AccScience Publishing / MSAM / Volume 3 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.36922/msam.4144
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

3D printing soft robots integrated with low-melting-point alloys

Liuchao Jin1,2,3 Xiaoya Zhai4 Kang Zhang1 Jingchao Jiang5* Wei-Hsin Liao1,6*
Show Less
1 Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Soft Mechanics and Smart Manufacturing, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China
3 Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China
4 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China
5 Department of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
6 Institute of Intelligent Design and Manufacturing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Submitted: 4 July 2024 | Accepted: 14 August 2024 | Published: 4 September 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Soft robots are developed and applied in aspects such as grasping delicate objects. Their inherent flexibility also enables applications that are unattainable by humans, especially those in life-threatening environments. However, the object grasping performed by most pneumatic soft robotics during transportation requires continuous external power/force, a highly energy-consuming process, particularly for long-distance transportation. In this paper, we propose a low-melting-point alloy (LMPA)-integrated soft robot, manufactured by material extrusion additive manufacturing, requiring no power/force for holding objects during the moving process and thus presenting energy-saving characteristics. The working principles of the LMPA-integrated soft robot are as follows: (1) The LMPA is injected inside the soft robot using material extrusion. (2) The LMPA is heated to above its melting temperature so that the soft robot can change its shape. (3) At this stage, the soft robot is able to grasp an object. (4) While the soft robot is holding or grasping the object, the LMPA is cooled down to room temperature so that it turns into a solid state, and from this point onward, the soft robot can hold the object without relying on extra power for object grasping. (5) Once the soft robot arrives at the destination, the LMPA will be melted again to change the shape of the soft robot for releasing the grip and/or getting ready for another object grasping. In summary, this paper presents a case study of soft grippers, using 3D printing, specifically material extrusion, for fabricating an LMPA-integrated soft robot.

Keywords
Additive manufacturing
3D printing
Soft robot
Soft gripper
Energy consumption
Smart manufacturing
Funding
This work was funded by the Research Grants Council (C4074-22G), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Project ID: 3110174), Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Anhui (2208085QA01), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK0010000075).
Conflict of interest
Jingchao Jiang serves as the Editorial Board Member of the journal but was not in any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B, et al. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Vol. 17. Germany. Springer; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3
  2. Zhai X, Jin L, Jiang J. A survey of additive manufacturing reviews. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022;1(4):21. doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i4.21
  3. Jiang J. A survey of machine learning in additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2023;36(9):1258-1280. doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2023.2177740
  4. Jin L, Zhai X, Wang K, et al. Big data, machine learning, and digital twin assisted additive manufacturing: A review. Mater Des. 2024;244:113086. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113086
  5. Uriondo A, Esperon-Miguez M, Perinpanayagam S. The present and future of additive manufacturing in the aerospace sector: A review of important aspects. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng. 2015;229(11):2132-2147. doi: 10.1177/0954410014568797
  6. Lu Z, San SLL, Tan MJ, An J, Zhang Y, Chua CK. Preliminary investigation on tensile and fatigue properties of ti6al4v manufactured by selected laser melting. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2023;2(2):0912. doi: 10.36922/msam.0912
  7. Marchal V, Zhang Y, Labed N, Lachat R, Peyraut F. Fast layer fiber orientation optimization method for continuous fiber-reinforced material extrusion process. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2023;2(1):49. doi: 10.36922/msam.49
  8. Menon V, Aranas C Jr., Saha G. Cold spray additive manufacturing of copper-based materials: Review and future directions. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022;1(2):12. doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i2.12
  9. Salmi M. Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(1):191. doi: 10.3390/ma14010191
  10. Fayyazbakhsh F, Tusar MH, Huang YW, Leu MC. Effect of bioactive borate glass on printability and physical properties of hydrogels. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2024;3(1):2845. doi: 10.36922/msam.2845
  11. Rouf S, Malik A, Raina A, et al. Functionally graded additive manufacturing for orthopedic applications. J Orthop. 2022;33:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.013
  12. Kouhi M, de Souza Araújo IJ, Asa’ad F, et al. Recent advances in additive manufacturing of patient-specific devices for dental and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Dent Mater. 2024;40:700-715. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.006
  13. Lu W, He W, Wu J, Zhang Y. A critical review of additive manufacturing technology in rehabilitation medicine via the use of visual knowledge graph. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1):e2132265. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2248464
  14. Huang Y, Zhu Q, Liu H, Ren, Zhang L, Gou M. Current materials for 3D-printed flexible medical electrodes. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2023;2(4):2084. doi: 10.36922/msam.2084
  15. Kuzmanić I, Vujović I, Terzić V, Petković M, Šoda J. Additive manufacturing in marine engineering education. Prog Addit Manuf. 2022;7(3):521-530.
  16. Jia Y, Abdelrahman S, Hauser CA. Developing a sustainable resin for 3D printing in coral restoration. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2024;3(2):3125. doi: 10.36922/msam.3125
  17. Wang Z, Zhang B, He Q, et al. Multimaterial embedded 3D printing of composite reinforced soft actuators. Research (Wash D C). 2023;6:0122. doi: 10.34133/research.0122
  18. Rouway M, Tarfaoui M, Chakhchaoui N, Omari LEH, Fraija F, Cherkaoui O. Additive manufacturing and composite materials for marine energy: Case of tidal turbine. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023;10(6):1309-1319. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0194
  19. Garbatov Y, Marchese SS, Epasto G, Crupi V. Flexural response of additive-manufactured honeycomb sandwiches for marine structural applications. Ocean Eng. 2024;302:117732. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117732
  20. Wang M, Li D, Zang Z, et al. 3D food printing: Applications of plant-based materials in extrusion-based food printing. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(26):7184-7198. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1911929
  21. Silva LRG, Stefano JS, Nocelli RCF, Janegitz BC. 3D electrochemical device obtained by additive manufacturing for sequential determination of paraquat and carbendazim in food samples. Food Chem. 2023;406:135038. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135038
  22. Oliveira SM, Martins AJ, Fucinos P, Cerqueira MA, Pastrana LM. Food additive manufacturing with lipid-based inks: Evaluation of phytosterol-lecithin oleogels. J Food Eng. 2023;341:111317. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111317
  23. Yu Q, Zhang M, Bhandari B, Li J. Future perspective of additive manufacturing of food for children. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;136:120-134. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.04.009
  24. Hu G, Damanpack A, Bodaghi M, Liao WH. Increasing dimension of structures by 4D printing shape memory polymers via fused deposition modeling. Smart Mater Struct. 2017;26(12):125023. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aa95e
  25. Zhang K, Gao Q, Jiang J, et al. High energy dissipation and self-healing auxetic foam by integrating shear thickening gel. Compos Sci Technol. 249 (2024) 110475. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110475
  26. Jin L, Yu S, Cheng J, et al. Machine learning-driven forward prediction and inverse design for 4d printed hierarchical architecture with arbitrary shapes. Appl Mater Today. 2024;40:102373. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2024.102373
  27. Li X, Wang X, Mei D, Xu C, Wang Y. Acoustic-assisted DLP 3D printing process for carbon nanofiber reinforced honeycomb structures. J Manuf Processes. 2024;121:374-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.05.047
  28. Yu C, Jiang J. A perspective on using machine learning in 3D bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2020;6(1):253. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i1.253
  29. Kryou C, Leva V, Chatzipetrou M, Zergioti I. Bioprinting for liver transplantation. Bioengineering. 2019;6(4):95. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering6040095
  30. Jo HJ, Kang MS, Jang HJ, et al. Advanced approaches with combination of 2D nanomaterials and 3D printing for exquisite neural tissue engineering. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2023;2(2):0620. doi: 10.36922/msam.0620
  31. Liu C, Ling C, Chen C, et al. Laser additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys and its biomedical applications. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022;1(4):24. doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i4.24
  32. Xu W, Nassehi A, Liu F. Metal additive manufacturing of orthopedic bone plates: An overview. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2023;2(4):2113. doi: 10.36922/msam.2113
  33. Stano G, Percoco G. Additive manufacturing aimed to soft robots fabrication: A review. Extreme Mech Lett. 2021;42:101079. doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2020.101079
  34. Sparrman B, Du Pasquier C, Thomsen C, et al. Printed silicone pneumatic actuators for soft robotics. Addit Manuf. 2021;40:101860. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101860
  35. Roels E, Terryn S, Brancart J, Verhelle R, Van Assche G, Vanderborght B. Additive manufacturing for self-healing soft robots. Soft Robot. 2020;7(6):711-723. doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0081
  36. Jin L, Cui W. On technical issues for underwater charging of robotic fish schools using ocean renewable energy. Ships Offshore Struct. 2023:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2023.2245164
  37. El-Atab N, Mishra RB, Al-Modaf F, et al. Soft actuators for soft robotic applications: A review. Adv Intell Syst. 2020;2(10):2000128. doi: 10.1002/aisy.202000128
  38. Usevitch NS, Hammond ZM, Schwager M, Okamura AM, Hawkes EW, Follmer S. An untethered isoperimetric soft robot. Sci Robot. 2020;5(40):eaaz0492. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aaz0492
  39. Tang Y, Chi Y, Sun J, et al. Leveraging elastic instabilities for amplified performance: Spine-inspired high-speed and high-force soft robots. Sci Adv. 2020;6(19):eaaz6912. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6912
  40. Wang Y, Yang Z, Zhou H, et al. Inflatable particle-jammed robotic gripper based on integration of positive pressure and partial filling. Soft Robot. 2022;9(2):309-323. doi: 10.1089/soro.2020.0139
  41. Li S, Stampfli JJ, Xu HJ, et al. A vacuum-driven origami magic-ball soft gripper. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). United States: IEEE; 2019. p. 7401-7408. doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794068
  42. Faber JA, Arrieta AF, Studart AR. Bioinspired spring origami. Science. 2018;359(6382):1386-1391. doi: 10.1126/science.aap7753
  43. Liu Y, Tu K. Low melting point solders based on Sn, Bi, and In elements. Mater Today Adv. 2020;8:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100115
  44. Daeneke T, Khoshmanesh K, Mahmood N, et al. Liquid metals: Fundamentals and applications in chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(11):4073-4111. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00043j
  45. Wang X, Guo R, Liu J. Liquid metal based soft robotics: Materials, designs, and applications. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4(2):1800549. doi: 10.1002/admt.201800549
  46. Xu S, Yang XH, Tang SS, Liu J. Liquid metal activated hydrogen production from waste aluminum for power supply and its life cycle assessment. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(33):17505-17514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.176
  47. Zhang XD, Yang XH, Zhou YX, et al. Experimental investigation of Galinstan based Minichannel cooling for high heat flux and large heat power thermal management. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;185:248-258. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.010
  48. Yan J, Lu Y, Chen G, Yang M, Gu Z. Advances in liquid metals for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:2518-2533. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00309A
  49. Zhang M, Zhang P, Zhang C, Wang Y, Chang H, Rao W. Porous and anisotropic liquid metal composites with tunable reflection ratio for low-temperature electromagnetic interference shielding. Appl Mater Today. 2020;19:100612. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100612
  50. Jiang J, Zhai X, Zhang K, et al. Low-melting-point alloys integrated extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2023;72:103633. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103633
  51. Jiang J, Zhai X, Jin L, et al. Design for reversed additive manufacturing low-melting-point alloys. J Eng Des. 2023:1-14.doi: 10.1080/09544828.2023.2261096
  52. Bartlett JL, Heim FM, Murty YV, Li X. In situ defect detection in selective laser melting via full-field infrared thermography. Addit Manuf. 2018;24:595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.045
  53. Sushchenko A, Scherschel A, Love-Baker C, et al. Evaluating consumer 3D printing nozzles as a low-cost alternative for mesophase pitch-derived carbon fiber production. Carbon. 2024;225:119088. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2024.119088
  54. Bartlett JL, Li X. An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2019;27:131-149. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.020



Share
Back to top
Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9635 Published by AccScience Publishing