Association of teleworking with employee psychosocial characteristics and well-being: A descriptive study
In recent years, teleworking (also referred to as telecommuting) has been the focus of academic research, due to its wide implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic and its significant implications, including psychosocial effects, job satisfaction, and social interactions among employees. Thus, this study employed a quantitative approach to examine these concepts and determine to what extent they have been changed by the implementation of teleworking in companies. Based on the findings, the most important aspect of teleworking was the need for social interactions. These three concepts also showed a statistically significant, but not a strong correlation. First, the women in the sample had higher psychosocial effects and a greater need for social interactions, compared to the men, whereas the younger participants had less psychosocial effects. Second, the participants aged 51 – 60 years had lower averages for job satisfaction, while the participants aged 41 – 50 years had lower averages for social interactions. Third, those who worked in companies consisting of 51 – 200 employees had significantly higher psychosocial effects, but significantly lower job satisfaction, compared to the rest of the sample. Finally, demographic and work characteristics played important roles in the assessment of the impact of teleworking on psychosocial effects, job satisfaction, and social interactions.
Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., & Shockley, K.M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2):40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Baard, S.K., Rench, T.A., & Kozlowski, S.W. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1):48-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488210
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z.J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1):165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
Βryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Choi, S. (2020). The impact of telecommuting on work-life balance. Work, 66(1):217-225.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. United States: Sage.
Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. United States: Sage Publications.
DeFilippis, E., Impink, S.M., Singell, M., Polzer, J.T., & Sadun, R. (2020). Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Nature of Work. NBER Working Papers No. 27612. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. United States: Sage Publications.
Erickson, L.B., Noonan, M.C., & McCall, L. (2020). Making telework work: Understanding the implications of telework for success at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. ILR Review, 73(2):354-379.
Eurofound and the International Labour Office. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Joint Research Report. Ireland: Eurofound.
Gajendran, R.S., & Harrison, D.A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6):1524-1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Golden, T.D., & Gajendran, R.S. (2019). Unpacking the role of a telecommuter’s job in their performance: Examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence, and social support. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(6):765-779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9530-4
Golden, T.D., & Veiga, J.F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2):301-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271768
Grant, C.A., Wallace, L.M., & Spurgeon, P.C. (2013). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote E-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being, and work-life balance. Employee Relations, 35(5):527-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2012-0059
Kossek, E.E., Baltes, B.B., & Matthews, R.A. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(3):352-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x
Mertens, D.M. (2014). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. United States: Sage Publications.
Morganson, V.J., Major, D.A., Oborn, K.L., Verive, J.M., & Heelan, M.P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6):578-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011056941
Morris, M.G., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Job characteristics and job satisfaction: Understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quarterly, 34(1):143-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721418
Neeley, T. (2015). Global teams that work. Harvard Business Review, 93(10):74-81.
Ozimek, A. (2020). The Future of Remote Work. IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 13500.
Raghuram, S., Garud, R., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2002). Technology enabled heterarchy: Sources and consequences of structure in virtual teams. Organization Science, 13(3):339-352.
Shockley, K.M., Douek, J., Smith, C.R., & Yu, J. (2017). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: A meta-analysis and implications for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3):379-400.