AccScience Publishing / IJOCTA / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJOCTA026090035
Submit to IJOCTA
Cite this article
4
Download
14
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Investigation of the elastic–plastic behavior of pipes and vertical risers in offshore hydraulic structures

Latif F. Aslanov1,2∗ ,  Ulvi L. Aslanli1,2
Show Less
1 “OilGasScientificResearchProject'' Institute, State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), Baku, Azerbaijan
2 Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, Baku, Azerbaijan
IJOCTA, 026090035 https://doi.org/10.36922/IJOCTA026090035
Received: 1 March 2026 | Revised: 3 April 2026 | Accepted: 8 April 2026 | Published online: 20 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
XML
Cite
Abstract

This article investigates the stability and strength of tubular elements in offshore oil and gas structures, considering internal fluid flow, centrifugal forces, and material nonlinearity. The main objective is to analyze the deformation of tubular elements under various fluid flow regimes and assess their stability under eccentricity and initial imperfections. Both elastic and elastoplastic material models are employed, along with the effects of distributed loads and axial forces. An increase in fluid flow velocity leads to significant changes in element behavior, reducing structural stability. The small parameter method is applied to capture nonlinear effects more accurately, providing analytical solutions for additional bending and their influence on structural stability. This approach allows for precise evaluation of tubular element behavior under internal fluid flow conditions and can be applied to the design, strength calculation, and optimization of pipelines and other hydraulic structures. Although fractional derivatives were not applied in this study, it is acknowledged that they have gained significant importance in modern research as powerful tools. These derivatives offer new analytical perspectives for modeling complex physical systems and have been increasingly used in various fields such as engineering, physics, and applied mathematics. The results contribute to practical engineering recommendations, operational improvement, and the design optimization of offshore infrastructure, ensuring applicability to a wide range of nonlinear structural mechanics problems.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Standpipe
Offshore structures
Pipeline systems
Follower forces
Nonlinear theory
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Al-Kwradi M, Altarawneh M. Degradation path-ways of amino acids during thermal utiliza-tion of biomass: a review. Front Chem Sci Eng. 2024;18:78. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-024-2433-1
  2. Alam S, Manzur T, Matthews J, et al. Exper-imental and analytical investigation on friction resistance force between buried coated pressur-ized steel pipes and soil. Front Struct Civ Eng. 2024;18:615-629. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1017-y
  3. Arroussi C, Belalia A, & Meliani Tempera-ture effects on the resistance capacity of API X60 pipe elbow under bending moment using X-FEM method. J Mech Sci Technol. 2024;38:661-669. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0114-0
  4. Arun Sundaram B, Kesavan K, & Parivallal Re-cent Advances in Health Monitoring and Assess-ment of In-service Oil and Gas Buried Pipelines. J Inst Eng India Ser. 2018;99:729-740. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0316-5
  5. Asif R, Lee HW, & Hu Oil plant piping structure multi-factor optimization approach for enhancing fatigue life using one-way FSI analysis. J Mech Sci Technol. 2025;39:4027-4042. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-025-0627-1
  6. Aslanov Wave interaction of offshore struc-ture and shelf soil through large section piles with a ‘hard core’ on the half-space model. Neft khozyaystvo. 2015a;(2):78-81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286 035701 Wave interaction of offshore structure a nd shelf subgrade through the large cross-secti on pile with rigid core along the model of sem ispace
  7. Aslanov LF. Interaction between large cross sections bored piles with ‘hard core’ under dynamic loads and shelf soils. Sci Bull Natl Min Univ. 2015b;(5):21-25. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Nvngu_2015_5_5.pdf
  8. Aslanov “Reflected waves from bored or CFA piles of large section in the offshore soils. Neft khozyaystvo. 2016;7:112-116. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318 492911 Reflected waves from bored or CFA pil es of large section in the offshore soils
  9. Aslanov LF. Optimization of the Calculation of the Piles of Fixed Offshore Platforms. In: El-Askary H, Erguler ZA, Karakus M0, Chamin´e, I. (eds)  Research  De-velopments  in  Geotech-nics, Geo-Informatics and Remote Sensing. CAJG 2019. Advances in Science Technology & Innova-tion. Springer, Cham. 2022. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72896-0 32

 

 

  1. Aslanov LF, Aslanli UL. Study of the stress-strain state of the pontoon element of the support block. SOCAR 2024a;2:115-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.5510/OGP20240200976
  2. Aslanov  LF,  Aslanli    Study  of  Marine  Hy-draulic Structures Under Seismic Effects. In: Ksibi M, et al. Recent Advances in Environmental Sci-ence from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surround-ing Regions (4th Edition). EMCEI 2022. Advances in  Science  Technology  &  Innovation.  Springer, Cham. 2024b. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51904-8 193
  3. Aslanov LF, Aslanli UL. Determination of load-bearing capacity of piles used in station-ary offshore platforms. SOCAR Proceedings. 2024c;1:116-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.5510/OGP240100949
  4. Aslanov LF, Aslanov Choosing an Effec-tive Design Solution for Fixing Offshore Hydro-Technical Structures to Shelf Ground. In: C¸ iner A, et al. Recent Research on Geotechnical Engineer-ing, Remote Sensing, Geophysics and Earthquake Seismology. MedGU 2021. Advances in Science Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. 2024a. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43218- 7 22
  5. Aslanov LF, Aslanov Some Tasks of Increas-ing  and  Identifying  the  Reserves  of  the  Bear-ing  Capacity  of  Anchor  Fastenings  of  Offshore Fixed Platforms. In: Bezzeghoud M, et al. Recent Research on Geotechnical Engineering, Remote Sensing, Geophysics and Earthquake Seismology. MedGU 2022. Advances in Science Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. 2024b. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48715-6 10
  6. Aslanov LF, Aslanli UL, Aslanov Construc-tion of foundations for reservoirs in the Caspian Sea. SOCAR Proceedings. 2024;(1):29-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5510/OGP2024SI101031
  7. Aslanov LF, Aslanli UL, Aslanov FL. New calcu-lation method for the pontoon element of offshore fixed platforms for oil and gas production. Nafta-Gaz 2025;3:188-198. https://www.doi.org/10.18668/NG.2025.03.05
  8. Aslanov LF, Aslanov Local Stability of Ele-ments from Sealed Pipes of Fixed Offshore Plat-forms. In: C¸ iner A, et al. Recent  Research  on Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, Paleontology, Tec-tonics, Geochemistry, Volcanology and Petroleum Geology. MedGU 2023. Advances in Science Tech-nology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. 2025. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87558-8 38
  9. Aslanov LF, & Aslanli UL. A methodology for calculating the load-bearing capacity of pile foun-dations in offshore hydraulic structures based on principles of rational An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications. 2026;16(1):138-159. https://www.doi.org/10.36922/IJOCTA025340146
  10. Bochkarev SV, Galinovskii AL. & Salnikov AF. A Vibroacoustic Method for Diagnosing the Influ-ence of Impulse Load on Fiberglass Pipes. Polym Sci Ser. 2022;15:652-657. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1995421222040025
  11. Carloni ACN, Conde KEd, Pantale˜ao AV, et Validation and analysis of turbulence modeling in pipe elbow under secondary flow conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2022;44:595. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03899-9
  12. Chen H, Cui J, Li Y, et (2025) Influence of Internal Water on Dynamic Response of Underground Pipelines. Soil Mech Found Eng. 2025;62:348-356. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11204-025-10067-3
  13. Chen W, Cao Y, Guo X, et al. Nonlinear vibra-tion analysis of pipeline considering the effects of soft nonlinear clamp. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2022;43:1555-1568. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-022-2903-7
  14. Chen W, Qu X, Zhang R, et al. Nonlinear stress analysis of aero-engine pipeline based on semi-analytical method. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2025;46:521-538. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-025-3225-8
  15. Chinchanikar S, Mulik  H,  Varude  P,  et    A review  of  emerging  hydroforming  technologies: design  considerations,  parametric  studies,  and recent innovations. J Eng Appl Sci. 2024;71:205. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00546-z
  16. Da Silva DL, Echer L, Rojo Tanzi BN, et al. Experimental investigation of the structural per-formance of fiber-reinforced patches in the repair of locally damaged steel pipes. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2023;45:435. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04348-x
  17. Du X, Li Z, Fang H, et Numerical and practical investigation of the multiple hole grouting repair law of underground drainage pipeline defects. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 2023;82:44. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03070-1
  18. Eipakchi H, Nasrekani FM, & Ahmadi An analytical approach for the vibration behavior of  viscoelastic cylindrical shells under internal moving pressure. Acta Mech. 2020;231:3405-3418. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02719-2
  19. Fan H, Xie Y, & Wang Stress-strain model of austenitic stainless steel for pressure vessel design. J Mech Sci Technol. 2023;37:481-3494. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0613-4
  20. Fu C, Quan L, Geng Y, et al. (2025) Dynamic response of reinforced soft tubes: A numerical and experimental J Mech Sci Technol. 2025;39:3883-3896. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-025-0612-8
  21. Gan Cb, Guo Sq, Lei H, et al. Random uncertainty modeling and vibration analysis of a straight pipe conveying fluid. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014;77:503-519. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1313-5
  22. Gholami M, Eftekhari M. Nonlinear forced vibra-tion in a subcritical regime of a porous function-ally graded pipe conveying fluid with a retain-ing clip. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2025;46:101- https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-025-3206-9
  23. Guo J, Zhang Y, Cheng Y, et Study on urban ground collapse induced by defec-tive pipelines based on physical model ex-periments and numerical simulation. Sci Rep. 2025;15:6085. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90146-5
  24. Guo X, Liu Q, Han X, et al. High-precision nu-merical modeling of the projectile launch and fail-ure mechanism analysis of projectile-borne com-ponents. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2025;46:885- https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-025-3254-9
  25. Hajiyev MA, Huseynov IG, Hajiyeva UM, Alaeva SM. Calculation of metal elements deflection using a three-line strain di-agram. SOCAR 2024;2:109-114. https://www.doi.org/10.5510/OGP20240200975
  26. Hern´a ndez-Rojo MA, Alamilla-Lopez JL, Dominguez-Aguilar MA, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of failure in flex-ible pipe by a mechanism of intentional J Mech Sci Technol. 2020;34:1979-1988. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0419-6
  27. Huang M, Qian X, Xu J, et Evalu-ation of the submarine debris-flow hazard risks to planned subsea pipeline systems: a case study in the Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin. 2023;42:139-153. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s13131-022-2123-0
  28. Iskandarov EKh, Ismayilova FB, Shukurlu MF, Ismayilova PSh. Changes in energy character-istics of pipeline systems considering hydrody-namic loads. SOCAR Proceedings. 2024;(2):105- https://www.doi.org/10.5510/OGP20240200974
  29. Iskandarov STUDY OF STRUC-TURAL CHANGES IN MULTI-FACETED GAS PIPELINES. SO-CAR Proceedings. 2024;(4):117-122. https://www.doi.org/10.5510/OGP20240401026
  30. Ji L, Li Y, Li W, et Investigation of vortex dynamics diagnosis in the stall state of mixed-flow pump with blade gap size effect. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2023;45:395. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04268-w

 

 

  1. Jones JF, Raj V, Abas PE, et Ap-plication of artificial intelligence for asset integrity management of offshore oil and gas pipelines. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng. 2025. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s41872-025-00353-2
  2. Kandil M, El-Sayed TA, & Kamal AM. Un-veiling the impact of pipe materials on wa-ter hammer in pressure pipelines: an ex-perimental and numerical study. Sci Rep. 2024;14:30599. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80853-w
  3. Khan M, Khan N, Ullah I, Shah K, Ab-deljawad T, & Abdalla A novel fractal fractional mathematical model for HIV/AIDS transmission stability and sensitivity with numerical analysis. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):23. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93436-0
  4. Kovtun AV, Tabunenko VO, Nesterenko S, et Determining the Strength of Tanks with Fluid in the Case of Free Dropping. Int Appl Mech. 2023;59:107-113. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10778-023-01204-2
  5. Kubenko VD, Koval’chuk Stability and Nonlinear Vibrations of Closed Cylin-drical Shells Interacting with a Fluid Flow (Review). Int Appl Mech. 2015;51:12-63. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10778-015-0672-z
  6. Lee Y, Lee ET. Analysis of prestressed con-crete cylinder pipes with fiber reinforced polymer. KSCE J Civ 2015;19:682-688. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0006-9
  7. Lu P, Sheng X, Gao Y, et Influ-ence of Shear Effects on the Characteris-tics of Axisymmetric Wave Propagation in a Buried Fluid-Filled Pipe. Chin J Mech Eng. 2022;35:74. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00710-7
  8. Lu W, Li Z, Tang X, et Effects of Operation Parameters on Heat Transfer in Tubular Moving Bed Heat Exchangers: A CFD-DEM Study. J Therm Sci. 2025;34:542-554. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11630-024-2063-4
  9. Luan Y, Zhuang Y, Wang G et Defor-mation behavior in the tube hydro-pressing of rectangular cross-section components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2025;138:4561-4575. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15751-0
  10. Li F, An C, Duan M, et In-plane and out-of-plane dynamics of curved pipes conveying fluid by integral trans-form method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2019;41:542. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-2053-8
  11. Li G, Liu G, Wang H, et Throt-tle valve erosion in the oil and gas industry. J Mater Sci. 2024;59:20874-20899. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-10334-y
  12. Li P, Zhang Z, Wang W, et Vi-bration Manipulation Properties of Phononic Crystals and Acoustic Meta-materials for Fluid-Conveying Pipeline Systems: A Review. J Vib Eng Technol. 2025;13:114. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01673-w
  13. Lin J, Li Z, Ning Z, et On the mech-anism of the post buckling and the ini-tiation of a propagating buckle in sand-wich pipelines based on shear deformation theory. J Mech Sci Technol. 2025;39:777-793. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-025-0122-8
  14. List A, Huang C, Wiehler L, et In-fluence of Ductility on Fracture in Ten-sile Testing of Cold Gas Sprayed De-posits. J Therm Spray Tech. 2023;32:1780-1795. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11666-023-01598-y
  15. Liu Hl, Hou C, Li L, et Experimen-tal investigation on flow properties of ce-mented paste backfill through L-pipe and loop-pipe tests. J Cent South Univ. 2021;28:2830-2842. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11771-021-4810-y

 

 

  1. Mao X, Ding H, & Chen Bending vi-bration control of pipes conveying fluids by nonlinear torsional absorbers at the bound-ary. Sci China Technol Sci. 2021;64:1690-1704. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1791-2
  2. Okolie O, Latto J, Faisal N, et al. Man-ufacturing Defects in Thermoplastic Com-posite Pipes and Their Effect on the in-situ Performance of Thermoplastic Com-posite Pipes in Oil and Gas Applica-tions. Appl Compos 2023;30:231-306. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10443-022-10066-9
  3. Orjiocha SI, Eze FC, Salem MAS, et Plant-derived extracts for mitigating scale formation in pipelines and industrial systems: a review of status. Discov Mater.2025;5:201. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s43939-025-00365-w
  4. Orynyak IV, Dubyk YR, & Batura Anal-ysis of Fluid-Induced Vibrations of Long Branched Pipelines. Strength Mater. 2015;47:314-331. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11223-015-9661-z
  5. Pacheco A, Viotti M, Veiga CN, et al. Eval-uation of Bending Stresses in Pipelines by Using Hole-drilling Measurements Combined with Interferometry. Exp Mech. 2016;56:133- https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0079-0
  6. Parviz M, Aminnejad B, & Fiouz Nu-merical simulation of dynamic response of water in buried pipeline under ex-plosion. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2017;21:2798-2806. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0889-y
  7. Plasencia J, Inkson N, & Nydal Research on the viscosity of stabilized emulsions in different pipe diameters us-ing pressure drop and phase inversion. Exp Comput Multiph Flow. 2022;4:241-263. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s42757-020-0102-2
  8. Rajabiani E, Gharib MR, & Koochi A. Buckling Analysis of Groove Corroded Pipe Due to Axial Pressure with Finite Element Method. Int J Steel 2021;21:1723-1740. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00531-9
  9. Rao Y, Wang Y, Wang S, et Numer-ical simulation study on the influence of bend diameter rate on the flow characteris-tics of nature gas hydrate particles. Sci Rep. 2024;14:31604. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77890-w
  10. Ren J, Zhao Y, Zhang X, et al. Design of a Deformable Pipeline for Efficient Recovery of Protective Coal Pillars. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04811-2
  11. Seyfipour I, Mirghaderi R, & Bahaari Buckling and stability of subsea HP/HT pipelines on laterally sloping seabeds. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy. 2023;9:1-23. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40722-022-00245-y
  12. Shah K, Abdeljawad T, Abdalla B, et al. Analyzing a coupled dynamical sys-tem of materials recycling in chemo-stat systems with artificial deep neu-ral network. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2025;11:313. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40808-025-02473-1
  13. Sher M, Shah K, Ali Z, & Abdeljawad T. Us-ing deep neural network in computational anal-ysis of coupled systems of fractional integro-differential equations. J Comput Appl Math. 2025;474:116912. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2025.116912
  14. Shishesaz M, Gatea AH, Moradi S, et Stress analysis in the buried polyethy-lene pipes with viscoelastic behavior: a finite element study. Discov Appl Sci. 2024;6:616. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06331-0
  15. Singh J, Gill HS, & Vasudev Computa-tional fluid dynamics analysis on role of par-ticulate shape and size in erosion of pipe bends. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2023;17:2631-2646. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-01094-7

 

 

  1. Song S, Liu G, He S, et Study on the gas flow resistance state in un-stable collapse boreholes and the clas-sification of borehole types. Sci Rep. 2025;15:14433. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99387-w
  2. Sun W, Wu J, Su S-F, & Zhao X. Neural network-based fixed-time tracking control for input-quantized nonlinear systems with actua-tor faults. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net-works and Learning Systems. 2024;35(3):3978- https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022. 3201504
  3. Sun Z, Yu R, Wang X, et Dy-namic analysis of liquid-filled clamp-pipe systems based on the spectral element method. Arch Appl Mech. 2025;95:24. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00419-024-02723-1
  4. Tang Y, Zhang HJ, Chen LQ, et al. Recent progress on dynamics and control of pipes conveying fluid. Nonlinear Dyn. 2025;113:6253- https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10486-1
  5. Valli J, Majumder M, Venkatraman S, et al. Numerical study of pipe-soil interaction un-der lateral movements on different types of seabed J Ocean Eng Mar Energy. 2025. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40722-025-00434-5
  6. Wang Py, Wan Gh, Wang Zj, et al. In-vestigation on the stress-strain rate curve of MR fluids in a combined mode and its application in sheet flexible-die form-ing. Int J Adv Manuf 2021;117:67-79. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07301-1
  7. Wang My, Yao Hy, Liu Yf, et Under-standing and probing progression of localized corrosion on inner walls of steel pipelines: an overview. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2025;32:1–18. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s42243-024-01213-6
  8. Wang ZY, Liu JC, Tan Y, et Exper-imental and numerical investigation on in-ternal erosion induced by infiltration of de-fective buried pipe. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 2025;84:38. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-04073-2
  9. Wu HG, Yu JH, Shi CZ, et Pipe-Soil Interaction and Sensitivity Study of Large-Diameter Buried Steel Pipes. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2021;25:793-804. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0392-3
  10. Wu T, Yu H, Jiang N, et Theoret-ical analysis of the deformation for steel gas pipes taking into account shear ef-fects under surface explosion loads. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8658. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12698-0
  11. Yeganeh M, Heydarie Y, Shahryari Z, et al. Corrosion Inhibitor of API Pipeline Steels: A Review. J Bio Tribo Corros. 2025;11:44. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40735-025-00965-2
  12. Xue X, Zhu J, & Sang Study on design pressure  of  in-service  welding pipes.  SCI CHINA SER E. 2006;49:434-444. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11431-006-2005-2
  13. Yu C, Guo Z, Pan Z, et Performance and Stress Analysis of Flat-Tubular Solid Ox-ide Fuel Cells Fueled with Methane and Hy-drogen. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2025;38:402-414. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10338-024-00514-3
  14. Yu J, Wu M, Sun Z, et Research progress of buckling propagation experiment of deep-water pipelines. Trans Tianjin Univ. 2016;22:285-293. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-2801-0
  15. Yu J, An C, Zhang Y, et Experimental and Numerical Study on Vortex-Induced Vi-bration Suppression by Helical Strakes on Sub-sea Pipelines. J Marine Sci Appl. 2025;24: 580-592. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11804-025-00650-3
  16. Yuan J, Sun W, Sun Y, & Su S-F. Mask privacy preservation prescribed-time consen-sus control for nonlinear multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2025;22:11554- https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2025.3535924
  17. Yue C, Ma Q, Yang Z, et al. Multi-jointed pneumatic sealing disc of fluid-driven pipeline robot: impacts of structural parameters on performance. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2024;46:80. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04655-3
  18. Zangeneh Fitness-for-Service Assessment of Local Thin Area in a Line Pipe. J Fail Anal & Preven. 2021;21:1085-1095. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-021-01161-3
  19. Zeng D, Luo J, Ke R, et Research Progress on Tribo-Corrosion Behavior of Oil Country Tubular Goods: A Review. J Bio Tribo Corros. 2025;11:122. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40735-025-01048-y
  20. Zhang H, Li Y, Xu Z, et Modal analysis of PE pipeline un-der seabed dynamic pressure. Sci Rep. 2024;14:29198. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80583-z
  21. Zhang H, Zhang J, Lin R, Wang Y. Damage Mechanism Investigation of Offshore Pipelines Impacted by Falling Objects. In: Submarine Pipeline Integrity: Assessment of Failure Modes and Advanced Evaluation Techniques. Ocean Engineering & Oceanography. Springer, Cham. 2025;28. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92092-9 3
  22. Zhang W, Sun W, Yuan W, et al. Progress and prospect of particle finite element method for large deformation simulation in geotechnical engineering. Comp Part Mech. 2025;12:1893-1911. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40571-025-01000-4
  23. Zhao D, Liu J, & Wu Stability and lo-cal bifurcation of parameter-excited vibration of pipes conveying pulsating fluid under thermal loading. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2015;36:1017-1032. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-015-1960-7
Next article in this issue
Share
Back to top
An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, Electronic ISSN: 2146-5703 Print ISSN: 2146-0957, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept