Comparative deformation indices of FDM-printed PLA-LW structures across three infill topologies: Secant stiffness, apparent strain, and specific toughness
Most characterisation work on fused deposition modelling-printed lightweight polylactic acid (PLA-LW) focuses on peak load resistance, leaving the pre-fracture deformation regime underexplored. This regime governs stiffness, deformation tolerance, and energy absorption per unit volume, and is decisive for deflection-limited and impact-tolerant lightweight components. In this study, three comparative mechanical indices were extracted from 114 quasi-static tensile records spanning Phase 1 (Cubic; eight temperatures; n = 6 per temperature) and Phase 2 (Cubic, Gyroid, Sub-Cubic; two temperatures and two flow rates; n = 3–6 per condition) at 20% infill ratio: the secant stiffness index Es, the apparent strain index εapp, and the specific toughness index U/ρ. Two Gyroid F80/240°C specimens were excluded after stress–strain curve inspection revealed grip-slip artefacts, evidence as early-loading plateaus in which crosshead displacement is taken up by specimen seating and slip at the grips rather than by gauge-section deformation. The remaining three valid specimens at this condition were retained. Phase 1 ANOVA confirmed a highly significant temperature effect on Es (F(7,40) = 15.13, p < 0.001). Near the foaming onset (210°C), Es peaked at 117.4 ± 10.7 MPa while εapp reached its descriptive minimum (F(7,40) = 1.80, p = 0.114 overall; F(6,35) = 1.07, p = 0.400 excluding 190°C). In Phase 2, flow-rate effects on Es were significant for the Cubic (t(19.4) = 16.37, p < 0.001, d = 6.68) and Sub-Cubic (t(19.4) = 7.25, p < 0.001, d = 2.96). The Gyroid showed no significant flow-rate reversal (t(15.8) = −1.70, p = 0.108); however, both Gyroid flow-rate conditions exhibited a significant temperature sensitivity (F70: p = 0.006; F80: p = 0.005). Deformation-regime indices diverged substantially from strength trends; no single topology ranked highest across all three dimensions simultaneously. Future work should validate these comparative indices using extensometer or digital image correlation measurements.
- Unlu SM. Flexural strength and weight optimization of infill sandwich and honeycomb sandwich structures made of PLA/lW-PLA using the FDM method. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2026;33(1):2641171. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2026.2641171
- Damanpack AR, Sousa A, Bodaghi M. Porous PLAs with controllable density by FDM 3D printing and chemical foaming agent. Micromachines. 2021;12(8):866. doi: 10.3390/mi12080866
- Tunçel O, Kahya Ç. Performance Enhancement of Lightweight PLA Parts Printed by FFF Using Taguchi–GRA Method. Polymers. 2025;17(17):2413. doi: 10.3390/polym17172413
- Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P. Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J. 2008;14(2):72-80. doi: 10.1108/13552540810862028
- Park YE, Lee S. Characterization of PLA/LW-PLA Composite Materials Manufactured by Dual-Nozzle FDM 3D-Printing Processes. Polymers. 2024;16(20):2852. doi: 10.3390/polym16202852
- Dev S, Srivastava R. Experimental investigation and optimization of FDM process parameters for material and mechanical strength. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26(2):1995-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.435
- Ramadan S, Abu-Shams M. Optimizing 3D printing parameters for lightweight and high-strength unmanned aerial vehicle parts. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2026;5(1):025290065. doi: 10.36922/MSAM025290065
- Ritchie RO. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat Mater. 2011;10(11):817-822. doi: 10.1038/nmat3115
- Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139878326
- Benedetti M, du Plessis A, Ritchie RO, Dallago M, Razavi N, Berto F. Architected cellular materials: A review on their mechanical properties towards fatigue-tolerant design and fabrication. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2021;144:100606. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2021.100606
- Alshwawra A, Abo Swerih A, Sakhrieh A, Dinkelacker F. Structural Performance of Additively Manufactured Cylinder Liner—A Numerical Study. Energies. 2022;15(23):8926. doi: 10.3390/en15238926
- Rodríguez-Panes A, Claver J, Camacho AM. The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: A comparative analysis. Materials. 2018;11(8):1333. doi: 10.3390/ma11081333
- ASTM International. ASTM D638-14: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014. doi: 10.1520/D0638-14
- Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des. 2014;58:242-246. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038
- Akhoundi B, Behravesh AH. Effect of Filling Pattern on the Tensile and Flexural Mechanical Properties of FDM 3D Printed Products. Exp Mech. 2019;59(6):883-897. doi: 10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y
- Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Alrawi B, Guzman A. Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach. Procedia Manuf. 2017;10:791-803. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079
- Torres J, Cotelo J, Karl J, Gordon AP. Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. JOM. 2015;67(5):1183-1193. doi: 10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y
- Maskery I, Sturm L, Aremu AO, et al. Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer. 2018;152:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049
- Al-Ketan O, Rowshan R, Abu Al-Rub RK. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Addit Manuf. 2018;19:167-183. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006
- Feng G, Li S, Xiao L, Song W. Mechanical properties and deformation behavior of functionally graded TPMS structures under static and dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2023;176:104554. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104554
- Shaikh A, Saxena A, Griffis J, Shahed K, Manogharan G. Functionally graded TPMS gyroid structures for additive manufacturing of non-pneumatic tires. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2024;3(4):5022. doi: 10.36922/msam.5022
- Ramful R. A review on development of eco-friendly natural fiber-reinforced composite filaments for 3D printing: Fabrication and characteristics. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2025;4(1):8533. doi: 10.36922/msam.8533
- Abueidda DW, Elhebeary M, Shiang CS (Andrew), Pang S, Abu Al-Rub RK, Jasiuk IM. Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric Gyroid cellular structures: Experimental and finite element study. Mater Des. 2019;165:107597. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107597
- Chowdhury D, Lee S. Study on the various lightweight PLA honeycomb structures with 3D printing process conditions. Fashion Text. 2025;12(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40691-025-00429-8
- Samudin I bin M, Mohd Radzuan NA, Sulong AB bin, Alshwawra A. Mechanical performance and failure analysis of 3D-printed biodegradable polymer reinforced with carbon fiber in gyroid structures: a compression-tension comparative study. Iran Polym J. 2026;35:1565-1583. doi: 10.1007/s13726-026-01642-y
- Song Y, Li Y, Song W, Yee K, Lee KY, Tagarielli VL. Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des. 2017;123:154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051
- Wickramasinghe S, Do T, Tran P. FDM-Based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments. Polymers. 2020;12(7):1529. doi: 10.3390/polym12071529
- Jiang D, Fraser D, Wong S, et al. Influence of Strut Shape on the As-Built Quality and Mechanical Performance of Additively Manufactured Simple Cubic Lattices. Addit Manuf Lett. 2025;15:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100346
- Alshwawra A, Fayoumi A, Alomari MH, Radzuan NAM. Symmetry-Driven Mechanical Response and Fracture Behavior of FDM-Printed PLA LW Structures: A Factorial Study of Infill Topology, Print Temperature, and Flow Rate with Macrographic Fractographic Validation. J Compos Sci. 2026;10(7):376. doi: 10.3390/jcs10070376
- Lapenna M, Faglioni F, Chand K, Hejazi B, Fioresi R, Bruno G. Chamfer distance for non-linear registration of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface lattices. Addit Manuf Lett. 2025;14:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100299
