AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 0 / Issue 0 / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.1233

Strontium-doped calcium silicate scaffolds with enhanced mechanical properties and tunable biodegradability fabricated by vat photopolymerization

Yinjin Li1,2 Jin Su1,2 Annan Chen1,2* Yifei Li1,2 Xi Yuan3 Kezhuo Chen4 Zhaoqing Li5 Chunze Yan1,2 Jian Lu6,7 Yusheng Shi1,2
Show Less
1 State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2 Engineering Research Center of Ceramic Materials for Additive Manufacturing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430074, China
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
4 Institute of Resource Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
5 Wuhan Zeqing Technology Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430074, China
6 Centre for Advanced Structural Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
7 Centre for Advanced Structural Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Research Institute, Greater Bay Joint Division, Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Shenzhen 518057, China
Submitted: 27 April 2023 | Accepted: 21 July 2023 | Published: 14 September 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). Licensee AccScience Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( )

 Strontium-doped calcium silicate (SrCS) bioceramics have demonstrated outstanding vasculogenic ability to repair large segmental bone defects, while their poor mechanical properties and rapid degradation rate remain the major obstacles in clinical treatment. Here, we proposed a novel approach to significantly enhance the mechanical properties of SrCS bioceramics with tunable biodegradability using micron barium titanate-based (BTA) powders as a dopant. Biomimetic SrCS-BTA scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface structures were fabricated by vat photopolymerization. The effects of BTA content on microtopography, mechanical properties, degradability, and bioactivity of composite scaffolds were studied. On the one hand, the BTA greatly increased the maximum densification rate of SrCS ceramics by 84.37%, while the corresponding densification temperature decreased by 95°C. On the other hand, CaTiO3 generated by the reaction of SrCS and BTA intercepted cracks at the grain boundaries, and thus, the mechanical properties were enhanced due to the pinning effect. The SrCS-40BTA scaffold exhibited much higher compressive strength and elastic modulus by 296% compared with the pure SrCS scaffold. The energy absorption of SrCS-40BTA scaffolds was 5.6 times higher than that of the pure SrCS scaffold. In addition, biocompatible SrCS-BTA scaffolds with lower degradation rates can play a supporting role in the process of repair for a longer duration. This work provides a promising strategy to fabricate biomimetic scaffolds with highly enhanced mechanical properties and tunable biodegradability for repairing damaged large segmental bone tissues.

Strontium-doped calcium silicate
3D print¬ing
Vat photopolymerization
Mechanical property
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52205363), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019kfyRCPY044 and 2021GCRC002), Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team (2018QYTD04), and Program for Innovative Research Team of the Ministry of Education (IRT1244).
  1. Hao J, Bai B, Ci Z, et al., 2022, Large-sized bone defect repair by combining a decalcified bone matrix framework and bone regeneration units based on photo-crosslinkable osteogenic microgels. Bioact Mater, 14: 97–109.



  1. Loi F, Cordova LA, Pajarinen J, et al., 2016, Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. Bone, 86: 119–30.



  1. Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, et al., 2018, Bone substitutes: A review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng, 9: 2041731418776819.



  1. Wubneh A, Tsekoura EK, Ayranci C, et al., 2018, Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 80: 1–30.



  1. Hutmacher DW, 2000, Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. J Biomater, 21(24): 2529–2543.



  1. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A, 2012, Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol, 30(10): 546–554.



  1. Nommeots-Nomm A, Lee PD, Jones JR, 2018, Direct ink writing of highly bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc, 38(3): 837–844.



  1. Dong Y, Chen A, Yang T, et al., 2023, Ultra-lightweight ceramic scaffolds with simultaneous improvement of pore interconnectivity and mechanical strength. J Mater Sci Technol, 137: 247–258.



  1. Chen P, Su J, Wang H, et al., 2022, Mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of lattice-surfaced PEEK cage fabricated by high-temperature laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Sci Technol, 125: 105–117.



  1. Ros-Tárraga P, Murciano A, Mazón P, et al., 2017, New 3D stratified Si-Ca-P porous scaffolds obtained by sol-gel and polymer replica method: Microstructural, mineralogical and chemical characterization. Ceram Int, 43(8): 6548–6553.



  1. Wu Q, Sun H, 2022, Preparation and properties of porous ceramics from nickel slag by aerogel gelcasting. Ceram Int, 48(22): 33058–33065.



  1. Zhou W, Zhang Z, Li N, et al., 2022, A new mullite foamed ceramic prepared by direct-foaming methods in parallel with a mechanical activation technique. Ceram Int, 48(14): 20721–20730.



  1. Liu F, He H, Cheng L, et al., 2023, Influence of layer thickness on microstructure and dielectric properties of Mg2TiO4 microwave ceramics fabricated by vat photopolymerization. Addit Manuf, 63.



  1. Chen A, Su J, Li Y, et al., 2023, 3D/4D printed bio-piezoelectric smart scaffolds for next-generation bone tissue engineering. Int J Extreme Manuf, 5: 032007.



  1. Yan C, Ma G, Chen A, et al., 2021, Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite and its composite materials: A review. J Micromech Mol Phys, 05(03).



  1. Wang H, Chen P, Wu H, et al., 2022, Comparative evaluation of printability and compression properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf, 57.



  1. Su R, Chen J, Zhang X, et al., 2023, 3D-printed micro/ nano-scaled mechanical metamaterials: Fundamentals, technologies, progress, applications, and challenges. Small, 19(29): e2206391.



  1. Feng P, Zhao R, Tang W, et al., 2023, Structural and functional adaptive artificial bone: Materials, fabrications, and properties. Adv Funct Mater, 33(23).



  1. Distefano F, Pasta S, Epasto G, 2023, Titanium lattice structures produced via additive manufacturing for a bone scaffold: A review. J Funct Biomater, 14(3): 125.



  1. Shuai C, Yang W, Feng P, et al., 2021, Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact Mater, 6(2): 490–502.



  1. Zhou Q, Su X, Wu J, et al., 2023, Additive manufacturing of bioceramic implants for restoration bone engineering: Technologies, advances, and future perspectives. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 9(3): 1164–1189.



  1. Su J, Hua S, Chen A, et al., 2022, Three-dimensional printing of gyroid-structured composite bioceramic scaffolds with tuneable degradability. Biomater Adv, 133: 112595.



  1. Wang Y, Chen S, Liang H, et al., 2022, Digital light processing (DLP) of nano biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramic for making bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Ceram Int, 48(19): 27681–27692.



  1. Zhang B, Xing F, Chen L, et al., 2023, DLP fabrication of customized porous bioceramics with osteoinduction ability for remote isolation bone regeneration. Biomater Adv, 145: 213261.



  1. Almubarak S, Nethercott H, Freeberg M, et al., 2016, Tissue engineering strategies for promoting vascularized bone regeneration. Bone, 83: 197–209.



  1. Dashnyam K, El-Fiqi A, Buitrago JO, et al., 2017, A mini review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J Tissue Eng, 8: 2041731417707339.



  1. Mao L, Xia L, Chang J, et al., The synergistic effects of Sr and Si bioactive ions on osteogenesis, osteoclastogenesis and angiogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Acta Biomater, 61: 217–232.



  1. Shie MY, Chiang WH, Chen IP, et al., 2017, Synergistic acceleration in the osteogenic and angiogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by calcium silicate-graphene composites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 73: 726–735.



  1. Lin K, Xia L, Li H, et al., 2013, Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials, 34(38): 10028–10042.



  1. Xing M, Wang X, Wang E, et al., 2018, Bone tissue engineering strategy based on the synergistic effects of silicon and strontium ions. Acta Biomater, 72: 381–395.



  1. Genchi GG, Marino A, Rocca A, et al., 2016, Barium titanate nanoparticles: promising multitasking vectors in nanomedicine. Nanotechnology, 27(23): 232001.



  1. Dubey AK, Ea A, Balani K, et al., 2013, Multifunctional properties of multistage spark plasma sintered HA-BaTiO3-based piezobiocomposites for bone replacement applications. J Am Ceram Soc, 96(12): 3753–3759.



  1. Tavangar M, Heidari F, Hayati R, et al., 2020, Manufacturing and characterization of mechanical, biological and dielectric properties of hydroxyapatite-barium titanate nanocomposite scaffolds. Ceram Int, 46(7): 9086–9095.




  1. Yang L, Mertens R, Ferrucci M, et al., 2019, Continuous graded Gyroid cellular structures fabricated by selective laser melting: Design, manufacturing and mechanical properties. Mat Des, 162: 394–404. h



  1. Zakeri S, Vippola M, Levänen E, 2020, A comprehensive review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in stereolithography. Addit Manuf, 35.



  1. Chen A, Gao F, Li M, et al., 2019, Mullite ceramic foams with controlled pore structures and low thermal conductivity prepared by SLS using core-shell structured polyamide12/ FAHSs composites. Ceram Int, 45(12): 15538–15546.



  1. Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ, 2010, The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31(3): 461–466.



  1. Wang H, Xu Y, Wang P, et al., 2021, Cell-mediated injectable blend hydrogel-BCP ceramic scaffold for in situ condylar osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater, 123: 364–378.



  1. Halloran JW, 2016, Ceramic stereolithography: Additive manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization. Annu Rev Mater Res, 46(1): 19–40.



  1. Qi G, Zeng Y, Chen J, 2022, Preparation of porous SnO2- based ceramics with lattice structure by DLP. Ceram Int, 48(10): 14568–14577.



  1. Xing H, Zou B, Liu X, et al., 2020, Effect of particle size distribution on the preparation of ZTA ceramic paste applying for stereolithography 3D printing. Powder Technol, 359: 314–322.




  1. Chen S, Wang C, Zheng W, et al., 2022, Effects of particle size distribution and sintering temperature on properties of alumina mold material prepared by stereolithography. Ceram Int, 48(5): 6069–6077.




  1. Zheng J, Zhang H, Li X, 2021, Effect of ternary particles size distribution on rheology of slurry and microstructure of DLP printed ZTA ceramic. Mater Chem Phys, 269.



  1. Esposito Corcione C, Montagna F, Greco A, et al., 2006, Free form fabrication of silica moulds for aluminium casting by stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J, 12(4): 184–188.



  1. Huang X, Dai H, Hu Y, et al., 2021, Development of a high solid loading β-TCP suspension with a low refractive index contrast for DLP-based ceramic stereolithography. J Eur Ceram Soc, 41(6): 3743–3754.



  1. Xu X, Zhou S, Wu J, et al., 2021, Relationship between the adhesion properties of UV-curable alumina suspensions and the functionalities and structures of UV-curable acrylate monomers for DLP-based ceramic stereolithography. Ceram Int, 47(23): 32699–32709.



  1. Zhang X, Xu Y, Li L, et al., 2019, Acrylate-based photosensitive resin for stereolithographic three-dimensional printing. J Appl Polym Sci, 136(21).



  1. Du Z, Leng H, Guo L, et al., 2020, Calcium silicate scaffolds promoting bone regeneration via the doping of Mg2+ or Mn2+ ion. Compos B: Eng, 190.



  1. Chen A, Wu J, Cheng L, et al., 2020, Enhanced densification and dielectric properties of CaTiO3-0.3NdAlO3 ceramics fabricated by direct coagulation casting. J Eur Ceram Soc, 40(4): 1174–1180.



  1. Liu Y, Chen A, Wu J, et al., 2018, Effect of K2SO4 additions on properties of porous fibrous alumina ceramics prepared by DCC and lost-mold method. J Am Ceram Soc, 101(6): 2216–2227.



  1. Chen A, Li M, Wu J, et al., 2019, Enhancement mechanism of mechanical performance of highly porous mullite ceramics with bimodal pore structures prepared by selective laser sintering. J Alloys Compd, 776: 486–494.



  1. Chen A, Chen J, Wu J, et al., 2019, Porous mullite ceramics with enhanced mechanical properties prepared by SLS using MnO2 and phenolic resin coated double-shell powders. Ceram Int, 45(17): 21136–21143.



  1. Ma S, Tang Q, Zhu C, et al., 2022, Laser powder bed fusion-built Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds composed of sheet and strut-based porous structures: Morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility. Chin J Mech Eng: Addit Manuf Front, 1(4).



  1. Chen A, Lu L, Cheng L, et al., 2019, TEM analysis and mechanical strengthening mechanism of MnO2 sintering aid in selective laser sintered porous mullites. J Alloys Compd, 809.



  1. Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang W, et al., 2017, Analysis of the osteogenic effects of biomaterials using numerical simulation. Biomed Res Int, 2017: 6981586.








Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing