AccScience Publishing / IJB / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.4055
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
61
Download
654
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The effect of manufacturing method; direct compression, hot-melt extrusion, and 3D printing on polymer stability and drug release from polyethylene oxide tablets

Nour Nashed1 ,  Barnaby W. Greenland1 ,  Mridul Majumder2 ,  Matthew Lam1,3 ,  Taravat Ghafourian4 ,  Ali Nokhodchi1,5*
Show Less
1 Arundel Building, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
2 M2M Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Reading, United Kingdom
3 Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom
4 Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, United States of America
5 Lupin Research Inc., Coral Spring, Florida, United States of America
IJB 2024, 10(5), 4055 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.4055
Submitted: 27 June 2024 | Accepted: 2 August 2024 | Published: 5 August 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Thermal 3D printing has gained substantial attention in pharmaceutical formulation, especially concerning its potential use in personalized dose delivery. The choice of a printable polymer is crucial in this technique, but it is restricted due to technical issues such as thermal stability and thermal-rheological properties of the polymers. Polyethylene oxide (PEO) is a widely used polymer in drug formulation designs, with potential application in 3D printing due to its favorable rheological properties. However, the thermal stability of PEOs exposed to high temperatures during fused deposition modeling (FDM) needs to be characterized. This research focused on the characterization of two molecular weights (Mw) of PEO (7 and 0.9 M) under various manufacturing methods and formulation compositions. PEO was mixed with other low-viscosity polymers of hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) or ethyl cellulose (EC) to achieve printable formulations (PEO/HPC or PEO/EC). Tablets were manufactured by direct compression, compression of hot-melt extrudates (HME) at 150°, or by FDM 3D-printing at 220°. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), dissolution tests, and their kinetics studies were carried out. Results demonstrated that thermal processes could reduce the crystallinity of PEO and induce Mw reduction that varies depending on the Mw of PEO. As a result, dissolution efficiency (DE%) varied based on the formulation composition and manufacturing method. For formulations containing PEO and HPC, 3D-printed and HME tablets exhibited higher DE (>60%) compared to directly compressed tablets (DE < 50%), while for those with PEO and EC, 3D printing reduced DE% to <26% compared to direct compression (~30%) and HME tablets (~50%). This was attributed to the hydrophobic nature of EC and the increased hardness of the printed tablets, preventing tablet disintegration during dissolution, which outweighs the Mw reduction in PEO.  

Keywords
Manufacturing method
Hot-melt extrusion
Polyethylene oxide
3D printing
Molecular weight
Thermal stability
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Salem S, Byrn SR, Smith DT, et al. Impact assessment of the variables affecting the drug release and extraction of polyethylene oxide based tablets. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;71:103337. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103337
  2. Meruva S, Donovan MD. Polyethylene oxide (PEO) molecular weight effects on abuse-deterrent properties of matrix tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21: 1-10. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019-1565-y
  3. Pajander J, Rensonnet A, Hietala S, et al. The evaluation of physical properties of injection molded systems based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). Int J Pharm. 2017;518 (1–2):203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm. 2016.12.050
  4. Maggi L, Bruni R, Conte U. High molecular weight polyethylene oxides (PEOs) as an alternative to HPMC in controlled release dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2000;195 (1–2):229-238. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00402-0
  5. Malik P, Castro M, Carrot C. Thermal degradation during melt processing of poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) and their blends in the presence of additives, for conducting applications. Polym Degrad Stab. 2006;91(4):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.020
  6. Crowley MM, Zhang F, Koleng JJ, et al. Stability of polyethylene oxide in matrix tablets prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Biomaterials. 2002;23(21):4241-428. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00187-4
  7. Cantin O. PEO Hot Melt Extrudates for Controlled Drug Delivery (Doctoral dissertation, Université du Droit et de la Santé–Lille II). 2017. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01540630
  8. Shojaee S, Asare-Addo K, Kaialy W, et al. An investigation into the stabilization of diltiazem HCl release from matrices made from aged polyox powders. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(3):1190-1198. doi: 10.1208/s12249-013-0013-7
  9. Shojaee S, Cumming I, Kaialy W, et al. The influence of vitamin E succinate on the stability of polyethylene oxide PEO controlled release matrix tablets. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;111:486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.06.038
  10. Vrandečić NS, Erceg M, Jakić M, et al. Kinetic analysis of thermal degradation of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(ethylene oxide)s of different molecular weight. Thermochim Acta. 2010;498(1–2):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2009.10.005
  11. Smith KL, Van Cleve R. High molecular weight polymers of ethylene oxide plastic properties. Indus Eng Chem. 1958;50(1):12-16. doi: 10.1021/ie50577a024
  12. Repka MA, McGinity JW. Influence of vitamin E TPGS on the properties of hydrophilic films produced by hot-melt extrusion. Int J Pharm. 2000;202(1–2):63-70. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00418-X
  13. Cantin O, Siepmann F, Danede F, et al. PEO hot melt extrudates for controlled drug delivery: importance of the molecular weight. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;36:130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2016.09.003
  14. Isreb A, Baj K, Wojsz M, et al. 3D printed oral theophylline doses with innovative ‘radiator-like’ design: impact of polyethylene oxide (PEO) molecular weight. Int J Pharm. 2019;564:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.04.017
  15. Ong JJ, Awad A, Martorana A, et al. 3D printed opioid medicines with alcohol-resistant and abuse-deterrent properties. Int J Pharm. 2020;579:119169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119169
  16. Nashed N, Lam M, Ghafourian T, et al. An insight into the impact of thermal process on dissolution profile and physical characteristics of theophylline tablets made through 3D printing compared to conventional methods. Biomedicines. 2022;10(6):1-18. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061335
  17. Quinten T. Evaluation of injection molding as a pharmaceutical production technology for sustained-release matrix tablets. Ghent University. 2010. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
  18. Shodexhplc, Poly (Ethylene Oxide) Standards. Available from: shodexhplc.com/applications/poly-ethylene-oxide-standards/
  19. Stringano E, Gea A, Salminen JP, et al. Simple solution for a complex problem: proanthocyanidins, galloyl glucoses and ellagitannins fit on a single calibration curve in high performance-gel permeation chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(43):7804-7812. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.082
  20. Dishman KL. Sieving in particle size analysis. In: Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Wiley; 2000. doi: 10.1002/9780470027318.a1514.
  21. Tan DK, Maniruzzaman M, Nokhodchi A. Development and optimisation of novel polymeric compositions for sustained release theophylline caplets (PrintCap) via FDM 3D printing. Polymers. 2020;12(1):1-18. doi: 10.3390/polym12010027
  22. Anderson NH, Bauer M, Boussac N, et al. An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998;17 (4–5):811-822. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(98)00011-9
  23. Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, et al. DDSolver: an add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. AAPS J. 2010;12(3):263-271. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9185-1
  24. Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Release. 1987;5(1):23-36. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4
  25. Bruschi ML. Mathematical models of drug release. In: Strategies to Modify the Drug Release from Pharmaceutical Systems. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2015:63-86. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100092-2.00005-9
  26. Shi K, Slavage JP, Maniruzzaman M, et al. Role of release modifiers to modulate drug release from fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printed tablets. Int J Pharm. 2021;597:120315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120315
  27. Ashland Inc. Klucel Hydroxypropylcellulose Physical and Chemical Properties (Datasheet). 2017. http://www.ashland.com/file_source/Ashland/Product/ Documents/Pharmaceutical/PC_11229_Klucel_HPC.pdf
  28. Homaee Borujeni S, Mirdamadian SZ, Varshosaz J, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) printed tablets using ethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose to achieve zero order sustained release profile. Cellulose. 2020;27(3):1573–1589. doi: 10.1007/s10570-019-02881-4
  29. Polaskova M, Peer P, Cermak R, et al. Effect of thermal treatment on crystallinity of poly(ethylene oxide) electrospun fibers. Polymers. 2019;11(9):1384. doi: 10.3390/polym11091384
  30. PerkinElmer. Polymer crystallinity studies by DSC- Raman spectroscopy. 2009. https://perkinelmer.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ Polymer-Crystallinity-by-DSC-Raman.pdf
  31. Park MS, Kim JK. Phase behavior and crystallization of a poly(ethylene oxide)/cellulose acetate butyrate blend. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 2002;40(15):1673-1681. doi: 10.1002/polb.10225
  32. Leineweber A. Reflection splitting-induced microstrain broadening. Powder Diffraction. 2017;32(S1):S35-S39. doi: 10.1017/S0885715617000665
  33. Bhagia S, Gallego NC, Hiremath N, et al. Fine grinding of thermoplastics by high speed friction grinding assisted by guar gum. J Appl Polym Sci. 2021;138(32):50797. doi: 10.1002/app.50797
  34. Schmidt J, Plata M, Tröger S, et al. Production of polymer particles below 5μm by wet grinding. Powder Technol. 2012;228:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.064.
  35. Jung H, Lee YJ, Yoon WB. Effect of moisture content on the grinding process and powder properties in food: a review. Processes. 2018;6(6):69. doi: 10.3390/pr6060069
  36. Eckert A, Abbasi M, Mang T, et al. Structure, mechanical properties, and dynamics of polyethylenoxide/nanoclay nacre-mimetic nanocomposites. Macromolecules. 2020;53(5):1716-1725. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01931
  37. Xiao P, Guo Y, Wang J, et al. The effect of granules characters on mechanical properties of press-coated tablets: a comparative study. Int J Pharm. 2022;624:121986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121986
  38. Vinayagamoorthy R. Effect of particle sizes on the mechanical behaviour of limestone-reinforced hybrid plastics. Polym Polym Compos. 2020;28(6): 410-420. doi: 10.1177/0967391119883163
  39. Huang Y, Paul DR. Effect of temperature on physical aging of thin glassy polymer films. Macromolecules. 2005;38(24):10148-1054. doi: 10.1021/ma051284g
  40. Greiner R, Schwarzl FR. Volume relaxation and physical aging of amorphous polymers I. theory of volume relaxation after single temperature jumps. Colloid Polym Sci. 1989;267(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/BF01410147
  41. Zhang J, Feng X, Patil H, et al. Coupling 3D printing with hot-melt extrusion to produce controlled-release tablets. Int J Pharm. 2016;519:186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.12.049

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept