AccScience Publishing / MSAM / Volume 5 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.36922/MSAM025330076
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Unlocking the sustainable potential of 3D concrete printing with large aggregates and steam–CO2 curing

Suvash Chandra Paul1* Junghyun Lee1 Yi Wei Daniel Tay1 Sean Gip Lim1 Jihye Jhun1 Bandar A. Fadhel2 Issam T. Amr2 Ming Jen Tan1*
Show Less
1 Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
2 Saudi Aramco Research & Development Center, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
MSAM 2026, 5(1), 025330076 https://doi.org/10.36922/MSAM025330076
Received: 15 August 2025 | Accepted: 12 September 2025 | Published online: 29 October 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) has emerged as a promising innovation in the construction industry, significantly reducing its reliance on intensive labor while minimizing material waste. Despite its benefits, a major limitation of current 3DCP practices is the high reliance on cement as the primary binder, which often exceeds 60% of the total solid content. This high cement usage contributes significantly to CO2 emissions, raising sustainability concerns. In this study, a 3D-printable concrete mix incorporating large aggregates (up to 10 mm) was developed, replacing over 7% of fine aggregate and reducing cement content to approximately 29% by weight. The effects of CO2 gas and a steam–CO2 mixture on the mechanical performance and CO2 uptake of the printed concrete were assessed. Thermogravimetric analysis was used to quantify CO2 sequestration over time. Compared to control samples without gas treatment, those exposed to the steam–CO2 mixture showed enhanced buildability, improved compressive and flexural strength, and greater CO2 uptake. The results suggest that surface spraying of the steam–CO2 mixture during the 3D printing process offers a viable and scalable approach to improving both the structural performance and environmental footprint of printed concrete elements.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
3D concrete printing
Carbon dioxide uptake
Large-aggregate printing
Steam–CO2 injection
3DCP buildability
CO2 emission cost
Mechanical strength
Funding
This research was supported by Saudi Aramco Technologies Company (SATC) and the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its Medium- Sized Centre funding scheme for the Singapore Centre for 3D Printing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Pongwisuthiruchte A, Potiyaraj P. Challenges and innovations in sustainable 3D printing. Mater Today Sustain. 2025;31:101134. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101134
  2. Available from: https://builtin.com/articles/3d-printed-house [Last accessed on 2025 Jun 04].
  3. Jia Y, Abdelrahman S, Hauser CA. Developing a sustainable resin for 3D printing in coral restoration. MSAM. 2024;3(2):3125. doi: 10.36922/msam.3125
  4. Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Meena H, Ghani Z. Mechanical characterization of 3D printable concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;227:116710. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116710
  5. Bhattacherjee S, Basavaraj AS, Rahul AV, et al. Sustainable materials for 3D concrete printing. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;122:104156. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104156
  6. Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: The influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion. Cem Concr Res. 2019;119:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.017
  7. Ding T, Xiao J, Zou S, Zhou X. Anisotropic behavior in bending of 3D printed concrete reinforced with fibers. Compos Struct. 2020;254:112808. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112808
  8. Wang D, Xiao J, Sun B, Zhang S, Poon CS. Mechanical properties of 3D printed mortar cured by CO2. Cem Concr Compos. 2023;139:105009. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105009
  9. Haselbach L. Potential for carbon dioxide absorption in concrete. J Environ Eng. 2009;135(6):465-472. doi: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000004
  10. Sikora P, Techman M, Federowicz K, et al. Insight into the microstructural and durability characteristics of 3D printed concrete: Cast versus printed specimens. Case Stud Constr Mat. 2022;17:e01320. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01320
  11. Sun B, Dominicus R, Dong E, Li P, Ye Z, Wang W. Predicting the strength development of 3D printed concrete considering the synergistic effect of curing temperature and humidity: From perspective of modified maturity model. Constr Build Mater. 2024;427:136291. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136291
  12. Li L, Hao L, Li X, Xiao J, Zhang S, Poon CS. Development of CO2-integrated 3D printing concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2023;409:134233. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134233
  13. Kazemian M, Shafei B. Carbon sequestration and storage in concrete: A state-of-the-art review of compositions, methods, and developments. J CO2 Util. 2023;70:102443. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102443
  14. Castellote M, Fernandez L, Andrade C, Alonso C. Chemical changes and phase analysis of OPC pastes carbonated at different CO2 concentrations. Mater Struct. 2009;42:515-525. doi: 10.1617/s11527-008-9399-1
  15. Kashef-Haghighi S, Ghoshal S. CO2 sequestration in concrete through accelerated carbonation curing in a flow-through reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49(3):1143-1149. doi: 10.1021/ie900703d
  16. Monkman S, Hwang SD, Khayat, K. Rheology modification of flowable mortar with CO2. Cem Concr Compos. 2024;151:105584. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105584
  17. Rahul AV, Mohan MK, De Schutter G, Van Tittelboom K. 3D printable concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates: Rheological, mechanical and shrinkage behaviour. Cem Concr Compos. 2022;125:104311. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104311
  18. An D, Zhang YX, Yang R. Incorporating coarse aggregates into 3D concrete printing from mixture design and process control to structural behaviours and practical applications: A review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2351154. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2351154
  19. Wang X, Jia L, Jia Z, et al. Optimization of 3D printing concrete with coarse aggregate via proper mix design and printing process. J Build Eng. 2022;56:104745. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104745
  20. Li M, Weng Y, Liu Z, Zhang D, Wong TN. Optimizing of chemical admixtures for 3D printable cementitious materials by central composite design. MSAM. 2022;1(3):16. doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i3.16
  21. Liu H, Liu C, Wu Y, et al. 3D printing concrete with recycled coarse aggregates: The influence of pore structure on interlayer adhesion. Cem Concr Compos. 2022;134:104742. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104742
  22. Liu H, Liu C, Wu Y, et al. Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. Cem Concr Res. 2022;159:106868. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106868
  23. Mai I, Brohmann L, Freund N, et al. Large particle 3D concrete printing-a green and viable solution. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(20):6125. doi: 10.3390/ma14206125
  24. Wang D, Xiao J, Duan Z. Strategies to accelerate CO2 sequestration of cement-based materials and their application prospects. Constr Build Mater. 2022;314:125646. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125646
  25. Singh R, Wang L, Ostrikov K, Huang J. Designing carbon‐based porous materials for carbon dioxide capture. Adv Mater Interf. 2024;11(4):2202290. doi: 10.1002/admi.202202290
  26. Al-Khowaiter AO, Jamal A, Amr IT, Bamagain R, Al-Hunaidy AS, Fadhel BA. Cementitious Print Head, 3D Printing Architecture, and Cementitious Printing Methodology. Patent No. US011236517B2; 2022.
  27. Lim SG, Tay YWD, Paul SC, et al. Carbon capture and sequestration with in-situ CO2 and steam integrated 3D concrete printing. Carbon Capture Sci Technol. 2024;13:100306. doi: 10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100306
  28. ASTM. C109/C109M-20: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA, United States: ASTM.
  29. ASTM. C293/C293M-16. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam With Center-Point Loading). West Conshohocken, PA, United States: ASTM.
  30. Bhatty JI. Hydration versus strength in a portland cement developed from domestic mineral wastes-A comparative study. Thermochim Acta. 1986;106:93-103. doi: 10.1016/0040-6031(86)85120-6
  31. Takahashi H, Maruyama I. Quantification of CO2 in cement pastes with different degrees of carbonation. J Adv Concr Technol. 2024;22(11):706-715. doi: 10.3151/jact.22.706
  32. Fang X, Xuan D, Poon CS. Empirical modelling of CO2 uptake by recycled concrete aggregates under accelerated carbonation conditions. Mater Struct. 2017;50:1-13. doi: 10.1617/s11527-017-1066-y
  33. Bernal SA, Provis JL, Mejía de Gutiérrez R, Van Deventer JS. Accelerated carbonation testing of alkali-activated slag/ metakaolin blended concretes: Effect of exposure conditions. Mater Struct. 2015;48:653-669. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0289-4
  34. Kaliyavaradhan SK, Ling TC, Mo KH. CO2 sequestration of fresh concrete slurry waste: Optimization of CO2 uptake and feasible use as a potential cement binder. J CO2 Util. 2020;42:101330. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101330
  35. Moini R, Rodriguez F, Olek J, Youngblood JP, Zavattieri PD. Mechanical properties and fracture phenomena in 3D-printed helical cementitious architected materials under compression. Mater Struct. 2024;57(7):170. doi: 10.1617/s11527-024-02437-4
  36. Panda B, Paul SC, Tan MJ. Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Mater Lett. 2017;209:146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.123
  37. Pi Y, Lu C, Li B, Zhou J. Crack propagation and failure mechanism of 3D printing engineered cementitious composites (3DP-ECC) under bending loads. Constr Build Mater. 2023;408:133809. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133809
  38. Wang YC, Lee MG, Wang WC, Kan YC, Kao SH, Chang HW. CO2 curing on the mechanical properties of Portland cement concrete. Buildings. 2022;12(6):817. doi: 10.3390/buildings12060817
  39. Shi C, Wu Y. Studies on some factors affecting CO2 curing of lightweight concrete products. Resour Conserv Recycle. 2008;52(8-9):1087-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.05.002
  40. Kamal NLM, Itam Z, Sivaganese Y, Beddu S. Carbon dioxide sequestration in concrete and its effects on concrete compressive strength. Mater Today Proc. 2020;31:A18-A21. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.185
  41. Lippiatt N, Ling TC. Rapid hydration mechanism of carbonic acid and cement. J Build Eng. 2020;31:101357. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101357
  42. Han Y, Meng LY, Lin R, Kim S, Kim T, Wang XY. Evaluating the sustainability of microwave pre-cured high-volume slag concrete: Mechanical properties, environmental impact and cost-benefit analysis. J Build Eng. 2024;96:110663. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110663
  43. Gao Y, Jiang Y, Tao Y, Shen P, Poon CS. Accelerated carbonation of recycled concrete aggregate in semi-wet environments: A promising technique for CO2 utilization. Cem Concr Res. 2024;180:107486. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107486
  44. Dixit A, Du H, Dai Pang S. Carbon capture in ultra-high performance concrete using pressurized CO2 curing. Constr Build Mater. 2021;288:123076. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123076
  45. Meng LY, Wang YS, Sun F, Lin R, Wang XY. An integrated strength-carbon emissions-total cost model for silica fume concrete. Case Stud Constr Mat. 2025;22:e04327. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04327
  46. O˘Guz S, Bellefontaine R, West J. Visualized: The Price of Carbon around the World in 2024. Available from: https:// www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/visualized-the-price- of-carbon-around-the-world-in-2024 [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 24].

 

Share
Back to top
Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9635 Published by AccScience Publishing