AccScience Publishing / EER / Volume 2 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.36922/eer.5839
Submit to EER
Cite this article
27
Download
534
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Designing sustainable urban parks: A proposal backed by practical research

Serkan Yildiz1* ,  Züleyha Oğuz1
Show Less
1 Department of Real Estate Development and Management, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
EER 2025, 2(1), 5839 https://doi.org/10.36922/eer.5839
Submitted: 11 November 2024 | Revised: 20 January 2025 | Accepted: 5 February 2025 | Published: 19 February 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Sustainable urban park designs are essential in advancing urban sustainability by addressing environmental issues, enhancing community well-being, fostering social interactions, and boosting local economies. Hence, this study aimed to develop a sustainable urban park design model. A total of 32 design elements were identified through a comprehensive literature review. The significance of these elements to the sustainability of urban parks was evaluated through a survey conducted with 318 participants. The survey results indicated that “being clean and well-kept” was the most important design element, receiving a mean score of 4.86 out of 5. In contrast, “availability of kiosks for buying drinks and snacks” emerged as the least important element, with a mean score of 3.81. Furthermore, exploratory factor analysis was used to categorize the design elements into six factors that collectively explained approximately 60% of the total variance. These factors were labeled as management quality, life quality, social quality, esthetics and furnishing quality, environmental quality, and activity quality. In the final phase of the study, Altinpark, located in Ankara, was examined using the developed model. Altinpark is one of the largest and renowned parks in the city, encompassing an area of 640,000 m² and housing over 18,000 trees. The examination revealed that while the park was well-designed, it exhibited significant shortcomings in terms of sustainability. The findings of this study are anticipated to guide local governments and communities in the design and construction of urban parks, enhancing their contribution to urban sustainability through improved functionality and serving as exemplary spaces.

Keywords
Factor analysis
Park user preferences
Sustainable urban parks
Urban park model
Urban sustainability
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Zipperer WC, Northrop R, Andreu M. Urban development and environmental degradation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. p. 1-25. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.97

 

  1. Satterthwaite D. Sustainable cities or cities that contribute to sustainable development? Urban Stud. 2021;34(10):1667-1691.

 

  1. Kisiała W, Rącka I. Spatial and statist. Analysis of urban poverty for sustainable city development. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):858. doi: 10.3390/su13020858

 

  1. Susser I, Schneider J. Wounded cities: Destruction and reconstruction in a globalized world. In: Wounded Cities. London: Routledge; 2020. p. 1-23.

 

  1. Platt RH. The excellent urban park system: What makes it great and how to get there. The Human Metropolis: People and Nature in the 21st-Century City; 2003. p. 47.

 

  1. Ibes DC. Integrating ecosystem services into urban park planning & design. Cities Environ. 2016;9(1):1.

 

  1. Aly D, Dimitrijevic B. Systems approach to the sustainable management of urban public parks. U For U. Green. 2022;68:127482. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127482

 

  1. Dizdaroğlu D. Assessing women’s satisfaction, safety and use in urban parks: A case study of gençlik park. In: Contemporary Issues in Architecture and Urban Planning: Architecture And Exploration. DAKAM Books: İstanbul; 2022a. p. 71-78.

 

  1. Paraskevopoulou A, Klados A, Malesios C. Historical public parks: Investigating contemporary visitor needs. Sustainability. 2020;12(23):9976. doi: 10.3390/su12239976

 

  1. Phetkongtong N. The priorities of landscape architectural elements and the decision to use urban park spaces. Int J Sustain Dev Plann. 2022;17(2):605-614. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.170225

 

  1. Grigorovschi M, Gheorghita CC. Small landscape designs, a premise for urban sustainability. Urban Arhitectura. Construct. 2015;6(1):91.

 

  1. Gümüş H, Alay Ö, Karakılıç M. Fiziksel aktivite için park ve rekreasyon alanlarına gelen kullanıcıların mekân seçimi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi Derg. 2017;15(1):31-38.

 

  1. Wu X, Chen M, Zhang Y. Evaluation of the open space performance for the mass fitness activities in an urban park a case study of Lixiang Park in Shenzhen City. Int Rev Spatial Plan Sustain Dev. 2022;10(2):200-218. doi: 10.14246/irspsd.10.2_200

 

  1. Elassal O, Haron A. A comparative study of constructed wetland parks as a model for sustainable parks. Eng Res J. 2023;52(2):1-9.

 

  1. Haredy A. Sustainable park landscaping as an approach for the development of the built environment: Review and employment. Envion Sci Sustain Dev. 2019;4(2):1-15. doi: 10.21625/essd.v4i2.553

 

  1. Ogunsote OO, Adedeji Y, Prucnalogunsote B. Combating Environmental Degradation through Sustainable Landscaping in Emerging Mega Cities. In: Proceedings of the International Union of Architecture XXIV World Congress of Archicture, Tokyo. Japan; 2011.

 

  1. Gholamreza NA. Economıc benefits of sustainable park: A solution to improve the city’s environment. Sci Works/ Elmi Eserler. 2022;2:34-46. doi: 10.58225/sw.2022.2.34-46

 

  1. Kolimenakis A, Solomou AD, Proutsos N, et al. The socioeconomic welfare of urban green areas and parks; a literature review of available evidence. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7863. doi: 10.3390/su13147863

 

  1. Tereci A, Atmaca M. Integrating renewable energy systems into urban furniture for recreational spaces design proposal for Konya Adalet Park. Gazi Univ J Sci. 2020;33(1):1-12. doi: 10.35378/gujs.532828

 

  1. Saeedi I, Dabbagh E. Modeling the relationships between hardscape color and user satisfaction in urban parks. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23:6535-6552. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00866-z

 

  1. Dizdaroğlu D. Developing design criteria for sustainable urban parks. J Contemp Urban Affairs. 2022b;6(1):69-81. doi: 10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n1-7

 

  1. Ibes DC. Sustainable urban park systems. Cities Environ. 2014;7(2):8.

 

  1. Yıldızcı AC, Yücel GF. Setting quality criteria in city parks. İTÜ Derg Mimarlık P Tas. 2006;5(2):220-230. doi: 10.33613/antropolojidergisi.633411

 

  1. Bahriny F, Bell S. Patterns of urban park use and their relationship to factors of quality: A case study of Tehran, Iran. Sustainability. 2020;12(4):1560. doi: 10.3390/su12041560

 

  1. Gong L, Mao B, Qi Y, Xu C. A satisfaction analysis of the infrastructure of country parks in Beijing. Urb For Urb Green. 2015;14:480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.013

 

  1. Kalansooriya J. Sustainability assessment of park studies in Sri Lanka: A comprehensive review. Int J Adv Multidiscipl Res Stud. 2023;3(4):290-299.

 

  1. Sultana S. An Innovation approach towards transforming a urban park to a sustainable park. J Emerg Techn Innov Res. 2022;9(5): 335-344.

 

  1. Trojanowska M. Assessment of sustainability and health promotion of three public parks in Poland’s Pomerania Region. Bull Geog Socio-economic Ser. 2024;64:117-136. doi: 10.12775/bgss-2024-0017

 

  1. Di Simone L, Petracci B, Piva M. Economic sustainability, innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2270. doi: 10.3390/su14042270

 

  1. Akkurt Y, Akten M. Kent parklarinda ekosistem hizmetlerinin rolü. J Arch Sci Appl. 2021;6(1):348-357. doi: 10.30785/mbud.812292

 

  1. Velásquez C, Espín F, Castro M, Rodríguez F. Energy efficiency in public lighting systems friendly to the environment and protected areas. Sustainability. 2024;16(12):5113. doi: 10.3390/su16125113

 

  1. Kindler M, Vivoni E, Perez‐Ruiz ER, Wang Z. Water conservation potential of modified turf grass irrigation in urban parks of Phoenix, Arizona. Ecohydrology. 2022;15(3):e2399. doi: 10.1002/eco.2399

 

  1. Ignatieva M, Haase D, Dushkova D, Haase A. Lawns in cities: From a globalised urban green space phenomenon to sustainable nature-based solutions. Land. 2020;9(3):73. doi: 10.3390/land9030073

 

  1. Chao KW. Symbiotic Urban Parks: Exploring Design Aesthetics, User Experiences and Ecological Services (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph); 2015.

 

  1. Freestone R, Favaro P. The social sustainability of smart cities: A conceptual framework. City Cult Soc. 2022;29:100460. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100460

 

  1. Bennett E, Helms R, Hermann A, et al. Leveraging Parks and Playgrounds in Pekin. Campbellsburg, and Salem: Kelley School of Business; 2021.

 

  1. Padial-Ruz R, Puga-González ME, Céspedes-Jiménez A, Cabello-Manrique D. Determining factors in the use of urban parks that influence the practice of physical activity in children: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073648

 

  1. Sanmargaraja S, Seow TW, Radzuan ISM, Fazri M. Inclusıve landscape design for the recreational parks: Case study in kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysıa. Environ Manage Sustain Dev. 2019;11: 548-562.

 

  1. Kurtaslan BO. Examination of Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus in the context of ecological landscape design. J Environ Biol. 2020;41(2):463-474. doi: 10.22438/jeb/41/2(SI)/JEB-33

 

  1. Safarkhani M. Sustainable Park Model: A Qualitative Approach in Sustainability Assessment of Parks. (Doctoral Dissertation İTÜ, İstanbul); 2023.

 

  1. Chen J, Tao Z, Wu W, Wang L, Chen D. Influence of Urban park pathway features on the density and intensity of walking and running. Land. 2024;13(2):156. doi: 10.3390/land13020156

 

  1. Van Renswouw L, Neerhof J, Vos S, Van Wesemael P, Lallemand C. Sensation: Sonifying the Urban Running Experience. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2021. p. 1-5. doi: 10.1145/3411763.3451788

 

  1. Song Y, Fernandez J, Wang T. Understanding perceived site qualities and experiences of urban public spaces: A case study of social media reviews in Bryant Park, New York City. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):8036. doi: 10.3390/su12198036

 

  1. SPSS, IBM SPSS Version 29.0.1. Boston, Mass: International Business Machines Corp; 2023.

 

  1. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test. 2005;5(2):159-168. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4

 

  1. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

 

  1. Bowling A, Shah E. Handbook of Health Research Methods Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. United States: McGraw-Hill Education; 2005.

 

  1. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334.

 

  1. Bartlett MS. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Psychol. 1950;3(Part II):77-85.

 

  1. Norusis MJ. SPSS Inc. SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1994.

 

  1. Mvududu NH, Sink CA. Factor analysis in counseling research and practice. Couns Outcome Res Eval. 2013;4(2):75-98. doi: 10.1177/2150137813494766

 

  1. Bilgili BC. Ankara Kenti Yeşil Alanlarının Kent Ekosistemine Olan Etkilerinin Bazı Ekolojik Göstergelerle Değerlendirilmesi (doctoral dissertation Ankara University, Turkey); 2009.

 

  1. ABB (Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi), Altınpark; 2024. Available from: https://www.ankara.bel.tr/ cevrekorumavekontrol/peyzaj-uygulama/prestij-parklari [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 27].

 

  1. Google Maps, Altınpark. Available from: https://www.google. com/maps/place/altınpark [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 15.

 

  1. Ekinci Z, Sağlam H. Meanings and social roles of the republic period urban parks in Ankara. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2016;216:610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.038

 

  1. Kahraman ZE, Özdemir SS. A housing satisfaction study in an area of urban transformation: The case of the Türk-iş apartment blocks. Megaron. 2017;12(4):619-634. doi: 10.5505/megaron.2017.04834

 

  1. Yenioğlu F. Kent Parklarında Aydınlatma Elemanlarının Kullanımının Peyzaj Mimarlığı Açısından Irdelenmesi, (Master’s thesis, Bartın University, Turkey); 2010.

 

  1. Önal S, Sağır M. Identification of the use of urban parks in Ankara. Ankara Araşt Derg. 2018;6(1):77-90. doi: 10.5505/jas.2018.57338

 

  1. Tripadvisor, ANFA Altınpark. Available from: https://www. tripadvisor.com.tr/attraction_review-g298656-d3600724- reviews-or20-anfa_altinpark-Ankara.html [Last accessed on 2024 Oct 12].

 

  1. Ocak RÖ, Perçin H. Investigating design of urban parks Approaches on native and foreign samples. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Derg. 2014;1(1):12-20.

 

  1. ABB (Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi), Altınpark Yaşlılar Lokali Yeni Üyelerini Bekliyor; 2023. Available from: https://www. ankara.bel.tr/cevrekorumavekontrol/peyzaj-uygulama/ prestij-parklari/altinpark [Last accessed on 2024 Oct 08].

 

  1. Available from: https://www.instagram.com/engelsiz_ ankara/p/CDtBg39jvZr/?img_index=1 [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 24].

 

  1. Ekşisözlük, Altınpark. Available from: https://eksisozluk. com/altinpark--109539 [Last accessed on 2024 Oct 15].

 

  1. Önal S. Determining the suitability of urban park furnitures to standards: The case of Ankara. Antropoloji. 2019;38:54- 64. doi: 10.33613/antropolojidergisi.633411

 

  1. Fousquare, Altınpark Yürüyüş ve Koşu Parkuru. Available from: https://tr.foursquare.com/v/ alt%C4%B1npark/4c1b8e3855e4c9b6c77c4923 [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 25].

 

  1. Duygu ÇR, Fatma A. Benefits of Urban Green Spaces for Citizens: Ankara Case Study. Ecol Urban Areas. In: Conference: 4th International Conference “Ecology of Urban Areas 2014”At: Zrenjanin/Serbia; 2014. p. 608-614.

 

  1. Yılmaz D, Işınkaralar Ö. How can natural environment scoring tool (nest) be adapted for urban parks? Kastamonu Univ J Eng Sci. 2021;7(2):127-139.

 

  1. Ayan B. Öznel Iyi Olma Hali Üzerine Kent Parklarının Etkilerinin Irdelenmesi: Ankara Kenti Örneği (Doctoral Dissertation Ankara University, Turkey); 2017.

 

  1. Yılmaz FÇ, Sonkur BA, Çorbacı ÖL. Ankara İklim Koşullarında İlkbahar Mevsiminin Habercisi Olan Bitki Türleri. Yalova: Süs Bitkileri Kongresi; 2013.

 

  1. Yiğit S. Ankara Altınpark: Ankara’nın En Büyük Rekreasyon Alanı; 2023. Available from: https://www.peyzax.com/ ankara-altinpark-ankaranin-en-buyuk-rekreasyon-alani [Last accessed on 2024 Oct 08].

 

  1. Sönmez AC. Peyzaj Özellikleri ve Ekolojik Tolerans Bakımından Peyzaj Bitkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi, (Master’s Thesis, Bursa Uludag University, Turkey); 2023.

 

  1. Çorbacı ÖL, Ekren E. Evaluation of urban open green areas in terms of xeriscape: The case of Ankara Altınpark. Peyzaj Araşt Uyg Derg. 2022;4(1):1-11. doi: 10.56629/paud.1137410

 

  1. Ocak RÖ. Ankara›daki Bazi Kent Parklarinin Tasarim Anlayişlarinin Incelenmesi. (Master Thesis, Ankara University, Turkey); 2014.

 

  1. Nielsen TS, Hansen KB. Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas. Health Place. 2007;13:839-850. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001

 

  1. O’Reilly C. We have gone recreation mad”: The consumption of leisure and popular entertainment in municipal public parks in early twentieth century Britain. Int J Reg Local Hist. 2013;8(2):112-128. doi: 10.1179/2051453013Z.0000000009

 

  1. Oğuz D. User surveys of Ankara’s urban parks. Landscape Urban Plann. 2000;52:165-171. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00130-4

 

  1. Güler N, Uğurlar A. User satisfaction in urban parks: Ankara Kugulu Park case. Megaron. 2017;12(3):443-459. doi: 10.5505/megaron.2017.76094

 

  1. Bertram C, Meyerhoff J, Rehdanz K, Wüstemann H. Differences in the recreational value of urban parks between weekdays and weekends: A discrete choice analysis. Lands Urb Plann. 2017;159:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.006

 

  1. Junyi L. Landscape evaluation on urban waterfront under semantic segmentation technology-taking Xihu Park and Zuohai Park in Fuzhou as Examples. Chin Lands Arch. 2022;38:92-97.

 

  1. Jahani A, Saffariha M. Aesthetic preference and mental restoration prediction in urban parks: An application. Urb For Urb Green. 2020;54:126775. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126775

 

  1. Lee YC, Kim KH. Attitudes of citizens towards urban parks and green spaces for urban sustainability. Sustainability. 2015;7(7):8240-8254. doi: 10.3390/su7078240

 

  1. Seymour M. Just sustainability in urban parks. Local Environ. 2012;17(2):167-185. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.646968

 

  1. Domeneghini J, Yonegura VB, Silveira ALLD. Urban parks with adjacent bike lanes: A factor in attracting cyclist users? Rev Perc Mar. 2023;15:53-81.

 

  1. Smith A, Osborn G, Vodicka G. Programming parks. How do organized events and activities affect the inclusivity of urban green spaces? J Leisure Res. 2024;55(3):344-362. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2023.2210563

 

 

Share
Back to top
Explora: Environment and Resource, Electronic ISSN: 3060-9046 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept