AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AC026280051
Cite this article
1
Download
13
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Educational innovation and active musical practice in teacher training: A socio- perspective

Ana Mercedes Vernia Carrasco1,2*
Show Less
1 Department of Education and Specific Didactics, Faculty YYY, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Castellón , Spain
2 L’Alcora Chair for Music Research and Quality of Life, Department of Education and Specific Didactics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Castellón , Spain
Received: 8 July 2026 | Revised: 7 August 2026 | Accepted: 20 August 2026 | Published online: 9 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article presents a theoretical review of the integration of emerging digital technologies into the initial training of primary school music teachers, analyzing this process from the perspective of science and technology studies. Based on a critical review of recent literature (2010–2024), the trends, approaches, and challenges in integrating digital tools, virtual learning environments, collaborative platforms, sound-production applications, and generative artificial intelligence systems into music teacher education are identified. The analysis draws on theoretical frameworks from the science and technology studies field, particularly the social construction of technology, studies on technological systems, and debates on appropriation, agency, and power in educational digital environments. It is argued that digital technologies are not neutral artifacts: their design, distribution, and adoption in educational contexts are shaped by power relations, economic interests, cultural dynamics, and political decisions that directly affect formative processes. The review shows that pedagogically meaningful integration requires, beyond technical skills, a critical understanding of the sociotechnical dimensions that configure these technologies. It is concluded that 21st-century music teacher education needs to articulate active practice and bodily expression together with critical reflection on the technological devices and platforms that mediate such education.

Keywords
Science and technology studies
Social construction of technology
Generative artificial intelligence
Music education
Teacher education
Active musical practice
Body expression
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no competing interests.
References
  1. Dussel I. Tactilidad y pedagogía. Sensorialidad y creación en la historia educativa [Tactility and pedagogy: sensoriality and creation in educational history]. Pedagogía Saberes. 2023;(59):115-128. doi: 10.17227/pys.num59-19383
  2. Winner L. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus. 1980;109(1):121-136.
  3. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 1987.
  4. Feenberg A. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2002.
  5. Cabero-Almenara J, Llorente-Cejudo C. Covid-19: transformación radical de la digitalización en las instituciones universitarias [Covid-19: radical transformation of digitalization in university institutions]. Campus Virtuales. 2020;9(2):25-34. [In Spanish]
  6. Arguedas Quesada C. Música y expresión corporal en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje del Inglés, Español y Francés [Music and body expression in the teaching and learning processes of English, Spanish, and French]. Rev Actual Investig Educ.2011;9(1):1-30. [In Spanish]
  7. Grille Iturra M. Expresión corporal en la Educación Musical: la corporeidad silenciada. Experiencia en primer ciclo [Body expression in music education: silenced corporeality]. Undergraduate thesis. Santiago, Chile; 2023. [In Spanish] Accessed November 20, 2025. https://bibliotecadigital.academia.cl/server/api/core/bitstreams/859e9938-3aa9-40f4-8597-02aec141020f/content
  8. Cuevas Romero S. La creación expresiva corporal a través de la música en educación secundaria obligatoria [Expressive body creation through music in compulsory secondary education]. J Phys Educ Hum Mov. 2023;5(1):38-46. [In Spanish] doi: 10.24310/JPEHMjpehmjpehm.v5i115832
  9. Selwyn N. Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. J Comput Assist Learn. 2010;26(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
  10. Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J, eds. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2008.
  11. Pinch TJ, Bijker WE. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc Stud Sci. 1984;14(3):399-441. doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004
  12. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  13. van Dijck J, Poell T, de Waal M. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  14. Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2016.
  15. Williamson B. Learning in the “platform society”: disassembling an educational data assemblage. Res Educ. 2017;98(1):59-82. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723389
  16. Cope D. Computer Models of Musical Creativity. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2017.
  17. Mazlan CAN, Koning SI, Yusoff MYM, Hassim DSHA, Hidayatullah R, Jamnongsarn S. Artificial Intelligence in Music Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions. In: Proceedings of the 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE). Suzhou, China: IEEE; 2025:713-717. doi: 10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158139
  18. Selwyn N. Is Technology Good for Education? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2016.
  19. Serrano Hidalgo M, Palacios Rodríguez A, Llorente-Cejudo C, Cabero Almenara J. Mejorando la enseñanza a través de la innovación educativa [Improving teaching through educational innovation]. Madrid, Spain: Dykinson; 2023. [In Spanish]
  20. Sánchez-Jara JFM, Gutiérrez SG, Migueláñez SO, García Malheiro MA. Digital platforms for music production (DAW): educational innovation from music teacher training. Electron J Music Educ. 2023;(52):53-72. doi: 10.7203/LEEME.52.27178
  21. Bravo-Marín R, López-García NJ, Martín-Ruiz F, Sánchez-Parra MJ. Impacto del Plan de Formación en Competencia Digital Docente en los especialistas de Música de Castilla-La Mancha [Impact of the Teacher Digital Competence Training Plan on music specialists in Castilla-La Mancha]. RELATEC. 2026;25(1):79-96. [In Spanish] doi: 10.17398/1695-288X.25.1.79
  22. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Nice R, trans. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press; 1987.
  23. Leman M. Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2007.
  24. Álamos-Gómez J, Tejada Giménez J, Moreno García L. Conexiones cognitivas entre expresión corporal y formación rítmica en Educación Primaria. Un estudio con docentes de música en Chile [Cognitive connections between body expression and rhythmic training in Primary Education: a study with music teachers in Chile]. RIFOP. 2023;98(37.3):187-202. [In Spanish] doi: 10.47553/rifop.v98i37.3.100661
  25. García-Peñalvo FJ. Inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación superior: una perspectiva de 360°. Presented at: IFE Conference Special Event; Artificial Intelligence in Education Summit. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México; 2024. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10499827
  26. Civit M, Cuadrado F. Diseño de sonido para producciones audiovisuales e historias sonoras en el aula. Hacia una docencia creativa mediante el uso de herramientas inteligentes [Sound design for audiovisual productions and sound stories in the classroom: toward creative teaching through the use of intelligent tools]. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2024. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2408.02113
  27. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: FT Press; 2014.
  28. Small C. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown, CT, USA: Wesleyan University Press; 1998.
  29. Vernia-Carrasco AM. La educación musical para la mejora de la calidad de vida en las aulas [Music education for improving quality of life in classrooms]. Human Rev. 2022;11:1-11. [In Spanish] doi: 10.37467/revhuman.v11.3856
  30. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  31. British Educational Research Association (BERA). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. London, UK: British Educational Research Association; 2024.
  32. Blanco García Y, Serrano Pastor RM. La formación permanente del profesorado de música ante los retos de la sociedad actual: ¿Qué nos aportan las políticas educativas? Una investigación cualitativa [Continuing education for music teachers facing the challenges of contemporary society: what do education policies offer? A qualitative study]. Rev Complut Educ. 2025;36(2):139-149. [In Spanish] doi: 10.5209/rced.93286
  33. Zhao Y, Frank KA. Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective. Am Educ Res J. 2003;40(4):807-840. doi: 10.3102/00028312040004807
  34. Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books; 1983.
  35. Samuelson P. Generative AI meets copyright. Science. 2023;381(6654):158-161. doi: 10.1126/science.adi0656
  36. Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. doi: 10.2760/159770
  37. Hernández-Marín JL, Jiménez-Campos MI, Jiménez-Campos V. Tecnologías digitales en educación musical obligatoria: una revisión de alcance (2020-2024) [Digital technologies in compulsory music education: a scoping review (2020-2024)]. Rev Ensayos Pedagógicos. 2025;20(2):1-34. [In Spanish] doi: 10.15359/rep.20-2.16
  38. Armstrong V. Hard bargaining on the hard drive: gender bias in the music technology classroom. Gend Educ. 2008;20(4):375-386. doi: 10.1080/09540250802190206
  39. Wajcman J. TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2004.
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing