AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ac.1597
Submit to AC
Cite this article
65
Download
1196
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Speculative ubimus design: Probing the potential for expansion of second-wave ubiquitous music frameworks

Damián Keller1,2* ,  Ivan Simurra1,2 ,  Luzilei Aliel2 ,  Rongge Zheng3
Show Less
1 Federal University of Acre, Brazil
2 Amazon Center for Music Research (NAP), Rio Branco, Brazil
3 Maynooth University, Ireland
AC 2023, 1(2), 1597 https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.1597
Submitted: 15 August 2023 | Accepted: 7 October 2023 | Published: 9 November 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

This contribution engages with the relationships between field deployments and conceptual underpinnings of ubiquitous music (ubimus) research, to establish a dialog with speculative design. Three cases serve as triggers for a conceptual exercise that points to common threads among ubimus endeavors within three active areas of second-wave ubimus investigations: Emugel, a tool for lite-coding; Ouija, an ecomprovisational artwork; and InMesh, a multimodal installation inspired in the cultural frictions of current Amazonian reality. Lite coding is proposed as a sonic-oriented practice that incorporates simplified semantic strategies to foster knowledge sharing in iterative individual and group-based creative activities. Ouija is an ecomprovisational artwork deployable on the musical internet that highlights the dynamic relationships between fixed and volatile resources in music making. The processes leading to the realization of InMesh furnish an opportunity to probe the limits of repurposed telematic tools for sharing implicit knowledge and hint at potential limitations of multimodal artistic frameworks.

Keywords
Second-wave ubiquitous music
Speculative design
Post-2020 music-making
Funding
Brazilian Council for the Development of Science and Technology
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Pimenta MS, Keller D, Flores LV, et al., 2014, In: Lazzarini V, (ed.), Methods in Creativity-centred Design for Ubiquitous Musical Activities. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, p. 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11152-0_2

 

  1. Keller D, Flores LV, Pimenta MS, et al., 2011, Convergent trends toward ubiquitous music. J N Music Res, 40: 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2011.594514

 

  1. Miletto EM, Pimenta MS, Bouchet F, et al., 2011, Principles for music creation by novices in networked music environments. J N Music Res, 40: 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2011.603832

 

  1. Karkina S, Mena J, Valeeva R, et al., 2023, Fostering future music teachers’ professional skills: Developing a signature pedagogy using E-learning. Front Educ, 8: 1162748. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1162748

 

  1. Keller D, Radivojević N, Lazzarini V, 2022, Issues of Ubimus Archaeology: Beyond Pure Computing and Precision During the Analogue-digital Transition. In: Proceedings of the Ubiquitous Music Symposium (UbiMus 2022). Curitiba, PR: Ubiquitous Music Group, p. 17–26.

 

  1. Keller D, 2014, Characterizing Resources in Ubimus Research: Volatility and Rivalry. In: Proceedings of the V Workshop in Ubiquitous Music (V UbiMus). Vitória, ES: Ubiquitous Music Group.

 

  1. Messina M, Keller D, Aliel L, et al., 2022, The internet of musical stuff (IoMuSt): Ubimus perspectives on artificial scarcity, virtual communities and (de)objectification. INSAM J Contemp Music Art Technol, 9: 26–50. https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2022.5.9.26

 

  1. Dourish P, Bell G, 2011, Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

  1. Tenney J, 1963, Sound-generation by means of a digital computer. J Music Theory, 7: 24–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/843021

 

  1. Thoret E, Caramiaux B, Depalle P, et al., 2021, Learning metrics on spectrotemporal modulations reveals the perception of musical instrument timbre. Nat Hum Behav, 5: 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00987-5

 

  1. Aliel L, Keller D, Costa R, 2018, The Maxwell Demon: A proposal for modeling in ecological synthesis in art practices. Rev Música Hodie, 18: 103. https://doi.org/10.5216/mh.v18i1.53575

 

  1. Chakraborty S, Yaseen A, Timoney J, et al., 2022, Adaptive Touchless Whole-body Interaction for Casual Ubiquitous Musical Activities. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC2022). Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick, p. 132–138.

 

  1. Ascott R, 1984, In: Grundmann H, (ed.), Art and Telematics: Towards a Network Consciousness. Vancouver: The Western Front, p. 25–67.

 

  1. Keller D, 2000, Compositional processes from an ecological perspective. Leonardo Music J, 10: 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/096112100570459

 

  1. Keller D, Lazzarini V, 2017, Ecologically grounded creative practices in ubiquitous music. Organised Sound, 22: 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771816000340

 

  1. Otero N, Jansen M, Lazzarini V, et al., 2020, In: Turchet L, (ed.), Computational Thinking in Ubiquitous Music Ecologies. London: Routledge, p. 146–170. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429281440

 

  1. Keller D, 2018, Challenges for a second decade of ubimus research: Knowledge transfer in ubimus activities. Rev Música Hodie, 18: 148–165. https://doi.org/10.5216/mh.v18i1.53578

 

  1. Keller D, Ferreira E, da Silva FP, et al., 2013, Criatividade Musical Cotidiana: Um Estudo Exploratório Com Sons Vocais Percussivos (Everyday Musical Creativity: An Exploratory Study with Vocal Percussion Sounds). In: Proceedings of the ANPPOM. Natal, RN: ANPPOM.

 

  1. Yi S, Letz S, 2020, In: Lazzarini V, Keller D, Otero N, (eds.), et al., The Browser as a Platform for Ubiquitous Music. London: Routledge, p. 185–206. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429281440

 

  1. Lazzarini V, Yi S, Timoney J, et al., 2012, The Mobile Csound Platform. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library, p. 163–167.

 

  1. Radanovitsck EA, Keller D, Flores LV, et al., 2011, MixDroid: Time Tagging for Creative Activities (mixDroid: Marcação Temporal Para Atividades Criativas). In: Proceedings of the XIII Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music (SBCM 2011). Available from: https://compmus.ime.usp.br/ sbcm/2011

 

  1. Ribeiro Netto A, Castheloge L, Oliosi A, et al., 2015, Memory Tree: Multimedia Interactive Installation (Árvore das Memórias: Instalação Multimídia Interativa). In: Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music (SBCM 2015). Campinas, SP: SBC, p. 76–82.

 

  1. Lazzarini V, Keller D, Radivojević N, 2023, Issues of ubiquitous music archaeology: Shared knowledge, simulation, terseness, and ambiguity in early computer music. Front Signal Process, 3: 1132672. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsip.2023.1132672

 

  1. Dunne A, Raby F, 2013, Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

  1. Lazzarini V, Keller D, Otero N, (eds.), et al., 2020, Ubiquitous Music Ecologies. England: Routledge.

 

  1. Keller D, Truax B, 1998, Ecologically based Granular Synthesis. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Ann Arbor, MI: ICMA, p. 117–120.

 

  1. Keller D, Berger J, 2001, Everyday Sounds: Synthesis Parameters and Perceptual Correlates. In: Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music. Fortaleza, CE: SBC.

 

  1. Keller D, Capasso A, 2006, New concepts and techniques in eco-composition. Organised Sound, 11: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771806000082

 

  1. Capasso-Keller-Tinajero, 2023, Capasso+Keller+Tinajero: An Artist Collective. Available from: https:// capassokellertinajero.quarespace.com

 

  1. Connors TM, 2015, Audiovisual Installation as Ecological Performativity. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art (ISEA2015). Available from: https://isea2015.org/proceeding/submissions/ISEA2015_ submission_149.pdf

 

  1. Keller D, Capasso A, Tinajero P, 2019, Knowledge transfer in ecologically grounded approaches to ubimus: InMesh 1.0. J N Music Res, 48: 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2019.1642361

 

  1. Keller D, Messina M, Oliveira FZ, 2020, Second-wave ubiquitous music: Collaboration, automation and knowledge transfer for creativity (editorial). J Dig Media Interact, 3: 5–20. https://doi.org/10.34624/jdmi.v3i5.15989

 

  1. Keller D, Daniel Luis B, Queiroz M, et al., 2010, Anchoring in Ubiquitous Musical Activities. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, p. 319–326.

 

  1. Keller D, Lazzarini V, Pimenta MS, 2014, Ubiquitous Music. Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11152-0

 

  1. Wen-Chung C, 1966, Open rather than bounded. Perspect N Music, 5: 1–6.

 

  1. Keller D, Aliel L, Filho MC, et al., 2021, Toward ubimus philosophical frameworks. Open Philos, 4: 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0188

 

  1. Radanovitsck EA, Keller D, Flores LV, et al., 2011, MixDroid: Time Tagging for Creative Activities (mixDroid: Marcação Temporal Para Atividades Criativas). In: Proceedings of the XIII Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music (SBCM 2011). Vitória, ES: SBC.

 

  1. Camporez HA, Mota TS, Astorga EM, et al., 2018, RoboMus: Uma plataforma para performances musicais robóticas (RoboMus: A platform for robotic musical performances). In: Keller D, Lima MH, (eds.), Aplicações em Música Ubíqua (Applications in Ubiquitous Music). São Paulo, SP: Editora ANPPOM, p. 58–93.

 

  1. Simurra I, Messina M, Aliel L, et al., 2023, Radical creative semantic anchoring: Creative-action metaphors and timbral interaction. Organised Sound, 28: 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771822000322

 

  1. Oliveira PJ, 2012, The shape of live that never came: A speculative approach to the future of live musical performance. DESIGNA, 2013: 353.

 

  1. Flores L, Miletto E, Pimenta M, et al., 2010, Musical Interaction Patterns: Communicating Computer Music Knowledge in a Multidisciplinary Project. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. New York: ACM, p. 199–206.

 

  1. Timoney J, Lazzarini V, Keller D, 2020, DIY Electronics for Ubiquitous Music Ecosystems. In: Ubiquitous Music Ecologies. England: Routledge, p. 52–70.

 

  1. Ouzounian G, Haworth C, Bennett P, 2017, Speculative Designs: Towards a Social Music. In: International Computer Music Conference.

 

  1. Lucier A, Simon D, 2012, Chambers: Scores by Alvin Lucier. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780819573087

 

  1. Baron-Cohen S, 1999, Evolution of a theory of mind. In: Corballis M, Lea SE, (eds.), The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

  1. Livingstone SR, Thompson WF, 2009, The emergence of music from the theory of mind. Musicae Sci, 13: 83–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864909013002061

 

  1. Rescorla M, 2015, The Computational theory of mind. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/ computational-mind

 

  1. Chakraborty S, Yaseen A, Timoney J, et al., 2022, Adaptive Touchless Whole-Body Interaction for Casual Ubiquitous Musical Activities. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC2022). Limerick, Ireland, p. 3–9.

 

  1. Keller D, Yaseen A, Timoney J, et al., 2023, Banging interaction: A ubimus-design strategy for the musical internet. Future Internet, 15: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15040125

 

  1. Mathews MV, 1961, An acoustic compiler for music and psychological stimuli. Bell Syst Tech J, 40: 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1961.tb03237.x

 

  1. Zheng R, Keller D, Timoney J, et al., 2023, Toward lite Coding: Designing the Emugel Prototype to Boost Music-computational Thinking. In: Proceedings of the Ubiquitous Music Symposium (UbiMus 2023). Derry, Northern Ireland: Ubiquitous Music Group.

 

  1. Lazzarini V, Walsh R, 2023, Aurora-Lattice: Rapid Prototyping and Development of Music Processing Applications. In: Proceedings of the Ubiquitous Music Symposium (UbiMus 2023). Derry, Northern Ireland: Ubiquitous Music Group.

 

  1. Jansen M, Kohen-Vacs D, Otero N, 2018, A Complementary View for Better Understanding the Term Computational Thinking. In: International Conference on Computational Thinking Education, Hong Kong, p. 17.

 

  1. Vaggione H, 2001, Some ontological remarks about music composition processes. Comput Music J, 25: 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892601300126115

 

  1. Keller D, Costa R, 2018, Special issue Música Hodie: Contributions of sound and music computing to current musical and artistic knowledge. Rev Música Hodie, 18: 1. https://doi.org/10.5216/mh.v18i1.53567

 

  1. Wright EO, 2010, Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept