Enzymatic post-crosslinking of printed hydrogels of methacrylated gelatin and tyramine-conjugated 8-arm poly(ethylene glycol) to prepare interpenetrating 3D network structures
Methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) has been intensively studied as a 3D printable scaffold material in tissue regeneration fields, which can be attributed to its wellknown biological functions. However, the long-term stability of photo-crosslinked GelMA scaffolds is hampered by a combination of its fast degradation in the presence of collagenase and the loss of physical crosslinks at higher temperatures. To increase the longer-term shape stability of printed scaffolds, a mixture of GelMA and tyramine-conjugated 8-arm PEG (8PEGTA) was used to create filaments composed of an interpenetrating network (IPN). Photo-crosslinking during filament deposition of the GelMA and subsequent enzymatic crosslinking of the 8PEGTA were applied to the printed 3D scaffolds. Although both crosslinking mechanisms are radical based, they operate without interference of each other. Rheological data of bulk hydrogels showed that the IPN was an elastic hydrogel, having a storage modulus of 6 kPa, independent of temperature in the range of 10 – 40°C. Tensile and compression moduli were 110 kPa and 80 kPa, respectively. On enzymatic degradation in the presence of collagenase, the gelatin content of the IPN fully degraded in 7 days, leaving a stable secondary crosslinked 8PEGTA network. Using a BioMaker bioprinter, hydrogels without and with human osteosarcoma cells (hMG-63) were printed. On culturing for 21 days, hMG-63 in the GelMA/8PEGTA IPN showed a high cell viability (>90%). Thus, the presence of the photoinitiator, incubation with H2 O2 , and mechanical forces during printing did not hamper cell viability. This study shows that the GelMA/8PEGTA ink is a good candidate to generate cell-laden bioinks for extrusion-based printing of constructs for tissue engineering applications.
Hoffman AS, 2002, Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 54: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00239-3
Guan XF, Avci-Adali M, Alarcin E, et al., 2017, Development of hydrogels for regenerative engineering. Biotechnol J, 12:1600394. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600394
Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W, et al., 2017, A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Adv Mater, 29: 1604983. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604983
Annabi N, Tamayol A, Uquillas JA, et al., 2014, 25th anniversary article: Rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater, 26: 85–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201303233
Hoch E, Hirth T, Tovar GE, et al., 2013, Chemical tailoring of gelatin to adjust its chemical and physical properties for functional bioprinting. J Mater Chem B, 1: 5675–5685. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB20745E
Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al., 2014, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials, 35: 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
O’Connell CD, Onofrillo C, Duchi S, et al., 2019, Evaluation of sterilisation methods for bio-ink components: Gelatin, gelatin methacryloyl, hyaluronic acid and hyaluronic acid methacryloyl. Biofabrication, 11: 035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0b7c
Choi JR, Yong KW, Choi JY, et al., 2019, Recent advances in photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biotechniques 66: 40–53. https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2018-0083
Schuurman W, Levett PA, Pot MW, et al., 2013, Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol Biosci, 13: 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201200471
Klotz BJ, Gawlitta D, Rosenberg AJ, et al., 2016, Gelatin-methacryloyl hydrogels: Towards biofabrication-based tissue repair. Trends Biotechnol, 34: 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.002
Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73: 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
Liang J, Guo Z, Timmerman A, et al., 2019, Enhanced mechanical and cell adhesive properties of photo-crosslinked PEG hydrogels by incorporation of gelatin in the networks. Biomed Mater, 14: 024102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aaf31b
Yoon HJ, Shin SR, Cha JM, et al., 2016, Cold water fish gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel for tissue engineering application. PLoS One, 11: e0163902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163902
Zhu M, Wang Y, Ferracci G, et al., 2019, Gelatin methacryloyl and its hydrogels with an exceptional degree of controllability and batch-to-batch consistency. Sci Rep, 9: 6863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42186-x
Bakaic E, Smeets NM, Hoare T, 2015, Injectable hydrogels based on poly(ethylene glycol) and derivatives as functional biomaterials. RSC Adv, 5: 35469–35486. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA13581D
Moore EM, West JL, 2019, Bioactive poly(ethylene glycol) acrylate hydrogels for regenerative engineering. Regen Eng Transl Med, 5: 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-018-0074-y
Ooi HW, Kocken JM, Morgan FL, et al., 2020, Multivalency enables dynamic supramolecular host-guest hydrogel formation. Biomacromolecules, 21: 2208–2217. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00148
Sim SL, He T, Tscheliessnig A, et al., 2012, Branched polyethylene glycol for protein precipitation. Biotechnol Bioeng, 109: 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24343
Wang J, Zhang F, Tsang WP, et al., 2017, Fabrication of injectable high strength hydrogel based on 4-arm star PEG for cartilage tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 120: 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.12.015
Skardal A, Devarasetty M, Kang HW, et al., 2015, A hydrogel bioink toolkit for mimicking native tissue biochemical and mechanical properties in bioprinted tissue constructs. Acta Biomater, 25: 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.030
Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, et al., 2015, A multilateral bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27: 1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405076
Liang J, Dijkstra PJ, Poot AA, et al., 2022, Hybrid hydrogels based on methacrylate-functionalized gelatin (GelMA) and synthetic polymers. Biomed Mater Devices. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-022-00023-2
Pereira RF, Bartolo PJ, 2015, 3D bioprinting of photocrosslinkable hydrogel constructs. J Appl Polym Sci, 132: 42458–42473. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42458
Decante G, Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, et al., 2021, Engineering bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 13: 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abec2c
Gao G, Yonezawa T, Hubbell K, et al., 2015, Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging. Biotechnol J, 10: 1568–1577. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400635
Daniele MA, Adams AA, Naciri J, et al., 2014, Interpenetrating networks based on gelatin methacrylamide and PEG formed using concurrent thiol click chemistries for hydrogel tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 35: 1845–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.009
Pacelli S, Rampetsreiter K, Modaresi S, et al., 2018, Fabrication of a double-cross-linked interpenetrating polymeric network (IPN) hydrogel surface modified with polydopamine to modulate the osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10: 24955–24962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b05200
Schipani R, Scheurer S, Florentin R, et al., 2020, Reinforcing interpenetrating network hydrogels with 3D printed polymer networks to engineer cartilage mimetic composites. Biofabrication, 12: 035011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8708
Zhang X, Kim GJ, Kang MG, et al., 2018, Marine biomaterial-based bioinks for generating 3D printed tissue constructs. Mar Drugs, 16: 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16120484
Jeon O, Shin JY, Marks R, et al., 2017, Highly elastic and tough interpenetrating polymer network-structured hybrid hydrogels for cyclic mechanical loading-enhanced tissue engineering. Chem Mater, 29: 8425–8432. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02995
Seyedmahmoud R, Çelebi-Saltik B, Barros N, et al., 2019, Three-dimensional bioprinting of functional skeletal muscle tissue using gelatin methacryloyl-alginate bioinks. Micromachines (Basel), 10: 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10100679
Fares MM, Sani ES, Lara RP, et al., 2018, Interpenetrating network gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and pectin-g-PCL hydrogels with tunable properties for tissue engineering. Biomater Sci, 6: 2938–2950. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00474a
Berger AJ, Linsmeier KM, Kreeger PK, et al., 2017, Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials, 141: 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.039
Xiao W, He J, Nichol JW, et al., 2011, Synthesis and characterization of photocrosslinkable gelatin and silk fibroin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 7: 2384–2393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.016
Shin H, Olsen BD, Khademhosseini A, 2012, The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules. Biomaterials, 33: 3143–3152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.050
Serban MA, Kaplan DL, 2010, pH-sensitive ionomeric particles obtained via chemical conjugation of silk with poly(amino acid)s. Biomacromolecules, 11: 3406–3412. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100925s
Park KM, Ko KS, Joung YK, et al., 2011, In situ cross-linkable gelatin-poly(ethylene glycol)-tyramine hydrogel viaenzyme-mediated reaction for tissue regenerative medicine. J Mater Chem, 21: 13180–13187. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM12527C
Jin R, Teixeira LS, Dijkstra PJ, et al., 2010, Enzymatically-crosslinked injectable hydrogels based on biomimetic dextran-hyaluronic acid conjugates for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31: 3103–3113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.013
Wang R, Leber N, Buhl C, et al., 2014, Cartilage adhesive and mechanical properties of enzymatically crosslinked polysaccharide tyramine conjugate hydrogels. Polym Advan Technol, 25: 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3286
Wei Q, Xu M, Liao C, et al., 2016, Printable hybrid hydrogel by dual enzymatic polymerization with superactivity. Chem Sci, 7: 2748–2752. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SC02234G
Wang R, Both SK, Geven M, et al., 2015, Kinetically stable metal ligand charge transfer complexes as crosslinks in nanogels/hydrogels: Physical properties and cytotoxicity. Acta Biomater, 26: 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.019
Fantini V, Bordoni M, Scocozza F, et al., 2019, Bioink composition and printing parameters for 3D modeling neural tissue. Cells, 8:830. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8080830
Wang R, Huang X, Zoetebier B, et al., 2023, Enzymatic co-crosslinking of star-shaped poly(ethylene glycol) tyramine and hyaluronic acid tyramine conjugates provides elastic biocompatible and biodegradable hydrogels. Bioact Mater, 20: 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.020
Danielson AP, Van-Kuren DB, Bornstein JP, et al., 2018, Investigating the mechanism of horseradish peroxidase as a RAFT-initiase. Polymers (Basel), 10: 741–755. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070741
Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, et al., 2010, Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials, 31: 5536–5544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
Krishnamoorthy S, Noorani B, Xu C, 2019, Effects of encapsulated cells on the physical-mechanical properties and microstructure of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Int J Mol Sci, 20: 5061–5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205061
Gai HJ, Wu J, Wu CY, et al., 2015, Synthesis and characterization of thermosensitive hydrogel with improved mechanical properties. J Mater Res, 30: 2400–2407. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2015.233