AccScience Publishing / AIH / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AIH026170039
Cite this article
2
Download
52
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reducing cognitive load in polypharmacy: A prototype clinical decision support system

Insiya Fatma1 Mary A. Dolansky2 Evelyn G. Duffy2 Colin K. Drummond1*
Show Less
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
2 Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
Received: 23 April 2026 | Revised: 29 May 2026 | Accepted: 12 June 2026 | Published online: 23 June 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications, presents a significant health risk for older adults, particularly when managing complex “as-needed” (PRN) regimens. While healthcare providers establish treatment plans, the operational complexity of managing daily regimens often exceeds the support structures available to the patient, increasing the risk of unintended medication errors. This paper describes the development of a prototype clinical decision support tool designed to enable exploration of automated systems with the potential to reduce this cognitive load by integrating natural language processing with dynamic prescription transcription. The prototype utilizes a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture, merging targeted information retrieval from a clinical knowledge base with the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). This allows the system to interpret natural language queries and provide contextually relevant safety data. At this stage of development, the prototype does not test cognitive load explicitly, rather provides preliminary technical feasibility through retrieval performance, guardrail behavior, and prototype feasibility. Preliminary results are encouraging; the prototype effectively processed complex inquiries regarding NSAID usage, accurately identifying drug-drug interactions (e.g., with lithium) and flagging gastrointestinal risks. Furthermore, the system demonstrated essential safety guardrails by identifying its own data limitations and directing users to professional consultation, but the system has not been clinically validated for such use. These initial findings suggest that RAG-based prototypes offer a feasible pathway toward reducing the cognitive demands of polypharmacy, providing a foundation for future systems that integrate patient-specific health data to further minimize clinical ambiguity.

Keywords
Polypharmacy
Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Medication adherence
Large Language Models
Clinical decision support systems
Geriatric health informatics
Funding
Research reported in this publication was internally funded by Case Western Reserve University Department of Biomedical Engineering.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Scarlett W, Young S. Medical Noncompliance: The Most Ignored National Epidemic. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116:554-555. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.111
  2. Mansoor M, Kumari M, Manalai P. Treatment Nonadherence: An Epidemic Hidden in Plain Sight. Psychiatric Times. 2020;37(Issue No. 3). Accessed June 8, 2026. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/treatment-nonadherence-epidemic-hidden-plain-sight
  3. Punnapurath S, Vijayakumar P, Platty PL, Krishna S, Thomas T. A study of medication compliance in geriatric patients with chronic illness. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(4):1644-1648. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1302_20
  4. Pruitt SD, Khan R, Chaiyakunapruk N, et al. The silent epidemic of non-adherence – insights from the 2024 a:care congress. BMC Proc. 2025;19(S10):13. doi: 10.1186/s12919-025-00326-4
  5. Kleinsinger F. The Unmet Challenge of Medication Nonadherence. Permanente Journal. 2018;22:18-033. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-033
  6. Watanabe JH, McInnis T, Hirsch JD. Cost of Prescription Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52(9):829-837. doi: 10.1177/1060028018765159
  7. Dusetzina SB, Besaw RJ, Whitmore CC, et al. Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Desire for Medication Cost Information Among Adults Aged 65 Years and Older in the US in 2022. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2314211. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14211
  8. Roy S. 35+ Latest Patient Adherence Statistics for 2025. Dialog Health. February 17, 2025. Accessed May 20, 2026. Available from: https://www.dialoghealth.com/post/patient-adherence-statistics
  9. Ruiz-Ramos J, Plaza-Diaz A, Roure-i-Nuez C, et al. Drug-Related Problems in Elderly Patients Attended to by Emergency Services. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010003
  10. BCC Research. Medication Adherence: Systems, Technologies and Global Markets. 2021. Accessed January 11, 2026. https://academic-bccresearch-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/ market-research/pharmaceuticals/medication-adherence-systems-technologies-and-global-markets.html
  11. Steinman M. Polypharmacy: time to get beyond numbers. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):482-483. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8597
  12. Quinn K, Shah N. A dataset quantifying polypharmacy in the United States. Sci Data. 2017;4, 170167. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.167
  13. Mardani A, Paal P, Weck C, Jamshed S, Vaismoradi M. Practical Considerations of PRN Medicines Management: An Integrative Systematic Review. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:759998. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.759998
  14. Coughlin SS, Vernon M, Hatzigeorgiou C, George V. Health Literacy, Social Determinants of Health, and Disease Prevention and Control. J Environ Health Sci. 2020;6(1):3061.
  15. Tija J, Ellington L, Clayton M. Managing Medications During Home Hospice Cancer Care: The Needs of Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;50(5):630-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.005
  16. Makowka J, Lau T. AARP Caregivers and Technology: What they need and what they want.”. AARP Project Catalyst, Apr. Published online 2018. Accessed June 8, 2026. https://imph.org/wp-content/uploads/Caregivers-and-Technology- AARP-2016.pdf
  17. Chi NC, Demirir G, Pike KC, Washington K, Oliver DP. Pain Management Concerns From the Hospice Family Caregivers’ Perspective. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;35(4):601-611. doi: 10.1177/1049909117729477
  18. Borkowski AA, Ben-Ari A. Multiagent AI Systems in Health Care: Envisioning Next-Generation Intelligence. Fed Pract. 2025;42(5):188-194. doi: 10.12788/fp.0589
  19. Colbert J. Modernizing Chronic Care Management with Artificial Intelligence. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.commure.com/blog/modernizing-chronic-care-management-with-artificial-intelligence
  20. Xu G, Li X, Chen Y, et al. A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare. J Biomed Inform. 2026;179:105045. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2026.105045
  21. Milanti A, Norman C, Chan DNS, So WKW, Skinner H. eHealth Literacy 3.0: Updating the Norman and Skinner 2006 Model. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e70112. doi: 10.2196/70112
  22. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e506. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9
  23. Abernethy A, Afsar N, Anderson B, Barfield W, Bharel M, Brown J, et al. Toward a National Health Digital and Data Architecture: Laying the Foundation for Digital Transformation. NAM Perspectives. 2026;3. doi: 10.31478/202603b
  24. Méndez A, Aguirre M, Del Pozo A, García-Navarro T, Torralbo M, Carreño J. From Conversation to Clinical Decision Supported Assistance: A Secure, Personalized Platform for Elder Care: In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications; 2026:146-157. doi: 10.5220/0014249500004070
  25. Vamadevan A, Vijayan V, Cole C, Jayasudha K, Yusuf N, Walker LE. A NASSS framework-guided systematic review and exploratory modelling of digital health interventions for polypharmacy management in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2025;25:1032. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06602-4
  26. Fitzpatrick PJ. Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners. Front Digit Health. 2023;5:1264780. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1264780
  27. Chambers C. The potential of placing a digital assistant in patients’ homes. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(690):8-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X707273
  28. Langston EM, Hattakitjamroen V, Hernandez M, et al. Exploring artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistants to understand their potential to support older adults’ search needs. Hum Factors Healthcare. 2025;7:100092. doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2025.100092
  29. Bailoni T, Dragoni M. A Review on Trustworthiness of Digital Assistants for Personal Healthcare. ACM Comput Surv. 2025;57(7):164:1-164:34. doi: 10.1145/3714999
  30. Barsky A. Suing Therapeutic AI Systems for Malpractice. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ us/blog/agens-scientiam/202602/suing-therapeutic-ai-systems-for-malpractice
  31. Everett J, Jagoda J, Pike J, Pullen S, Sullivan, Sean. Your AI Therapist May Need a Lawyer: Pennsylvania Brings Suit Against Chatbot Developer. JDSupra. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/your-ai-therapist-may-need-a-lawyer-3525513/
  32. Johnson C. Ethical considerations regarding AI use in healthcare: How much is too much? The DO. August 29, 2025. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://thedo.osteopathic. org/columns/ethical-considerations-regarding-ai-use-in-healthcare-how-much-is-too-much/
  33. Weiner EB, Dankwa-Mullan I, Nelson WA, Hassanpour S. Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice. PLoS Digit Health. 2025;4(4):e0000810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000810
  34. Adeyemi AH, Wiredu B, Okobi OE, Nebuwa P, Ezeani EI, Alozie AS. Challenges and Strategies in Medication Management for Patients with Multiple Comorbidities. Cureus. 17(6):e85992. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85992
  35. Abo El-Enen M, Saad S, Nazmy T. A survey on retrieval-augmentation generation (RAG) models for healthcare applications. Neural Comput & Applic. 2025;37(33):28191-28267. doi: 10.1007/s00521-025-11666-9
  36. Neha F, Bhati D, Shukla DK. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review. AI. 2025;6(9):226. doi: 10.3390/ai6090226
  37. Wang S, Yang H, Liu W. Research on the construction and application of retrieval enhanced generation (RAG) model based on knowledge graph. Sci Rep. 2025;15:40425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-21222-z
  38. Zhou J, Jiang J, Han Z, Wang Z, Gao X. Streamline automated biomedical discoveries with agentic bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform. 2025;26(5):bbaf505. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf505
  39. Chen X, Lu G, Zhang H, Wan J. Knowledge graph-enhanced deep learning for pharmaceutical demand forecasting. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):4776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35113-4
  40. Chen J, Deng Q, Zhen P, et al. Knowledge-graph-enhanced multi-scale modeling for drug-drug interaction prediction. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2026;37(1):102855. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102855
  41. As’ad M, Faran N, Joharji H. AI-Supported Shared Decision- Making (AI-SDM): Conceptual Framework. JMIR AI. 2025;4(1):e75866. doi: 10.2196/75866
  42. Brown A, Roman M, Devereux B. A Systematic Literature Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Techniques, Metrics, and Challenges. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2025;9(12):320. doi: 10.3390/bdcc9120320
  43. USP. USP Drug Classification. Accessed April 21, 2026. https://www.usp.org/health-quality-safety/usp-drug-classification-system
  44. Zitnik M, Agrawal M, Leskovec J. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(13):i457-i466. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294
  45. Leskovec J, Sosič R. SNAP: A General-Purpose Network Analysis and Graph-Mining Library. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2017;8(1):1-20. doi: 10.1145/2898361
  46. FDA. Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS). March 11, 2026. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/ surveillance/fda-adverse-event-monitoring-system-aems
  47. National Library of Medicine. DRUGBANK Source Information. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.nlm.nih. gov/research/umls/rxnorm/sourcereleasedocs/drugbank.html
  48. Kuhn M, von Mering C, Campillos M, Jensen LJ, Bork P. STITCH: interaction networks of chemicals and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D684-D688. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm795
  49. Li S, Yang R, Liu X, Li X. Risk factors for comorbid hypertension and depression in the elderly: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study. Medicine. 2025;104(33):e44004. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044004
  50. Drugs.com. Drug Interaction Report: irbesartan, mirtazapine. Accessed May 28, 2026. https://www.drugs.com/drug-interactions/irbesar tan-with-mirtazapine-1383-0-1640-0.html
  51. Hermann M, Carstens N, Kvinge L, et al. Polypharmacy and Potential Drug–Drug Interactions in Home-Dwelling Older People – A Cross-Sectional Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:589-597. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S297423
  52. Gottlieb S. Cardioprotective effects of aspirin compromised by other NSAIDs. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.520
  53. Barkin RL. Acetaminophen, aspirin, or Ibuprofen in combination analgesic products. Am J Ther. 2001;8(6):433- 442. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200111000-00008

54. Drugs.com. Drug Interaction Report: linezolid, sevoflurane. Accessed May 28, 2026. https://www.drugs.com/ interactions-check.php?drug_list=1472-0,2059-0

Share
Back to top
Artificial Intelligence in Health, Electronic ISSN: 3029-2387 Print ISSN: 3041-0894, Published by AccScience Publishing