AccScience Publishing / MSAM / Volume 5 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/MSAM025510122
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Development of a compact multi-material vat photopolymerization printing solution

Wudith W. Niyagama1* S. Siddharth Kumar1 Tuomas Puttonen1 Jouni Partanen1
Show Less
1 Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
MSAM 2026, 5(2), 025510122 https://doi.org/10.36922/MSAM025510122
Received: 29 October 2025 | Accepted: 26 December 2025 | Published online: 27 February 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Multi-material vat photopolymerization (MMVPP) is an emerging additive manufacturing technology with great potential in biomedical engineering, soft robotics, electronics, and customized manufacturing, particularly where functional gradients and spatially varying material properties are essential. The capability to precisely control composition at the voxel level enables the fabrication of bioinspired structures and multifunctional components with tailored mechanical and functional performance. This study presents the conceptual design and development of a compact and commercially viable MMVPP system that addresses key challenges in current state-of-the-art technologies. A two-vat prototype printer was fabricated to demonstrate the feasibility of precise multi-material printing. Critical challenges, including resin compatibility, interfacial adhesion, and mechanical property optimization, were systematically investigated. Novel strategies such as variable layer height exposure control, overlapped layer printing, and optimized curing parameters were introduced to improve interfacial bonding and overall structural integrity. The proposed methods were validated through mechanical testing, confirming enhanced interface strength and material cohesion. The study also details system-level innovations, including efficient vat-switching mechanisms and process synchronization for rapid material transition. These advances establish foundational methodologies for reliable multi-material photopolymerization and expand the design space of photopolymer-based additive manufacturing. The results demonstrate MMVPP’s transformative potential to enable next-generation manufacturing of functionally graded and multi-material components with superior performance and design freedom.

 

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Process design
Vat photopolymerization
Photopolymer resins
Digital light processing
Multi-material interface evaluation
Additive manufacturing
Funding
This work was funded by the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme PREIN (Decision no. 320167).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Gibson I. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 3rd ed. Germany: Springer; 2021.
  2. Loh GH, Pei E, Harrison D, Monzón MD. An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2018;23:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.023
  3. Subedi S, Liu S, Wang W, Naser Shovon SMA, Chen X, Ware HOT. Multi-material vat photopolymerization 3D printing: A review of mechanisms and applications. Npj Adv Manuf. 2024;1(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s44334-024-00005-w
  4. Sampson KL, Deore B, Go A, et al. Multimaterial vat polymerization additive manufacturing. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2021;3(9):4304-4324. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.1c00262
  5. Nazir A, Gokcekaya O, Md Masum Billah K, et al. Multi-material additive manufacturing: A systematic review of design, properties, applications, challenges, and 3D printing of materials and cellular metamaterials. Mater Des. 2023;226:111661. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111661
  6. Salmi M. Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications. Materials. 2021;14(1):191. doi: 10.3390/ma14010191
  7. Kumar SS, Akmal JS, Salmi M. 4D printing of shape memory polymer with continuous carbon fiber. Prog Addit Manuf. 2024;9(6):1985-1995. doi: 10.1007/s40964-023-00553-1
  8. Kumar SS, Niyagama WW, Akmal JS, Salmi M. 4D printing of electro-activated thermochromic composites for dynamic 3D displays. Mater Des. 2025;251:113674. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.113674
  9. Ghaderi I, Behravesh AH, Hedayati SK, et al. Multimaterial additive manufacturing of poly-L-lactic acid– hydroxylapatite/graphene oxide scaffold fabricated via vat photopolymerization: Experimental investigation, analysis and cell study. Rapid Prototyp J. 2024;30(9):1789-1802. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2024-0085
  10. Al Rashid A, Ahmed W, Khalid MY, Koç M. Vat photopolymerization of polymers and polymer composites: Processes and applications. Addit Manuf. 2021;47:102279. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102279
  11. McKerricher G, Vaseem M, Shamim A. Fully inkjet-printed microwave passive electronics. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2017;3(1):16075. doi: 10.1038/micronano.2016.75
  12. Vyas A, Garg V, Ghosh SB, Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S. Photopolymerizable resin-based 3D printed biomedical composites: Factors affecting resin viscosity. Mater Today Proc. 2022;62:1435-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.172
  13. Choi JW, Kim HC, Wicker R. Multi-material stereolithography. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211(3):318-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.10.003
  14. Inamdar A, Magana M, Medina F, Grajeda Y, Wicker R. Development of an automated multiple material stereolithography machine. In: 17th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium in Austin TX. 2006. p. 624-635.
  15. Wicker R, Medina F, Elkins C. Multiple material micro-fabrication: Extending stereolithography to tissue engineering and other novel applications. In: 15th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium in Austin TX. 2004. p. 754-764.
  16. Zhou C, Chen Y, Yang Z, Khoshnevis B. Digital material fabrication using mask‐image‐projection‐based stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J. 2013;19(3):153-165. doi: 10.1108/13552541311312148
  17. Huang P, Deng D, Chen Y. Modeling and fabrication of heterogeneous three-dimensional objects based on additive manufacturing. In: Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing. United States: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013. p. V02AT02A056. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2013-65724
  18. Bhusal A, Dogan E, Nguyen HA, et al. Multi-material digital light processing bioprinting of hydrogel-based microfluidic chips. Biofabrication. 2022;14(1):014103. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac2d78
  19. Jiang CP, Romario YS, Bhat C, Hentihu MFR, Zeng XC, Ramezani M. Design and fabrication of multi-material pneumatic soft gripper using newly developed high-speed multi-material vat photopolymerization 3D printer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2024;130(3-4):1093-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-12774-3
  20. Matte CD, Pearson M, Trottier-Cournoyer F, Dafoe A, Kwok TH. Automated storage and active cleaning for multi-material digital-light-processing printer. Rapid Prototyp J. 2019;25(5):864-874. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-08-2018-0211
  21. Shaukat U, Thalhamer A, Rossegger E, Schlögl S. Dual-vat photopolymerization 3D printing of vitrimers. Addit Manuf. 2024;79:103930. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103930
  22. Khatri B, Frey M, Raouf-Fahmy A, Scharla MV, Hanemann T. Development of a multi-material stereolithography 3D printing device. Micromachines. 2020;11(5):532. doi: 10.3390/mi11050532
  23. Hu K, Zhao P, Li J, Lu Z. High-resolution multiceramic additive manufacturing based on digital light processing. Addit Manuf. 2022;54:102732. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102732
  24. Cheng J, Wang R, Sun Z, et al. Centrifugal multimaterial 3D printing of multifunctional heterogeneous objects. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35622-6
  25. Wu X, Lian Q, Li D, Jin Z. Biphasic osteochondral scaffold fabrication using multi-material mask projection stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J. 2019;25(2):277-288. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-07-2017-0144
  26. Nam OH, Chung SY, Hyun HK, et al. Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(4):838.e1-838.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026
  27. Parks GS, Barton B. Vapor pressure data for isopropyl alcohol and tertiary butyl alcohol. J Am Chem Soc. 1928;50(1):24-26. doi: 10.1021/ja01388a004
  28. Santos EO, Oliveira PLE, De Mello TP, et al. Surface characteristics and microbiological analysis of a vat-photopolymerization additive-manufacturing dental resin. Materials. 2022;15(2):425. doi: 10.3390/ma15020425
  29. ASTM Subcommittee D20. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. United States: ASTM International; 2022. doi: 10.1520/D0638-22
  30. Riccio C, Civera M, Grimaldo Ruiz O, et al. Effects of curing on photosensitive resins in SLA additive manufacturing. Appl Mech. 2021;2(4):942-955. doi: 10.3390/applmech2040055
  31. Anastasio R, Peerbooms W, Cardinaels R, van Breemen LCA. Characterization of ultraviolet-cured methacrylate networks: From photopolymerization to ultimate mechanical properties. Macromolecules. 2019;52(23):9220-9231. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01439
  32. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212-10290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
  33. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;110:442-458. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
  34. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma QP, et al. A Review of vat photopolymerization technology: Materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3D printing. Polymers. 2021;13(4):598. doi: 10.3390/polym13040598
  35. Lur’e ZY. Analysis of pitch error in lead screws. Meas Tech. 1973;16(9):1340-1341. doi: 10.1007/BF00813042
  36. Jin G, Gu H, Jang M, et al. Influence of postwashing process on the elution of residual monomers, degree of conversion, and mechanical properties of a 3D printed crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater. 2022;38(11):1812-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.017
  37. Hassanpour M, Narongdej P, Alterman N, Moghtadernejad S, Barjasteh E. Effects of post-processing parameters on 3D-printed dental appliances: A review. Polymers. 2024;16(19):2795. doi: 10.3390/polym16192795
  38. Wang X, Li Z, Deng J, et al. Unprecedented strength enhancement observed in interpenetrating phase composites of aperiodic lattice metamaterials. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(1):2406890. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202406890
  39. Xavier MS, Tawk CD, Yong YK, Fleming AJ. 3D-printed omnidirectional soft pneumatic actuators: Design, modeling and characterization. Sens Actuators Phys. 2021;332:113199. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2021.113199

 

Share
Back to top
Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9635 Published by AccScience Publishing