AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJB025440447
REVIEW ARTICLE
Early Access

ECM-Inspired 4D SMART biomaterials for bioprinting in tissue engineering

Ryan Martin1 Haiwei Zhai2 Daehoon Han3 Fanben Meng2,4* Daeha Joung1,5*
Show Less
1 Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284, USA
2 Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
3 School of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea
4 Nebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
5 Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
Received: 29 October 2025 | Accepted: 26 December 2025 | Published online: 12 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidisciplinary Efforts in Bioprinting)
© 2026 by the Author(s).. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Tissue development and regeneration arise from a dynamic interplay among cells, the extracellular matrix (ECM), and surrounding biophysical and biochemical cues. These interactions form the basis for stimuli-responsive materials for advanced regenerative technologies (SMART) that drive innovation in 4D bioprinting for tissue engineering. This review discusses the biophysical foundations of SMART materials, emphasizing native ECM components, their interactions, and organ-specific properties that inform biomimetic material design. We highlight recent advances in 4D SMART systems, including ionic self-healing, pH-, thermal-, hydration-, and magneto-responsive materials, and their roles in mimicking developmental and regenerative processes. Followed by a comparative overview of these stimuli-responsive material classes—benchmarked against each other, native ECM performance, and clinical translation requirements—revealing persistent gaps in long-term stability, multi-stimuli integration, and regulatory feasibility. Together, these insights outline an interdisciplinary framework for designing adaptive, responsive biomaterials that guide tissue morphogenesis and advance the future of regenerative medicine.

Keywords
4D bioprinting
Stimuli-responsive materials
Extracellular matrix
Biomaterials
4D Tissue engineering
Regenerative medicine
Funding
This research was supported by the Commonwealth Health Research Board (CHRB) under Award No. 236-08-21. F. B. acknowledges the support from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant P20GM113126, Nebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication; American Cancer Society grant IRG-22-146-07-IRG; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant CA036727, Buffett Cancer Center; Nexus of Virology, Immunology and Bioengineering; Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Funds. D. H. acknowledges the “Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE)" through the Gwangju RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Gwangju Metropolitan Government, Republic of Korea (2025-RISE-05-011).
Conflict of interest
Fanben Meng and Daeha Joung serves as the guest editors of the journal, but did not in any way involve in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. Other authors declare they have no competing interests.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing