Developing a bioink for single-step deposition and maturation of human epidermis
Patients with severe burns, which cause extensive damage to their skin, require rapid intervention to prevent life-threatening hypothermia, infection, and fluid loss. Current treatments typically involve surgical excision of the burned skin and reconstruction of the wound with the aid of skin autografts. However, there is a lack of donor site in the most severe cases. While alternative treatments such as cultured epithelial autografts and “spray-on” skin can allow much smaller donor tissues to be used (and hence reduce donor site morbidity), they present their own challenges in terms of fragility of the tissues and control of the cell deposition, respectively. Recent advances in bioprinting technology have led researchers to explore its use to fabricate skin grafts, which depend on several factors, including appropriate bioinks, cell types, and printability. In this work, we describe a collagen-based bioink that allows the deposition of a contiguous layer of the keratinocytes directly onto the wound. Special attention was given to the intended clinical workflow. For example, since media changes are not feasible once the bioink is deposited onto the patient, we first developed a media formulation designed to permit a single deposition step and promote self-organization of the cells into the epidermis. Using a collagenbased dermal template populated with dermal fibroblasts, we demonstrated by immunofluorescence staining that the resulting epidermis recapitulates the features of natural skin in expressing p63 (stem cell marker), Ki67 and keratin 14 (proliferation markers), filaggrin and keratin 10 (keratinocyte differentiation and barrier function markers), and collagen type IV (basement membrane protein involved in adherence of the epidermis to the dermis). While further tests are still required to verify its utility as a burn treatment, based on the results we have achieved thus far, we believe that our current protocol can already produce donor-specific model for testing purposes.
World Health Organization, 2018, Burns. World Health Organization, Geneva: Available: from: https://www.who. int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns [Last accessed on 2022 Sep 06].
Chacon MA, Haas J, Hansen TC, et al., 2019, Thin and ultra-thin split-thickness skin grafts are safe and efficacious in the burn population. J Burn Care Res, 41: 849–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irz208
Lohana P, Hassan S, Watson S, 2014, Integra™ in burns reconstruction: our experience and report of an unusual immunological reaction. Ann Burns Fire Disasters, 27: 17.
Akita S, Hayashida K, Yoshimoto H, et al., 2017, Novel application of cultured epithelial autografts (CEA) with expanded mesh skin grafting over an artificial dermis or dermal wound bed preparation. Int J Mol Sci, 19: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010057
Elliott M, Vandervord J, 2002, Initial experience with cultured epithelial autografts in massively burnt patients. ANZ J Surg, 72: 893–895. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02591.x
Wood F, Kolybaba M, Allen P, 2006, The use of cultured epithelial autograft in the treatment of major burn injuries: A critical review of the literature. Burns, 32: 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.02.025
Matsumura H, Gondo M, Imai R, et al., 2013, Chronological histological findings of cultured epidermal autograft over bilayer artificial dermis. Burns, 39: 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.10.004
Motamedi S, Esfandpour A, Babajani A, et al., 2021, The current challenges on spray-based cell delivery to the skin wounds. Tissue Eng Part Methods, 27: 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2021.0158
Wood FM, Giles N, Stevenson A, et al., 2012, Characterisation of the cell suspension harvested from the dermal epidermal junction using a ReCell® kit. Burns, 38: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.001
Cheng RY, Eylert G, Gariepy JM, et al., 2020, Handheld instrument for wound-conformal delivery of skin precursor sheets improves healing in full-thickness burns. Biofabrication, 12: 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6413
Beh CW, Yew DS, Chai RJ, et al., 2021, A fluid-supported 3D hydrogel bioprinting method. Biomaterials, 276: 121034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121034
Grigoryan B, Paulsen SJ, Corbett DC, et al., 2019, Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science, 364: 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9750
Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al., 2014, 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell‐laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater, 26: 3124–3130. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506
Skylar-Scott MA, Uzel SG, Nam LL, et al., 2019, Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels. Sci Adv, 5: eaaw2459. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw2459
Hakimi N, Cheng R, Leng L, et al., 2018, Handheld skin printer: In situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues. Lab Chip, 18: 1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc01236e
Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, et al., 2019, In situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci Rep, 9: 1856. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w
Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti JP, et al., 2013, Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 20: 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335
Min D, Lee W, Bae IH, et al., 2018, Bioprinting of biomimetic skin containing melanocytes. Exp Dermatol, 27: 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13376
Kim BS, Lee JS, Gao G, et al., 2017, Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system. Biofabrication, 9: 025034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8
Moakes RJ, Senior JJ, Robinson TE, et al., 2021, A suspended layer additive manufacturing approach to the bioprinting of tri-layered skin equivalents. APL Bioeng, 5: 046103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061361
Jorgensen AM, Varkey M, Gorkun A, et al., 2019, Bioprinted skin recapitulates normal collagen remodeling in full-thickness wounds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26: 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0319
Baltazar T, Merola J, Catarino C, et al., 2020, Three dimensional bioprinting of a vascularized and perfusable skin graft using human keratinocytes, fibroblasts, pericytes, and endothelial cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 26: 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0201
Cubo N, Garcia M, del Cañizo JF, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting of functional human skin: Production and in vivo analysis. Biofabrication, 9: 015006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015006
Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, et al., 2018, Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs. Biofabrication, 10: 025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9e1e
MacAdam A, Chaudry E, McTiernan CD, et al., 2022, Development of in situ bioprinting: A mini review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10: 940896. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.940896
Varkey M, Visscher D, van Zuijlen P, et al., 2019, Skin bioprinting: The future of burn wound reconstruction? Burns Trauma, 7: 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0142-7
Shpichka A, Butnaru D, Bezrukov EA, et al., 2019, Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury. Stem Cell Res Ther, 10: 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1203-3
Smits JP, Niehues H, Rikken G, et al., 2017, Immortalized N/TERT keratinocytes as an alternative cell source in 3D human epidermal models. Sci Rep, 7: 11838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12041-y
Armengot-Carbo M, Hernández-Martín Á,Torrelo A, 2015, The role of filaggrin in the skin barrier and disease development. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 106: 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2013.10.019
Kanitakis J, Ramirez-Bosca A, Reano A, et al., 1988, Filaggrin expression in normal and pathological skin. A marker of keratinocyte differentiation. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol, 412: 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00750265
Varkey M, Ding J,Tredget EE, 2014, Superficial dermal fibroblasts enhance basement membrane and epidermal barrier formation in tissue-engineered skin: Implications for treatment of skin basement membrane disorders. Tissue Eng Part A, 20: 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0160
Hamill KJ, Kligys K, Hopkinson SB, et al., 2009, Laminin deposition in the extracellular matrix: A complex picture emerges. J Cell Sci, 122: 4409–4417. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.041095
Miller I, Min M, Yang C, et al., 2018, Ki67 is a graded rather than a binary marker of proliferation versus quiescence. Cell Rep, 24: 1105–1112.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.110
Alam H, Sehgal L, Kundu ST, et al., 2011, Novel function of keratins 5 and 14 in proliferation and differentiation of stratified epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell, 22: 4068–4078. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0703
Breitkreutz D, Koxholt I, Thiemann K, et al., 2013, Skin basement membrane: The foundation of epidermal integrity- -BM functions and diverse roles of bridging molecules nidogen and perlecan. Biomed Res Int, 2013: 179784. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/179784
Sood R, Roggy DE, Zieger MJ, et al., 2015, A comparative study of spray keratinocytes and autologous meshed split-thickness skin graft in the treatment of acute burn injuries. Wounds, 27: 31–40.
Fredriksson C, Kratz G, Huss F, 2008, Transplantation of cultured human keratinocytes in single cell suspension: A comparative in vitro study of different application techniques. Burns, 34: 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.008
Svensjö T, Yao F, Pomahac B, et al., 2001, Autologous keratinocyte suspensions accelerate epidermal wound healing in pigs. J Surg Res, 99: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2001.6197
Lamb R, Ambler CA, 2013, Keratinocytes propagated in serum-free, feeder-free culture conditions fail to form stratified epidermis in a reconstituted skin model. PLoS One, 8: e52494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052494
Mammone T, Ingrassia M, Goyarts E, 2008, Osmotic stress induces terminal differentiation in cultured normal human epidermal keratinocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 44: 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-008-9087-z
Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, et al., 2017, The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv, 35: 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
Chai RJ, Wong WL, Beh CW, 2022, Developing a Bioprintable Epidermis. In: International Conference of Additive Manufacturing for a Better World (AMBW 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.531