Optimizing 3D printing parameters for lightweight and high-strength unmanned aerial vehicle parts

Additive manufacturing, particularly fused deposition modelling (FDM), has gained increasing attention in aerospace applications due to its capability to produce complex geometries with reduced material usage, making it a promising approach for manufacturing lightweight yet strong unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) parts. In this study, an integrated framework was developed to optimize FDM parameters for producing UAV parts that are both lightweight and high in strength. A response surface methodology was used to analyze the effects of infill percentage, layer height, number of walls, and build plate temperature on the mass and tensile strength of the printed parts. Two regression models with high predictive accuracy were constructed (R2 = 98.2% for mass, R2 = 88.5% for tensile strength). A multi-objective optimization approach was applied, using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II Pareto front analysis in combination with Minitab’s Response Optimizer tool, to identify the optimal combination of parameters. The results showed that layer height, number of walls, and infill percentage, along with their interaction effects and quadratic effects, had the most significant effects on both mass and tensile strength, whereas build plate temperature had negligible effects. The results from the Pareto front analysis revealed the trade-off between minimizing mass and maximizing tensile strength for the parts. The optimal parameter settings (e.g., 58.26% infill percentage, 0.1635-mm layer height, 4 walls, and 65°C build plate temperature) achieved a tensile strength of 47.08 MPa and a mass of 1.60 g, offering a well-balanced strength-to-weight ratio suitable for UAV applications.

- Barua A, Singha S. Simulation Studies for Structural Optimization of A 3D Printable Quadcopter. Conference: 6th International Conference on Mechanical Industrial and Materials Engineering; 2024.
- Chodorek A, Chodorek R, Yastrebov A. Weather sensing in an urban environment with the use of a UAV and WebRTC-based platform: A pilot study. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21:7113. doi: 10.3390/s21217113
- Laghari AA, Jumani AK, Laghari RA, Nawaz H. Unmanned aerial vehicles: A review. Cogn Robotics. 2023;3:8-22. doi: 10.1016/J.COGR.2022.12.004
- Praveena BA, Lokesh N, Buradi A, Santhosh N, Praveena BL, Vignesh R. A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): Methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential. Mater Today Proc. 2022;52:1309-1313. doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.11.059
- Shoeb M, Kumar L, Haleem A, Javaid M. Trends in additive manufacturing: An exploratory study. In: Advances in Additive Manufacturing: Artificial Intelligence, Nature-Inspired, and Biomanufacturing. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2023. p. 15-25. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91834-3.00027-2
- Klenam DEP, McBagonluri F, Asumadu TK, et al. Additive manufacturing: Shaping the future of the manufacturing industry - overview of trends, challenges and opportunities. Appl Eng Sci. 2025;22:100224. doi: 10.1016/J.APPLES.2025.100224
- Kanishka K, Acherjee B. Revolutionizing manufacturing: A comprehensive overview of additive manufacturing processes, materials, developments, and challenges. J Manuf Process. 2023;107:574-619. doi: 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2023.10.024
- Blakey-Milner B, Gradl P, Snedden G, et al. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review. Mater Des. 2021;209:110008. doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2021.110008
- Khan N, Riccio A. A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: Current trends and future directions. Prog Aerospace Sci. 2024;149:101021. doi: 10.1016/J.PAEROSCI.2024.101021
- Alami AH, Ghani Olabi A, Alashkar A, et al. Additive manufacturing in the aerospace and automotive industries: Recent trends and role in achieving sustainable development goals. Ain Shams Eng J. 2023;14(11):102516. doi: 10.1016/J.ASEJ.2023.102516
- Espadinha-Cruz P, Reboredo E. A fuzzy system to measure additive manufacturing maturity: A case study in the automotive industry. Procedia Comput Sci. 2025;253:1402-1411. doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2025.01.202
- Zaman UK, Boesch E, Siadat A, Rivette M, Baqai AA. Impact of fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameters on strength of built parts using Taguchi’s design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;101(5):1215-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-3014-6
- Heidari-Rarani M, Ezati N, Sadeghi P, Badrossamay MR. Optimization of FDM process parameters for tensile properties of polylactic acid specimens using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2020;35(12):2435-2452. doi: 10.1177/0892705720964560
- Kumar MS, Farooq MU, Ross NS, Yang CH, Kavimani V, Adediran AA. Achieving effective interlayer bonding of PLA parts during the material extrusion process with enhanced mechanical properties. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33510-7
- Ramadan S, Altwarah Q, Abu-Shams M, Alkurdi D. Optimizing tensile strength and energy consumption for FDM through mixed-integer nonlinear multi-objective optimization and design of experiments. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30164. doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E30164
- Panico A, Corvi A, Collini L, Sciancalepore C. Multi objective optimization of FDM 3D printing parameters set via design of experiments and machine learning algorithms. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):16753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01016-z
- Medibew T. A comprehensive review on the optimization of the fused deposition modeling process parameter for better tensile strength of PLA-printed parts. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2022;2022:1-11. doi: 10.1155/2022/5490831
- Hamid RA, Husni S, Ito T. Effect of printing orientation and layer thickness on microstructure and mechanical properties of PLA parts. Malays J Compos Sci Manuf. 2022;8:11-23. doi: 10.37934/mjcsm.8.1.1123
- Ahmed NA, Page JR. Manufacture of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for advanced project design using 3D printing technology. Appl Mech Mater. 2013;397-400:970-980. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.397-400.970
- Kantaros A, Drosos C, Papoutsidakis M, Pallis E, Ganetsos T. Composite filament materials for 3D-printed drone parts: Advancements in mechanical strength, weight optimization and embedded electronics. Materials (Basel). 2025;18(11):2465. doi: 10.3390/ma18112465
- Goh GD, Agarwala S, Goh GL, Dikshit V, Sing SL, Yeong WY. Additive manufacturing in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Challenges and potential. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2017;63:140-151. doi: 10.1016/J.AST.2016.12.019
- Huang Y, Tian X, Li W, et al. 3D printing of topologically optimized wing spar with continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng. 2024;272:111166. doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2023.111166
- Goh GD, Toh W, Yap YL, Ng TY, Yeong WY. Additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic for topology optimized unmanned aerial vehicle structures. Compos B Eng. 2021;216:108840. doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.108840
- Syed B, Rhaman Q, Shahriar H, Khan MMA. Grey-Taguchi Approach for Optimizing Fused Deposition Modeling Process in Terms of Mechanical Properties and Dimensional Accuracy. In: Conference: International Conference on Engineering Research and Education School of Applied Science and Technology, SUST, Sylhet; 2021.
- Kumar K, Singh H. Multi-objective optimization of fused deposition modeling for mechanical properties of biopolymer parts using the grey-taguchi method. Chinese J Mech Eng. 2023;36(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s10033-023-00847-z
- Chinchanikar S, Shinde S, Shaikh A, Gaikwad V, Ambhore NH. Multi-objective Optimization of FDM using hybrid genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. J Institut Eng Ser D. 2024;105(1):49-63. doi: 10.1007/s40033-023-00459-w
- Kaptan A, Kartal F. A critical review of composite filaments for fused deposition modeling: Material properties, applications, and future directions. Eur Mech Sci. 2024;8:199-209. doi: 10.26701/ems.1451829