AccScience Publishing / AIH / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/aih.2592
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Applying ChatGPT to writing scientific articles on the use of telemedicine: Opportunities and limitations

Daniil Kolesnikov1* Alexandra Kozlova1 Andrey Aleхandrov1 Nikolai Kalmykov1 Pavel Treshkov1 Tyler W. LeBaron2,3 Oleg Medvedev4,5
Show Less
1 Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia
2 Department of Kinesiology and Outdoor Recreation, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah, United States of America
3 Molecular Hydrogen Institute, Cedar City, Utah, United States of America
4 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Basic Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
5 Laboratory of Experimental Pharmacology, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
AIH 2024, 1(3), 53–63; https://doi.org/10.36922/aih.2592
Submitted: 31 December 2023 | Accepted: 22 April 2024 | Published: 22 July 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

In the rapidly evolving world of technology, artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly integrated into various aspects of our lives, including health-care, education, finance, transportation, and entertainment. Notably, AI has also impacted the writing of textual works such as scientific papers, professional opinions, and educational texts. This study investigates the application of OpenAI’s ChatGPT language model in writing scientific articles on telemedicine, specifically in the areas of cardiology, oncology, and remote medical examination. The study uses ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 to create articles using three different prompts. The created articles were evaluated based on the reliability of the cited literature references, the impact factor (IF) of the journal in which the sources were published, and the relevance of the sources. The sources were divided into three categories: reliable, semi-reliable, and completely fictitious. The results demonstrate that ChatGPT can produce semantically coherent and error-free texts indistinguishable from human-written texts. However, the reliability of literary references varies significantly. ChatGPT 4, benefitting from its larger training dataset, generates a higher percentage of reliable sources compared to ChatGPT 3.5. The IF analysis indicates the prevalence of high-impact journals among reliable sources, which emphasizes the effectiveness of the model in selecting quality references. The study highlights the need for caution when using AI to write scientific articles due to the potential for biased, unverified, and inaccurate information. It is important to critically evaluate and vet AI-generated content. In addition, the study emphasizes that the correct use of AI and thoughtful drafting of prompts can improve the efficiency and quality of scientific papers. Future advancements in AI technology are expected to further minimize errors and biases.

Keywords
Artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
Biotelemetry
Cardiology
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Thomas M. The Future of AI: How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the World. Built In; 2023. Available from: https:// builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-future [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. West DM, Allen JR. How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the World. Brookings; 2018. Available from: https://www. brookings.edu/articles/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. Lee R. Artificial Intelligence in Daily Life. Germany: Springer Nature; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-7695-9

 

  1. Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell TM. What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science. 2017;358(6370):1530-1534. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8062

 

  1. Cruz GBD, Rubi J. Technoarete Transactions on Advances in Computer Applications (TTACA). TBEAH. Available from: https://technoaretepublication.org/computer-applications/ effects-ai-various-spheres-life.php [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. Aswin A, Ariati C, Kurniawan S. Artificial intelligence in higher education: A practical approach: Edited by Prathamesh Padmakar Churi, Shubham Joshi, Mohamed Elhoseny, and Amina Omrane, Florida, CRC Press, 2022, 266 pp., £79.99 (Hardback), £35.99 (eBook), ISBN 9781032026060. J High Educ Policy Manag. 2022;45(5):583-586. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2022.2156088

 

  1. Loh HW, Ooi CP, Seoni S, Barua PD, Molinari F, Acharya UR. Application of explainable artificial intelligence for healthcare: A systematic review of the last decade (2011- 2022). Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;226:107161. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107161

 

  1. Blanco-González A, Cabezón A, Seco-González A, et al. The role of AI in drug discovery: Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023;16(6):891. doi: 10.3390/ph16060891

 

  1. Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: Writing better scientific review articles. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(4):1148-1154.

 

  1. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, et al. Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manag. 2023;71:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

 

  1. Xu Y, Liu X, Cao X, et al. Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation (Camb). 2021;2(4):100179. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179

 

  1. Giglio AD, da Costa MUP. The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native English speakers. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023;69(9):e20230560. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230560

 

  1. Zhao, X. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing Wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers. RELC J. 2022;54(3):890-894. doi: 10.1177/00336882221094089

 

  1. Abdullahi A. 10 Best AI Writing Tools 2023. eWEEK; 2023. Available from: https://www.eweek.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-writing-tools [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. Pividori M, Greene CS. A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring. bioRxivorg. 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.21.525030

 

  1. Cabanac G, Labbé C. Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2021;72(12):1461-1476. doi: 10.1002/asi.24495

 

  1. Scimeca M, Bonfiglio R. Dignity of science and the use of ChatGPT as a co-author. ESMO Open. 2023;8(4):101607. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101607

 

  1. Mullin B, Grant N. Google Tests A.I. Tool that is Able to Write News Articles. The New York Times; 2023. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/19/business/google-artificial-intelligence-news-articles.html [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. Ray PP. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber Phys Syst. 2023;3:121-154. doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

 

  1. Megawati R, Listiani H, Pranoto NW, Akobiarek M, Megahati SRR. Role of GPT chat in writing scientific articles: A systematic literature review. JPPIPA. 2023;9(11):1078-1084. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5559

 

  1. Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620-621. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

 

  1. Hosseini M, Rasmussen LM, Resnik DB. Using AI to write scholarly publications. Account Res. 2023:1-9. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535

 

  1. Park JY. Could ChatGPT help you to write your next scientific paper?: Concerns on research ethics related to usage of artificial intelligence tools. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;49(3):105-106. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.105

 

  1. Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

 

  1. Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379(6630):313. doi: 10.1126/science.adg7879

 

  1. Dergaa I, Chamari K, Zmijewski P, Ben Saad H. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol Sport. 2023;40(2):615-622. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623

 

  1. Sharma P. Chatbots in medical research: Advantages and limitations of artificial intelligence-enabled writing with a focus on ChatGPT as an author. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(9):838-839. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004665

 

  1. Alkaissi H, McFarlane SI. Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35179. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35179

 

  1. Dashti M, Londono J, Ghasemi S, Moghaddasi N. How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing? J Prosthet Dent. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.023

 

  1. Masic I, Miokovic M, Muhamedagic B. Evidence based medicine - New approaches and challenges. Acta Inform Med. 2008;16(4):219-225. doi: 10.5455/aim.2008.16.219-225

 

  1. Ansari M. Impact of Online Reading on Skills of Professionals. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal). Pakistan: University of Karachi; 2018. Available from: https:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1753.html [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. ChatGPT. Openai.com. Available from: https://chat.openai. com [Last accessed on 2024 July 16].

 

  1. OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv [csCL]; 2023. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 16].

 

  1. Rahaman MS, Ahsan MMT, Anjum N, Terano HJR, Rahman MM. From ChatGPT-3 to GPT-4: A significant advancement in AI-driven NLP tools. J Eng Emerg Technol. 2023;2(1):50-60. doi: 10.52631/jeet.v2i1.188

 

  1. Koubaa A. GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: A concise showdown. Preprints. 2023. doi: 10.20944/preprints202303.0422.v1

 

  1. Ahmad FB, Cisewski JA, Xu J, Anderson RN. Provisional mortality data - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(18):488-492. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a3

 

  1. World Health Statistics 2020: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: World Health Statistics. Available from: https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789240005105 [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 16].

 

  1. Health Statistics at Regional Level. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index. php?title=health_statistics_at_regional_level [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 09].

 

  1. Home. SCI Journal. Available from: https://www.scijournal. org [Last accessed on 2024 July 16].

 

  1. Li J, Cheng X, Zhao X, Nie JY, Wen JR. HaluEval: A Large- Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models. arXiv [csCL]; 2023. Available from: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2305.11747 [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 16].

 

  1. Zhang Y, Li Y, Cui L, Cai D, Liu L. Siren’s Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models. arXiv [csCL]; 2023. Available from: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2309.01219 [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 16].

 

  1. US Census Bureau. Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2010 Census; 2019. Available from: https://www.census.gov/ topics/population/genealogy/data/2010_surnames.html [Last accessed on 2023 Dec 13].

 

  1. Jiang Z. 公安部发布去年全国姓名报告,王、李、张姓排前三 [Public Security Bureau Releases Last Year’s National Name Report, “Wang, Li, Zhang” Ranked Top Three]. 澎湃新闻 [The Paper]; 2019. Available from: https:// www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2927573 [Last accessed on 2023 Dec 13]. [In Chinese]
Share
Back to top
Artificial Intelligence in Health, Electronic ISSN: 3029-2387 Print ISSN: 3041-0894, Published by AccScience Publishing