AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026380408
Cite this article
45
Download
830
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Recent advances in 3D bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering: Biomimetic strategies, cellular regulation, and future perspectives

Hebin Ma1,2† ,  Zhen Yang1,3† ,  Yajing Li4 ,  Qiyuan Lin1,3 ,  Ziyue Chu1,3 ,  Hui Li1,3 ,  Dan Xing1,3* ,  Jianhao Lin1,3*
Show Less
1 Arthritis Clinical and Research Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing , China
2 Peking University People’s Hospital Collaborative Training Center, Graduate School, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei , China
3 Arthritis Institute, Peking University, Beijing , China
4 Senior Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Eighth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 25 May 2026 | Revised: 15 September 2026 | Accepted: 28 September 2026 | Published online: 28 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Articular cartilage has limited intrinsic repair capacity, and current clinical approaches often fail to restore durable hyaline cartilage. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting offers spatial control over cells, biomaterials, and bioactive cues, creating opportunities to fabricate patient-specific constructs that recapitulate cartilage architecture and function. However, functional cartilage regeneration cannot be achieved by optimizing printing technology, bioink composition, cell source, or scaffold design in isolation. This review critically examines recent advances in 3D bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering through an integrated, design-oriented framework. Bioprinting modalities are compared according to their underlying physical mechanisms and their trade-offs in resolution, throughput, bioink compatibility, and cellular stress. Natural, synthetic, and composite bioinks are discussed with emphasis on how rheological behavior, crosslinking, and reinforcement jointly regulate printability, cell-instructive capacity, degradation, and mechanical durability. The roles of chondrocytes, mesenchymal stromal cells, and pluripotent stem cell-derived chondrogenic cells are evaluated in relation to phenotype stability, scalability, safety, and clinical application. At the construct level, pore architecture, mechanical and compositional gradients, fiber alignment, and spatiotemporally controlled factor delivery are considered as interacting regulators of mass transport, matrix organization, regional function, and host integration. A central conclusion is that successful cartilage bioprinting requires balanced optimization of competing objectives, including bioactivity versus printability, printing fidelity versus cytocompatibility, and porosity versus mechanical integrity. Future translation will require standardized, cartilage-specific evaluation of long-term matrix quality, mechanical function, safety, reproducibility, and repair efficacy in clinically relevant models.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
3D bioprinting techniques
Tissue engineering
Composite biomaterial
Cartilage regeneration
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82125018, 82472482), National Key R&D Program Project (2024YFA1108603), Peking University People's Hospital Scientific Research Development Fund (RDX202504), Peking University Medicine Fund of Fostering Young Scholars’ Scientific & Technological Innovation (BMU2026YFJHPY022), the Research Project on Innovation and Development of Young Scientific and Technological Talents in Orthopedics (2025) (GSKQNJJ-2025-001).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Li M, Sun D, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wei Q, Wang Y. Application and development of 3D bioprinting in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(19):5430-5458. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00709f
  2. Udomluck N, Park H, Lee JY. Advances in biomaterial-based composite spheroid for articular cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng. 2025;16:20417314251349669. doi: 10.1177/20417314251349669
  3. Wang M, Wang J, Xu X, Li E, Xu P. Engineering gene-activated bioprinted scaffolds for enhancing articular cartilage repair. Mater Today Bio. 2024;29:101351. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101351
  4. Jiao R, Lin X, Wang J, et al. 3D-printed constructs deliver bioactive cargos to expedite cartilage regeneration. J Pharm Anal. 2024;14(12):100925. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.12.015
  5. Tan B, Gan S, Wang X, Liu W, Li X. Applications of 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: advantages, deficiencies, improvements, and future perspectives. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(27):5385-5413. doi: 10.1039/d1tb00172h
  6. Du X, Gu H, Ouyang X, et al. Advanced 3D Bioprinting Technology for Cartilage Engineering and Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(10):5780-5804. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c01107
  7. Chae S, Cho DW. Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2023;156:4-20. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.004
  8. Liang Q, Ma Y, Yao X, Wei W. Advanced 3D-Printing Bioinks for Articular Cartilage Repair. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(3):511. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i3.511
  9. Zheng Z, Yu D, Wang H, et al. Advancement of 3D biofabrication in repairing and regeneration of cartilage defects. Biofabrication. 2025;17(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ada8e1
  10. Pei Z, Gao M, Xing J, et al. Experimental study on repair of cartilage defects in the rabbits with GelMA-MSCs scaffold prepared by three-dimensional bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):662. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.662
  11. Diaz-Payno PJ, Kalogeropoulou M, Muntz I, et al. Swelling-Dependent Shape-Based Transformation of a Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Laden 4D Bioprinted Construct for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(2):e2201891. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201891
  12. Boretti G, Amirfallah A, Edmunds KJ, Hamzehpour H, Sigurjonsson OE. Advancing Cartilage Tissue Engineering: A Review of 3D Bioprinting Approaches and Bioink Properties. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2025;31(4):357-373. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0168
  13. Santos-Beato P, Midha S, Pitsillides AA, Miller A, Torii R, Kalaskar DM. Biofabrication of the osteochondral unit and its applications: Current and future directions for 3D bioprinting. J Tissue Eng. 2022;13:20417314221133480. doi: 10.1177/20417314221133480
  14. Park DY, Kim SH, Park SH, Jang JS, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ. 3D Bioprinting Strategies for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024;52(7):1883-1893. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03236-8
  15. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin CT. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;226:119536. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
  16. Zhou D, Dou B, Kroh F, Wang C, Ouyang L. Biofabrication strategies with single-cell resolution: a review. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2023;5(4):042005. doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ace863
  17. Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H, He Y. Development of 3D bioprinting: From printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15(5):529-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.003
  18. Prendergast ME, Burdick JA. Recent Advances in Enabling Technologies in 3D Printing for Precision Medicine. Adv Mater. 2020;32(13):1902516. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902516
  19. Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, Luo S, Nie J, Zhu X. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(1):110-115. doi 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003
  20. Manzoli S, Merotto E, Piccoli M, Gobbo P, Todros S, Pavan PG. An Overview of 3D Bioprinting Impact on Cell Viability: From Damage Assessment to Protection Solutions. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(12). doi: 10.3390/jfb16120436
  21. Agarwal T, Chiesa I, Presutti D, et al. Recent advances in bioprinting technologies for engineering different cartilage-based tissues. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;123:112005. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112005
  22. Idaszek J, Costantini M, Karlsen TA, et al. 3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head. Biofabrication. 2019;11(4):044101. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab2622
  23. Hu G, Liang Z, Fan Z, et al. Construction of 3D-Bioprinted cartilage-mimicking substitute based on photo-crosslinkable Wharton's jelly bioinks for full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair. Mater Today Bio. 2023;21:100695. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100695
  24. Olate-Moya F, Rubi-Sans G, Engel E, Mateos-Timoneda MA, Palza H. 3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Alginate/Gelatin/Chondroitin Sulfate Hydrogel Nanocomposites for Intrinsically Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biomacromolecules. J10 2024;25(6):3312-3324. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c01444
  25. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, Gal I, Wertheim L, Dvir T. 3D Printing of Personalized Thick and Perfusable Cardiac Patches and Hearts. Article. Adv Sci. 2019;6(11):1900344. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900344
  26. Muth JT, Vogt DM, Truby RL, et al. Embedded 3D Printing of Strain Sensors within Highly Stretchable Elastomers. Adv Mater. 2014;26(36):6307-6312. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400334
  27. Jeon O, Lee YB, Jeong H, Lee SJ, Wells D, Alsberg E. Individual cell-only bioink and photocurable supporting medium for 3D printing and generation of engineered tissues with complex geometries. 10.1039/C9MH00375D. Mater Horiz. 2019;6(8):1625-1631. doi: 10.1039/C9MH00375D
  28. Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, Forgacs G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2009;30(30):5910-5917. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034
  29. Croom BP, Abbott A, Kemp JW, et al. Mechanics of nozzle clogging during direct ink writing of fiber-reinforced composites. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101701
  30. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, Cornelissen M, Dubruel P. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
  31. McCormack A, Highley CB, Leslie NR, Melchels FPW. 3D Printing in Suspension Baths: Keeping the Promises of Bioprinting Afloat. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):584-593. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.020
  32. Wu Q, Song K, Zhang D, et al. Embedded extrusion printing in yield-stress-fluid baths. Matter. 2022;5(11):3775-3806. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2022.09.003
  33. Al Qassab M, Merheb M, Sayadi S, et al. Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(10):356. doi: 10.3390/jfb16100356
  34. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al. Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. Review. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10793-10833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
  35. Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A, et al. 3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications. Small. 2019;15(23):1805510. doi:10.1002/smll.201805510
  36. Barui S, Saunders RE, Naskar S, Basu B, Derby B. Acoustic Poration and Dynamic Healing of Mammalian Cell Membranes during Inkjet Printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(1):749-757. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01635
  37. Reizabal A, Tandon B, Lanceros-Méndez S, Dalton PD. Electrohydrodynamic 3D Printing of Aqueous Solutions. Review. Small. 2023;19(7):2205255. doi: 10.1002/smll.202205255
  38. Xie M, Gao Q, Zhao H, et al. Electro-Assisted Bioprinting of Low-Concentration GelMA Microdroplets. Article. Small. 2019;15(4):1804216. doi: 10.1002/smll.201804216
  39. Cai S, Sun Y, Wang Z, Yang W, Li X, Yu H. Mechanisms, influencing factors, and applications of electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nanotechnol Rev. 2021;10(1):1046-1078. doi: doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2021-0073
  40. Vasilopoulou AG, Gines Rodriguez N, Mansouri A, et al. Converging laser-induced forward transfer and melt electrowriting for biofabrication of reinforced cartilage constructs. Biofabrication. 2026;18(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ae3c43
  41. Yang H, Yang KH, Narayan RJ, Ma S. Laser-based bioprinting for multilayer cell patterning in tissue engineering and cancer research. Essays Biochem. 2021;65(3):409-416. doi: 10.1042/ebc20200093
  42. Vanaei S, Parizi MS, Vanaei S, Salemizadehparizi F, Vanaei HR. An Overview on Materials and Techniques in 3D Bioprinting Toward Biomedical Application. Eng Regen. 2021;2:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.001
  43. Lin Y, Huang G, Huang Y, Jeremy Tzeng TR, Chrisey D. Effect of laser fluence in laser‐assisted direct writing of human colon cancer cell. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2010;16(3):202-208. doi: 10.1108/13552541011034870
  44. Cheng L, Suresh KS, He H, et al. 3D Printing of Micro- and Nanoscale Bone Substitutes: A Review on Technical and Translational Perspectives. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:4289-4319. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S311001
  45. Sun J, Fang T, Zhang Y, et al. Imaging-Guided Microscale Photothermal Stereolithography Bioprinting. Adv Sci. 2025;12(18):2500640. doi:10.1002/advs.202500640
  46. Wang X, Ma Y, Niu Y, et al. Sub-second volumetric 3D printing by synthesis of holographic light fields. Nature. 2026;650(8103):882-890. doi: 10.1038/s41586-026-10114-5
  47. Agarwal T, Onesto V, Banerjee D, et al. 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation. Biofabrication. 2025;17(4):42003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a
  48. Chansoria P, Narayanan LK, Schuchard K, Shirwaiker R. Ultrasound-assisted biofabrication and bioprinting of preferentially aligned three-dimensional cellular constructs. Biofabrication. 2019;11(3):035015. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab15cf
  49. Bouyer C, Chen P, Güven S, et al. A Bio-Acoustic Levitational (BAL) Assembly Method for Engineering of Multilayered, 3D Brain-Like Constructs, Using Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Neuro-Progenitors. Adv Mater. 2016;28(1):161-167. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503916
  50. Chen P, Güven S, Usta OB, Yarmush ML, Demirci U. Biotunable acoustic node assembly of organoids. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4(13):1937-1943. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500279
  51. Garvin KA, Dalecki D, Hocking DC. Vascularization of three-dimensional collagen hydrogels using ultrasound standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(11):1853-1864. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.07.008
  52. Hwangbo H, Chae S, Ryu D, Kim G. In situ magnetic-field-assisted bioprinting process using magnetorheological bioink to obtain engineered muscle constructs. Bioact Mater. 2025;45:417-433. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.035
  53. Lee JM, Sing SL, Zhou M, Yeong WY. 3D bioprinting processes: A perspective on classification and terminology. IJB. 4(2):151. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v4i2.151
  54. Tseng H, Gage JA, Raphael RM, et al. Assembly of a Three-Dimensional Multitype Bronchiole Coculture Model Using Magnetic Levitation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013;19(9):665-675. doi: doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0157
  55. Haisler WL, Timm DM, Gage JA, Tseng H, Killian TC, Souza GR. Three-dimensional cell culturing by magnetic levitation. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(10):1940-1949. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.125
  56. Choi H, Jang J. Magnetic-based tissue engineering: principles, applications, and future prospects in biofabrication. 10.1039/D5BM00160A. Biomater Sci. 2025;13(22):6215-6238. doi: 10.1039/D5BM00160A
  57. Hou S, Tiriac H, Sridharan BP, et al. Advanced Development of Primary Pancreatic Organoid Tumor Models for High-Throughput Phenotypic Drug Screening. SLAS Discov. 2018;23(6):574-584. doi: 10.1177/2472555218766842
  58. Souza GR, Tseng H, Gage JA, et al. Magnetically Bioprinted Human Myometrial 3D Cell Rings as A Model for Uterine Contractility. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4):683.
  59. Fattah ARA, Meleca E, Mishriki S, et al. In Situ 3D Label-Free Contactless Bioprinting of Cells through Diamagnetophoresis. ACS BIOMATER SCI ENG. 2016;2(12):2133-2138. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00614
  60. Ayan B, Heo DN, Zhang Z, et al. Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics. Sci Adv. 2020;6(10):eaaw5111. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5111
  61. Ning W, Duan F, Raymond L, et al. High-precision path planning for multi-material 3D bioprinting of complex structures. Biofabrication. 2026;18(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ae36f8
  62. Kim C, Hong S, Shin D, An S, Zhang X, Jhe W. Sorting Gold and Sand (Silica) Using Atomic Force Microscope-Based Dielectrophoresis. Nanomicro Lett. 2021;14(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00760-x
  63. Cañada J, Bigelow Z, Velásquez-García LF. Fully 3D-Printed electric motor manufactured via multi-modal, multi-material extrusion. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2026;21(1):e2613185. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2026.2613185
  64. Lee JY, Oh MH, Park JH, Kang SH, Kang SK. Three-Dimensionally Printed Expandable Structural Electronics Via Multi-Material Printing Room-Temperature-Vulcanizing (RTV) Silicone/Silver Flake Composite and RTV. Polymers (Basel). 23 2023;15(9)doi: 10.3390/polym15092003
  65. Burdis R, Chariyev-Prinz F, Kelly DJ. Bioprinting of biomimetic self-organised cartilage with a supporting joint fixation device. Biofabrication. 2021;14(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac36be
  66. Xie X, Wu S, Mou S, Guo N, Wang Z, Sun J. Microtissue-Based Bioink as a Chondrocyte Microshelter for DLP Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(22):e2201877. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201877
  67. Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D, et al. Volumetric Bioprinting of Complex Living-Tissue Constructs within Seconds. Adv Mater. 2019;31(42):e1904209. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904209
  68. Budharaju H, Sundaramurthi D, Sethuraman S. Embedded 3D bioprinting – An emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic & large vascularized tissue constructs. Review. Bioact Mater. 2024;32:356-384. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.012
  69. Bilici Ç, Altunbek M, Afghah F, Tatar AG, Koç B. Embedded 3D Printing of Cryogel-Based Scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(8):5028-5038. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00751
  70. Xu H, Zhang S, Song K, Yang H, Yin J, Huang Y. Droplet-based 3D bioprinting for drug delivery and screening. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2025;217:115486. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115486
  71. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future. Biomaterials. 2016;102:20-42. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
  72. Bożek J, Kurchakova O, Michel J, et al. Pneumatic conveying inkjet bioprinting for the processing of living cells. Article. Biofabrication. 2025;17(2)025003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ada8e2
  73. Ablanedo Morales P, Rodriguez B, Furth ME, et al. Thermal inkjet bioprinting drastically alters cell phenotype. Biofabrication. 25 2023;15(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acd3b3
  74. Gasperini. -L, Maniglio. -D, Motta. -A, Migliaresi. -C. An Electrohydrodynamic Bioprinter for Alginate Hydrogels Containing Living Cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21(2015)(2):123-132. doi: doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0149
  75. Park J-U, Hardy M, Kang SJ, et al. High-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nat Mater. 2007;6(10):782-789. doi: 10.1038/nmat1974
  76. Franke T, Braunmüller S, Schmid L, Wixforth A, Weitz DA. Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS). Lab Chip. 21 2010;10(6):789-794. doi: 10.1039/b915522h
  77. Jo MC, Guldiken R. A label-free cell separation using surface acoustic waves. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:7691-7694. doi: 10.1109/iembs.2011.6091895
  78. Guo F, Mao Z, Chen Y, et al. Three-dimensional manipulation of single cells using surface acoustic waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(6):1522-1527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524813113
  79. Barani A, Paktinat H, Janmaleki M, et al. Microfluidic integrated acoustic waving for manipulation of cells and molecules. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;85:714-725. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.059
  80. Qiu Y, Wang H, Demore CE, et al. Acoustic devices for particle and cell manipulation and sensing. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14(8):14806-14838. doi: 10.3390/s140814806
  81. Kuang X, Rong Q, Belal S, et al. Self-enhancing sono-inks enable deep-penetration acoustic volumetric printing. Science. 2023;382(6675):1148-1155. doi: doi: 10.1126/science.adi1563
  82. Tillinger D, Armendarez NX, Najem JS. Multi-Material Droplet-Based Hydrogel Threads for Extrusion 3D Printing. Small Methods. 2026;10(5):e00928. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202500928
  83. Campbell PG, Weiss LE. Tissue engineering with the aid of inkjet printers. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007;7(8):1123-1127. doi: 10.1517/14712598.7.8.1123
  84. O'Connell CD, Di Bella C, Thompson F, et al. Development of the Biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):015019. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015019
  85. Singh S, Choudhury D, Yu F, Mironov V, Naing MW. In situ bioprinting - Bioprinting from benchside to bedside? Acta Biomater. 2020;101:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.045
  86. Checcucci E, Amparore D, Volpi G, et al. Metaverse Surgical Planning with Three-dimensional Virtual Models for Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2024;85(4):320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.015
  87. Dang Y, Liu X, Zheng Z, et al. Lutetium-Based Nanoprobes for Radiosensitization with Immune Microenvironment Remodeling and NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Surgery in Colorectal Cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(38):e10136. doi: 10.1002/advs.202510136
  88. Minto J, Zhou X, Osborn J, Zhang LG, Sarkar K, Rao RD. Three-Dimensional Printing: A Catalyst for a Changing Orthopaedic Landscape. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(2):e0076. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00076
  89. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
  90. VanKoevering KK, Zopf DA, Hollister SJ. Tissue Engineering and 3-Dimensional Modeling for Facial Reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019;27(1):151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2018.08.012
  91. Du X, Yu B, Pei P, Ding H, Yu B, Zhu Y. 3D printing of pearl/CaSO(4) composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(3):499-509. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02667f
  92. Savio G, Rosso S, Meneghello R, Concheri G. Geometric Modeling of Cellular Materials for Additive Manufacturing in Biomedical Field: A Review. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:1654782. doi: 10.1155/2018/1654782
  93. Wang Z, Yang Y. Application of 3D Printing in Implantable Medical Devices. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6653967. doi: 10.1155/2021/6653967
  94. Samaila EM, Negri S, Zardini A, et al. Value of three-dimensional printing of fractures in orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(1):300060519887299. doi: 10.1177/0300060519887299
  95. Henckel J, Holme TJ, Radford W, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. 3D-printed Patient-specific Guides for Hip Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(16):e342-e348. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00719
  96. Kim JW, Lee Y, Seo J, et al. Clinical experience with three-dimensional printing techniques in orthopedic trauma. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(2):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.12.010
  97. Huang G, Li F, Zhao X, et al. Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment. Chem Rev. 2017;117(20):12764-12850. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00094
  98. Ullah S, Chen X. Fabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering. Appl Mater Today. 2020;20:100656. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100656
  99. Wang M, Zhou J, Tavares J, et al. Applications of algae to obtain healthier meat products: A critical review on nutrients, acceptability and quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(26):8357-8374. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2054939
  100. Reiss J, Robertson S, Suzuki M. Cell Sources for Cultivated Meat: Applications and Considerations throughout the Production Workflow. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14). doi: 10.3390/ijms22147513
  101. Sung SY, Lin YW, Wu CC, et al. Supercritical carbon dioxide-decellularized arteries exhibit physiologic-like vessel regeneration following xenotransplantation in rats. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(7):2566-2580. doi: 10.1039/d2bm01233b
  102. Barajaa MA, Otsuka T, Ghosh D, Kan HM, Laurencin CT. Development of porcine skeletal muscle extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels with improved properties and low immunogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(19):e2322822121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322822121
  103. Golebiowska AA, Intravaia JT, Sathe VM, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP. Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative therapies: Advances, challenges and clinical prospects. Bioact Mater. 2024;32:98-123. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.09.017
  104. Wang B, Qinglai T, Yang Q, et al. Functional acellular matrix for tissue repair. Mater Today Bio. 2023;18:100530. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100530
  105. Du Z, Liao J, Wang B, Yu S, Li X. Advantages and prospects of cell derived decellularized extracellular matrix as tissue engineering scaffolds. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024;38(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404114
  106. Ladero M, Reche-Sainz JA, Gallardo ME. Hereditary Optic Neuropathies: A Systematic Review on the Interplay between Biomaterials and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Bioengineering. 2024;11(1):52. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11010052
  107. Meng X, Zhou Z, Chen X, et al. A sturgeon cartilage extracellular matrix-derived bioactive bioink for tissue engineering applications. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(5):768. doi: 10.18063/ijb.768
  108. Abolhasani S, Ahmadi Y, Rostami Y, Baravar E, Fattahi D. Biomaterials in tissue repair and regeneration: key insights from extracellular matrix biology. Review. Front Med Technol. 2025;Volume 7 - 2025
  109. Sasmal PK, Ganguly S. Polymer in hemostasis and follow-up wound healing. J Appl Polym Sci. 2023;140(9)e53559. doi: 10.1002/app.53559
  110. Charbe NB, Tambuwala M, Palakurthi SS, et al. Biomedical applications of three-dimensional bioprinted craniofacial tissue engineering. Bioeng Transl Med. 2023;8(1)e10333. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10333
  111. Wang Z, Xu J, Zhu J, et al. Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: Scaffold Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Applications. Biotechnol J. 2025;20(1):e202400699. doi: 10.1002/biot.202400699
  112. Mansoor AK, van Turnhout MC, Ito K, Ristori T, Foolen J. Dynamic and static strain levels differentially affect the enzymatic degradation of collagen fibres. Acta Biomater. 2026;213:439-451. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2026.01.056
  113. Wang Y, Wang Z, Dong Y. Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(3):1132-1150. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00730
  114. Khan MUA, Stojanović GM, Hassan R, Anand TJS, Al-Ejji M, Hasan A. Role of Graphene Oxide in Bacterial Cellulose−Gelatin Hydrogels for Wound Dressing Applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8(18):15909-15919. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07279
  115. Li R, Liu K, Huang X, et al. Bioact Mater Promote Wound Healing through Modulation of Cell Behaviors. Review. Adv Sci. 2022;9(10):2105152. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105152
  116. Gao D, Li R, Pan J, et al. 3D bioprinting bone/cartilage organoids: construction, applications, and challenges. J Orthop Transl. 2025;55:75-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.08.008
  117. Aldana AA, Abraham GA. Current advances in electrospun gelatin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Int J Pharm. 2017;523(2):441-453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.044
  118. Martyniak K, Lokshina A, Cruz MA, Karimzadeh M, Kemp R, Kean TJ. Biomaterial composition and stiffness as decisive properties of 3D bioprinted constructs for type II collagen stimulation. Acta Biomater. 2022;152:221-234. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.058
  119. Ximu Z, Wei Z, Maobin Y. Application of Hydrogels in Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;13(7):497-516. doi: 10.2174/1574888X12666171017160323
  120. Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Dey S, Bhardwaj N, Mandal BB. Trends and advances in silk based 3D printing/bioprinting towards cartilage tissue engineering and regeneration. Prog Biomed Eng. 2024;6(2):022002. doi: 10.1088/2516-1091/ad2d59
  121. Saremi J, Khanmohammadi M, Azami M, Ai J, Yousefi-Ahmadipour A, Ebrahimi-Barough S. Tissue-engineered nerve graft using silk-fibroin/polycaprolactone fibrous mats decorated with bioactive cerium oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res - A. 2021;109(9):1588-1599. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37153
  122. Shen C, Zhou Z, Li R, et al. Silk fibroin-based hydrogels for cartilage organoids in osteoarthritis treatment. Theranostics. 2025;15(2):560-584. doi: 10.7150/thno.103491
  123. Wang Y, Liu H, He Y, et al. Hydrogel-Based Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation-Induced Skin Injury: Progress and Mechanistic Insights. Biomimetics. 2025;10(11):758.
  124. Zhang H, Xu D, Zhang Y, Li M, Chai R. Silk fibroin hydrogels for biomedical applications. Smart Med. 2022;1(1):e20220011. doi: 10.1002/SMMD.20220011
  125. Zheng H, Zuo B. Functional silk fibroin hydrogels: preparation, properties and applications. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(5):1238-1258. doi: 10.1039/d0tb02099k
  126. Lima R, Fernandes C, Pinto MMM. Molecular modifications, biological activities, and applications of chitosan and derivatives: A recent update. Chirality. 2022;34(9):1166-1190. doi: 10.1002/chir.23477
  127. Li X, Wang Y, Feng C, Chen H, Gao Y. Chemical Modification of Chitosan for Developing Cancer Nanotheranostics. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(6):2197-2218. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00184
  128. Oryan A, Sahvieh S. Effectiveness of chitosan scaffold in skin, bone and cartilage healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:1003-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.124
  129. Zhang X, Cheng F, Islam MR, Li H. The fabrication of the chitosan-based bioink for in vitro tissue repair and regeneration: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;257:128504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128504
  130. Sangsanoh P, Supaphol P. Stability improvement of electrospun chitosan nanofibrous membranes in neutral or weak basic aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(10):2710-2714. doi: 10.1021/bm060286l
  131. Berger J, Reist M, Mayer JM, Felt O, Gurny R. Structure and interactions in chitosan hydrogels formed by complexation or aggregation for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57(1):35-52. doi: 10.1016/s0939-6411(03)00160-7
  132. Yu X, Wang Y, Liu X, Ge Y, Zhang S. Ursolic Acid Loaded-Mesoporous Hydroxylapatite/ Chitosan Therapeutic Scaffolds Regulate Bone Regeneration Ability by Promoting the M2-Type Polarization of Macrophages. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:5301-5315. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S323033
  133. Rawojć K, Tadeusiewicz R, Zych-Stodolak E. Advancements in Chitosan-Based Scaffolds for Chondrogenic Differentiation and Knee Cartilage Regeneration: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025;12(7). doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070740
  134. Rojas-Murillo JA, Simental-Mendía MA, Moncada-Saucedo NK, et al. Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of Fibrin Scaffolds for Cartilage Repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17). doi: 10.3390/ijms23179879
  135. Haugh MG, Thorpe SD, Vinardell T, Buckley CT, Kelly DJ. The application of plastic compression to modulate fibrin hydrogel mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;16:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.009
  136. Park CH, Woo KM. Fibrin-Based Biomaterial Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1064:253-261. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0445-3_16
  137. Gupta N, Cruz MA, Nasser P, Rosenberg JD, Iatridis JC. Fibrin-Genipin Hydrogel for Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Nasal Reconstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(7):640-646. doi: 10.1177/0003489419836667
  138. Yoon KH, Park JY, Lee JY, Lee E, Lee J, Kim SG. Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defect. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(5):1236-1245. doi: 10.1177/0363546520905565
  139. Ma H, Xie B, Chen H, et al. Structurally sophisticated 3D-printed PCL-fibrin hydrogel meniscal scaffold promotes in situ regeneration in the rabbit knee meniscus. Materials Today Bio. 2025;30:101391. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101391
  140. Kim W-J, Kim Y, Ovissipour R, Nitin N. Plant-based biomaterials as scaffolds for cellular agriculture. Future Foods. 2024;10:100468. doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100468
  141. Ng S, Kurisawa M. Integrating biomaterials and food biopolymers for cultured meat production. Acta Biomater. 2021;124:108-129. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.017
  142. Rao KM, Kim HJ, Won S, Choi SM, Han SS. Effect of Grape Seed Extract on Gelatin-Based Edible 3D-Hydrogels for Cultured Meat Application. Gels. 2023;9(1). doi: 10.3390/gels9010065
  143. Ramiah P, du Toit LC, Choonara YE, Kondiah PPD, Pillay V. Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Regeneration. Front Mater. 2020;7. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2020.00076
  144. Buléon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S. Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol. 1998;23(2):85-112. doi: 10.1016/s0141-8130(98)00040-3
  145. Apriyanto A, Compart J, Fettke J. A review of starch, a unique biopolymer - Structure, metabolism and in planta modifications. Plant Sci. 2022;318:111223. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111223
  146. Torres FG, Commeaux S, Troncoso OP. Starch-based biomaterials for wound-dressing applications. Starch - Stärke. 2013;65(7-8):543-551. doi:10.1002/star.201200259
  147. Niu R, Xin Q, Xu E, Yao S, Chen M, Liu D. Nanostarch-Stimulated Cell Adhesion in 3D Bioprinted Hydrogel Scaffolds for Cell Cultured Meat. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(18):23015-23026. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c03585
  148. Lu H, Tian Y. Nanostarch: Preparation, Modification, and Application in Pickering Emulsions. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(25):6929-6942. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01244
  149. Alonso-Sande M, Teijeiro-Osorio D, Remuñán-López C, Alonso MJ. Glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide for biopharmaceutical purposes. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(2):453-462. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.02.005
  150. Xiao C, Gao S, Wang H, Zhang L. Blend films from chitosan and konjac glucomannan solutions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000;76(4):509-515. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000425)76:4<509::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-2
  151. Ye S, Zongo AW, Shah BR, Li J, Li B. Konjac Glucomannan (KGM), Deacetylated KGM (Da-KGM), and Degraded KGM Derivatives: A Special Focus on Colloidal Nutrition. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(44):12921-12932. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03647
  152. Zhuang K, Shu X, Xie W. Konjac glucomannan-based composite materials: Construction, biomedical applications, and prospects. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;344:122503. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122503
  153. Tang X, Deng G, Yang L, et al. Konjac glucomannan-fibrin composite hydrogel as a model for ideal scaffolds for cell-culture meat. Food Res Int. 2024;187:114425. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114425
  154. Diaz CJ, Douglas KJ, Kang K, et al. Developing algae as a sustainable food source. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1029841. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1029841
  155. Afonso NC, Catarino MD, Silva AMS, Cardoso SM. Brown Macroalgae as Valuable Food Ingredients. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019;8(9). doi: 10.3390/antiox8090365
  156. Zhang C, Guan X, Yu S, Zhou J, Chen J. Production of meat alternatives using live cells, cultures and plant proteins. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2021;43. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.11.002
  157. Serafin A, Culebras M, Collins MN. Synthesis and evaluation of alginate, gelatin, and hyaluronic acid hybrid hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;233:123438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123438
  158. Cui P, Pan P, Qin L, et al. Nanoengineered hydrogels as 3D biomimetic extracellular matrix with injectable and sustained delivery capability for cartilage regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2023;19:487-498. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.032
  159. Lee H, Kim D, Choi KH, et al. Animal-free scaffold from brown algae provides a three-dimensional cell growth and differentiation environment for steak-like cultivated meat. Food Hydrocolloids. 2024;152:109944. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.109944
  160. Mallakpour S, Azadi E, Hussain CM. State-of-the-art of 3D printing technology of alginate-based hydrogels—An emerging technique for industrial applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;293:102436. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102436
  161. Shirehjini LM, Sharifi F, Shojaei S, Irani S. Poly-caprolactone nanofibrous coated with sol-gel alginate/ mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;74:103488. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103488
  162. Saeedi Garakani S, Khanmohammadi M, Atoufi Z, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/agarose scaffolds containing extracellular matrix for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;143:533-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.040
  163. Samrot AV, Sathiyasree M, Rahim SBA, et al. Scaffold Using Chitosan, Agarose, Cellulose, Dextran and Protein for Tissue Engineering-A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(6). doi: 10.3390/polym15061525
  164. Hong SJ, Kim DH, Ryoo JH, et al. Influence of Gelatin on Adhesion, Proliferation, and Adipogenic Differentiation of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Cultured on Soy Protein-Agarose Scaffolds. Foods. 2024;13(14). doi: 10.3390/foods13142247
  165. Moradi M, Guimarães JT, Sahin S. Current applications of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria in the development of food active edible packaging. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021;40:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.06.001
  166. Ucm R, Aem M, Lhb Z, et al. Comprehensive review on biotechnological production of hyaluronic acid: status, innovation, market and applications. Review. Bioengineered. 2022;13(4):9645-9661. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2057760
  167. Wolf KJ, Kumar S. Hyaluronic Acid: Incorporating the Bio into the Material. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(8):3753-3765. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01268
  168. Highley CB, Prestwich GD, Burdick JA. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:35-40. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008
  169. Kobayashi T, Chanmee T, Itano N. Hyaluronan: Metabolism and Function. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11):1525.
  170. Fallacara A, Baldini E, Manfredini S, Vertuani S. Hyaluronic Acid in the Third Millennium. Polymers. 2018;10(7):701.
  171. Qiu H, Mao X, Pan G, et al. A fluorescent hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogel for traceable articular cartilage regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;300:140905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140905
  172. Choi SM, Shin EJ. The Nanofication and Functionalization of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(3). doi: 10.3390/nano10030406
  173. Khan S, Ul-Islam M, Ullah MW, et al. Fabrication strategies and biomedical applications of three-dimensional bacterial cellulose-based scaffolds: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;209(Pt A):9-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.191
  174. Fu LH, Qi C, Ma MG, Wan P. Multifunctional cellulose-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. Review. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(10):1541-1562. doi: 10.1039/c8tb02331j
  175. Mahendiran B, Muthusamy S, Janani G, Mandal BB, Rajendran S, Krishnakumar GS. Surface Modification of Decellularized Natural Cellulose Scaffolds with Organosilanes for Bone Tissue Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(5):2000-2015. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01502
  176. Ghalia MA, Alhanish A. Mechanical and biodegradability of porous PCL/PEG copolymer-reinforced cellulose nanofibers for soft tissue engineering applications. Med Eng Phys. 2023;120(1):104055. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104055
  177. Yoon DM, Fisher JP. Natural and Synthetic Polymeric Scaffolds. In: Narayan R, ed. Biomedical Materials. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2021:257-283.
  178. Sionkowska A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: Review. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36(9):1254-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.003
  179. Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7411-7431. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037
  180. Thomson RC, Wake MC, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds to regenerate organs. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1995:245-274.
  181. Naureen B, Haseeb ASMA, Basirun WJ, Muhamad F. Recent advances in tissue engineering scaffolds based on polyurethane and modified polyurethane. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;118:111228. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111228
  182. Chae S, Lee SS, Choi YJ, et al. 3D cell-printing of biocompatible and functional meniscus constructs using meniscus-derived bioink. Biomaterials. 2021;267:120466. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120466
  183. Chang YC, Cheng YL, Liu WC, Zhong WB, Tsao CK. Flexible polyurethane scaffolds with high biocompatibility for effective chondrogenic performance in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2025;20(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/add6f8
  184. Ji H, Shi X, Yang H. Recent Advances in Polyurethane for Artificial Vascular Application. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(24). doi: 10.3390/polym16243528
  185. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(10):1217-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002
  186. Lee CH, Rodeo SA, Fortier LA, Lu C, Erisken C, Mao JJ. Protein-releasing polymeric scaffolds induce fibrochondrocytic differentiation of endogenous cells for knee meniscus regeneration in sheep. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:(266).
  187. Malikmammadov E, Tanir TE, Kiziltay A, Hasirci V, Hasirci N. PCL and PCL-based materials in biomedical applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(7-9):863-893. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2017.1394711
  188. Xu Y, Huang Y, Armstrong J, et al. Recent advances in biomaterials and structural design of 3D printed multiphasic scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Mat Sci Eng R. 2026;170:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2026.101210
  189. Siri S, Wadbua P, Amornkitbamrung V, Kampa N, Maensiri S. Surface modification of electrospun PCL scaffolds by plasma treatment and addition of adhesive protein to promote fibroblast cell adhesion. Mater Sci Technol. 2010;26:1292-1297. doi: 10.1179/026708310x12798718274070
  190. Mieloch AA, Semba JA, Rybka JD. CNT-Type Dependent Cellular Adhesion on 3D-Printed Nanocomposite for Tissue Engineering. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(2):548. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i2.548
  191. Khouri NG, Bahú JO, Blanco-Llamero C, Severino P, Concha VOC, Souto EB. Polylactic acid (PLA): Properties, synthesis, and biomedical applications – A review of the literature. J Mol Struct. 2024;1309:138243. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138243
  192. Rodrigues N, Benning M, Ferreira AM, Dixon L, Dalgarno K. Manufacture and Characterisation of Porous PLA Scaffolds. Procedia CIRP. 2016;49:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.025
  193. Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T, Jarzem P, Haglund L. 3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(7):15118-15135.
  194. Fairag R, Rosenzweig DH, Ramirez-Garcialuna JL, Weber MH, Haglund L. Three-Dimensional Printed Polylactic Acid Scaffolds Promote Bone-like Matrix Deposition in Vitro. ACS Appl Mate. Interfaces. 2019;11(17):15306-15315. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b02502
  195. Vink ETH, Rábago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR. Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab. 2003;80(3):403-419. doi: 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00372-5
  196. Rasal RM, Janorkar AV, Hirt DE. Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(3):338-356. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003
  197. Place ES, George JH, Williams CK, Stevens MM. Synthetic polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. 10.1039/B811392K. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(4):1139-1151. doi: 10.1039/B811392K
  198. Shen P, Moriya A, Rajabzadeh S, Maruyama T, Matsuyama H. Improvement of the antifouling properties of poly (lactic acid) hollow fiber membranes with poly (lactic acid)–polyethylene glycol–poly (lactic acid) copolymers. Desalination. 2013;325:37-39. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.012
  199. Donate R, Monzón M, Alemán-Domínguez ME. Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. Review. E-Polymers. 2020;20(1):571-599. doi: 10.1515/epoly-2020-0046
  200. Shuai C, Yang W, Feng P, Peng S, Pan H. Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(2):490-502. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.001
  201. Fan X, Li L, Zhu H, Yan L, Zhu S, Yan Y. Preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility evaluation of polymer (amino acid and glycolic acid)/hydroxyapatite composite for bone repair. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(2):025004. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/abdbdd
  202. Zhang ZY, Zheng WZ, Zhen ZC, et al. In vivo and in vitro degradation and biological toxicity studies of polyesters with varying degradation rates. J Hazard Mater. 2025;492:138196. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138196
  203. Critchley S, Sheehy EJ, Cunniffe G, et al. 3D printing of fibre-reinforced cartilaginous templates for the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:130-143. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.040
  204. Uematsu K, Hattori K, Ishimoto Y, et al. Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and a three-dimensional poly-lactic-glycolic acid (PLGA) scaffold. Biomaterials. 2005;26(20):4273-4279. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.037
  205. Seo SJ, Mahapatra C, Singh RK, Knowles JC, Kim HW. Strategies for osteochondral repair: Focus on scaffolds. J Tissue Eng. 2014;5:2041731414541850. doi: 10.1177/2041731414541850
  206. Fan L, Teng W, He J, et al. Value of 3D Printed PLGA Scaffolds for Cartilage Defects in Terms of Repair. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:3561430. doi: 10.1155/2022/3561430
  207. Chang DP, Garripelli VK, Rea J, Kelley R, Rajagopal K. Investigation of Fragment Antibody Stability and Its Release Mechanism from Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)-Triacetin Depots for Sustained-Release Applications. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(10):3404-3417. doi: 10.1002/jps.24546
  208. Liu Y, Wang S, Dong J, et al. External Stimuli-Induced Welding of Dynamic Cross-Linked Polymer Networks. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(5). doi: 10.3390/polym16050621
  209. Wu Z, Zhu M, Song P, et al. Chemically Programmable Liquid-to-Solid Transitions and Spatial Dynamics in Synthetic Coacervates. J Am Chem Soc. 2026;148(27):29220-29230. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c07923
  210. Li X, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Cross-Linking Methods of the Silk Protein Hydrogel in Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024;21(4):529-544. doi: 10.1007/s13770-023-00624-y
  211. Xue P, Wang J, Fu Y, He H, Gan Q, Liu C. Material-Mediated Immunotherapy to Regulate Bone Aging and Promote Bone Repair. Small. 2025;21(11):e2409886. doi: 10.1002/smll.202409886
  212. Peng Z, Ji C, Zhou Y, Zhao T, Leblanc RM. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) derived carbon dots: Preparation and applications. Appl Mater Today. 2020;20:100677. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100677
  213. Lin X, Liu R, Beitzel J, Zhou Y, Lagadon C, Zhang M. Injectable Biodegradable Chitosan-PEG/PEG-Dialdehyde Hydrogel for Stem Cell Delivery and Cartilage Regeneration. Gels. 2024;10(8). doi: 10.3390/gels10080508
  214. Fu N, Liao J, Lin S, et al. PCL-PEG-PCL film promotes cartilage regeneration in vivo. Cell Prolif. 2016;49(6):729-739. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12295
  215. Yao Y, Wei G, Deng L, Cui W. Visualizable and Lubricating Hydrogel Microspheres Via NanoPOSS for Cartilage Regeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(15):e2207438. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207438
  216. Liu F, Wang X. Synthetic Polymers for Organ 3D Printing. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8). doi: 10.3390/polym12081765
  217. Choe G, Park J, Park H, Lee JY. Hydrogel Biomaterials for Stem Cell Microencapsulation. Polymers (Basel). 2018;10(9). doi: 10.3390/polym10090997
  218. Seo Y-H, Lee J-M, Park S-Y, Kim M-H, Kim S-B, Oh T-H. PVA Hydrogels Supplemented with PLA Mesh for Tissue Regeneration Scaffold. Gels. 2024;10(6):364. doi: 10.3390/gels10060364
  219. Suleiman GSA, Zeng X, Chakma R, Wakai IY, Feng Y. Recent advances and challenges in thermal stability of <scp>PVA</scp>‐based film: A review. Polym Adv Technol. 2024;35(2). doi: 10.1002/pat.6327
  220. Zhong Y, Lin Q, Yu H, et al. Construction methods and biomedical applications of PVA-based hydrogels. Front Chem. 2024;12:1376799. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1376799
  221. Jiang S, Liu S, Feng W. PVA hydrogel properties for biomedical application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(7):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.005
  222. Luo C, Guo A, Zhao Y, Sun X. A high strength, low friction, and biocompatible hydrogel from PVA, chitosan and sodium alginate for articular cartilage. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;286:119268. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119268
  223. Barbon S, Contran M, Stocco E, et al. Enhanced Biomechanical Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Based Hybrid Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Processes. 2021;9(5):730.
  224. Ulery BD, Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys. 2011;49(12):832-864. doi: doi.org/10.1002/polb.22259
  225. Sonthithai P, Kaewkong P, Channasanon S, Tanodekaew S. 3D-Printed PEG-PLA/Gelatin Hydrogel: Characterization toward In Vitro Chondrocyte Redifferentiation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(4):2157-2166. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c02409
  226. Bedell ML, Torres AL, Hogan KJ, et al. Human gelatin-based composite hydrogels for osteochondral tissue engineering and their adaptation into bioinks for extrusion, inkjet, and digital light processing bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac8768
  227. Senturk E, Bilici C, Afghah F, et al. 3D bioprinting of tyramine modified hydrogels under visible light for osteochondral interface. Biofabrication. 2023;15(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acd6bf
  228. Ding A, Lee SJ, Ayyagari S, Tang R, Huynh CT, Alsberg E. 4D biofabrication via instantly generated graded hydrogel scaffolds. Bioact Mater. 2022;7:324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.021
  229. Cianciosi A, Stecher S, Löffler M, et al. Flexible Allyl-Modified Gelatin Photoclick Resin Tailored for Volumetric Bioprinting of Matrices for Soft Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(30):e2300977. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300977
  230. Thijssen Q, Quaak A, Toombs J, et al. Volumetric Printing of Thiol-Ene Photo-Cross-Linkable Poly(ε-caprolactone): A Tunable Material Platform Serving Biomedical Applications. Adv Mater. 2023;35(19):e2210136. doi: 10.1002/adma.202210136
  231. Gavish Moscovitz A, Simaan Yameen H, Bar-Am O, Seliktar D. Evaluating Cross-Linking Efficiency and Cytocompatibility of Three Commonly Used Photoinitiators across Different Cell-Compatible Hydrogel Platforms. Biomacromolecules. 2025;26(10):6817-6833. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142
  232. Miklosic G, Bektas EI, Hangartner A, et al. Radical-free photopolymerizable composites of hyaluronic acid and gelatin for tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia. 2025;197:121-134. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.03.017
  233. Anthony Dicks J, Woolard C. Thiol-X Chemistry: A Skeleton Key Unlocking Advanced Polymers in Additive Manufacturing. Macromol Mater Eng. 2025;310(7):2400445. doi:10.1002/mame.202400445
  234. Wei W, Dai H. Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: Recent advances and challenges. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(12):4830-4855. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.011
  235. Ko CY, Ku KL, Yang SR, et al. In vitro and in vivo co-culture of chondrocytes and bone marrow stem cells in photocrosslinked PCL-PEG-PCL hydrogels enhances cartilage formation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(10):E485-E496. doi: 10.1002/term.1846
  236. Zeng L, Yao Y, Wang DA, Chen X. Effect of microcavitary alginate hydrogel with different pore sizes on chondrocyte culture for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;34:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.003
  237. Qi C, Liu J, Jin Y, et al. Photo-crosslinkable, injectable sericin hydrogel as 3D biomimetic extracellular matrix for minimally invasive repairing cartilage. Biomaterials. 2018;163:89-104. doi: j.biomaterials.2018.02.016
  238. Graceffa V, Vinatier C, Guicheux J, Stoddart M, Alini M, Zeugolis DI. Chasing Chimeras – The elusive stable chondrogenic phenotype. Biomaterials. 2019;192:199-225. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.014
  239. Wei X, Yang X, Han Z-p, Qu F-f, Shao L, Shi Y-f. Mesenchymal stem cells: a new trend for cell therapy. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2013;34(6):747-754. doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.50
  240. Lopa S, Mondadori C, Mainardi VL, et al. Translational Application of Microfluidics and Bioprinting for Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Repair. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018(1):6594841. doi: 10.1155/2018/6594841
  241. Liu Y, Du L, Zhang H, et al. Bioprinted biomimetic hydrogel matrices guiding stem cell aggregates for enhanced chondrogenesis and cartilage regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(22):5360-5376. doi: 10.1039/d4tb00323c
  242. Nedunchezian S, Banerjee P, Lee CY, et al. Generating adipose stem cell-laden hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds using 3D bioprinting via the double crosslinked strategy for chondrogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;124:112072. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112072
  243. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2007;448(7151):313-317. doi: 10.1038/nature05934
  244. Murry CE, Keller G. Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Clinically Relevant Populations: Lessons from Embryonic Development. Cell. 2008;132(4):661-680. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.008
  245. Chung JY, Song M, Ha CW, Kim JA, Lee CH, Park YB. Comparison of articular cartilage repair with different hydrogel-human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell composites in a rat model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5(2):39. doi: 10.1186/scrt427
  246. Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, Duda DG, Fukumura D. Engineering vascularized tissue. Short survey. Nature Biotechnology. 2005;23(7):821-823. doi: 10.1038/nbt0705-821
  247. Zheng K, Ma Y, Chiu C, et al. Co-culture pellet of human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells and rat costal chondrocytes as a candidate for articular cartilage regeneration: in vitro and in vivo study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03094-6
  248. Pitacco P, Sadowska JM, O'Brien FJ, Kelly DJ. 3D bioprinting of cartilaginous templates for large bone defect healing. Acta Biomater. 2023;156:61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.07.037
  249. Wu Z, Wang Y, Zhu M, Lu M, Liu W, Shi J. Synovial microenvironment in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: crosstalk with chondrocytes and potential therapeutic targets. Life Sci. 2024;354:122947. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122947
  250. Zhang M, Wang J. Epigenetics and Osteoarthritis. Genes Dis. 2015;2(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.12.005
  251. Walewska A, Janucik A, Tynecka M, Moniuszko M, Eljaszewicz A. Mesenchymal stem cells under epigenetic control - the role of epigenetic machinery in fate decision and functional properties. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(11):720. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06239-4
  252. Xiao JL, Meng JH, Gan YH, Li YL, Zhou CY, Ma XC. DNA methylation profiling in different phases of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;68:105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.04.006
  253. Loughlin J, Reynard LN. Osteoarthritis: Epigenetics of articular cartilage in knee and hip OA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(1):6-7. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.189
  254. Wu YL, Lin ZJ, Li CC, et al. Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2 2023;8(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01333-7
  255. Qiu Y, Xu Q, Xie P, et al. Epigenetic modifications and emerging therapeutic targets in cardiovascular aging and diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2025;211:107546. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107546
  256. Zaratiegui M, Irvine DV, Martienssen RA. Noncoding RNAs and gene silencing. Cell. 2007;128(4):763-776. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.016
  257. Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):629-641. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006
  258. Chang LH, Chuang SC, Wu SC, et al. Comparisons of miRNA profiles of exosomes derived from human iPSCs, ADSCs, and BMSCs and effects on chondrocyte function. Bone Joint Res. 2025;14(8):696-712. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.148.Bjr-2024-0267.R4
  259. Zhao Y, Chen L, Jiang S, et al. Exosomes derived from MSCs exposed to hypoxic and inflammatory environments slow intervertebral disc degeneration by alleviating the senescence of nucleus pulposus cells through epigenetic modifications. Bioact Mater. 2025;49:515-530. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.02.046
  260. Kim HJ, Park JM, Lee S, et al. Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-based knockdown of RUNX2 to induce chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(2):514-523. doi: 10.1039/d1bm01716k
  261. Kim E, Seok JM, Bae SB, Park SA, Park WH. Silk Fibroin Enhances Cytocompatibilty and Dimensional Stability of Alginate Hydrogels for Light-Based Three-Dimensional Bioprinting. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22(5):1921-1931. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00034
  262. Sánchez-Sánchez R, Rodríguez-Rego JM, Macías-García A, Mendoza-Cerezo L, Díaz-Parralejo A. Relationship between shear-thinning rheological properties of bioinks and bioprinting parameters. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):687. doi: 10.18063/ijb.687
  263. Mendoza-Cerezo L, Rodríguez-Rego JM, Macías-García A, Callejas-Marín A, Sánchez-Guardado L, Marcos-Romero AC. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of GelMA Hydrogels with Culture Medium: Balancing Printability, Rheology and Cell Viability for Tissue Regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(10). doi: 10.3390/polym16101437
  264. Xie M, Su J, Zhou S, Li J, Zhang K. Application of Hydrogels as Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Ink for Tissue Engineering. Gels. 2023;9(2). doi: 10.3390/gels9020088
  265. Rharbi Y, Romdhane A, Blésès D, El Kissi N. 3D printing of alginate scaffolds for low-pH environments through slow alginic-acid hydrogel formation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026;372:153041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.153041
  266. Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, Kim WD, Kim SH. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication. 2020;12(3):035018. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707
  267. Liu Q, Yang J, Wang Y, et al. Direct 3D Bioprinting of Tough and Antifatigue Cell-Laden Constructs Enabled by a Self-Healing Hydrogel Bioink. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24(6):2549-2562. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00057
  268. Tsai CC, Chandel AKS, Mitsuhashi K, Fujiyabu T, Inagaki NF, Ito T. Injectable, Shear-Thinning, Self-Healing, and Self-Cross-Linkable Benzaldehyde-Conjugated Chitosan Hydrogels as a Tissue Adhesive. Biomacromolecules. 2024;25(2):1084-1095. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c01117
  269. Li H, Chen S, Dissanayaka WL, Wang M. Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate/Cellulose Nanocrystal Inks and 3D Printing for Dental Tissue Engineering Applications. ACS Omega. 2024;9(49):48361-48373. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06458
  270. Warwar Damouny C, Martin P, Vasilyev G, et al. Injectable Hydrogels Based on Inter-Polyelectrolyte Interactions between Hyaluronic Acid, Gelatin, and Cationic Cellulose Nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(8):3222-3234. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00316
  271. Sarah R, Schimmelpfennig K, Rohauer R, Lewis CL, Limon SM, Habib A. Characterization and Machine Learning-Driven Property Prediction of a Novel Hybrid Hydrogel Bioink Considering Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting. Gels. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.3390/gels11010045
  272. Cui Y, Jin R, Zhang Y, Yu M, Zhou Y, Wang LQ. Cellulose Nanocrystal-Enhanced Thermal-Sensitive Hydrogels of Block Copolymers for 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(4):397. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.397
  273. Chen X, Yue Z, Winberg PC, Lou YR, Beirne S, Wallace GG. 3D bioprinting dermal-like structures using species-specific ulvan. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(7):2424-2438. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01784a
  274. Janarthanan G, Kim JH, Kim I, Lee C, Chung EJ, Noh I. Manufacturing of self-standing multi-layered 3D-bioprinted alginate-hyaluronate constructs by controlling the cross-linking mechanisms for tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication. 2022;14(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac6c4c
  275. Fischer L, Nosratlo M, Hast K, et al. Calcium supplementation of bioinks reduces shear stress-induced cell damage during bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac84af
  276. Klompmaker J, Jansen HWB, Veth RH, Nielsen HKL, de Groot JH, Pennings AJ. Porous implants for knee joint meniscus reconstruction: A preliminary study on the role of pore sizes in ingrowth and differentiation of fibrocartilage. Clin Mater. 1993;14(1):1-11. doi:10.1016/0267-6605(93)90041-5
  277. McNamara LE, Sjöström T, Seunarine K, Meek RD, Su B, Dalby MJ. Investigation of the limits of nanoscale filopodial interactions. J Tissue Eng. 2014;5:2041731414536177. doi: 10.1177/2041731414536177
  278. Tang T, Zhong J, Hu J, et al. Gradients in lacunar morphology and cartilage mineralization reflect the mechanical function of the mouse femoral head epiphysis. Acta Biomaterialia. 2025;201:385-399. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.06.002
  279. Singh BN, Nallakumarasamy A, Sinha S, et al. Generation of hybrid tissue engineered construct through embedding autologous chondrocyte loaded platelet rich plasma/alginate based hydrogel in porous scaffold for cartilage regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;203:389-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.054
  280. Jeong HJ, Lee SW, Hong MW, et al. Total Meniscus Reconstruction Using a Polymeric Hybrid-Scaffold: Combined with 3D-Printed Biomimetic Framework and Micro-Particle. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(12). doi: 10.3390/polym13121910
  281. Klarmann GJ, Gaston J, Ho VB. A review of strategies for development of tissue engineered meniscal implants. Review Article. Biomater Biosyst. 2021;4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100026
  282. Wang D, Jiang C, Li J, et al. Effects of porosity distribution on mechanical properties and osseointegration of porous polyetheretherketone. Biomater Adv. 2025;166:214043. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214043
  283. Wang Y, Song Y, Hu Q, Zhang H. Dual-Channel Extrusion-Based 3D Printing of a Gradient Hydroxyapatite Hydrogel Scaffold with Spatial Curved Architecture. Gels. 2026;12(1). doi: 10.3390/gels12010093
  284. Liu H, Qiao H, Li R, et al. Kartogenin-loaded chitosan composite scaffold with cartilage-mimetic microstructure for layered osteochondral repair and cartilage phenotype maintenance. Mater Today Bio. 2026;36:102727. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102727
  285. Liu YY, Intini C, Dobricic M, O'Brien FJ, J LL, Echeverry-Rendon M. Collagen-based 3D printed poly (glycerol sebacate) composite scaffold with biomimicking mechanical properties for enhanced cartilage defect repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;280(Pt 2):135827. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135827
  286. Zare P, Pezeshki-Modaress M, Davachi SM, et al. An additive manufacturing-based 3D printed poly ɛ-caprolactone/alginate sulfate/extracellular matrix construct for nasal cartilage regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022;110(6):1199-1209. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37363
  287. Gentile F, Tirinato L, Battista E, et al. Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. Biomaterials. 2010;31(28):7205-7212. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.016
  288. Chen M, Gao S, Wang P, et al. The application of electrospinning used in meniscus tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(5):461-475. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2018.1425180
  289. Zhang X, Liu Y, Zuo Q, et al. 3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix and Silk Fibroin for Osteochondral Repair. Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(4):401. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.401
  290. Xie B, Ma H, Yang F, et al. Development and evaluation of 3D composite scaffolds with piezoelectricity and biofactor synergy for enhanced articular cartilage regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(40):10416-10433. doi: 10.1039/d4tb01319k
  291. Mosher CZ, Brudnicki PAP, Gong Z, et al. Green electrospinning for biomaterials and biofabrication. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac0964
  292. Karipidou N, Gorley JPM, Katrilaka C, et al. A Critical Review of Commercial Collagen-Based Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Functional Properties and Clinical Evidence from Infuse((R)) Bone Graft. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(9). doi: 10.3390/jfb16090313
  293. Vijayan A, C LV, Kumar GSV. Dual growth factor entrapped nanoparticle enriched alginate wafer-based delivery system for suppurating wounds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;208:172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.068
  294. Wang H, Peng T, Wu H, et al. In situ biomimetic lyotropic liquid crystal gel for full-thickness cartilage defect regeneration. J Control Release. 2021;338:623-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.062
  295. Lewis JA, Nemke B, Lu Y, et al. A bioactive supramolecular and covalent polymer scaffold for cartilage repair in a sheep model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(33):e2405454121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405454121
  296. Hafezi M, Khorasani SN, Khalili S, Neisiany RE. Self-healing interpenetrating network hydrogel based on GelMA/alginate/nano-clay. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;242(Pt 2):124962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124962
  297. Fang D, Jin P, Huang Q, Yang Y, Zhao J, Zheng L. Platelet-rich plasma promotes the regeneration of cartilage engineered by mesenchymal stem cells and collagen hydrogel via the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(9):15627-15637. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28211
  298. DePhillipo NN, LaPrade RF, Zaffagnini S, Mouton C, Seil R, Beaufils P. The future of meniscus science: international expert consensus. J Exp Orthop. 2021;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00345-y
  299. Li Z, Zhang X, Yuan T, et al. Addition of Platelet-Rich Plasma to Silk Fibroin Hydrogel Bioprinting for Cartilage Regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020;26:886-895. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0304
  300. Shapira A, Dvir T. 3D Tissue and Organ Printing—Hope and Reality. Adv Scie. 2021;8(10):2003751. doi: 10.1002/advs.202003751
  301. Yu C, Ma X, Zhu W, et al. Scanningless and continuous 3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials. 2019;194:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.12.009
  302. You S, Li J, Zhu W, Yu C, Mei D, Chen S. Nanoscale 3D printing of hydrogels for cellular tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(15):2187-2197. doi: 10.1039/c8tb00301g
  303. Worthington KS, Wiley LA, Kaalberg EE, et al. Two-photon polymerization for production of human iPSC-derived retinal cell grafts. Acta Biomater. 2017;55:385-395. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.039
  304. Ma X, Qu X, Zhu W, et al. Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(8):2206-2211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524510113
  305. Puistola P, Miettinen S, Skottman H, Moro A. Novel strategy for multi-material 3D bioprinting of human stem cell based corneal stroma with heterogenous design. Mater Today Bio. 2024;24:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100924
  306. Abaci A, Guvendiren M. 3D bioprinting of dense cellular structures within hydrogels with spatially controlled heterogeneity. Biofabrication. 2024;16(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad52f1
  307. Wu X, Ehrmann K, Gan CT, Leuschel B, Pashley-Johnson F, Barner-Kowollik C. Two Material Properties from One Wavelength-Orthogonal Photoresin Enabled by a Monochromatic Laser Integrated Stereolithographic Apparatus (Mono LISA). Adv Mater. 2025;37(13):e2419639. doi: 10.1002/adma.202419639
  308. Chen Z, Zhang H, Huang J, et al. DNA-encoded dynamic hydrogels for 3D bioprinted cartilage organoids. Mater Today Bio. 2025;31:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101509
  309. Morgan FLC, Fernandez-Perez J, Moroni L, Baker MB. Tuning Hydrogels by Mixing Dynamic Cross-Linkers: Enabling Cell-Instructive Hydrogels and Advanced Bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(1):e2101576. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101576
  310. Chen F, Wang W, Zhao H, et al. MXene-Based Cartilage-Adhesive Microspheres for Photothermal-Controlled Hydrophobic Drug Release and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Delivery in Osteoarthritis. ACS Nano. 2025;19(22):20502-20515. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c16918
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing