AccScience Publishing / EER / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EER026140010
Cite this article
166
Download
325
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Toward sustainable river tourism in the Brahmaputra River Basin: A socio-ecological perspective on climate adaptation, smart tourism, and community well-being

Barnali Mahanta1*
Show Less
1 Department of Tourism Management, Pragjyotish College, Guwahati, Assam , India
Received: 30 March 2026 | Revised: 6 August 2026 | Accepted: 18 August 2026 | Published online: 15 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

River tourism has emerged as an important means of promoting sustainable regional development, especially in ecologically and culturally important destinations. However, increasing climatic variability, technological transformation, and growing community expectations pose significant challenges to the long-term sustainability of the river tourism system. This study explores the future of sustainable river tourism in the Brahmaputra River Basin, Assam, India, through a socio-ecological perspective informed by resilience theory and socio-ecological systems (SES) theory. Using a qualitative exploratory case study design, the research investigated stakeholders’ perceptions of climate adaptation, smart tourism, community well-being, and governance processes. A total of 24 semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and November 2025 with key stakeholders involved in the development of river tourism, including community leaders, tourism entrepreneurs, service providers, government officials, environmental practitioners, and tourism researchers. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis involving open, axial, and selective coding. The results revealed four interconnected themes that shape the future of sustainable river tourism: (i) climate resilience and adaptive planning, (ii) smart tourism and digital governance, (iii) community participation and social inclusion, and (iv) integrated governance for sustainable tourism futures. The study shows that sustainable tourism thrives through the dynamic interplay between environmental resilience, digital adaptive capacity, community legitimacy, and adaptive governance. Based on these findings, the study proposes an adaptive sustainability framework that extends existing resilience-based tourism research by integrating environmental, technological, and social aspects in the context of a socio-ecological system. These findings provide practical insights for policymakers and destination managers looking to strengthen climate adaptive capacity, promote inclusive governance, and encourage sustainable tourism transformation in ecologically fragile river destinations.

Keywords
Sustainable river tourism
Climate adaptation
Smart tourism
Community well-being
Socio-ecological systems
Brahmaputra River Basin
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
References
  1. Holling CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1973;4:1-23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  2. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 2004;9(2):5. doi: 10.5751/ES-00650-090205
  3. Folke C. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change. 2006;16(3):253-267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
  4. Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon ML, eds. Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press; 2015. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316014240
  5. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C, eds. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press; 2009. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511541957
  6. Amore A, Hall CM, Prayag G. Tourism and Resilience: Individual, Organisational and Destination Perspectives. Bristol, UK: Channel View Publications; 2018. doi: 10.21832/9781845416317.
  7. Dogru T, Marchio EA, Bulut U, Suess C. Climate change: Vulnerability and resilience of tourism and the entire economy. Tour Manag. 2019;72:292-305. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.010
  8. Prayag G. Time for reset? COVID-19 and tourism resilience. Tour Rev Int. 2020;24(2-3):179-184. doi: 10.3727/154427220X15926147793595
  9. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc. 2010;15(4):20. doi: 10.5751/ES-03610-150420
  10. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 2009;325(5939):419-422. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133
  11. Bramwell B, Lane B. Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. J Sustain Tour. 2011;19(4-5):411-421. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2011.580586
  12. Becken S. Developing a framework for assessing resilience of tourism sub-systems to climatic factors. Ann Tour Res. 2013;43:506-528. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2013.06.002
  13. Li Y, Hu C, Huang C, Duan L. The concept of smart tourism in the context of tourism information services. Tour Manag. 2017;58:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.03.014
  14. Sigala M. Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research. J Bus Res. 2020;117:312-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.015
  15. Koo C, Shin S, Gretzel U, Hunter WC, Chung N. Conceptualization of smart tourism destination competitiveness. Asia Pac J Inf Syst. 2016;26(4):561-576. doi: 10.14329/apjis.2016.26.4.561
  16. Murphy PE. Tourism: A Community Approach. Routledge; 1985.
  17. Nunkoo R, Ramkissoon H. Developing a community support model for tourism. Ann Tour Res. 2011;38(3):964-988. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.017
  18. Berkes F, Ross H. Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Soc Nat Resour. 2013;26(1):5-20. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
  19. Hall CM. Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial ecology of sustainable tourism. J Sustain Tour. 2019;27(7):1044-1060. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1560456
  20. World Tourism Organization, United Nations Development Programme. Tourism and the Sustainable Development Goals–Journey to 2030. World Tourism Organization; 2017. doi: 10.18111/9789284419401
  21. Bhuiyan MA, Zhang Q, Xuan W, Rahman MK, Khare V. Does good governance promote sustainable tourism? A systematic review of PESTEL analysis. SN Bus Econ. 2023;3(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s43546-022-00408-x
  22. Paauw M, Scown M, Triyanti A, Du H, Garmestani A. Adaptive governance of river deltas under accelerating environmental change. Utrecht Law Rev. 2022;18(2):30-50. doi: 10.36633/ulr.803
  23. Scott D, Hall CM, Gössling S. Global tourism vulnerability to climate change. Ann Tour Res. 2019;77:49-61. doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.007
  24. Gretzel U, Sigala M, Xiang Z, Koo C. Smart tourism: Foundations and developments. Electron Mark. 2015;25(3):179-188. doi: 10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8
  25. Buhalis D, Moldavska I. Voice assistants in hospitality: Using artificial intelligence for customer service. J Hosp Tour Technol. 2022;13(3):386-403. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-03-2021-0104
  26. Tosun C. Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tour Manag. 2000;21(6):613-633. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00009-1
  27. Dredge D, Jamal T. Progress in tourism planning and policy: A post-structural perspective on knowledge production. Tour Manag. 2015;51:285-297. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.002
  28. Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N, eds. Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance. University of British Columbia Press; 2008. doi: 10.59962/9780774855457
  29. Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc. 2014;19(3):56. doi: 10.5751/ES-06824-190356
  30. Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R. Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 2010;23(10):986-1001. doi: 10.1080/08941920802178214
  31. Bellato L, Frantzeskaki N, Nygaard CA. Regenerative tourism: A conceptual framework leveraging theory and practice. Tour Geogr. 2023;25(4):1026-1046. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2022.2044376
  32. Higgins-Desbiolles F. The “war over tourism”: Challenges to sustainable tourism in the tourism academy after COVID-19. J Sustain Tour. 2021;29(4):551-569. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1803334
  33. Fletcher R, Murray Mas I, Blanco-Romero A, Blázquez-Salom M. Tourism and degrowth: An emerging agenda for research and praxis. J Sustain Tour. 2019;27(12):1745-1763. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1679822
  34. Cave J, Dredge D. Regenerative tourism needs diverse economic practices. Tour Geogr. 2020;22(3):503-513. doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1768434
  35. Sheldon PJ. Designing tourism experiences for inner transformation. Ann Tour Res. 2020;83:102935. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102935
  36. Geels FW. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2011;1(1):24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
  37. Prayag G, Spector S, Orchiston C, Chowdhury M. Psychological resilience, organizational resilience and life satisfaction in tourism firms: Insights from the Canterbury earthquakes. Curr Issues Tour. 2020;23(10):1216-1233. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1607832
  38. Mahanta B, Khawzawl TL. Factors influencing tourist perceptions of river tourism destinations: A case study of the Brahmaputra River in Guwahati, Assam, India. Afr J Biomed Res. 2025;28(2S):774-778. doi: 10.53555/AJBR.v28i2S.6947
  39. Mahanta B. Riverine eco-tourism and sustainable development in Assam, India: Transforming the Brahmaputra corridor. Eco-Tour Sustain Dev. 2026;2(1):119-130. doi: 10.63385/etsd.v2i1.462
  40. Mili M, Saha S. Prospects and challenges of river tourism in Assam, India: A SWOT analysis. South Asian J Soc Stud Econ. 2025;22(12):130-142. doi: 10.9734/sajsse/2025/v22i121225
  41. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 1998.
  42. Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Sage Publications; 2018.
  43. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Share
Back to top
Explora: Environment and Resource, Electronic ISSN: 3060-9046 Published by AccScience Publishing