AccScience Publishing / MSAM / Volume 1 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.18063/msam.v1i4.22

Experimental and numerical studies on the acoustic performance of simple cubic structure lattices fabricated by digital light processing 

Zhejie Lai1 Miao Zhao1 Chong Heng Lim1 Jun Wei Chua1*
Show Less
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117575, Singapore
Accepted: 28 October 2022 | Published: 17 November 2022
© 2022 by the Author(s). Licensee AccScience Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( )

Sound absorption is one of the important properties of porous materials such as foams and lattices. Many mathematical models in the literature are capable of modeling the acoustic properties of lattices. However, appropriate models need to be chosen for specific lattice structures on a case-by-case basis and require significant experience in acoustic modeling. This work aims to provide simplified insights into different mathematical models for the simple cubic lattice. The strut lengths and radii of the unit cells were varied, and the sound absorption properties were measured using an impedance tube. The sound absorption coefficients of the lattices generally increased and exhibited more resonant-like behavior as the strut radius increased. The Delany-Bazley (DB) model and the multi-layered micropore-cavity (MMC) model were used to simulate the acoustic properties of the lattices. The correction factors in the MMC were calculated based on empirical relations fitted using experimental data of the design geometry parameters. Results show that the DB model was able to model the sound absorption coefficients for lattice samples with porosities as low as 0.7, while the MMC with resonator theory is a more appropriate acoustics approach for lattices with porosities lower than 0.7. This work will be highly useful for materials researchers who are studying the acoustic properties of novel porous materials, as well as manufacturers of acoustic materials interested in the additive manufacturing of lattice structures for sound absorption and insulation applications.

Lattice structures
Sound absorption
Delany-Bazley model
Transfer matrix method

Cao L, Fu Q, Si Y, et al., 2018, Porous materials for sound absorption. Composites Commun, 10: 25–35


Jia C, Li L, Liu Y, et al., 2020, Highly compressible and anisotropic lamellar ceramic sponges with superior thermal insulation and acoustic absorption performances. Nat Commun, 11: 3732.


Yu X, Lu Z, Zhai W, 2021, Enhancing the flow resistance and sound absorption of open-cell metallic foams by creating partially-open windows. Acta Mater, 206: 116666.


Yang W, An J, Chua CK, et al., 2020, Acoustic absorptions of multifunctional polymeric cellular structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces fabricated by stereolithography. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15: 242–249.


Zieliński TG, Opiela KC, Pawłowski P, et al., 2020, Reproducibility of sound-absorbing periodic porous materials using additive manufacturing technologies: Round robin study. Additive Manuf, 36: 101564.


Cheng Y, Xu Z, Chen S, et al., 2021, The influence of closed pore ratio on sound absorption of plant-based polyurethane foam using control unit model. Appl Acoust, 180: 108083.


Doutres O, Atalla N, Dong K, 2011, Effect of the microstructure closed pore content on the acoustic behavior of polyurethane foams. J Appl Phys, 110: 064901.


Delany ME, Bazley EN, 1970, Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials. Appl Acoust, 3: 105–116.


Kino N, 2015, Further investigations of empirical improvements to the Johnson-Champoux-Allard model. Appl Acoust, 96: 153–170.


Biot MA, 1956, Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid. II. Higher frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am, 28: 179–191.


Dib L, Bouhedja S, Amrani H, 2015, Mechanical parameters effects on acoustic absorption at polymer foam. Adv Mater Sci Eng, 2015: 1–10.


Allard JF, Atalla N, 2009, Propagation of Sound in Porous media: Modelling Sound Absorbing Materials. 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. p358.


Verdiere K, Panneton R, Elkoun S, et al., Transfer matrix method applied to the parallel assembly of sound absorbing materials. J Acoust Soc Am, 134: 4648.


Niskanen M, Groby JP, Duclos A, et al., 2017, Deterministic and statistical characterization of rigid frame porous materials from impedance tube measurements. J Acoust Soc Am, 142: 2407.


Boulvert J, Cavalieri T, Costa-Baptista J, et al., Optimally graded porous material for broadband perfect absorption of sound. J Appl Phys, 126: 175101.


Chen S, Lei S, Zhu J, et al., 2021, The influence of microstructure on sound absorption of polyurethane foams through numerical simulation. Macromol Theory Simul, 30: 2000075.


Zhai W, Yub X, Song X, et al., 2018, Microstructure-based experimental and numerical investigations on the sound absorption property of open-cell metallic foams manufactured by a template replication technique. Mater Design, 137: 108–116.


Chua JW, Li X, Li T, et al., 2022, Customisable sound absorption properties of functionally graded metallic foams. J Mater Sci Technol, 108: 196–207.


Gai XL, Xing T, Li XY, et al., 2016, Sound absorption of microperforated panel mounted with helmholtz resonators. Appl Acoust, 114: 260–265.


Komkin AI, Mironov MA, Bykov AI, 2017, Sound absorption by a Helmholtz resonator. Acoust Phys, 63: 385–392.


Maa DY, 1998, Potential of microperforated panel absorber. J Acoust Soc Am, 104: 2861–2866.


Morse PM, Ingard KU, 1968, Theoretical Acoustics (International Series in Pure and Applied Physics). McGraw- Hill, New York.


Li X, Yu X, Chua JW, et al., 2021, Microlattice metamaterials with simultaneous superior acoustic and mechanical energy absorption. Small, 17: e2100336.


Doutres O, Atalla N, Osman H, 2015, Transfer matrix modeling and experimental validation of cellular porous material with resonant inclusions. J Acoust Soc Am, 137: 3502–3513.


Jiménez N, Umnova O, Groby JP, 2021, Acoustic Waves in Periodic Structures, Metamaterials, and Porous Media (Topics in Applied Physics). Springer, Germany.


Fourie JG, Du Plessis JP, 2002, Pressure drop modelling in cellular metallic foams. Chem Eng Sci, 57: 2781–2789.


Verdière K, Panneton R, Elkoun S, et al., 2013, Transfer matrix method applied to the parallel assembly of sound absorbing materials. J Acoust Soc Am, 134: 4648–4658.


Ashby M, Evans T, Fleck NA, 2000, Metal Foams: A Design Guide. Elsevier, Burlington.


Okuzono T, Nitta T, Sakagami K, 2019, Note on microperforated panel model using equivalent-fluid-based absorption elements. Acoust Sci Technol, 40: 221–224.


Li X, Yu X, Zhai W, 2021, Additively manufactured deformation-recoverable and broadband sound-absorbing microlattice inspired by the concept of traditional perforated panels. Adv Mater, 33: e2104552.


Li X, Yu X, Zhai W, 2022, Less is more: Hollow-truss microlattice metamaterials with dual sound dissipation mechanisms and enhanced broadband sound absorption. Small, 18: e2204145.


Rahimabady M, Statharas EC, Yao K, et al., Hybrid local piezoelectric and conductive functions for high performance airborne sound absorption. Appl Phys Lett, 111: 241601.


Egab L, Wang X, Fard M, 2014, Acoustical characterisation of porous sound absorbing materials: A review. Int J Veh Noise Vib 10: 129–149.


Institution BS, 1993, Acoustics. Materials for Acoustical Applications. Determination of Airflow Resistance. British Standards Institution, United Kingdom.


Khosravani MR, Reinicke T, 2021, Experimental characterization of 3D-printed sound absorber. Eur J Mech A Solids, 89: 104304.

Back to top
Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9635 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by AccScience Publishing