AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AC026210035
Cite this article
26
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Scrolling through culture: Social media, visual communication, and the creative identity of art students in India

Mayuree Pal1*
Show Less
1 School of Media Studies, Presidency University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Received: 19 May 2026 | Revised: 10 June 2026 | Accepted: 8 July 2026 | Published online: 21 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Social media has transformed and changed the visual ecology in which emerging artists learn, create and communicate. This shift becomes more complex in India, where art education is equally influenced by its indigenous arts and aesthetics, and the increasingly globalized digital technologies. This study examines social media practices and their impacts on creative identity, cultural expression, and artistic self-efficacy among art students in undergraduate and postgraduate programs from various higher education institutions in India. This study adopted a cross-sectional survey approach, using a structured questionnaire, and a sample of 312 art students from government, private, and university-affiliated institutions across four regional zones in India to identify platform-specific engagement style, perceptions of cultural influence, and associations with creative self-efficacy. Results from multiple linear regression analysis show that indigenous art content in social media (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), proficiency with digital tools (β = 0.33, p < 0.001), and frequency of Instagram use (β = 0.29, p < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of creative self-efficacy. In contrast, perceived pressure to conform to Western aesthetics negatively moderated the above relationship (β = −0.18, p = 0.006). The results have implications for art education, curriculum developers, and policymakers in the context of India’s National Education Policy 2020, which places art education and digital pedagogy at the core of education.

Keywords
Social media
Visual culture
Art education
Creative identity
Digital art
India
Cultural heritage
Postcolonial aesthetics
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Gao L, Ahmed A, Chen O, et al. Governance of AI-Generated Content: A Case Study on Social Media Platforms. In: Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2026:1-22. doi: 10.1145/3772318.3790415
  2. Bishop S. Influencer creep: How artists strategically navigate the platformisation of art worlds. New Media Soc. 2023;27(4):2109-2126. doi: 10.1177/14614448231206090
  3. Basu P. Performance, cultural resistance and social justice: India’s creative economies since the COVID-19 pandemic. Cult Trends. 2023;32(4):383-397. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2023.2212627
  4. Das A, Ghosh S, Ara F, Kumar A, Seetharam A. Rhythms of Learning: State of the Education Report for India 2024 – Culture and Arts in Education. Unesco.org. Published 2026. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000392331.locale=en.
  5. Shimray C. An Analysis of the National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023 in the Context of Environmental Education. Sch Sci. 2023;61(4):30-44.
  6. Joghee S, Alzoubi HM. Impact of Social Media Usage on the Effectiveness of Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from India. In: Studies in Big Data. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024:3-25. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-55221-2_1
  7. Gillespie T. The Relevance of Algorithms. In: Media Technologies. The MIT Press; 2014:167-194. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
  8. Bucher T. If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press; 2018.
  9. Noble SU. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. In: Algorithms of oppression. New York University Press; 2018.
  10. Prianti DD, Athique A. Navigating Digital Identities: Instagram, Postcolonial Esthetics, and Indonesian Youth Culture. Howard J Commun. 2025;37(2):562-582. doi: 10.1080/10646175.2025.2500597
  11. Shofiyyah NA, Amini H, Nurhasanah LR, Maksim K. Instagrammable Culture: Implications of Social Media on the Younger Generation’s Perception of Cultural Art. Mediakita. 2024;8(1):16-38. doi: 10.30762/mediakita.v8i1.1422
  12. Setiadi H, Sukmana O, Wahyudi W. Exposure to Technology and Social Media: A Study of Generation Z’s Consumerist Culture in South Jakarta. Asian J Eng Soc Health. 2024;3(5):1055-1062. doi: 10.46799/ajesh.v3i5.318
  13. Yixuan F, Yunwen W, Chao C. Digital Arts in Education: Significance, Efficacy and Impact. Front Art Res. 2023;5(17). doi: 10.25236/FAR.2023.051702
  14. Sattar G, Rustemova S, Nebessayeva Z. Socially Interactive Approaches and Digital Technologies in Art Education: Developing Creative Thinking in Students During Art Classes. Open Educ Stud. 2025;7(1). doi: 10.1515/edu-2025-0096
  15. Hu B, Li Y. The role of digital drawing software in enhancing specific artistic skills and behavioral intentions in art education. Cogent Educ. 2025;12(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186x.2025.2481679
  16. Tarifa-Rodriguez A, Virues-Ortega J, Perez-Bustamante Pereira A, Calero-Elvira A, Cowie S. Quantitative Indices of Student Social Media Engagement in Tertiary Education: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy. J Behav Educ. 2023;33(4):769-797. doi: 10.1007/s10864-023-09516-6
  17. Moran S. The Roles of Creativity in Society. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press; 2010:74-90. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511763205.006
  18. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. In: The Health Psychology Reader. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2002:94-106. doi: 10.4135/9781446221129.n6
  19. Beghetto R. Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students. Creat Res J. 2006;18(4):447-457. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
  20. Tongaria M, Mathur K. A Review Study on the Impact of Digital Art on Freelance Art in India. ShodhKosh J Vis Per. Arts. 2024;5(ICETDA24):383-392. doi: 10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.iICETDA24.2024.2030
  21. Carah N, Angus D. Algorithmic brand culture: participatory labour, machine learning and branding on social media. Media Cult Soc. 2018;40(2):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0163443718754648
  22. Bhabha HK. The Location of Culture. Routledge; 2012. doi: 10.4324/9780203820551
  23. Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory Cult Soc. 1990;7(2-3):295-310. doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017
  24. Chen H, Yu Y, Guo H, et al. A self-learning multimodal approach for fake news detection. Front Artif Intell. 2025;8. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1665798
  25. Cevallos M, De Biase M, Vocaturo E, Zumpano E. Fake News Detection on COVID 19 tweets via Supervised Learning Approach. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE; 2022:2765-2772. doi: 10.1109/bibm55620.2022.9994918
  26. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press; 1996.
  27. Braun V, Clarke V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing