AccScience Publishing / JCBP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCBP025380074
SHORT COMMUNICATION

Confusion: A debilitating and persistent psychosomatic symptom of burnout among researchers

Carol Nash1*
Show Less
1 Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Received: 21 September 2025 | Revised: 27 October 2025 | Accepted: 6 November 2025 | Published online: 21 November 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

There are no studies on the psychosomatic symptoms of burnout among researchers, although such symptoms have been well studied in the general population in recent years. To enumerate and define the psychosomatic symptoms experienced by researchers in one burnout-reduction program, a historical narrative analysis was employed. This method interprets archived data gathered from an author-created and -facilitated burnout-reduction initiative for researchers offered annually over the past 10 years. Among researchers seeking the intervention, a feeling of being unable to think clearly about their work emerged as the predominant psychosomatic symptom. Across participation in the burnout-reduction process, those who indicated confusion as their primary reason for enrolling generally reported sufficient clarification of thought to resume their investigations. However, in the following academic year, some participants experienced a recurrence of this confusion, prompting additional program participation. Upon completion of the burnout-reduction program, the most frequently reported psychosomatic symptom—confusion—perceived as both predominantly debilitating and unique to researchers, appears to be at least temporarily resolved through participation in the intervention method. To develop further programs for burned-out researchers that focus on alleviating confusion, dedicated research studies are needed to assess the prevalence and severity of this symptom.

Keywords
Psychosomatic symptoms
Burnout
Researchers
Historical narrative analysis
Confusion
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Tatayeva R, Ossadchaya E, Sarkulova S, Sembayeva Z, Koigeldinova S. Psychosomatic aspects of the development of comorbid pathology: A review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022;36:152. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.152

 

  1. Nash C. Physician burnout: Historical context, psychosomatic division, evolution, results, solutions, and recommendations. Encyclopedia. 2025;5(2):74. doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia5020074

 

  1. Guseva Canu I, Marca SC, Dell’Oro F, et al. Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021;47(2):95-107. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3935

 

  1. Hammarström P, Rosendahl S, Gruber M, Nordin S. Somatic symptoms in burnout in a general adult population. J Psychosom Res. 2023;168:111217. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111217

 

  1. Keffane S, Bouazza S. Emotional exhaustion and psychosomatic symptoms for doctors working in hospitals resulting Coronavirus pandemic outbreak. Adv Educ Technol Psychol. 2021;5:58-66. doi: 10.23977/aetp.2021.55010

 

  1. Daumiller M, Rinas R, Breithecker J. Elite athletes’ achievement goals, burnout levels, psychosomatic stress symptoms, and coping strategies. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022;20(2):416-435. doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2021.1877326

 

  1. Voloshyna V, Popeliushko R, Romanovska L, Kravchyna T, Oliynyk K, Popyk Y. The influence of emotional burnout on the occurrence of psychologist’s psychosomatic diseases in the conditions of war. Brain. 2025;16(1):366. doi: 10.70594/brain/16.1/27

 

  1. Llorca-Pellicer M, Gil-LaOrden P, Prado-Gascó VJ, Gil- Monte PR. The role of psychosocial risks in burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction: Lineal models vs a QCA approach in non-university teachers. Psychol Health. 2025;40(4):681-695. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2253258

 

  1. Łopatkiewicz A, Kwaśnicka A, Nowicki P, et al. Occupational burnout and mental health. A study of psychiatric nurses from six European Countries. ACP. 2023;19(1):80-91. doi: 10.5709/acp-0380-0

 

  1. Kools FRW, Fox CM, Prakken BJ, Van Rijen HVM. One size does not fit all: An exploratory interview study on how translational researchers navigate the current academic reward system. Front Med. 2023;10:1109297. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1109297

 

  1. OECD. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. doi: 10.1787/9789264239012-en

 

  1. Ghezzi C. What is research and why we do it. In: Being a Researcher. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 1-23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45157-8_1

 

  1. Buckley R. Originality in research publication: Measure, concept, or skill? J Travel Res. 2022;62(5):1159-1163. doi: 10.1177/004728752210952

 

  1. Rodríguez Sánchez I, Mantecón A, Williams AM, Makkonen T, Kim YR. Originality: The holy grail of tourism research. J Travel Res. 2022;61(6):1219-1232. doi: 10.1177/00472875211033343

 

  1. Nguyen LT, Tuamsuk K. Factors influencing researchers’ scientific integrity in scholarly publishing: A path analysis approach. Res Ethics. 2025;21(3):384-407. doi: 10.1177/17470161241257445

 

  1. Aubert Bonn N, Pinxten W. Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) - a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021;6(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z

 

  1. Hiebert J, Cai J, Hwang S, Morris AK, Hohensee C. Significance of a study: Revisiting the “so what” question. In: Doing Research: A New Researcher’s Guide. Research in Mathematics Education. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 105-124. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-19078-0_5

 

  1. Nash C. Team mindfulness in online academic meetings to reduce burnout. Challenges. 2023;14(1):15. doi: 10.3390/challe14010015

 

  1. Nash C. Historical study of an online hospital-affiliated burnout intervention process for researchers. J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2024;9:1-17. doi: 10.21037/jhmhp-24-87

 

  1. Weiss CR, Johnson-Koenke R. Narrative inquiry as a caring and relational research approach: Adopting an evolving paradigm. Qual Health Res. 2023;33(5):388-399. doi: 10.1177/10497323231158619

 

  1. Lim WM. What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Aust Market J. 2025;33(2):199-229. doi: 10.1177/14413582241264619

 

  1. Josselson R, Hammack PL. Essentials of Narrative Analysis. United States: American Psychological Association; 2021. doi: 10.1037/0000246-000

 

  1. Sukhera J. Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. J Graduate Med Educ. 2022;14(4):414-417. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1

 

  1. Pino Gavidia LA, Adu J. Critical narrative inquiry: An examination of a methodological approach. Int J Qual Methods. 2022;21:16094069221081594. doi: 10.1177/16094069221081594
Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Basic Psychosomatics, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4414 Print ISSN: 3060-8562, Published by AccScience Publishing