AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AC025350075
ARTICLE

Ecosophical alternative realities

Alban Mannisi1*
Show Less
1 Department of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
Received: 25 August 2025 | Revised: 27 October 2025 | Accepted: 6 November 2025 | Published online: 20 November 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Since Western postmodernism sparked awareness and shaped our governance and lifestyle at the turn of the millennium, Global North ecosophies have attempted to grasp the ecological and ontological crises, creating their own performative narratives in the process. Pervasive throughout all modes of thought about our relationship to the world, environmental consciousness is part of political ecologies and contemporary hermeneutics. From design philosophies to laws and representations, everyone has an opinion on how we should manage our biospheres. This has led to the Global South being flooded with Western ethics, which are often hostile to them in the manner of imperialist modes of operation. Even more astonishing is the versatile plasticity of these conceptual changes, which are less disruptive than radical and pursue the same resilient environmental ethics that gave rise to them. Thus, the world of contemporary art is flooded with thinkers of a new ecological esthetic modeled on the genesis of the Anthropocene. The era of neoliberal ecological esthetics in communication design has thus become a soft power advocacy for Western imperialism, much like built environment experts who damage the world they claim to protect. It glorifies a myriad of empowering narratives of the corporate, privileged, wealthy, and educated elite, reminiscent of the aristocrats of past Western imperial empires. In an era of mutating environmental esthetics, we will explore the foundations and issues of these ecosophical alternative realities that perpetuate indifference toward both humans and non-humans. We will also examine how contemporary ecological relativism is leading new generations to disengage from generic communication design and embrace other existence praxis.

Keywords
Environmental narrative
Ecosophical esthetics
Communication design
Alternative reality
Global North and Global South
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Mannisi A. Other territorilisation regime. In: Tapia C, Mannisi A, editors. Reciproci Udad: Design Diplomacy in Seville. Málaga: Recolectores Urbanos; 2021. p. 27-45.

 

  1. Guattari F. The Three Ecologies. London: The Athlone Press; 2000. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226032055.001.0001

 

  1. Friedrich CD. Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog. ca. 1818. Oil on Canvas. Hamburger Kunsthalle, Hamburg. Wikimedia Commons. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia. org/wiki/file/caspar/david/friedrich/wanderer/above/the/sea/of/fog.jpg [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 12].

 

  1. Deleuze G. Difference and Repetition (1968). Columbia: Columbia University Press; 1994.

 

  1. Brook O, Miles A, O’Brien D, Taylor M. Social mobility and ‘openness’ in creative occupations since the 1970s. Sociology. 2023;57(4):789-810. doi: 10.1177/00380385221129953.

 

  1. Fanon F. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press; 2004.

 

  1. Diop M. Dahomey. Benin: Arte France Cinéma; 2024.

 

  1. Harari YN. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Israel: Dvir Publishing House; 2011.

 

  1. López-Calvo I. Coloniality is not over, it is all over: Interview with Dr Walter Mignolo. Transmoder J Perip Cul Prod Luso Hispanic World. 2016;6(1):176. doi: 10.5070/T461030930

 

  1. Achebe C. A Man of the People. United States: Heinemann; 1966.

 

  1. Quijano A. Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. Int Sociol. 2000;15(2):215-232. doi: 10.1177/0268580900015002005

 

  1. Sandel M. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.

 

  1. Shaw C, Nickpour F. Design as an agent of narratives: A matrix and framework for incorporating narratives into design processes. Adv Design Res. 2024;2(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadr.2024.07.003

 

  1. Ford J. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. United States: Paramount Pictures; 1962.

 

  1. Lovelock J. The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth Is Fighting Back: and How We Can Still Save Humanity. London: Allen Lane; 2007.

 

  1. Weber M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge; 1930.

 

  1. Laferrière E, Stoett PJ, editors. International Ecopolitical Theory: Critical Approaches. Columbia: University of British Columbia Press; 2006.

 

  1. Proudhon PJ. What is Property? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

 

  1. Chen S, Zhao Y. Ecological civilization: A blindspot in global media coverage of China’s environmental governance. Environ Commun. 2021;16(2):195-208. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1981419

 

  1. Sasa G. Oppressive pines: Uprooting Israeli green colonialism and implanting Palestinian A’wna. Politics. 2022;43(2):219-235. doi: 10.1177/02633957221122366

 

  1. Unknown Photographer. Debbas Square, Beirut. Wikimedia Commons; 1967. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:beirut_debbas_square_1967.jpg [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 12].

 

  1. Roger A. Nus et Paysages, Essai Sur la Fonction de L’Art. Canada: Aubier; 1978.

 

  1. Latour B. Facing Gaia. United States: Polity Press; 2017.

 

  1. Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014.

 

  1. Illich I. Deschooling Society. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1971.

 

  1. McGowan J. Greta Thunberg’s Stand with Gaza is a Problem for the Climate Change Movement. Forbes; 2023. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaymcgowan/ 2023/10/25/greta-thunbergs-stand-with-gaza-is-a-problem-for-the-climate-change-movement [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 21].

 

  1. Sinnokrot N. Rewilding (at) Sakiya. J Arch Educ. 2022;76(2):20-25.

 

  1. Guedich B. Global Sumud Flotilla, Sidi Bou Said, Tunis, Tunisia, 07-09-2025. Own Work. Wikimedia Commons. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file: global_sumud_ flotilla_sidi_bou_said_tunis_tunisia_07-09-2025-05808_21. jpg [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 12].

 

  1. Mannisi A. Deep Asian ecology. In: Rahmann H, Walliss J, editors. The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture. Berlin: Jovis; 2021. p. 177-179.

 

  1. Gergaud S. Indigenous cinemas and futurisms: How Indigenous visual arts are shifting the narratives and offering a new relationship to space and landscapes. Rech Angl Nord Amér. 2021;54:1-15. doi: 10.4000/ranam.862

 

  1. Watson C. Parachute science falls to earth. Nature. 2021;592(7853):182-183.

 

  1. Morton T. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. United States: University of Minnesota Press; 2013.

 

  1. Guha R, Martínez Alier J. Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Routledge (Earthscan); 1997.

 

  1. Ecuador. Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Art. 71; 2008. Available from: https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/sites/default/files/documents/old/constitucion/de_bolsillo. pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 10].

 

  1. Gramsci A. In: Buttigieg JA, editor. The Prison Notebooks: Critical Edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1992-2007.
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing