AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB026240246
Cite this article
12
Download
327
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Three-dimensional-printed bilayered scleral patches with mechano-biological synergistic activity for posterior scleral reinforcement in pathological myopia

Mengdi Chai1† Qing He1† Tingting Liu2 Xiu Wang1 Di Wu1 Bin Yao3* Ruihua Wei1*
Show Less
1 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China
2 Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, The 971st Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China
3 Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 9 June 2026 | Revised: 23 July 2026 | Accepted: 3 August 2026 | Published online: 3 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Pathological myopia (PM) is a leading cause of irreversible vision impairment, characterized by progressive axial elongation and posterior staphyloma. Posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) surgery is a key intervention to halt disease progression. In this procedure, PSR materials are fixed to the posterior pole of the eye to enhance the original scleral biomechanical properties and promote collagen deposition. However, the materials used for PSR are difficult to obtain and fail to fully achieve all required biomechanical functions. In this study, a novel bilayered biomaterial combining mechanical support with bio-regenerative capacity was developed. The outer reinforcement layer was a decellularized porcine sclera (dPS), while the inner functional layer was a gelatin methacryloyl/ scleral extracellular matrix (GelMA/dSECM) hydrogel. They were developed via low-temperature extrusion-based 3D printing. The dPS layer provided stable mechanical support with high tensile strength, while the GelMA/dSECM hydrogel exhibited a porous microstructure. Bioactive components released from the bilayered material enhanced human scleral fibroblast (HSF) proliferation, migration, and collagen I expression. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that dSECM core proteins were enriched in extracellular matrix organization and angiogenesis-related pathways. In a form-deprived myopia (FDM) guinea pig model, the bilayered material controlled axial elongation and vitreous chamber depth increase. It promoted scleral thickening and achieved close apposition with host tissue in 4 weeks. This work presents a “mechanical support + regenerative” synergistic system, offering a potential strategy for effective PM management.

Keywords
Myopia
Pathological myopia
Posterior scleral reinforcement
Gelatin methacryloyl
Extracellular matrix
Funding
This work was supported by the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline Construction Project (TJYXZDXK-3-004A-2) and the Tianjin Municipal Health Commission Science and Technology Project (TJWJ2024QN027). The sponsor or funding organization had no involvement in any stage of this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
  1. Chen H, Liu X, Zhou X, Fu J, Wang L. Advancements in Myopic Macular Foveoschisis Research. Ophthalmic Res. 2024;67(1):424-434. doi: 10.1159/000540238
  2. Németh J, Tapasztó B, Aclimandos WA, et al. Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(3):853-883. doi: 10.1177/1120672121998960
  3. Modjtahedi BS, Abbott RL, Fong DS, Lum F, Tan D. Reducing the Global Burden of Myopia by Delaying the Onset of Myopia and Reducing Myopic Progression in Children: The Academy's Task Force on Myopia. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(6):816-826. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.040
  4. Bourke CM, Loughman J, Flitcroft DI, Loskutova E, O'Brien C. We can't afford to turn a blind eye to myopia. Qjm. 2023;116(8):635-639. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz076
  5. Zhang X, El Hamdaoui M, Lim S, Grytz R, Weickenmeier J. Microindentation reveals softening of the equatorial and anterior sclera during early myopia development in tree shrew eyes. Acta Biomater. 2025;201:446-456. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.05.064
  6. Zhang S, Chen Y, Li Z, et al. Axial Elongation Trajectories in Chinese Children and Adults With High Myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024;142(2):87-94. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.5835
  7. Ohno-Matsui K, Wu PC, Yamashiro K, et al. IMI Pathologic Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.5.5
  8. Xue A, Bao F, Zheng L, Wang Q, Cheng L, Qu J. Posterior scleral reinforcement on progressive high myopic young patients. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(4):412-418. doi: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000201
  9. Zhao J, Zhao X, Jiang Y, et al. Incidence and Associated Factors of Myopic Maculopathy Progression after Posterior Scleral Contraction in High Myopia. Ophthalmology. 2026;133(4):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.11.002
  10. Ye J, Pan AP, Zhu S, Zheng L, Lu F, Xue AQ. Posterior Scleral Contraction to Treat Myopic Foveoschisis In Highly Myopic Eyes. Retina. 2021;41(5):1047-1056. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000002997
  11. Wang P, Chen S, Liu Y, et al. Lowering Intraocular Pressure: A Potential Approach for Controlling High Myopia Progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(14):17. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.14.17
  12. Yasir ZH, Sharma R, Zakir SM. Scleral collagen cross linkage in progressive myopia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024;72(2):174-180. doi: 10.4103/ijo.Ijo_1392_23
  13. Xu Y, Chen Q, Shao Z, et al. Evaluation of new robust silk fibroin hydrogels for posterior scleral reinforcement in rabbits. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1211688. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1211688
  14. Jobling AI, Gentle A, Metlapally R, McGowan BJ, McBrien NA. Regulation of scleral cell contraction by transforming growth factor-beta and stress: competing roles in myopic eye growth. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(4):2072-2079. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807521200
  15. Zhou XB, Huang YF, Wu ZH, Jiao XJ. Niu xin bao sheng wu bu pian dui hou gong mo jia gu qu de sheng wu li xue te xing ji qi zuo yong ji zhi [Biomechanical properties and mechanism of bovine pericardium biological patch on the posterior scleral reinforcement area]. Med J Chin People Armed Police Forces. 2015;(6):609-612. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2015.06.023
  16. Wang T, Zhang JS. Yi ti tuo xi bao zhen pi wang mo hou gong mo jia gu shu hou zu zhi rong he xing ji bFGF biao da de bian hua [Changes in histocompatibility and bFGF expression after posterior scleral reinforcement using allogeneic acellular dermal matrix]. Recent Adv Ophthalmol. 2015;35(10):921-923. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2015.0251
  17. Ma J, Wu F, Liu Z, et al. Biomechanical Considerations of Patching Material for Posterior Scleral Reinforcement Surgery. Front Med. 2022;9:888542. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.888542
  18. Zwirner J, Ondruschka B, Scholze M, Schulze-Tanzil G, Hammer N . Mechanical and morphological description of human acellular dura mater as a scaffold for surgical reconstruction. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;96:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.035
  19. Khurana D, Suresh A, Nayak R, et al. Biosubstitutes for dural closure: Unveiling research, application, and future prospects of dura mater alternatives. J Tissue Eng. 2024;15:20417314241228118. doi: 10.1177/20417314241228118
  20. Muniz NO, Baudequin T. Biomimetic and Nonbiomimetic Approaches in Dura Substitutes: The Influence of Mechanical Properties. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2025;31(2):174-189. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0079
  21. Hui J, Nie X, Wei P, et al. 3D printed fibroblast-loaded hydrogel for scleral remodeling to prevent the progression of myopia. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(10):2559-2570. doi: 10.1039/d3tb02548a
  22. Zhong T, Yi H, Gou J, et al. A wireless battery-free eye modulation patch for high myopia therapy. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1766. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46049-6
  23. Sun Y, Yu K, Nie J, et al. Modeling the printability of photocuring and strength adjustable hydrogel bioink during projection-based 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3):035032. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aba413
  24. Gaglio CG, Baruffaldi D, Pirri CF, Napione L, Frascella F. GelMA synthesis and sources comparison for 3D multimaterial bioprinting. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1383010. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1383010
  25. Im GB, Lin RZ. Bioengineering for vascularization: Trends and directions of photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1053491. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1053491
  26. Madl CM, Heilshorn SC. Bioorthogonal Strategies for Engineering Extracellular Matrices. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(11):1706046. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201706046
  27. Lian L, Xie M, Luo Z, et al. Rapid Volumetric Bioprinting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34):e2304846. doi: 10.1002/adma.202304846
  28. Cai D, Weng W. Development potential of extracellular matrix hydrogels as hemostatic materials. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1187474. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1187474
  29. Wang F, Zhao L, Li H, et al. Scleral defect repair using decellularized porcine sclera in a rabbit model. Xenotransplantation. 2020;27(6):e12633. doi: 10.1111/xen.12633
  30. Pei ZW, Wang JZ. Yuan wei 3D sheng wu da yin ji shu zai gu he ruan gu sun shang xiu fu zhong de yan jiu jin zhan [Research progress of in-situ 3D bioprinting technology for repairing bone and cartilage injuries]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022;36(4):487-494. [In Chinese] doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202111043
  31. Cheng W, Huang Y, Dai J, et al. Endotoxin, not DNA, determines the host response and tissue regeneration behavior of acellular biologic scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2025;195:157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.02.010
  32. Jiang L, Zhao B, Li Q, et al. A Self-Generated Electricity-Driven Sclera reinforcement bionic piezoelectric patch for Management of High Myopia. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03493-w
  33. Shirzadi H, Zohoor H, Naserkhaki S. Biomechanical simulation of eye-airbag impacts during vehicle accidents. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018;232(7):699-707. doi: 10.1177/0954411918778063
  34. Wang C, Xie Y, Wang G. The elastic modulus and collagen of sclera increase during the early growth process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:566-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.024
  35. Zhang M, Yang F, Han D, et al. 3D bioprinting of corneal decellularized extracellular matrix: GelMA composite hydrogel for corneal stroma engineering. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(5):774. doi: 10.18063/ijb.774
  36. Ward NA, Hanley S, Tarpey R, et al. Intermittent actuation attenuates fibrotic behaviour of myofibroblasts. Acta Biomater. 2024;173:80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.11.017
  37. Boere KW, Visser J, Seyednejad H, et al. Covalent attachment of a three-dimensionally printed thermoplast to a gelatin hydrogel for mechanically enhanced cartilage constructs. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(6):2602-2611. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.041
  38. Benton JA, DeForest CA, Vivekanandan V, Anseth KS. Photocrosslinking of gelatin macromers to synthesize porous hydrogels that promote valvular interstitial cell function. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(11):3221-3230. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0545
  39. Bilici C, Altunbek M, Afghah F, Tatar AG, Koc B. Embedded 3D Printing of Cryogel-Based Scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(8):5028-5038. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00751
  40. Shi M, Xu Q, Ding L, et al. Cell Infiltrative Inner Connected Porous Hydrogel Improves Neural Stem Cell Migration and Differentiation for Functional Repair of Spinal Cord Injury. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(12):5307-5318. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01127
  41. Shamloo A, Sarmadi M, Aghababaie Z, Vossoughi M. Accelerated full-thickness wound healing via sustained bFGF delivery based on a PVA/chitosan/gelatin hydrogel incorporating PCL microspheres. Int J Pharm. 2018;537(1-2):278-289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.12.045
  42. Fu J, Wiraja C, Muhammad HB, Xu C, Wang DA. Improvement of endothelial progenitor outgrowth cell (EPOC)-mediated vascularization in gelatin-based hydrogels through pore size manipulation. Acta Biomater. 2017;58:225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.012
  43. Snow F, O'Connell C, Elbourne A, et al. High resolution melt electro-written scaffolds promote alignment of human skeletal muscle cells. Biofabrication. 2025;17(3):035013. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/add960
  44. Saporito S, Panzetta V, Netti PA. Time and space modulation of substrate curvature to regulate cell mechanical identity. Acta Biomater. 2024;186:300-315. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.006
  45. Lu H, Wu Y, Xiong J, et al. Whorl-Like Collagen Fiber Arrangement Around Emissary Canals in the Posterior Sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025;66(3):35. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.3.35
  46. Hoerig C, McFadden S, Hoang QV, Mamou J. Biomechanical changes in myopic sclera correlate with underlying changes in microstructure. Exp Eye Res. 2022;224:109165. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.109165
  47. Markov PP, Eliasy A, Pijanka JK, et al. Bulk changes in posterior scleral collagen microstructure in human high myopia. Mol Vis. 2018;24:818-833.
  48. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011;32(12):3233-3243. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057
  49. Saraswathibhatla A, Indana D, Chaudhuri O. Cell-extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(7):495–516. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1
  50. Chastney MR, Kaivola J, Leppanen VM, Ivaska J. The role and regulation of integrins in cell migration and invasion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2025;26(2):147-167. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00777-1
  51. Kirtonia A, Pandey AK, Ramachandran B, et al. Overexpression of laminin-5 gamma-2 promotes tumorigenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through EGFR/ERK1/2/AKT/mTOR cascade. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79(7):362. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04392-1
  52. Chen XY, Wang MY, Shu X, Li J, Tang R, Liu XQ. Matrix-bound EGF promotes malignant phenotypes of breast cancer organoids in the biomimetic ECM of alginate. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32:101818. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101818
  53. Wang D, Keyoumu K, Yu R, et al. Extracellular matrix marker LAMC2 targets ZEB1 to promote TNBC malignancy via up-regulating CD44/STAT3 signaling pathway. Mol Med. 2024;30(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-00827-6
  54. Han C, Barakat M, DiPietro LA. Angiogenesis in Wound Repair: Too Much of a Good Thing? Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2022;14(10):a041225. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041225
  55. Shokrani H, Shokrani A, Sajadi SM, et al. Cell-Seeded Biomaterial Scaffolds: The Urgent Need for Unanswered Accelerated Angiogenesis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022;17:1035-1068. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S353062
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing