei PA, Akhavannasab S. On the relationship between building energy efficiency, aesthetic features and marketability: Toward a novel policy for energy demand reduction. Energy Policy. 2019;128:593-606. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.036

 

  1. Rockfon. Moving Buildings; 2022. Available from: https:// www.rockfon.co.uk/about-us/our-thinking/urbanization/ aesthetics

 

  1. Besten. Role of Aesthetics in Architecture-Best Architects Share their Thoughts!; 2020. Available from: https:// besten.in(2020/01)role-of-aesthetics-in-architecture-best-architects [Last accessed on 2024 May 10].

 

  1. Mohanta A, Das S. Decision support system for the early stage of green building envelope design considering energy and maintainability. Archit Eng Design Manage. 2023;19(2):163-182. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2022.2094869

 

  1. Zhu L, Shan M, Hwang BG. Overview of design for maintainability in building and construction research. J Perform Constructed Facil. 2018;32(1):04017116. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.00011

 

  1. Haq RSU, Saeed M, Mateen N, et al. Sustainable material selection with crisp and ambiguous data using single-valued neutrosophic-MEREC-MARCOS framework. Appl Soft Comput. 2022;128:109546. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109546

 

  1. Celentano G, Escamilla EZ, Göswein V, Habert G. A matter of speed: The impact of material choice in post-disaster reconstruction. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2019;34:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.026

 

  1. Dinh TH, Dinh TH, Götze U. Roadworks design: Study on selection of construction materials in the preliminary design phase based on economic performance. Int J Construc Manage. 2024;24(5):503-511. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2179603

 

  1. Yıldız S, Güneş GS, Alim B. Criteria in building material selection and the role of sustainability. Kent Akademisi. 2024;17:334-354. doi: 10.35674/kent.1448627

 

  1. Jaffar H, Javed N, Riaz A, et al. Critical analysis of smart materials in adaptive transparent systems for building façade. Energy Environ. 2024 ;1-31. doi: 10.1177/0958305X241300428

 

  1. Carp B. Is durability sustainable? AATCC Rev. 2020;20(1):36-43. doi: 10.14504/ar.20.1.1

 

  1. Yang J. Study on the Durability of Construction Materials and Structures; 2023. Available from: from https://www.mdpi. com/journal/buildings/special_issues

 

  1. Takano M, Hughes M, Winter SA. Multidisciplinary approach to sustainable building material selection: A case study in a finnish context. Build Environ. 2014;82:526-535. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.026

 

  1. Hong T, Koo C, Kim J, Lee M, Jeong K. A review on sustainable construction management strategies for monitoring, diagnosing, and retrofitting the building’s dynamic energy performance: Focused on the operation and maintenance phase. Appl Energy. 2015;155:671-707. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.043

 

  1. Arch20. 25 Cost-Effective Materials Wonders; 2024. Available from: https://www.arch2o.com/25-cost-effective-materials-wonders-pioneering-the-construction

 

  1. Abera YA. Sustainable building materials: A comprehensive study on eco-friendly alternatives for construction. Compos Adv Mater. 2024;33:26349833241255957. doi: 10.1177/26349833241255957

 

  1. Lin C. The role of sustainable building materials in advancing ecological construction. J Energy Environ Policy Options. 2021;4(1):15-21.

 

  1. Cudjoe D, Zhu B, Nketiah E, Wang H, Chen W, Qianqian Y. The potential energy and environmental benefits of global recyclable resources. Sci Total Environ. 2021;798:149258. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149258

 

  1. Champ H. The Power of Using Locally Sourced Sustainable Building Materials. Bluebeam Blog; 2024. Available from: https://blog.bluebeam.com/uk/the-power-of-using-locally-sustainable-building-materials

 

  1. Ibuchim O, Yang YJ, Brian J. Design Toolkit for Green Vernacular Buildings”, 1st International Graduate Research Symposium on the Built Environment. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University; 2010.

 

  1. IBM SPSS Statistics_29.0; 2022. Available from: https:// www.ibm.com

 

  1. Mann PS. Introductory Statistics. New York: Wiley; 1995.

 

  1. George D, Mallery P. Reliability analysis. In: IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. England, UK: Routledge; 2018. p. 249-260.

 

  1. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951;16(3):297-334.

 

  1. Helmstater G. Principles of Psychological Measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1964.

 

  1. Bowling A, Shah E. Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. United States: McGraw-Hill Education; 2005.

 

  1. Lutsenko T, Pospelov B, Andronov V, et al. Dynamics of skewness and kurtosis of dangerous environmental parameters in the event of fire. East Eur J Enterprise Technol. 2023;5:53-62. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2023.288938

 

  1. Mayers A. Introduction to Statistics and SPSS in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2013.

 

  1. Zhang Y, Wang S, Ke X, Ye H. A new Kolmogorov-Smirnov test based on representative points in the exponential distribution family. J Stat Comput Simul. 2024;94(15):3391-3408. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2024.2385687

 

  1. Massey FJ Jr. The kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Sci Stat Assoc. 1951;46:68-78.

 

  1. Dodge Y. The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

 

  1. Chirarattananon S, Taveekun J. An OTTV-based energy estimation model for commercial buildings in Thailand. Energy Build. 2004;36(7):680-689. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.035

 

  1. Sartori I, Hestnes AG. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy Build. 2007;39:249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001

 

  1. Mohammed TI, Greenough R, Taylor S, Meida LO, Acquaye A. Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings: A review of current trends. Energy Build. 2013;66:232-245. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.026

 

  1. Huo T, Ren H, Zhang X, et al. China’s energy consumption in the building sector: A statistical yearbook-energy balance sheet based splitting method. J Clean Prod. 2018;185:665-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.283

 

  1. Kömürlü R, Ceceloğlu D. Barrirers and their proposed solutions for project management in green building production. Artium. 2021;9(2):98-104. doi: 10.51664/artium.859757

 

 

Share
Back to top
Design+, Electronic ISSN: 3060-8953 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept