AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ac.4130
Submit to AC
Cite this article
32
Download
351
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Cinematic urbanism: Understanding cities through film

Tigran Haas1*
Show Less
1 Department of Urban Planning and Environment, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 10 A, Plan 1, Stockholm, Sweden
AC, 4130 https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.4130
Submitted: 3 July 2024 | Accepted: 20 August 2024 | Published: 8 October 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

This reflective paper explores the unique relationship between cinema and urbanism, illustrating how films offer a rich and multifaceted lens for understanding urban environments. Reflecting on a range of films, particularly Blade Runner and The Truman Show, the paper demonstrates how cinema captures and critiques cultural and social norms, represents urban spaces, and influences perceptions of architecture and urban design, especially in pedagogical contexts within urbanism university programs. These two movies have also been chosen as they represent paradigmatic cases on which analysis of new and post-urbanism has been done in urbanism studios. The paper emphasizes the pivotal role of films in shaping and reflecting our understanding of urban environments. The main crux and objective of the paper is the exploration and highlights of the educational value of films in urban studies, particularly within two master’s programs, offering insights into cities’ spatial dimensions and reflections on urban forms’ social life. The study integrates key scholarly perspectives and new cinematic urbanism pedagogics (a seven-step methodology developed in the studios). By weaving together these perspectives, this essay underscores the multifaceted relationship between cinema and urbanism, demonstrating how films can serve as powerful tools for understanding and shaping urban environments and the complex social life of urban forms. The paper ends with general conclusions and recommendations for policy and practice.

Keywords
Cinematic urbanism
Urban spaces
Cityscapes
Psychogeography
Urbanism studios
Film storytelling
The Truman Show
Blade Runner
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
References
  1. Friedberg A. Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1993.

 

  1. Shiel M, Fitzmaurice T. Screening the City. London: Verso; 2003.

 

  1. Bruno G. Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. New York: Verso; 2002.

 

  1. Sammon PM. Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.

 

  1. Neumann D. Film Architecture: From Metropolis to Blade Runner. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 1996.

 

  1. Huyssen A. Other Cities, Other Worlds: Urban Imaginaries in a Globalizing Age. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2008.

 

  1. Merrifield A. Metropolitan Mess: Explorations in City Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2002.

 

  1. Gehl J. Cities for People. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2010.

 

  1. Giddings B, Horne R. Urban Design: Method and Techniques. London, England: Architectural Press; 2002.

 

  1. AlSayyad N. Cinematic Urbanism: A History of the Modern from Reel to Real. New York: Routledge; 2006.

 

  1. Clarke DB. The Cinematic City. London, England: Routledge; 1997a.

 

  1. Dimendberg E. Film Noir and the Spaces of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004.

 

  1. Mennel B. Cities and Cinema. New York: Routledge; 2019.

 

  1. Clarke DB. Previewing the cinematic city. Film Stud. 1997b;1(1):18-30. doi: 10.7227/CFS.1.1.3

 

  1. Koeck R, Roberts L, editors. The City and the Moving Image: Urban Projections. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.

 

  1. Bailey J. Fun City Cinema: New York City and the Movies that Made It. New York: Abrams Books; 2021.

 

  1. Massood PJ. Black City Cinema: African American Urban Experiences in Film. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2003.

 

  1. Webb L. Global Cinematic Cities: New Landscapes of Film and Media. New York: Columbia University Press; 2017.

 

  1. Corbusier L. The City of Tomorrow and Its Planning. New York: Dover Publications; 1929.

 

  1. Rowe C, Koetter F. Collage City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1978.

 

  1. Koolhaas R. Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York: Monacelli Press; 1994.

 

  1. Virilio P. The Vision Machine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1984.

 

  1. Jencks C. The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. New York: Rizzoli; 1977.

 

  1. Solà-Morales I. Terrain Vague. In: Anyplace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. p. 118-123.

 

  1. Venturi R, Scott Brown D, Izenour S. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1972.

 

  1. Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House; 1961.

 

  1. Lynch K. The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1960.

 

  1. Rossi A. The Architecture of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982.

 

  1. Harvey D. The Urban Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989.

 

  1. Kellner D. Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity, and Politics between the Modern and the Postmodern. London, England: Routledge; 1994.

 

  1. Kerman J. Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press; 1997.

 

  1. Duany A, Plater-Zyberk E, Speck J. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press; 2000.

 

  1. Haas T., editor. New Urbanism and Beyond: Designing Cities for the Future. New York: Rizzoli; 2008.

 

  1. Bordwell D. On the History of Film Style. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.

 

  1. Lichty P. Surveillance in the Age of Post-Privacy. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Nai010 Publishers; 2013.

 

  1. Charney L, Schwartz VR. Cinema and the invention of modern life. Representations. 1995;49:1-26. doi: 10.2307/2928746

 

  1. Jacobs S. The wrong house: The architecture of Alfred Hitchcock. Camera Obscura. 2007;22(3):191-221. doi: 10.1215/02705346-2007-008

 

  1. Hansen MB. The mass production of the senses: Classical cinema as vernacular modernism. Modernism/Modernity. 1999;6(2):59-77. doi: 10.1353/mod.1999.0019

 

  1. Donald J. The immaterial city: Representation, imagination, and cinema. Urban Stud. 1999;36(5-6):835-844. doi: 10.1080/0042098993345

 

  1. Penz F, Koeck R. Cinematic Urban Geographies. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.

 

  1. Roberts L. Film, Mobility, and Urban Space: A Cinematic Geography of Liverpool. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press; 2016.

 

  1. Whyte WH. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces; 1980.

 

  1. Cullen G. The Concise Townscape. London, England: Routledge; 1961.

 

  1. Lefebvre H. In: Kofman E, Lebas E, Translators. Writings on Cities. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 1996.

 

  1. Kracauer S. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995.

 

  1. Johansson M. Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Societies in a Global Context. London, England: Verso; 2003.

 

  1. Diken B, Laustsen CB. Sociology through the Projector. London, England: Routledge; 2007.

 

  1. Baudelaire C. In: Mayne J, Translator. The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays. London, England: Phaidon Press; 1995.

 

  1. Benjamin W. In: Eiland H, McLaughlin K, Translators. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999.

 

  1. Gilloch G. Myth and Metropolis: Walter Benjamin and the City. Cambridge, England: Polity Press; 2007.

 

  1. De Certeau M. In: Rendall S, Translator. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984.

 

  1. Strickland R. Background into foreground: Film as a medium for teaching urban design. Places J. 2007;18:44-51.

 

  1. Norberg-Schulz C. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli; 1980.

 

  1. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press; 1977.

 

  1. Gehl J. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2011.

 

  1. Haas T, Wolfe CR. Sustaining a City’s Culture and Character: Principles and Best Practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers; 2021.
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept