Recent advances in 3D bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering: Biomimetic strategies, cellular regulation, and future perspectives
Articular cartilage has limited intrinsic repair capacity, and current clinical approaches often fail to restore durable hyaline cartilage. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting offers spatial control over cells, biomaterials, and bioactive cues, creating opportunities to fabricate patient-specific constructs that recapitulate cartilage architecture and function. However, functional cartilage regeneration cannot be achieved by optimizing printing technology, bioink composition, cell source, or scaffold design in isolation. This review critically examines recent advances in 3D bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering through an integrated, design-oriented framework. Bioprinting modalities are compared according to their underlying physical mechanisms and their trade-offs in resolution, throughput, bioink compatibility, and cellular stress. Natural, synthetic, and composite bioinks are discussed with emphasis on how rheological behavior, crosslinking, and reinforcement jointly regulate printability, cell-instructive capacity, degradation, and mechanical durability. The roles of chondrocytes, mesenchymal stromal cells, and pluripotent stem cell-derived chondrogenic cells are evaluated in relation to phenotype stability, scalability, safety, and clinical application. At the construct level, pore architecture, mechanical and compositional gradients, fiber alignment, and spatiotemporally controlled factor delivery are considered as interacting regulators of mass transport, matrix organization, regional function, and host integration. A central conclusion is that successful cartilage bioprinting requires balanced optimization of competing objectives, including bioactivity versus printability, printing fidelity versus cytocompatibility, and porosity versus mechanical integrity. Future translation will require standardized, cartilage-specific evaluation of long-term matrix quality, mechanical function, safety, reproducibility, and repair efficacy in clinically relevant models.

- Li M, Sun D, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wei Q, Wang Y. Application and development of 3D bioprinting in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(19):5430-5458. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00709f
- Udomluck N, Park H, Lee JY. Advances in biomaterial-based composite spheroid for articular cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng. 2025;16:20417314251349669. doi: 10.1177/20417314251349669
- Wang M, Wang J, Xu X, Li E, Xu P. Engineering gene-activated bioprinted scaffolds for enhancing articular cartilage repair. Mater Today Bio. 2024;29:101351. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101351
- Jiao R, Lin X, Wang J, et al. 3D-printed constructs deliver bioactive cargos to expedite cartilage regeneration. J Pharm Anal. 2024;14(12):100925. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.12.015
- Tan B, Gan S, Wang X, Liu W, Li X. Applications of 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: advantages, deficiencies, improvements, and future perspectives. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(27):5385-5413. doi: 10.1039/d1tb00172h
- Du X, Gu H, Ouyang X, et al. Advanced 3D Bioprinting Technology for Cartilage Engineering and Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(10):5780-5804. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c01107
- Chae S, Cho DW. Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2023;156:4-20. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.004
- Liang Q, Ma Y, Yao X, Wei W. Advanced 3D-Printing Bioinks for Articular Cartilage Repair. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(3):511. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i3.511
- Zheng Z, Yu D, Wang H, et al. Advancement of 3D biofabrication in repairing and regeneration of cartilage defects. Biofabrication. 2025;17(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ada8e1
- Pei Z, Gao M, Xing J, et al. Experimental study on repair of cartilage defects in the rabbits with GelMA-MSCs scaffold prepared by three-dimensional bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):662. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.662
- Diaz-Payno PJ, Kalogeropoulou M, Muntz I, et al. Swelling-Dependent Shape-Based Transformation of a Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Laden 4D Bioprinted Construct for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(2):e2201891. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201891
- Boretti G, Amirfallah A, Edmunds KJ, Hamzehpour H, Sigurjonsson OE. Advancing Cartilage Tissue Engineering: A Review of 3D Bioprinting Approaches and Bioink Properties. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2025;31(4):357-373. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0168
- Santos-Beato P, Midha S, Pitsillides AA, Miller A, Torii R, Kalaskar DM. Biofabrication of the osteochondral unit and its applications: Current and future directions for 3D bioprinting. J Tissue Eng. 2022;13:20417314221133480. doi: 10.1177/20417314221133480
- Park DY, Kim SH, Park SH, Jang JS, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ. 3D Bioprinting Strategies for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024;52(7):1883-1893. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03236-8
- Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin CT. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;226:119536. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
- Zhou D, Dou B, Kroh F, Wang C, Ouyang L. Biofabrication strategies with single-cell resolution: a review. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2023;5(4):042005. doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ace863
- Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H, He Y. Development of 3D bioprinting: From printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15(5):529-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.003
- Prendergast ME, Burdick JA. Recent Advances in Enabling Technologies in 3D Printing for Precision Medicine. Adv Mater. 2020;32(13):1902516. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902516
- Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, Luo S, Nie J, Zhu X. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(1):110-115. doi 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003
- Manzoli S, Merotto E, Piccoli M, Gobbo P, Todros S, Pavan PG. An Overview of 3D Bioprinting Impact on Cell Viability: From Damage Assessment to Protection Solutions. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(12). doi: 10.3390/jfb16120436
- Agarwal T, Chiesa I, Presutti D, et al. Recent advances in bioprinting technologies for engineering different cartilage-based tissues. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;123:112005. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112005
- Idaszek J, Costantini M, Karlsen TA, et al. 3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head. Biofabrication. 2019;11(4):044101. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab2622
- Hu G, Liang Z, Fan Z, et al. Construction of 3D-Bioprinted cartilage-mimicking substitute based on photo-crosslinkable Wharton's jelly bioinks for full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair. Mater Today Bio. 2023;21:100695. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100695
- Olate-Moya F, Rubi-Sans G, Engel E, Mateos-Timoneda MA, Palza H. 3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Alginate/Gelatin/Chondroitin Sulfate Hydrogel Nanocomposites for Intrinsically Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biomacromolecules. J10 2024;25(6):3312-3324. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c01444
- Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, Gal I, Wertheim L, Dvir T. 3D Printing of Personalized Thick and Perfusable Cardiac Patches and Hearts. Article. Adv Sci. 2019;6(11):1900344. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900344
- Muth JT, Vogt DM, Truby RL, et al. Embedded 3D Printing of Strain Sensors within Highly Stretchable Elastomers. Adv Mater. 2014;26(36):6307-6312. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400334
- Jeon O, Lee YB, Jeong H, Lee SJ, Wells D, Alsberg E. Individual cell-only bioink and photocurable supporting medium for 3D printing and generation of engineered tissues with complex geometries. 10.1039/C9MH00375D. Mater Horiz. 2019;6(8):1625-1631. doi: 10.1039/C9MH00375D
- Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, Forgacs G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2009;30(30):5910-5917. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034
- Croom BP, Abbott A, Kemp JW, et al. Mechanics of nozzle clogging during direct ink writing of fiber-reinforced composites. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101701
- Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, Cornelissen M, Dubruel P. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
- McCormack A, Highley CB, Leslie NR, Melchels FPW. 3D Printing in Suspension Baths: Keeping the Promises of Bioprinting Afloat. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):584-593. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.020
- Wu Q, Song K, Zhang D, et al. Embedded extrusion printing in yield-stress-fluid baths. Matter. 2022;5(11):3775-3806. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2022.09.003
- Al Qassab M, Merheb M, Sayadi S, et al. Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(10):356. doi: 10.3390/jfb16100356
- Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al. Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. Review. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10793-10833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
- Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A, et al. 3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications. Small. 2019;15(23):1805510. doi:10.1002/smll.201805510
- Barui S, Saunders RE, Naskar S, Basu B, Derby B. Acoustic Poration and Dynamic Healing of Mammalian Cell Membranes during Inkjet Printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(1):749-757. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01635
- Reizabal A, Tandon B, Lanceros-Méndez S, Dalton PD. Electrohydrodynamic 3D Printing of Aqueous Solutions. Review. Small. 2023;19(7):2205255. doi: 10.1002/smll.202205255
- Xie M, Gao Q, Zhao H, et al. Electro-Assisted Bioprinting of Low-Concentration GelMA Microdroplets. Article. Small. 2019;15(4):1804216. doi: 10.1002/smll.201804216
- Cai S, Sun Y, Wang Z, Yang W, Li X, Yu H. Mechanisms, influencing factors, and applications of electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nanotechnol Rev. 2021;10(1):1046-1078. doi: doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2021-0073
- Vasilopoulou AG, Gines Rodriguez N, Mansouri A, et al. Converging laser-induced forward transfer and melt electrowriting for biofabrication of reinforced cartilage constructs. Biofabrication. 2026;18(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ae3c43
- Yang H, Yang KH, Narayan RJ, Ma S. Laser-based bioprinting for multilayer cell patterning in tissue engineering and cancer research. Essays Biochem. 2021;65(3):409-416. doi: 10.1042/ebc20200093
- Vanaei S, Parizi MS, Vanaei S, Salemizadehparizi F, Vanaei HR. An Overview on Materials and Techniques in 3D Bioprinting Toward Biomedical Application. Eng Regen. 2021;2:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.001
- Lin Y, Huang G, Huang Y, Jeremy Tzeng TR, Chrisey D. Effect of laser fluence in laser‐assisted direct writing of human colon cancer cell. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2010;16(3):202-208. doi: 10.1108/13552541011034870
- Cheng L, Suresh KS, He H, et al. 3D Printing of Micro- and Nanoscale Bone Substitutes: A Review on Technical and Translational Perspectives. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:4289-4319. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S311001
- Sun J, Fang T, Zhang Y, et al. Imaging-Guided Microscale Photothermal Stereolithography Bioprinting. Adv Sci. 2025;12(18):2500640. doi:10.1002/advs.202500640
- Wang X, Ma Y, Niu Y, et al. Sub-second volumetric 3D printing by synthesis of holographic light fields. Nature. 2026;650(8103):882-890. doi: 10.1038/s41586-026-10114-5
- Agarwal T, Onesto V, Banerjee D, et al. 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation. Biofabrication. 2025;17(4):42003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a
- Chansoria P, Narayanan LK, Schuchard K, Shirwaiker R. Ultrasound-assisted biofabrication and bioprinting of preferentially aligned three-dimensional cellular constructs. Biofabrication. 2019;11(3):035015. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab15cf
- Bouyer C, Chen P, Güven S, et al. A Bio-Acoustic Levitational (BAL) Assembly Method for Engineering of Multilayered, 3D Brain-Like Constructs, Using Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Neuro-Progenitors. Adv Mater. 2016;28(1):161-167. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503916
- Chen P, Güven S, Usta OB, Yarmush ML, Demirci U. Biotunable acoustic node assembly of organoids. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4(13):1937-1943. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500279
- Garvin KA, Dalecki D, Hocking DC. Vascularization of three-dimensional collagen hydrogels using ultrasound standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(11):1853-1864. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.07.008
- Hwangbo H, Chae S, Ryu D, Kim G. In situ magnetic-field-assisted bioprinting process using magnetorheological bioink to obtain engineered muscle constructs. Bioact Mater. 2025;45:417-433. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.035
- Lee JM, Sing SL, Zhou M, Yeong WY. 3D bioprinting processes: A perspective on classification and terminology. IJB. 4(2):151. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v4i2.151
- Tseng H, Gage JA, Raphael RM, et al. Assembly of a Three-Dimensional Multitype Bronchiole Coculture Model Using Magnetic Levitation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013;19(9):665-675. doi: doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0157
- Haisler WL, Timm DM, Gage JA, Tseng H, Killian TC, Souza GR. Three-dimensional cell culturing by magnetic levitation. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(10):1940-1949. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.125
- Choi H, Jang J. Magnetic-based tissue engineering: principles, applications, and future prospects in biofabrication. 10.1039/D5BM00160A. Biomater Sci. 2025;13(22):6215-6238. doi: 10.1039/D5BM00160A
- Hou S, Tiriac H, Sridharan BP, et al. Advanced Development of Primary Pancreatic Organoid Tumor Models for High-Throughput Phenotypic Drug Screening. SLAS Discov. 2018;23(6):574-584. doi: 10.1177/2472555218766842
- Souza GR, Tseng H, Gage JA, et al. Magnetically Bioprinted Human Myometrial 3D Cell Rings as A Model for Uterine Contractility. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4):683.
- Fattah ARA, Meleca E, Mishriki S, et al. In Situ 3D Label-Free Contactless Bioprinting of Cells through Diamagnetophoresis. ACS BIOMATER SCI ENG. 2016;2(12):2133-2138. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00614
- Ayan B, Heo DN, Zhang Z, et al. Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics. Sci Adv. 2020;6(10):eaaw5111. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5111
- Ning W, Duan F, Raymond L, et al. High-precision path planning for multi-material 3D bioprinting of complex structures. Biofabrication. 2026;18(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ae36f8
- Kim C, Hong S, Shin D, An S, Zhang X, Jhe W. Sorting Gold and Sand (Silica) Using Atomic Force Microscope-Based Dielectrophoresis. Nanomicro Lett. 2021;14(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00760-x
- Cañada J, Bigelow Z, Velásquez-García LF. Fully 3D-Printed electric motor manufactured via multi-modal, multi-material extrusion. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2026;21(1):e2613185. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2026.2613185
- Lee JY, Oh MH, Park JH, Kang SH, Kang SK. Three-Dimensionally Printed Expandable Structural Electronics Via Multi-Material Printing Room-Temperature-Vulcanizing (RTV) Silicone/Silver Flake Composite and RTV. Polymers (Basel). 23 2023;15(9)doi: 10.3390/polym15092003
- Burdis R, Chariyev-Prinz F, Kelly DJ. Bioprinting of biomimetic self-organised cartilage with a supporting joint fixation device. Biofabrication. 2021;14(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac36be
- Xie X, Wu S, Mou S, Guo N, Wang Z, Sun J. Microtissue-Based Bioink as a Chondrocyte Microshelter for DLP Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(22):e2201877. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201877
- Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D, et al. Volumetric Bioprinting of Complex Living-Tissue Constructs within Seconds. Adv Mater. 2019;31(42):e1904209. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904209
- Budharaju H, Sundaramurthi D, Sethuraman S. Embedded 3D bioprinting – An emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic & large vascularized tissue constructs. Review. Bioact Mater. 2024;32:356-384. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.012
- Bilici Ç, Altunbek M, Afghah F, Tatar AG, Koç B. Embedded 3D Printing of Cryogel-Based Scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(8):5028-5038. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00751
- Xu H, Zhang S, Song K, Yang H, Yin J, Huang Y. Droplet-based 3D bioprinting for drug delivery and screening. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2025;217:115486. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115486
- Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future. Biomaterials. 2016;102:20-42. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
- Bożek J, Kurchakova O, Michel J, et al. Pneumatic conveying inkjet bioprinting for the processing of living cells. Article. Biofabrication. 2025;17(2)025003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ada8e2
- Ablanedo Morales P, Rodriguez B, Furth ME, et al. Thermal inkjet bioprinting drastically alters cell phenotype. Biofabrication. 25 2023;15(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acd3b3
- Gasperini. -L, Maniglio. -D, Motta. -A, Migliaresi. -C. An Electrohydrodynamic Bioprinter for Alginate Hydrogels Containing Living Cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21(2015)(2):123-132. doi: doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0149
- Park J-U, Hardy M, Kang SJ, et al. High-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nat Mater. 2007;6(10):782-789. doi: 10.1038/nmat1974
- Franke T, Braunmüller S, Schmid L, Wixforth A, Weitz DA. Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS). Lab Chip. 21 2010;10(6):789-794. doi: 10.1039/b915522h
- Jo MC, Guldiken R. A label-free cell separation using surface acoustic waves. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:7691-7694. doi: 10.1109/iembs.2011.6091895
- Guo F, Mao Z, Chen Y, et al. Three-dimensional manipulation of single cells using surface acoustic waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(6):1522-1527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524813113
- Barani A, Paktinat H, Janmaleki M, et al. Microfluidic integrated acoustic waving for manipulation of cells and molecules. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;85:714-725. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.059
- Qiu Y, Wang H, Demore CE, et al. Acoustic devices for particle and cell manipulation and sensing. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14(8):14806-14838. doi: 10.3390/s140814806
- Kuang X, Rong Q, Belal S, et al. Self-enhancing sono-inks enable deep-penetration acoustic volumetric printing. Science. 2023;382(6675):1148-1155. doi: doi: 10.1126/science.adi1563
- Tillinger D, Armendarez NX, Najem JS. Multi-Material Droplet-Based Hydrogel Threads for Extrusion 3D Printing. Small Methods. 2026;10(5):e00928. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202500928
- Campbell PG, Weiss LE. Tissue engineering with the aid of inkjet printers. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007;7(8):1123-1127. doi: 10.1517/14712598.7.8.1123
- O'Connell CD, Di Bella C, Thompson F, et al. Development of the Biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):015019. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015019
- Singh S, Choudhury D, Yu F, Mironov V, Naing MW. In situ bioprinting - Bioprinting from benchside to bedside? Acta Biomater. 2020;101:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.045
- Checcucci E, Amparore D, Volpi G, et al. Metaverse Surgical Planning with Three-dimensional Virtual Models for Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2024;85(4):320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.015
- Dang Y, Liu X, Zheng Z, et al. Lutetium-Based Nanoprobes for Radiosensitization with Immune Microenvironment Remodeling and NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Surgery in Colorectal Cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(38):e10136. doi: 10.1002/advs.202510136
- Minto J, Zhou X, Osborn J, Zhang LG, Sarkar K, Rao RD. Three-Dimensional Printing: A Catalyst for a Changing Orthopaedic Landscape. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(2):e0076. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00076
- Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
- VanKoevering KK, Zopf DA, Hollister SJ. Tissue Engineering and 3-Dimensional Modeling for Facial Reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019;27(1):151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2018.08.012
- Du X, Yu B, Pei P, Ding H, Yu B, Zhu Y. 3D printing of pearl/CaSO(4) composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(3):499-509. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02667f
- Savio G, Rosso S, Meneghello R, Concheri G. Geometric Modeling of Cellular Materials for Additive Manufacturing in Biomedical Field: A Review. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:1654782. doi: 10.1155/2018/1654782
- Wang Z, Yang Y. Application of 3D Printing in Implantable Medical Devices. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6653967. doi: 10.1155/2021/6653967
- Samaila EM, Negri S, Zardini A, et al. Value of three-dimensional printing of fractures in orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(1):300060519887299. doi: 10.1177/0300060519887299
- Henckel J, Holme TJ, Radford W, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. 3D-printed Patient-specific Guides for Hip Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(16):e342-e348. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00719
- Kim JW, Lee Y, Seo J, et al. Clinical experience with three-dimensional printing techniques in orthopedic trauma. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(2):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.12.010
- Huang G, Li F, Zhao X, et al. Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment. Chem Rev. 2017;117(20):12764-12850. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00094
- Ullah S, Chen X. Fabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering. Appl Mater Today. 2020;20:100656. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100656
- Wang M, Zhou J, Tavares J, et al. Applications of algae to obtain healthier meat products: A critical review on nutrients, acceptability and quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(26):8357-8374. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2054939
- Reiss J, Robertson S, Suzuki M. Cell Sources for Cultivated Meat: Applications and Considerations throughout the Production Workflow. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14). doi: 10.3390/ijms22147513
- Sung SY, Lin YW, Wu CC, et al. Supercritical carbon dioxide-decellularized arteries exhibit physiologic-like vessel regeneration following xenotransplantation in rats. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(7):2566-2580. doi: 10.1039/d2bm01233b
- Barajaa MA, Otsuka T, Ghosh D, Kan HM, Laurencin CT. Development of porcine skeletal muscle extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels with improved properties and low immunogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(19):e2322822121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322822121
- Golebiowska AA, Intravaia JT, Sathe VM, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP. Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative therapies: Advances, challenges and clinical prospects. Bioact Mater. 2024;32:98-123. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.09.017
- Wang B, Qinglai T, Yang Q, et al. Functional acellular matrix for tissue repair. Mater Today Bio. 2023;18:100530. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100530
- Du Z, Liao J, Wang B, Yu S, Li X. Advantages and prospects of cell derived decellularized extracellular matrix as tissue engineering scaffolds. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024;38(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404114
- Ladero M, Reche-Sainz JA, Gallardo ME. Hereditary Optic Neuropathies: A Systematic Review on the Interplay between Biomaterials and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Bioengineering. 2024;11(1):52. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11010052
- Meng X, Zhou Z, Chen X, et al. A sturgeon cartilage extracellular matrix-derived bioactive bioink for tissue engineering applications. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(5):768. doi: 10.18063/ijb.768
- Abolhasani S, Ahmadi Y, Rostami Y, Baravar E, Fattahi D. Biomaterials in tissue repair and regeneration: key insights from extracellular matrix biology. Review. Front Med Technol. 2025;Volume 7 - 2025
- Sasmal PK, Ganguly S. Polymer in hemostasis and follow-up wound healing. J Appl Polym Sci. 2023;140(9)e53559. doi: 10.1002/app.53559
- Charbe NB, Tambuwala M, Palakurthi SS, et al. Biomedical applications of three-dimensional bioprinted craniofacial tissue engineering. Bioeng Transl Med. 2023;8(1)e10333. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10333
- Wang Z, Xu J, Zhu J, et al. Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: Scaffold Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Applications. Biotechnol J. 2025;20(1):e202400699. doi: 10.1002/biot.202400699
- Mansoor AK, van Turnhout MC, Ito K, Ristori T, Foolen J. Dynamic and static strain levels differentially affect the enzymatic degradation of collagen fibres. Acta Biomater. 2026;213:439-451. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2026.01.056
- Wang Y, Wang Z, Dong Y. Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(3):1132-1150. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00730
- Khan MUA, Stojanović GM, Hassan R, Anand TJS, Al-Ejji M, Hasan A. Role of Graphene Oxide in Bacterial Cellulose−Gelatin Hydrogels for Wound Dressing Applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8(18):15909-15919. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07279
- Li R, Liu K, Huang X, et al. Bioact Mater Promote Wound Healing through Modulation of Cell Behaviors. Review. Adv Sci. 2022;9(10):2105152. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105152
- Gao D, Li R, Pan J, et al. 3D bioprinting bone/cartilage organoids: construction, applications, and challenges. J Orthop Transl. 2025;55:75-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.08.008
- Aldana AA, Abraham GA. Current advances in electrospun gelatin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Int J Pharm. 2017;523(2):441-453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.044
- Martyniak K, Lokshina A, Cruz MA, Karimzadeh M, Kemp R, Kean TJ. Biomaterial composition and stiffness as decisive properties of 3D bioprinted constructs for type II collagen stimulation. Acta Biomater. 2022;152:221-234. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.058
- Ximu Z, Wei Z, Maobin Y. Application of Hydrogels in Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;13(7):497-516. doi: 10.2174/1574888X12666171017160323
- Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Dey S, Bhardwaj N, Mandal BB. Trends and advances in silk based 3D printing/bioprinting towards cartilage tissue engineering and regeneration. Prog Biomed Eng. 2024;6(2):022002. doi: 10.1088/2516-1091/ad2d59
- Saremi J, Khanmohammadi M, Azami M, Ai J, Yousefi-Ahmadipour A, Ebrahimi-Barough S. Tissue-engineered nerve graft using silk-fibroin/polycaprolactone fibrous mats decorated with bioactive cerium oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res - A. 2021;109(9):1588-1599. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37153
- Shen C, Zhou Z, Li R, et al. Silk fibroin-based hydrogels for cartilage organoids in osteoarthritis treatment. Theranostics. 2025;15(2):560-584. doi: 10.7150/thno.103491
- Wang Y, Liu H, He Y, et al. Hydrogel-Based Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation-Induced Skin Injury: Progress and Mechanistic Insights. Biomimetics. 2025;10(11):758.
- Zhang H, Xu D, Zhang Y, Li M, Chai R. Silk fibroin hydrogels for biomedical applications. Smart Med. 2022;1(1):e20220011. doi: 10.1002/SMMD.20220011
- Zheng H, Zuo B. Functional silk fibroin hydrogels: preparation, properties and applications. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(5):1238-1258. doi: 10.1039/d0tb02099k
- Lima R, Fernandes C, Pinto MMM. Molecular modifications, biological activities, and applications of chitosan and derivatives: A recent update. Chirality. 2022;34(9):1166-1190. doi: 10.1002/chir.23477
- Li X, Wang Y, Feng C, Chen H, Gao Y. Chemical Modification of Chitosan for Developing Cancer Nanotheranostics. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(6):2197-2218. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00184
- Oryan A, Sahvieh S. Effectiveness of chitosan scaffold in skin, bone and cartilage healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:1003-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.124
- Zhang X, Cheng F, Islam MR, Li H. The fabrication of the chitosan-based bioink for in vitro tissue repair and regeneration: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;257:128504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128504
- Sangsanoh P, Supaphol P. Stability improvement of electrospun chitosan nanofibrous membranes in neutral or weak basic aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(10):2710-2714. doi: 10.1021/bm060286l
- Berger J, Reist M, Mayer JM, Felt O, Gurny R. Structure and interactions in chitosan hydrogels formed by complexation or aggregation for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57(1):35-52. doi: 10.1016/s0939-6411(03)00160-7
- Yu X, Wang Y, Liu X, Ge Y, Zhang S. Ursolic Acid Loaded-Mesoporous Hydroxylapatite/ Chitosan Therapeutic Scaffolds Regulate Bone Regeneration Ability by Promoting the M2-Type Polarization of Macrophages. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:5301-5315. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S323033
- Rawojć K, Tadeusiewicz R, Zych-Stodolak E. Advancements in Chitosan-Based Scaffolds for Chondrogenic Differentiation and Knee Cartilage Regeneration: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025;12(7). doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070740
- Rojas-Murillo JA, Simental-Mendía MA, Moncada-Saucedo NK, et al. Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of Fibrin Scaffolds for Cartilage Repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17). doi: 10.3390/ijms23179879
- Haugh MG, Thorpe SD, Vinardell T, Buckley CT, Kelly DJ. The application of plastic compression to modulate fibrin hydrogel mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;16:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.009
- Park CH, Woo KM. Fibrin-Based Biomaterial Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1064:253-261. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0445-3_16
- Gupta N, Cruz MA, Nasser P, Rosenberg JD, Iatridis JC. Fibrin-Genipin Hydrogel for Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Nasal Reconstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(7):640-646. doi: 10.1177/0003489419836667
- Yoon KH, Park JY, Lee JY, Lee E, Lee J, Kim SG. Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defect. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(5):1236-1245. doi: 10.1177/0363546520905565
- Ma H, Xie B, Chen H, et al. Structurally sophisticated 3D-printed PCL-fibrin hydrogel meniscal scaffold promotes in situ regeneration in the rabbit knee meniscus. Materials Today Bio. 2025;30:101391. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101391
- Kim W-J, Kim Y, Ovissipour R, Nitin N. Plant-based biomaterials as scaffolds for cellular agriculture. Future Foods. 2024;10:100468. doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100468
- Ng S, Kurisawa M. Integrating biomaterials and food biopolymers for cultured meat production. Acta Biomater. 2021;124:108-129. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.017
- Rao KM, Kim HJ, Won S, Choi SM, Han SS. Effect of Grape Seed Extract on Gelatin-Based Edible 3D-Hydrogels for Cultured Meat Application. Gels. 2023;9(1). doi: 10.3390/gels9010065
- Ramiah P, du Toit LC, Choonara YE, Kondiah PPD, Pillay V. Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Regeneration. Front Mater. 2020;7. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2020.00076
- Buléon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S. Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol. 1998;23(2):85-112. doi: 10.1016/s0141-8130(98)00040-3
- Apriyanto A, Compart J, Fettke J. A review of starch, a unique biopolymer - Structure, metabolism and in planta modifications. Plant Sci. 2022;318:111223. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111223
- Torres FG, Commeaux S, Troncoso OP. Starch-based biomaterials for wound-dressing applications. Starch - Stärke. 2013;65(7-8):543-551. doi:10.1002/star.201200259
- Niu R, Xin Q, Xu E, Yao S, Chen M, Liu D. Nanostarch-Stimulated Cell Adhesion in 3D Bioprinted Hydrogel Scaffolds for Cell Cultured Meat. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(18):23015-23026. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c03585
- Lu H, Tian Y. Nanostarch: Preparation, Modification, and Application in Pickering Emulsions. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(25):6929-6942. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01244
- Alonso-Sande M, Teijeiro-Osorio D, Remuñán-López C, Alonso MJ. Glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide for biopharmaceutical purposes. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(2):453-462. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.02.005
- Xiao C, Gao S, Wang H, Zhang L. Blend films from chitosan and konjac glucomannan solutions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000;76(4):509-515. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000425)76:4<509::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-2
- Ye S, Zongo AW, Shah BR, Li J, Li B. Konjac Glucomannan (KGM), Deacetylated KGM (Da-KGM), and Degraded KGM Derivatives: A Special Focus on Colloidal Nutrition. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(44):12921-12932. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03647
- Zhuang K, Shu X, Xie W. Konjac glucomannan-based composite materials: Construction, biomedical applications, and prospects. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;344:122503. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122503
- Tang X, Deng G, Yang L, et al. Konjac glucomannan-fibrin composite hydrogel as a model for ideal scaffolds for cell-culture meat. Food Res Int. 2024;187:114425. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114425
- Diaz CJ, Douglas KJ, Kang K, et al. Developing algae as a sustainable food source. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1029841. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1029841
- Afonso NC, Catarino MD, Silva AMS, Cardoso SM. Brown Macroalgae as Valuable Food Ingredients. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019;8(9). doi: 10.3390/antiox8090365
- Zhang C, Guan X, Yu S, Zhou J, Chen J. Production of meat alternatives using live cells, cultures and plant proteins. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2021;43. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.11.002
- Serafin A, Culebras M, Collins MN. Synthesis and evaluation of alginate, gelatin, and hyaluronic acid hybrid hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;233:123438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123438
- Cui P, Pan P, Qin L, et al. Nanoengineered hydrogels as 3D biomimetic extracellular matrix with injectable and sustained delivery capability for cartilage regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2023;19:487-498. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.032
- Lee H, Kim D, Choi KH, et al. Animal-free scaffold from brown algae provides a three-dimensional cell growth and differentiation environment for steak-like cultivated meat. Food Hydrocolloids. 2024;152:109944. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.109944
- Mallakpour S, Azadi E, Hussain CM. State-of-the-art of 3D printing technology of alginate-based hydrogels—An emerging technique for industrial applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;293:102436. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102436
- Shirehjini LM, Sharifi F, Shojaei S, Irani S. Poly-caprolactone nanofibrous coated with sol-gel alginate/ mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;74:103488. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103488
- Saeedi Garakani S, Khanmohammadi M, Atoufi Z, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/agarose scaffolds containing extracellular matrix for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;143:533-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.040
- Samrot AV, Sathiyasree M, Rahim SBA, et al. Scaffold Using Chitosan, Agarose, Cellulose, Dextran and Protein for Tissue Engineering-A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(6). doi: 10.3390/polym15061525
- Hong SJ, Kim DH, Ryoo JH, et al. Influence of Gelatin on Adhesion, Proliferation, and Adipogenic Differentiation of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Cultured on Soy Protein-Agarose Scaffolds. Foods. 2024;13(14). doi: 10.3390/foods13142247
- Moradi M, Guimarães JT, Sahin S. Current applications of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria in the development of food active edible packaging. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021;40:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.06.001
- Ucm R, Aem M, Lhb Z, et al. Comprehensive review on biotechnological production of hyaluronic acid: status, innovation, market and applications. Review. Bioengineered. 2022;13(4):9645-9661. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2057760
- Wolf KJ, Kumar S. Hyaluronic Acid: Incorporating the Bio into the Material. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(8):3753-3765. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01268
- Highley CB, Prestwich GD, Burdick JA. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:35-40. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008
- Kobayashi T, Chanmee T, Itano N. Hyaluronan: Metabolism and Function. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11):1525.
- Fallacara A, Baldini E, Manfredini S, Vertuani S. Hyaluronic Acid in the Third Millennium. Polymers. 2018;10(7):701.
- Qiu H, Mao X, Pan G, et al. A fluorescent hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogel for traceable articular cartilage regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;300:140905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140905
- Choi SM, Shin EJ. The Nanofication and Functionalization of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(3). doi: 10.3390/nano10030406
- Khan S, Ul-Islam M, Ullah MW, et al. Fabrication strategies and biomedical applications of three-dimensional bacterial cellulose-based scaffolds: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;209(Pt A):9-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.191
- Fu LH, Qi C, Ma MG, Wan P. Multifunctional cellulose-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. Review. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(10):1541-1562. doi: 10.1039/c8tb02331j
- Mahendiran B, Muthusamy S, Janani G, Mandal BB, Rajendran S, Krishnakumar GS. Surface Modification of Decellularized Natural Cellulose Scaffolds with Organosilanes for Bone Tissue Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(5):2000-2015. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01502
- Ghalia MA, Alhanish A. Mechanical and biodegradability of porous PCL/PEG copolymer-reinforced cellulose nanofibers for soft tissue engineering applications. Med Eng Phys. 2023;120(1):104055. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104055
- Yoon DM, Fisher JP. Natural and Synthetic Polymeric Scaffolds. In: Narayan R, ed. Biomedical Materials. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2021:257-283.
- Sionkowska A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: Review. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36(9):1254-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.003
- Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7411-7431. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037
- Thomson RC, Wake MC, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds to regenerate organs. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1995:245-274.
- Naureen B, Haseeb ASMA, Basirun WJ, Muhamad F. Recent advances in tissue engineering scaffolds based on polyurethane and modified polyurethane. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;118:111228. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111228
- Chae S, Lee SS, Choi YJ, et al. 3D cell-printing of biocompatible and functional meniscus constructs using meniscus-derived bioink. Biomaterials. 2021;267:120466. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120466
- Chang YC, Cheng YL, Liu WC, Zhong WB, Tsao CK. Flexible polyurethane scaffolds with high biocompatibility for effective chondrogenic performance in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2025;20(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/add6f8
- Ji H, Shi X, Yang H. Recent Advances in Polyurethane for Artificial Vascular Application. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(24). doi: 10.3390/polym16243528
- Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(10):1217-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002
- Lee CH, Rodeo SA, Fortier LA, Lu C, Erisken C, Mao JJ. Protein-releasing polymeric scaffolds induce fibrochondrocytic differentiation of endogenous cells for knee meniscus regeneration in sheep. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:(266).
- Malikmammadov E, Tanir TE, Kiziltay A, Hasirci V, Hasirci N. PCL and PCL-based materials in biomedical applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(7-9):863-893. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2017.1394711
- Xu Y, Huang Y, Armstrong J, et al. Recent advances in biomaterials and structural design of 3D printed multiphasic scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Mat Sci Eng R. 2026;170:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2026.101210
- Siri S, Wadbua P, Amornkitbamrung V, Kampa N, Maensiri S. Surface modification of electrospun PCL scaffolds by plasma treatment and addition of adhesive protein to promote fibroblast cell adhesion. Mater Sci Technol. 2010;26:1292-1297. doi: 10.1179/026708310x12798718274070
- Mieloch AA, Semba JA, Rybka JD. CNT-Type Dependent Cellular Adhesion on 3D-Printed Nanocomposite for Tissue Engineering. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(2):548. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i2.548
- Khouri NG, Bahú JO, Blanco-Llamero C, Severino P, Concha VOC, Souto EB. Polylactic acid (PLA): Properties, synthesis, and biomedical applications – A review of the literature. J Mol Struct. 2024;1309:138243. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138243
- Rodrigues N, Benning M, Ferreira AM, Dixon L, Dalgarno K. Manufacture and Characterisation of Porous PLA Scaffolds. Procedia CIRP. 2016;49:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.025
- Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T, Jarzem P, Haglund L. 3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(7):15118-15135.
- Fairag R, Rosenzweig DH, Ramirez-Garcialuna JL, Weber MH, Haglund L. Three-Dimensional Printed Polylactic Acid Scaffolds Promote Bone-like Matrix Deposition in Vitro. ACS Appl Mate. Interfaces. 2019;11(17):15306-15315. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b02502
- Vink ETH, Rábago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR. Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab. 2003;80(3):403-419. doi: 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00372-5
- Rasal RM, Janorkar AV, Hirt DE. Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(3):338-356. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003
- Place ES, George JH, Williams CK, Stevens MM. Synthetic polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. 10.1039/B811392K. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(4):1139-1151. doi: 10.1039/B811392K
- Shen P, Moriya A, Rajabzadeh S, Maruyama T, Matsuyama H. Improvement of the antifouling properties of poly (lactic acid) hollow fiber membranes with poly (lactic acid)–polyethylene glycol–poly (lactic acid) copolymers. Desalination. 2013;325:37-39. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.012
- Donate R, Monzón M, Alemán-Domínguez ME. Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. Review. E-Polymers. 2020;20(1):571-599. doi: 10.1515/epoly-2020-0046
- Shuai C, Yang W, Feng P, Peng S, Pan H. Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(2):490-502. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.001
- Fan X, Li L, Zhu H, Yan L, Zhu S, Yan Y. Preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility evaluation of polymer (amino acid and glycolic acid)/hydroxyapatite composite for bone repair. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(2):025004. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/abdbdd
- Zhang ZY, Zheng WZ, Zhen ZC, et al. In vivo and in vitro degradation and biological toxicity studies of polyesters with varying degradation rates. J Hazard Mater. 2025;492:138196. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138196
- Critchley S, Sheehy EJ, Cunniffe G, et al. 3D printing of fibre-reinforced cartilaginous templates for the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:130-143. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.040
- Uematsu K, Hattori K, Ishimoto Y, et al. Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and a three-dimensional poly-lactic-glycolic acid (PLGA) scaffold. Biomaterials. 2005;26(20):4273-4279. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.037
- Seo SJ, Mahapatra C, Singh RK, Knowles JC, Kim HW. Strategies for osteochondral repair: Focus on scaffolds. J Tissue Eng. 2014;5:2041731414541850. doi: 10.1177/2041731414541850
- Fan L, Teng W, He J, et al. Value of 3D Printed PLGA Scaffolds for Cartilage Defects in Terms of Repair. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:3561430. doi: 10.1155/2022/3561430
- Chang DP, Garripelli VK, Rea J, Kelley R, Rajagopal K. Investigation of Fragment Antibody Stability and Its Release Mechanism from Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)-Triacetin Depots for Sustained-Release Applications. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(10):3404-3417. doi: 10.1002/jps.24546
- Liu Y, Wang S, Dong J, et al. External Stimuli-Induced Welding of Dynamic Cross-Linked Polymer Networks. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(5). doi: 10.3390/polym16050621
- Wu Z, Zhu M, Song P, et al. Chemically Programmable Liquid-to-Solid Transitions and Spatial Dynamics in Synthetic Coacervates. J Am Chem Soc. 2026;148(27):29220-29230. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c07923
- Li X, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Cross-Linking Methods of the Silk Protein Hydrogel in Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024;21(4):529-544. doi: 10.1007/s13770-023-00624-y
- Xue P, Wang J, Fu Y, He H, Gan Q, Liu C. Material-Mediated Immunotherapy to Regulate Bone Aging and Promote Bone Repair. Small. 2025;21(11):e2409886. doi: 10.1002/smll.202409886
- Peng Z, Ji C, Zhou Y, Zhao T, Leblanc RM. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) derived carbon dots: Preparation and applications. Appl Mater Today. 2020;20:100677. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100677
- Lin X, Liu R, Beitzel J, Zhou Y, Lagadon C, Zhang M. Injectable Biodegradable Chitosan-PEG/PEG-Dialdehyde Hydrogel for Stem Cell Delivery and Cartilage Regeneration. Gels. 2024;10(8). doi: 10.3390/gels10080508
- Fu N, Liao J, Lin S, et al. PCL-PEG-PCL film promotes cartilage regeneration in vivo. Cell Prolif. 2016;49(6):729-739. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12295
- Yao Y, Wei G, Deng L, Cui W. Visualizable and Lubricating Hydrogel Microspheres Via NanoPOSS for Cartilage Regeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(15):e2207438. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207438
- Liu F, Wang X. Synthetic Polymers for Organ 3D Printing. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8). doi: 10.3390/polym12081765
- Choe G, Park J, Park H, Lee JY. Hydrogel Biomaterials for Stem Cell Microencapsulation. Polymers (Basel). 2018;10(9). doi: 10.3390/polym10090997
- Seo Y-H, Lee J-M, Park S-Y, Kim M-H, Kim S-B, Oh T-H. PVA Hydrogels Supplemented with PLA Mesh for Tissue Regeneration Scaffold. Gels. 2024;10(6):364. doi: 10.3390/gels10060364
- Suleiman GSA, Zeng X, Chakma R, Wakai IY, Feng Y. Recent advances and challenges in thermal stability of <scp>PVA</scp>‐based film: A review. Polym Adv Technol. 2024;35(2). doi: 10.1002/pat.6327
- Zhong Y, Lin Q, Yu H, et al. Construction methods and biomedical applications of PVA-based hydrogels. Front Chem. 2024;12:1376799. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1376799
- Jiang S, Liu S, Feng W. PVA hydrogel properties for biomedical application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(7):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.005
- Luo C, Guo A, Zhao Y, Sun X. A high strength, low friction, and biocompatible hydrogel from PVA, chitosan and sodium alginate for articular cartilage. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;286:119268. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119268
- Barbon S, Contran M, Stocco E, et al. Enhanced Biomechanical Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Based Hybrid Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Processes. 2021;9(5):730.
- Ulery BD, Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys. 2011;49(12):832-864. doi: doi.org/10.1002/polb.22259
- Sonthithai P, Kaewkong P, Channasanon S, Tanodekaew S. 3D-Printed PEG-PLA/Gelatin Hydrogel: Characterization toward In Vitro Chondrocyte Redifferentiation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(4):2157-2166. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c02409
- Bedell ML, Torres AL, Hogan KJ, et al. Human gelatin-based composite hydrogels for osteochondral tissue engineering and their adaptation into bioinks for extrusion, inkjet, and digital light processing bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac8768
- Senturk E, Bilici C, Afghah F, et al. 3D bioprinting of tyramine modified hydrogels under visible light for osteochondral interface. Biofabrication. 2023;15(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acd6bf
- Ding A, Lee SJ, Ayyagari S, Tang R, Huynh CT, Alsberg E. 4D biofabrication via instantly generated graded hydrogel scaffolds. Bioact Mater. 2022;7:324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.021
- Cianciosi A, Stecher S, Löffler M, et al. Flexible Allyl-Modified Gelatin Photoclick Resin Tailored for Volumetric Bioprinting of Matrices for Soft Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(30):e2300977. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300977
- Thijssen Q, Quaak A, Toombs J, et al. Volumetric Printing of Thiol-Ene Photo-Cross-Linkable Poly(ε-caprolactone): A Tunable Material Platform Serving Biomedical Applications. Adv Mater. 2023;35(19):e2210136. doi: 10.1002/adma.202210136
- Gavish Moscovitz A, Simaan Yameen H, Bar-Am O, Seliktar D. Evaluating Cross-Linking Efficiency and Cytocompatibility of Three Commonly Used Photoinitiators across Different Cell-Compatible Hydrogel Platforms. Biomacromolecules. 2025;26(10):6817-6833. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01142
- Miklosic G, Bektas EI, Hangartner A, et al. Radical-free photopolymerizable composites of hyaluronic acid and gelatin for tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia. 2025;197:121-134. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.03.017
- Anthony Dicks J, Woolard C. Thiol-X Chemistry: A Skeleton Key Unlocking Advanced Polymers in Additive Manufacturing. Macromol Mater Eng. 2025;310(7):2400445. doi:10.1002/mame.202400445
- Wei W, Dai H. Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: Recent advances and challenges. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(12):4830-4855. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.011
- Ko CY, Ku KL, Yang SR, et al. In vitro and in vivo co-culture of chondrocytes and bone marrow stem cells in photocrosslinked PCL-PEG-PCL hydrogels enhances cartilage formation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(10):E485-E496. doi: 10.1002/term.1846
- Zeng L, Yao Y, Wang DA, Chen X. Effect of microcavitary alginate hydrogel with different pore sizes on chondrocyte culture for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;34:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.003
- Qi C, Liu J, Jin Y, et al. Photo-crosslinkable, injectable sericin hydrogel as 3D biomimetic extracellular matrix for minimally invasive repairing cartilage. Biomaterials. 2018;163:89-104. doi: j.biomaterials.2018.02.016
- Graceffa V, Vinatier C, Guicheux J, Stoddart M, Alini M, Zeugolis DI. Chasing Chimeras – The elusive stable chondrogenic phenotype. Biomaterials. 2019;192:199-225. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.014
- Wei X, Yang X, Han Z-p, Qu F-f, Shao L, Shi Y-f. Mesenchymal stem cells: a new trend for cell therapy. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2013;34(6):747-754. doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.50
- Lopa S, Mondadori C, Mainardi VL, et al. Translational Application of Microfluidics and Bioprinting for Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Repair. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018(1):6594841. doi: 10.1155/2018/6594841
- Liu Y, Du L, Zhang H, et al. Bioprinted biomimetic hydrogel matrices guiding stem cell aggregates for enhanced chondrogenesis and cartilage regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(22):5360-5376. doi: 10.1039/d4tb00323c
- Nedunchezian S, Banerjee P, Lee CY, et al. Generating adipose stem cell-laden hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds using 3D bioprinting via the double crosslinked strategy for chondrogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;124:112072. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112072
- Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2007;448(7151):313-317. doi: 10.1038/nature05934
- Murry CE, Keller G. Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Clinically Relevant Populations: Lessons from Embryonic Development. Cell. 2008;132(4):661-680. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.008
- Chung JY, Song M, Ha CW, Kim JA, Lee CH, Park YB. Comparison of articular cartilage repair with different hydrogel-human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell composites in a rat model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5(2):39. doi: 10.1186/scrt427
- Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, Duda DG, Fukumura D. Engineering vascularized tissue. Short survey. Nature Biotechnology. 2005;23(7):821-823. doi: 10.1038/nbt0705-821
- Zheng K, Ma Y, Chiu C, et al. Co-culture pellet of human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells and rat costal chondrocytes as a candidate for articular cartilage regeneration: in vitro and in vivo study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03094-6
- Pitacco P, Sadowska JM, O'Brien FJ, Kelly DJ. 3D bioprinting of cartilaginous templates for large bone defect healing. Acta Biomater. 2023;156:61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.07.037
- Wu Z, Wang Y, Zhu M, Lu M, Liu W, Shi J. Synovial microenvironment in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: crosstalk with chondrocytes and potential therapeutic targets. Life Sci. 2024;354:122947. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122947
- Zhang M, Wang J. Epigenetics and Osteoarthritis. Genes Dis. 2015;2(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.12.005
- Walewska A, Janucik A, Tynecka M, Moniuszko M, Eljaszewicz A. Mesenchymal stem cells under epigenetic control - the role of epigenetic machinery in fate decision and functional properties. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(11):720. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06239-4
- Xiao JL, Meng JH, Gan YH, Li YL, Zhou CY, Ma XC. DNA methylation profiling in different phases of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;68:105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.04.006
- Loughlin J, Reynard LN. Osteoarthritis: Epigenetics of articular cartilage in knee and hip OA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(1):6-7. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.189
- Wu YL, Lin ZJ, Li CC, et al. Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2 2023;8(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01333-7
- Qiu Y, Xu Q, Xie P, et al. Epigenetic modifications and emerging therapeutic targets in cardiovascular aging and diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2025;211:107546. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107546
- Zaratiegui M, Irvine DV, Martienssen RA. Noncoding RNAs and gene silencing. Cell. 2007;128(4):763-776. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.016
- Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):629-641. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006
- Chang LH, Chuang SC, Wu SC, et al. Comparisons of miRNA profiles of exosomes derived from human iPSCs, ADSCs, and BMSCs and effects on chondrocyte function. Bone Joint Res. 2025;14(8):696-712. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.148.Bjr-2024-0267.R4
- Zhao Y, Chen L, Jiang S, et al. Exosomes derived from MSCs exposed to hypoxic and inflammatory environments slow intervertebral disc degeneration by alleviating the senescence of nucleus pulposus cells through epigenetic modifications. Bioact Mater. 2025;49:515-530. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.02.046
- Kim HJ, Park JM, Lee S, et al. Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-based knockdown of RUNX2 to induce chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(2):514-523. doi: 10.1039/d1bm01716k
- Kim E, Seok JM, Bae SB, Park SA, Park WH. Silk Fibroin Enhances Cytocompatibilty and Dimensional Stability of Alginate Hydrogels for Light-Based Three-Dimensional Bioprinting. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22(5):1921-1931. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00034
- Sánchez-Sánchez R, Rodríguez-Rego JM, Macías-García A, Mendoza-Cerezo L, Díaz-Parralejo A. Relationship between shear-thinning rheological properties of bioinks and bioprinting parameters. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):687. doi: 10.18063/ijb.687
- Mendoza-Cerezo L, Rodríguez-Rego JM, Macías-García A, Callejas-Marín A, Sánchez-Guardado L, Marcos-Romero AC. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of GelMA Hydrogels with Culture Medium: Balancing Printability, Rheology and Cell Viability for Tissue Regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(10). doi: 10.3390/polym16101437
- Xie M, Su J, Zhou S, Li J, Zhang K. Application of Hydrogels as Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Ink for Tissue Engineering. Gels. 2023;9(2). doi: 10.3390/gels9020088
- Rharbi Y, Romdhane A, Blésès D, El Kissi N. 3D printing of alginate scaffolds for low-pH environments through slow alginic-acid hydrogel formation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026;372:153041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.153041
- Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, Kim WD, Kim SH. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication. 2020;12(3):035018. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707
- Liu Q, Yang J, Wang Y, et al. Direct 3D Bioprinting of Tough and Antifatigue Cell-Laden Constructs Enabled by a Self-Healing Hydrogel Bioink. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24(6):2549-2562. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00057
- Tsai CC, Chandel AKS, Mitsuhashi K, Fujiyabu T, Inagaki NF, Ito T. Injectable, Shear-Thinning, Self-Healing, and Self-Cross-Linkable Benzaldehyde-Conjugated Chitosan Hydrogels as a Tissue Adhesive. Biomacromolecules. 2024;25(2):1084-1095. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c01117
- Li H, Chen S, Dissanayaka WL, Wang M. Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate/Cellulose Nanocrystal Inks and 3D Printing for Dental Tissue Engineering Applications. ACS Omega. 2024;9(49):48361-48373. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06458
- Warwar Damouny C, Martin P, Vasilyev G, et al. Injectable Hydrogels Based on Inter-Polyelectrolyte Interactions between Hyaluronic Acid, Gelatin, and Cationic Cellulose Nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(8):3222-3234. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00316
- Sarah R, Schimmelpfennig K, Rohauer R, Lewis CL, Limon SM, Habib A. Characterization and Machine Learning-Driven Property Prediction of a Novel Hybrid Hydrogel Bioink Considering Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting. Gels. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.3390/gels11010045
- Cui Y, Jin R, Zhang Y, Yu M, Zhou Y, Wang LQ. Cellulose Nanocrystal-Enhanced Thermal-Sensitive Hydrogels of Block Copolymers for 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(4):397. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.397
- Chen X, Yue Z, Winberg PC, Lou YR, Beirne S, Wallace GG. 3D bioprinting dermal-like structures using species-specific ulvan. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(7):2424-2438. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01784a
- Janarthanan G, Kim JH, Kim I, Lee C, Chung EJ, Noh I. Manufacturing of self-standing multi-layered 3D-bioprinted alginate-hyaluronate constructs by controlling the cross-linking mechanisms for tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication. 2022;14(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac6c4c
- Fischer L, Nosratlo M, Hast K, et al. Calcium supplementation of bioinks reduces shear stress-induced cell damage during bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac84af
- Klompmaker J, Jansen HWB, Veth RH, Nielsen HKL, de Groot JH, Pennings AJ. Porous implants for knee joint meniscus reconstruction: A preliminary study on the role of pore sizes in ingrowth and differentiation of fibrocartilage. Clin Mater. 1993;14(1):1-11. doi:10.1016/0267-6605(93)90041-5
- McNamara LE, Sjöström T, Seunarine K, Meek RD, Su B, Dalby MJ. Investigation of the limits of nanoscale filopodial interactions. J Tissue Eng. 2014;5:2041731414536177. doi: 10.1177/2041731414536177
- Tang T, Zhong J, Hu J, et al. Gradients in lacunar morphology and cartilage mineralization reflect the mechanical function of the mouse femoral head epiphysis. Acta Biomaterialia. 2025;201:385-399. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.06.002
- Singh BN, Nallakumarasamy A, Sinha S, et al. Generation of hybrid tissue engineered construct through embedding autologous chondrocyte loaded platelet rich plasma/alginate based hydrogel in porous scaffold for cartilage regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;203:389-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.054
- Jeong HJ, Lee SW, Hong MW, et al. Total Meniscus Reconstruction Using a Polymeric Hybrid-Scaffold: Combined with 3D-Printed Biomimetic Framework and Micro-Particle. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(12). doi: 10.3390/polym13121910
- Klarmann GJ, Gaston J, Ho VB. A review of strategies for development of tissue engineered meniscal implants. Review Article. Biomater Biosyst. 2021;4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100026
- Wang D, Jiang C, Li J, et al. Effects of porosity distribution on mechanical properties and osseointegration of porous polyetheretherketone. Biomater Adv. 2025;166:214043. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214043
- Wang Y, Song Y, Hu Q, Zhang H. Dual-Channel Extrusion-Based 3D Printing of a Gradient Hydroxyapatite Hydrogel Scaffold with Spatial Curved Architecture. Gels. 2026;12(1). doi: 10.3390/gels12010093
- Liu H, Qiao H, Li R, et al. Kartogenin-loaded chitosan composite scaffold with cartilage-mimetic microstructure for layered osteochondral repair and cartilage phenotype maintenance. Mater Today Bio. 2026;36:102727. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102727
- Liu YY, Intini C, Dobricic M, O'Brien FJ, J LL, Echeverry-Rendon M. Collagen-based 3D printed poly (glycerol sebacate) composite scaffold with biomimicking mechanical properties for enhanced cartilage defect repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;280(Pt 2):135827. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135827
- Zare P, Pezeshki-Modaress M, Davachi SM, et al. An additive manufacturing-based 3D printed poly ɛ-caprolactone/alginate sulfate/extracellular matrix construct for nasal cartilage regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022;110(6):1199-1209. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37363
- Gentile F, Tirinato L, Battista E, et al. Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. Biomaterials. 2010;31(28):7205-7212. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.016
- Chen M, Gao S, Wang P, et al. The application of electrospinning used in meniscus tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(5):461-475. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2018.1425180
- Zhang X, Liu Y, Zuo Q, et al. 3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix and Silk Fibroin for Osteochondral Repair. Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(4):401. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.401
- Xie B, Ma H, Yang F, et al. Development and evaluation of 3D composite scaffolds with piezoelectricity and biofactor synergy for enhanced articular cartilage regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(40):10416-10433. doi: 10.1039/d4tb01319k
- Mosher CZ, Brudnicki PAP, Gong Z, et al. Green electrospinning for biomaterials and biofabrication. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac0964
- Karipidou N, Gorley JPM, Katrilaka C, et al. A Critical Review of Commercial Collagen-Based Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Functional Properties and Clinical Evidence from Infuse((R)) Bone Graft. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(9). doi: 10.3390/jfb16090313
- Vijayan A, C LV, Kumar GSV. Dual growth factor entrapped nanoparticle enriched alginate wafer-based delivery system for suppurating wounds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;208:172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.068
- Wang H, Peng T, Wu H, et al. In situ biomimetic lyotropic liquid crystal gel for full-thickness cartilage defect regeneration. J Control Release. 2021;338:623-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.062
- Lewis JA, Nemke B, Lu Y, et al. A bioactive supramolecular and covalent polymer scaffold for cartilage repair in a sheep model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(33):e2405454121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405454121
- Hafezi M, Khorasani SN, Khalili S, Neisiany RE. Self-healing interpenetrating network hydrogel based on GelMA/alginate/nano-clay. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;242(Pt 2):124962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124962
- Fang D, Jin P, Huang Q, Yang Y, Zhao J, Zheng L. Platelet-rich plasma promotes the regeneration of cartilage engineered by mesenchymal stem cells and collagen hydrogel via the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(9):15627-15637. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28211
- DePhillipo NN, LaPrade RF, Zaffagnini S, Mouton C, Seil R, Beaufils P. The future of meniscus science: international expert consensus. J Exp Orthop. 2021;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00345-y
- Li Z, Zhang X, Yuan T, et al. Addition of Platelet-Rich Plasma to Silk Fibroin Hydrogel Bioprinting for Cartilage Regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020;26:886-895. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0304
- Shapira A, Dvir T. 3D Tissue and Organ Printing—Hope and Reality. Adv Scie. 2021;8(10):2003751. doi: 10.1002/advs.202003751
- Yu C, Ma X, Zhu W, et al. Scanningless and continuous 3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials. 2019;194:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.12.009
- You S, Li J, Zhu W, Yu C, Mei D, Chen S. Nanoscale 3D printing of hydrogels for cellular tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(15):2187-2197. doi: 10.1039/c8tb00301g
- Worthington KS, Wiley LA, Kaalberg EE, et al. Two-photon polymerization for production of human iPSC-derived retinal cell grafts. Acta Biomater. 2017;55:385-395. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.039
- Ma X, Qu X, Zhu W, et al. Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(8):2206-2211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524510113
- Puistola P, Miettinen S, Skottman H, Moro A. Novel strategy for multi-material 3D bioprinting of human stem cell based corneal stroma with heterogenous design. Mater Today Bio. 2024;24:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100924
- Abaci A, Guvendiren M. 3D bioprinting of dense cellular structures within hydrogels with spatially controlled heterogeneity. Biofabrication. 2024;16(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad52f1
- Wu X, Ehrmann K, Gan CT, Leuschel B, Pashley-Johnson F, Barner-Kowollik C. Two Material Properties from One Wavelength-Orthogonal Photoresin Enabled by a Monochromatic Laser Integrated Stereolithographic Apparatus (Mono LISA). Adv Mater. 2025;37(13):e2419639. doi: 10.1002/adma.202419639
- Chen Z, Zhang H, Huang J, et al. DNA-encoded dynamic hydrogels for 3D bioprinted cartilage organoids. Mater Today Bio. 2025;31:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101509
- Morgan FLC, Fernandez-Perez J, Moroni L, Baker MB. Tuning Hydrogels by Mixing Dynamic Cross-Linkers: Enabling Cell-Instructive Hydrogels and Advanced Bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(1):e2101576. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101576
- Chen F, Wang W, Zhao H, et al. MXene-Based Cartilage-Adhesive Microspheres for Photothermal-Controlled Hydrophobic Drug Release and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Delivery in Osteoarthritis. ACS Nano. 2025;19(22):20502-20515. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c16918
