AccScience Publishing / AIH / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AIH026220054
Cite this article
6
Download
301
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterization of radiation-induced esophagitis using explainable machine learning algorithms for lung cancer patients treated in the NRG/RTOG 0617clinical trial

Taman Upadhaya1* ,  Indrin J. Chetty1 ,  Joseph Lui1 ,  Katelyn M. Atkin1
Show Less
1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California , United States of America
Received: 27 May 2026 | Revised: 1 July 2026 | Accepted: 7 July 2026 | Published online: 8 October 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Limiting acute esophagitis remains a clinical challenge in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer using chemoradiotherapy. In this study, machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to predict acute esophagitis in patients (n = 451; training set 70% and independent test set 30%) treated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0617 clinical trial. Multiple ML models were trained to predict grade ≥ 2 esophagitis using clinical, radiomics, and dosimetric/dosiomics features. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best-performing model was explained using the Shapley additive explanation framework and decision curve analysis. The highest-accuracy model was based on radiomics–dosiomics features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model (AUC = 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60–0.78). A novel model that accounts for esophageal geometry relative to tumor location achieved an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58–0.76) using dose–volume histogram relationships. The ML models revealed important relationships that can guide radiation dose planning to minimize individual risk and facilitate personalized radiation therapy.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Machine learning
Esophagitis
Radiomics
Dosiomics
Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
RTOG 0617 trial
Funding
This work was supported in part by a research grant from Varian Medical Systems/Siemens Healthineers for research unrelated to this topic and by Cedars-Sinai Cancer Developmental Funds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Curran WJ, Paulus R, Langer CJ, et al. Sequential vs Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(19):1452-1460. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr325
  2. Rubin P, Constine LS, Marks LB, editors. ALERT—Adverse Late Effects of Cancer Treatment. Vol 1: General Concepts and Specific Precepts. Springer; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72314-1
  3. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, et al. Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3):S3-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
  4. Chapet O, Kong FM, Lee JS, Hayman JA, Ten Haken RK. Normal tissue complication probability modeling for acute esophagitis in patients treated with conformal radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77(2):176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.10.001
  5. Bradley J, Deasy JO, Bentzen SM, El Naqa I. Dosimetric correlates for acute esophagitis in patients treated with radiotherapy for lung carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58(4):1106-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.080
  6. El Naqa I, Bradley J, Blanco AI, et al. Multivariable modeling of radiotherapy outcomes, including dose-volume and clinical factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(4):1275-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.022
  7. Wei X, Liu HH, Tucker SL, et al. Risk factors for acute esophagitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(1):100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.022
  8. Rodríguez N, Algara M, Foro P, et al. Predictors of acute esophagitis in lung cancer patients treated with concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(3):810-817. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.064
  9. Palma DA, Senan S, Oberije C, et al. Predicting esophagitis after chemoradiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(4):690-696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.029
  10. Kamran SC, Yeap BY, Ulysse CA, et al. Assessment of a contralateral esophagus-sparing technique in locally advanced lung cancer treated with high-dose chemoradiation: a phase 1 nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(6):910-914. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0281
  11. Ladbury C, Li R, Danesharasteh A, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence to identify dosimetric predictors of toxicity in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 0617. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;117(5):1287-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.019
  12. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
  13. Leger S, Zwanenburg A, Pilz K, et al. A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13448-3
  14. Giger ML. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis/radiomics/machine learning/deep learning in medical imaging. Med Phys. 2023;50(S1):50-53. doi: 10.1002/mp.16025
  15. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563-577. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169
  16. Ma Z, Liang B, Wei R, et al. Enhanced prediction of postoperative radiotherapy-induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer: dosiomic model development in a real-world cohort and validation in the PORT-C randomized controlled trial. Thorac Cancer. 2023;14(28):2839-2845. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15068
  17. Luna JM, Chao HH, Shinohara RT, et al. Machine learning highlights the deficiency of conventional dosimetric constraints for prevention of high-grade radiation esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020;22:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.03.007
  18. Nair SS, Salazar RM, Xu T, et al. Multiomic random forest toxicity modeling of radiation esophagitis. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025;36:100838. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100838
  19. Herr DJ, Yin H, Bergsma D, et al. Factors associated with acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2024;197:110349. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110349
  20. Bradley JD, Hu C, Komaki RR, et al. Long-term results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0617: standard- versus high-dose chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(7):706-714. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01162
  21. Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):187-199. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71207-0
  22. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, et al. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(6):1045-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
  23. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13(3):176-181. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00031-6
  24. Monti S, Xu T, Mohan R, Liao Z, Palma G, Cella L. Radiation-induced esophagitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: voxel-based analysis and normal tissue complication probability modeling. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(7):1833. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071833
  25. Drzymala RE, Mohan R, Brewster L, et al. Dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90168-4
  26. Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, et al. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology. 2020;295(2):328-338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145
  27. Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S. Image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2016. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.07003
  28. Whybra P, Zwanenburg A, Andrearczyk V, et al. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized convolutional filters for reproducible radiomics and enhanced clinical insights. Radiology. 2024;310(2):e231319. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231319
  29. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ Jr. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill; 1957.
  30. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321-357. doi: 10.1613/jair.953
  31. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol. 1996;58(1):267-288. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
  32. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
  33. Wade C, Glynn K. Hands-On Gradient Boosting with XGBoost and scikit-learn: Perform Accessible Machine Learning and Extreme Gradient Boosting With Python. Packt Publishing; 2020.
  34. Aitkin M, Foxall R. Statistical modelling of artificial neural networks using the multi-layer perceptron. Stat Comput. 2003;13(3):227-239. doi: 10.1023/A:1024218716736
  35. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn. 2002;46(1-3):389-422. doi: 10.1023/A:1012487302797
  36. Li Y, Luo Y. Performance-weighted-voting model: an ensemble machine learning method for cancer type classification using whole-exome sequencing mutation. Quant Biol. 2020;8(4):347-358. doi: 10.1007/s40484-020-0226-1
  37. Rainio O, Teuho J, Klén R. Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):6086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56706-x
  38. Demler OV, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models. Stat Med. 2012;31(23):2577-2587. doi: 10.1002/sim.5328
  39. Lundberg S, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
  40. He H, Garcia EA. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2009;21(9):1263-1284. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2008.239
  41. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2012. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490
  42. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565-574. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361
  43. Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):W1-W73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698
  44. Zheng X, Guo W, Wang Y, et al. Multi-omics to predict acute radiation esophagitis in patients with lung cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01041-6
  45. Wang K, Zhao J, Duan J, et al. Radiomic and dosimetric parameter-based nomogram predicts radiation esophagitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1490348. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1490348
Share
Back to top
Artificial Intelligence in Health, Electronic ISSN: 3029-2387 Print ISSN: 3041-0894, Published by AccScience Publishing