AccScience Publishing / IJOCTA / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJOCTA026210085
Cite this article
6
Download
57
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Three-species dynamics eco-cognitive instantaneous response modulation in a predator-prey system

Ashraf Adnan Thirthar1* Abdulhassan A. Karamallah2 Prabir Panja3 Aiman Mukheimer4 Hisham Mohammad ALkhawar5 Thabet Abdeljawad6
Show Less
1 Department of Mathematics, College of Education, University of Fallujah, Anbar, Iraq
2 Technical Engineering College/Power Mechanics Engineering, Al-bayan University, Baghdad, Iraq
3 Department of Applied Science, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, India
4 Department of Mathematics and Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
5 Preparatory Year Program, Computer Department Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
6 Department of Fundamental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Istanbul Gelisim University, Avcılar-Istanbul, Turkey
Received: 19 May 2026 | Revised: 12 June 2026 | Accepted: 12 June 2026 | Published online: 29 June 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This paper presents a new three-species predator–prey model with an ecocognitive response for instantaneous trophic interactions. Unlike older models which base predator efficiency on factors such as encounter rates or handling time, this framework incorporates cognitive influence. Predator performance here is affected by their perception of immediate prey density—that is, how well predators recognize, pursue, and outsmart their prey. The system includes a prey population growing logistically, a middle predator guided by the cognition-based model, and a top predator preying on the middle one. It maintains biological realism while adding feedback between the number of prey and predator cognition in real-time. The analysis covers positiviy and boundedness, existence and local stability of equilibria, persistence and extinction thresholds, Hopf bifurcation, oscillatory coexistence and sensitivity analysis. Numerical continuation, bifurcation diagrams and phase portraits show complex dynamics like stable coexistence, wide swings, multistability, and transient chaos.

Keywords
Eco-cognitive response
Behavioral ecology
Nonlinear dynamics
Hopf bifurcation
Sensitivity analysis
Lyapunov exponent
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References

1. Mandal G, Guin LN, Chakravarty S, Han R. Dynamic complexities in a predator–prey model with prey refuge influenced by double Allee effects. Math Comput Simul. 2024;227:527-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2024.08.015.

 

2. Thirthar AA, Sharba BA, Majeed SJ, Panja P, Abdeljawad T. The dynamics of prey–predator model with global warming on carrying capacity and wind flow on predation. Nonlinear Eng. 2026;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2025-0182.

 

3. Rahman MS, Saha B. Analysis of predator–prey systems incorporating prey fear, cooperative predation, and harvesting. Int J Appl Comput Math. 2026;12(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-026-02110-0.

 

4. Roy S, Al-Jaf DS, Thirthar AA, Tiwari PK. The impact of human shields in autonomous and nonautonomous prey–predator models with modified Cosner functional response. Math Comput Simul. 2025;242:54-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2025.11.016.

 

5. Mondal B, Sardar P, Mandal S, Tiwari PK. Coupled tipping dynamics: parameter-driven bifurcations and noise-induced transitions in a Leslie–Gower model. Nonlinear Dyn. 2026;114(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-026-12596-4.

 

6. Correia HE, Dee LE, Byrnes JE, et al. Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research. Nat Commun. 2026;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69878-z.

 

7. Malard J, Adamowski J, Nassar JB, Anandaraja N, Tuy H, Melgar-Quiñonez H. Modelling predation: theoretical criteria and empirical evaluation of functional form equations for predator–prey systems. Ecol Modell. 2020;437:109264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.10926

 

8. Umrao AK, Roy S, Tiwari PK, Srivastava PK. Dynamical behaviors of autonomous and nonautonomous models of generalist predator–prey system with fear, mutual interference and nonlinear harvesting. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2024;183:114891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114891.

 

9. Wooster EI, Gaynor KM, Carthey AJ, Wallach AD, Stanton LA, Ramp D, Lundgren EJ. Animal cognition and culture mediate predator–prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2023;39(1):52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.09.012.

 

10. Rana SMS, Uddin MJ. Incorporating memory effects in population ecology using fractional derivatives: stability perspectives, bifurcations, and chaos control. Complexity. 2026;2026(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/cplx/7366836.

 

11. Roy S, Byrne HM, Banerjee J, Sasmal SK, Dutta S, Ghosh D. Spatio-temporal eco-evolutionary dynamics of prey-predator systems with defended and undefended prey. Commun Phys. 2025;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02434-1.

 

12. Perkins DM, Hatton IA, Gauzens B, Barnes AD, Ott D, Rosenbaum B, Vinagre C, Brose U. Consistent predator–prey biomass scaling in complex food webs. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32578-5.

 

13. Bhattacharyya S, Sinha S. Ecological networks: structure, interaction strength, and stability. In: Birkhäuser Boston eBooks. 2009:57-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4751-3_4.

 

14. Palmer MS, Portales-Reyes C, Potter C, Mech LD, Isbell F. Behaviorally-mediated trophic cascade attenuated by prey use of risky places at safe times. Oecologia. 2021;195(1):235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04816-4.

 

15. Sun S,Wu X, Xu T. A theoretical framework for a mathematical cognitive model for adaptive learning systems. Behav Sci. 2023;13(5):406. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050406.

 

16. Madani N, Hammouch Z, Ozdemir N. Hybrid GA-IPA and neural network-based solution for fractional-order nonlinear predator–prey dynamical systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2025;113(23):32979-33004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11781-1.

 

17. Uçar E, Özdemir N, Altun E. Qualitative analysis and numerical simulations of new model describing cancer. J Comput Appl Math. 2023;422:114899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114899.

 

18. Uçar E, Özdemir N. New fractional cancer mathematical model via IL-10 cytokine and anti-PD-L1 inhibitor. Fractal Fract. 2023;7(2):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020151.

 

19. Babaoglu M, Kumar P. Investigation of stability and oscillatory behavior of allelochemical influence on plants in time delay differential equation model. Trans Comput Model Intell Syst. 2025;1:10013. https://doi.org/10.65112/tcmis.10013.

 

20. Okundalaye O, Ozdemir N, Rotimi B, Akanbi F. Climate-based predictive modeling of malaria incidence using statistical and machine learning approaches. Trans Comput Model Intell Syst. 2025;1:10014. https://doi.org/10.65112/tcmis.10014.

 

21. Wang X, Zanette L, Zou X. Modelling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions. J Math Biol. 2016;73(5):1179-1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-0989-1.

 

22. Wang X, Zou X. Modeling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions with adaptive avoidance of predators. Bull Math Biol. 2017;79(6):1325-1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0287-0.

 

23. Das A, Samanta GP. Modeling the fear effect on a stochastic prey–predator system with additional food for the predator. J Phys A Math Theor. 2018;51(46):465601. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aae4c6.

 

24. Mondal S, Maiti A, Samanta GP. Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator–prey model. Biophys Rev Lett. 2018;13(04):157-177. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793048018500091.

 

25. Pal S, Pal N, Samanta S, Chattopadhyay J. Effect of hunting cooperation and fear in a predator–prey model. Ecol Complex. 2019;39:100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100770.

 

26. Dash S, Khajanchi S. Dynamics of intraguild predation with intraspecies competition. J Appl Math Comput. 2023;69(6):4877-4906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-023-01956-7.

 

27. Maji M, Khajanchi S. A fractional-order yeast prion mathematical model and its solution. J Appl Math Comput. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-024-02063-x.

 

28. Sarkar K, Khajanchi S. Spatiotemporal dynamics of a predator–prey system with fear effect. J Franklin Inst. 2023;360(11):7380-7414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.05.034.

 

29. Jabbari A, Lotfi M, Kheiri H, Khajanchi S. Mathematical analysis of the dynamics of a fractionalorder tuberculosis epidemic in a patchy environment under the influence of re-infection. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2023;46(17):17798-17817. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9532.

 

30. Mokni K, Ch-Chaoui M. Exploring persistence, stability, and bifurcations: a Darwinian Ricker–Cushing model. Int J Dyn Control. 2025;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-024-01539-9.

 

31. Mokni K, Ali HB, Ghosh B, Ch-Chaoui M. Nonlinear dynamics of a Darwinian Ricker system with strong Allee effect and immigration. Math Comput Simul. 2024;229:789-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2024.10.017.

 

32. Ahmidi M, Mokni K, Ch-Chaoui M. Influence of prey harvesting on the dynamics of a prey–predator system: multi-parameter bifurcation analysis. Nonlinear Dyn. 2025;113(22):31841-31870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11701-3.

 

33. Mokni K, Ch-Chaoui M. Strong Allee effect and evolutionary dynamics in a single-species Ricker population model. J Biol Syst. 2023;31(04):1341-1370. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218339023500456.

 

34. Biswas S, Ahmad B, Khajanchi S. Exploring dynamical complexity of a cannibalistic ecoepidemiological model with multiple time delay. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2022;46(4):4184-4211. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8749.

 

35. Khajanchi S. Dynamic behavior of a Beddington–DeAngelis type stage structured predator–prey model. Appl Math Comput. 2014;244:344-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.06.109.

 

36. Sarkar K, Khajanchi S, Mali PC, Nieto JJ. Rich dynamics of a predator-prey system with different kinds of functional responses. Complexity. 2020;2020:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4285294.

 

37. Mondal S, Samanta G. A comparison study of predator–prey system in determiistic and stochastic environments influenced by fear and its carry-over effects. Eur Phys J Plus. 2021;137(1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02219-9.

 

38. Das M, Samanta G. A delayed fractional order food chain model with fear effect and prey refuge. Math Comput Simul. 2020;178:218-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.06.015.

 

39. Thirthar AA, Kumar B, Verma SK. Effects of predator cooperation in hunting and prey fear in a generalist predator–prey model that includes global warming phenomena. Eur Phys J Plus. 2024;139(12). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05880-y.

 

40. Santra N, Mondal S, Samanta G. Complex dynamics of a predator–prey interaction with fear effect in deterministic and fluctuating environments. Mathematics. 2022;10(20):3795. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203795.

 

41. Hayes AR, Huntly NJ. Effects of wind on the behavior and call transmission of pikas (Ochotona princeps). J Mammal. 2005;86(5):974-981. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86.

 

42. McVicar TR, et al. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: implications for evaporation. J Hydrol. 2011;416-417:182-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024.

 

43. Klimczuk E, Halupka L, Czyż B, Borowiec M, Nowakowski JJ, Sztwiertnia H. Factors driving variation in biparental incubation behaviour in the reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus. Ardea. 2015;103(1):51-59. https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v103i1.a5.

 

44. Stander PE, Albon SD. Hunting success of lions in a semi-arid environment. In: Oxford University Press eBooks. 1993:127-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198540670.003.0007.

 

45. McBlain M, Jones KA, Shannon G. Sleeping Eurasian oystercatchers adjust their vigilance in response to the behaviour of neighbours, human disturbance and environmental conditions. J Zool. 2020;312(2):75-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12812.

 

46. Cherry MJ, Barton BT. Effects of wind on predator–prey interactions. Food Webs. 2017;13:92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.005.

 

47. Turner J, Vollrath F, Hesselberg T. Wind speed affects prey-catching behaviour in an orb web spider. Naturwissenschaften. 2011;98(12):1063-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0854-4.

 

48. Yasuoka J, Levins R. Ecology of vector mosquitoes in Sri Lanka–suggestions for future mosquito control in rice ecosystems. PubMed. 2007;38(4):646-657. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17883002.

 

49. Calcaterra LA, Porter SD, Briano JA. Distribution and abundance of fire ant decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae: Pseudacteon) in three regions of southern South America. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005;98(1):85-95. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098.

 

50. Dawson T, Hulbert A. Standard metabolism, body temperature, and surface areas of Australian marsupials. Am J Physiol. 1970;218(4):1233-1238. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.218.4.1233

 

51. Jawad S, Thirthar AA, Panja P, Abdeljawad T. Effects of wind, global warming and fear in a disease-induced Hassell-Varley predator–prey model through Caputo fractional order derivative. Int J Model Simul. 2026:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2026.2661662.

 

52. Thirthar AA, Jawad S, Shah K, Abdeljawad T. How does media coverage affect a COVID-19 pandemic model with direct and indirect transmission? J Math Comput Sci. 2024;35(02):169-181. https://doi.org/10.22436/jmcs.035.02.04.

 

53. Uçar S, Evirgen F, Özdemir N, Hammouch Z. Mathematical analysis and simulation of a giving up smoking model within the scope of nonsingular derivative. Proc Inst Math Mech Natl Acad Sci Azerb. 2022;48. https://doi.org/10.30546/2409-4994.48.2022.8499.

 

54. Thirthar AA, Alaoui AL, Roy S, Tiwari PK. Fractional and stochastic dynamics of predator–prey systems: the role of fear and global warming. Eur Phys J B. 2025;98(7). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-00992-5.

 

55. Thirthar AA, Panja P, Mahdi ZA, Mondal B, Al-Jaser A, Alqudah MA, Abdeljawad T. Climate change impacts on tri-trophic predator–prey model of the interactions between wolves, ungulates, and plants. Fractals. 2025;33(06). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348x25401061.

 

56. Evirgen F. Fractional-order modeling and analysis of dengue transmission incorporating aquatic environmental parameters. J Comput Appl Math. 2025:117188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2025.117188.

 

57. Thirthar AA, Majeed SJ, Shah K, Abdeljawad T. The dynamics of an aquatic ecological model with aggregation, fear and harvesting effects. AIMS Math. 2022;7(10):18532-18552. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221018.

 

58. Thomas AL, Taylor GK. Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight. J Theor Biol. 2001;212(3):399-424. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2387.

Share
Back to top
An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, Electronic ISSN: 2146-5703 Print ISSN: 2146-0957, Published by AccScience Publishing