Optimizing of chemical admixtures for 3D printable cementitious materials by central composite design

© 2022 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

Abstract

Printability of 3D printable cementitious materials is related to material rheological properties, and is affected and controlled by modern concrete chemical admixtures. In this work, the influence of several chemical admixtures including superplasticizer, retarder, and accelerator on the rheological characteristics of printable materials was investigated using central composite design (CCD). Twenty test points with varying dosages of chemical admixtures were performed to evaluate the primary effects of chemical admixtures and their combined interactive effects on the rheological properties. The results indicate that with the increase of retarder or superplasticizer dosage, all rheological parameters decrease while accelerator possesses an opposite impact. The rheological properties are negatively proportional to the combined interactive effect of retarder and accelerator. The combined interactive effect of retarder and superplasticizer positively affects dynamic yield stress, plastic viscosity, and thixotropy, while it negatively impacts static yield stress. The combined interactive effect of accelerator and retarder positively affects the yield stress, whereas it negatively influences the plastic viscosity and thixotropy. The results indicate that the CCD is an efficient method to find the desirable formulation within a given boundary.

Keywords

3D concrete printing

Central composites design

Rheological properties

Statistical models

References

[1]

Lu B, Tan MJ, Qian S, 2016, A review of 3D printable construction materials and applications. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing. (Pro-AM 2016), pp330–335. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1465107

[2]

Kondepudi K, Subramaniam KV, Nematollahi B, et al., 2022, Study of particle packing and paste rheology in alkali activated mixtures to meet the rheology demands of 3D Concrete Printing. Cem Concr Compo, 131: 104581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104581

[3]

Xu J, Buswell RA, Kinnell P, et al., 2020, Inspecting manufacturing precision of 3D printed concrete parts based on geometric dimensioning and tolerancing. Autom Constr, 117: 103233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103233

[4]

Weng Y, Li M, Ruan S, et al., 2020, Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach. J Clean Prod, 261: 121245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245

[5]

Zhu B, Pan J, Nematollahi B, et al., 2019, Development of 3D printable engineered cementitious composites with ultra-high tensile ductility for digital construction. Mater Des, 181: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108088

[6]

Buswell R, da Silva WR, Bos P, et al, (2020), A process classification framework for defining and describing digital fabrication with concrete. Cem Concr Res, 134: 106068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106068

[7]

Weng Y, Li M, Liu Z, et al., 2019, Printability and fire performance of a developed 3D printable fibre reinforced cementitious composites under elevated temperatures. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 14: 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1555046

[8]

Weng Y, Lu B, Li M, et al., 2018, Empirical models to predict rheological properties of fiber reinforced cementitious composites for 3D printing. Constr Build Mater, 189: 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.039

[9]

Liu Z, Li M, Weng Y, et al., 2019, Tan, mixture design approach to optimize the rheological properties of the material used in 3D cementitious material printing. Constr Build Mater, 198: 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.252

[10]

Ivanova I, Ivaniuk E, Bisetti S, et al., 2021, Comparison between methods for indirect assessment of buildability in fresh 3D printed mortar and concrete. Cem Concr Res, 156: 106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106764

[11]

Weng Y, Li M, Tan MJ, et al., 2018, Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model. Constr Build Mater, 163: 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.112

[12]

Roussel N, 2018, Rheological requirements for printable concrete. Cem Concr Res, 112: 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005

[13]

Marchon D, Kawashima S, Bessaies-Bey H, et al., 2018, Hydration and rheology control of concrete by admixtures for digital fabrication. Cem Concr Res, 112: 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.014

[14]

Buswell R, Silva WR, Jones SZ, et al., 2018, Dirrenberger, 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research. Cem Concr Res, 112: 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

[15]

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, She W, et al., 2019, Rheological and harden properties of the high-thixotropy 3D printing concrete. Constr Build Mater, 201: 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.061

[16]

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Yang L, et al., 2021, Hardened properties and durability of large-scale 3D printed cement-based materials. Mater Struct, 54: 45. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01632-x

[17]

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu G, et al., 2018, Fresh properties of a novel 3D printing concrete ink. Constr Build Mater, 174: 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.115

[18]

Dressler I, Freund N, Lowke D, 2020, The effect of accelerator dosage on fresh concrete properties and on interlayer strength in shotcrete 3D printing. Materials (Basel), 13: 13020374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020374

[19]

Zhang C, Nerella VN, Krishna A, et al., 2021, Mix design concepts for 3D printable concrete: A review. Cem Concr Compos, 122: 104155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104155

[20]

Yu S, Sanjayan J, Du H, 2022, Effects of cement mortar characteristics on aggregate-bed 3D concrete printing. Addit Manuf, 58: 103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103024

[21]

Yu S, Du H, Sanjayan J, 2020, Aggregate-bed 3D Concrete Printing with Cement Paste Ink. Cem Concr Res, 136: 106169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106169

[22]

Wangler T, Pileggi R, Gürel S, et al., 2022, A chemical process engineering look at digital concrete processes: Critical step design, inline mixing, and scaleup. Cem Concr Res, 155: 106782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106782

[23]

Ramakrishnan S, Kanagasuntharam S, Sanjayan J, 2022, In-line activation of cementitious materials for 3D concrete printing. Cem Concr Compos, 131: 104598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104598

[24]

Rubio-Hernández FJ, Adarve-Castro A, Velázquez- Navarro JF, et al., 2020, Influence of water/cement ratio, and type and concentration of chemical additives on the static and dynamic yield stresses of Portland cement paste. Constr Build Mater, 235: 117744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117744

[25]

Liu JC, Tan KH, Zhang D, 2017, Multi-response optimization of post-fire performance of strain hardening cementitious composite. Cem Concr Compos, 80: 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.001

[26]

Jones R, 2000, Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5th ed. Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.458

[27]

Chen L, Zhang Z, Gong W, et al., 2015, Liang, Quantifying the effects of fuel compositions on GDI-derived particle emissions using the optimal mixture design of experiments. Fuel, 154: 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.081

[28]

Chen L, Liang Z, Liu H, et al., 2017, Sensitivity analysis of fuel types and operational parameters on the particulate matter emissions from an aviation piston engine burning heavy fuels. Fuel, 202: 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.052

[29]

Chen L, Liu Z, Sun P, et al., 2015, Formulation of a fuel spray SMD model at atmospheric pressure using Design of Experiments (DoE). Fuel, 153: 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.013

[30]

Jiao D, Shi C, Yuan Q, et al, (2018), Mixture design of concrete using simplex centroid design method. Cem Concr Compos, 89: 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.001

[31]

Perrot A, Rangeard D, Pierre A, 2016, Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct, 49: 1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0571-0

[32]

Lu B, Li M, Neng T, et al, (2021), Effect of printing parameters on material distribution in spray-based 3D concrete printing (S-3DCP), Autom Constr, 124: 103570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103570

[33]

Roussel N, 2007, A theoretical frame to study stability of fresh concrete. Mater Struct, 39: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-005-9036-1

[34]

Wu D, Cai SJ, Huang G, 2014, Coupled effect of cement hydration and temperature on rheological properties of fresh cemented tailings backfill slurry. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 24: 2954–2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63431-2

[35]

Chen M, Liu B, Li L, et al., 2020, Cheng, Rheological parameters, thixotropy and creep of 3D-printed calcium sulfoaluminate cement composites modified by bentonite, Compos. Part B Eng, 186: 107821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107821

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9635 Published by AccScience Publishing