AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 10 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.1931
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
208
Download
1949
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

3D-bioprinted bone scaffolds incorporating SR1 nanoparticles enhance blood vessel regeneration in rat calvarial defects

KyeongWoong Yang1,2 ,  Donghyun Lee1 ,  Kyoung Ho Lee1 ,  Woong Bi Jang2 ,  Hye Ji Lim2 ,  Eun Ji Lee2 ,  Hojun Jeon3 ,  Donggu Kang3 ,  Gi Hoon Yang3 ,  KyeongHyeon Lee4 ,  Yong-Il Shin4,5 ,  Sang-Cheol Han6 ,  SangHyun An1* ,  Sang-Mo Kwon2*
Show Less
1 Preclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation (K-MEDI Hub), Dong-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
2 Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Biology, Department of Physiology, Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
3 Research Institute of Additive Manufacturing and Regenerative Medicine, Baobab Healthcare Inc., Ansan, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
4 Science of Convergence, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
5 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
6 CEN Co., Ltd. Nano-Convergence Center, Miryang, Republic of Korea
IJB 2024, 10(3), 1931 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1931
Submitted: 27 September 2023 | Accepted: 3 November 2023 | Published: 19 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D printing of bioinspired materials)
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

The inherent limitations of bone grafting in the treatment of critical-sized bone defects have led to a growing demand for bone repair implants. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising manufacturing technique for implants, offering flexibility in their structural design and the use of applicable materials. Although numerous 3D-bioprinted bone scaffolds have been developed to enhance osteogenesis, angiogenesis remains a challenge. Angiogenesis is crucial for successful bone healing because the process forms blood vessels to deliver essential nutrients and oxygen. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play a pivotal role in the early stages of vascularization. These cells, capable of differentiating into endothelial cells (ECs), are recruited from the bone marrow to the injured area during the healing process. CD34+ cells, a subset of EPCs, have gained attention because of their neovascularization potential and ability to contribute to bone regeneration. The incorporation of CD34+ cell-enhancing factors into 3D-printed bone scaffolds may facilitate successful bone healing in critical defects. StemRegenin-1 (SR1), a molecule that promotes CD34+ cell expansion, has shown promising results in increasing CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell populations. This study aimed to investigate the sustained release of SR1 from a collagen-based scaffold integrated with mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) to promote angiogenesis and enhance bone healing. The sustained release of SR1 from the collagen scaffold is hypothesized to promote angiogenesis, thereby facilitating bone repair. In vitro studies have demonstrated the angiogenic potential of SR1; however, further in vivo investigations are required to establish its clinical efficacy. This study contributes to the development of novel therapies targeting CD34+ cells and demonstrates the potential of SR1 as a promising agent for promoting angiogenesis and enhancing bone healing in critical defects.

Keywords
3D printing
Bone scaffold
Angiogenesis
Calvarial defect
Bone regeneration
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation (NRF2020R1A2C2101297 and 2022R1A5A2027161) funded by the Korean government, the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project number: 1711179402, RS-2022- 00140622), and South Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy via the 2021 Outstanding Company Research Center Promotion Project (ATC+).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Roberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis. 2012;8(4):114-124. doi: 10.4161/org.23306
  2. Zhang L, Yang G, Johnson BN, Jia X. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Acta Biomater. 2019;84:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039
  3. Wang H, Su K, Su L, Liang P, Ji P, Wang C. The effect of 3D-printed Ti(6)Al(4)V scaffolds with various macropore structures on osteointegration and osteogenesis: a biomechanical evaluation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;88:488-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.049
  4. Pei X, Ma L, Zhang B, et al. Creating hierarchical porosity hydroxyapatite scaffolds with osteoinduction by three-dimensional printing and microwave sintering. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):045008. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa90ed
  5. Dadhich P, Das B, Pal P, et al. A simple approach for an eggshell-based 3D-printed osteoinductive multiphasic calcium phosphate scaffold. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(19):11910-11924. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b11981
  6. Raisian S, Fallahi HR, Khiabani KS, Heidarizadeh M, Azdoo S. Customized titanium mesh based on the 3D printed model vs. manual intraoperative bending of titanium mesh for reconstructing of orbital bone fracture: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017;12(3):154-158. doi: 10.2174/1574887112666170821165206
  7. Kuttappan S, Mathew D, Jo JI, et al. Dual release of growth factor from nanocomposite fibrous scaffold promotes vascularisation and bone regeneration in rat critical sized calvarial defect. Acta Biomater. 2018;78:36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.050
  8. Rouwkema J, Rivron NC, van Blitterswijk CA. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechonol. 2008;26(8):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009
  9. Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization and role in vacular biology. Circ Res. 2004;95(4):343-353. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000137877.89448.78
  10. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275(5302):964-967. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5302.964
  11. Hertweck J, Ritz U, Götz H, Schottel PC, Rommens PM, Hofmann A. CD34(+) cells seeded in collagen scaffolds promote bone formation in a mouse calvarial defect model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(4):1505-1516. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33956
  12. Kawamoto A, Iwasaki H, Kusano K, et al. CD34-positive cells exhibit increased potency and safety for therapeutic neovascularization after myocardial infarction compared with total mononuclear cells. Circulation. 2018;114(20): 2163-2169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.644518
  13. Musialek P, Tekieli L, Kostkiewicz M, et al. Randomized transcoronary delivery of CD34(+) cells with perfusion versus stop-flow method in patients with recent myocardial infarction: early cardiac retention of (9)(9)(m)Tc-labeled cells activity. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18(1):104-116. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9326-z
  14. Pasquet S, Sovalat H, Hénon P, et al. Long-term benefit of intracardiac delivery of autologous granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized blood CD34+ cells containing cardiac progenitors on regional heart structure and function after myocardial infarct. Cytotherapy. 2009;11(8): 1002-1015. doi: 10.3109/14653240903164963
  15. Sivan-Loukianova E, Awad OA, Stepanovic V, Bickenbach J, Schatteman GC. CD34+ blood cells accelerate vascularization and healing of diabetic mouse skin wounds. J Vasc Res. 2003;40(4):368-377. doi: 10.1159/000072701
  16. O E, Lee BH, Ahn HY, et al. Efficient nanadhesive ex vivo expansion of early endothelial progenitor cells derived from CD34+ human cord blood fraction for effective therapeutic vascularization. FASEB J. 2011;25(1):159-169. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-162040
  17. Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Kawamoto A, et al. Local delivery of granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34- positive progenitor cells using bioscaffold for modality of unhealing bone fracture. Stem Cells. 2008;26(6):1395-1405. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0820
  18. Matsumoto T, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, et al. Therapeutic potential of vasculagenesis and osteogenesis promoted by peripheral blood CD34-positive cells for functional bone healing. Am J Pathol. 2006;169(4):1440-1457. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060064
  19. Boitano AE, Wang J, Romeo R, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonists promote the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2010;329(5997):1345-1348. doi: 10.1126/science.1191536
  20. Wagner JE Jr, Brunstein CG, Boitano AE, et al. Phase I/ II trial of StemRegenin-1 expanded umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells supports testing as a stand-alone graft. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(1):144-155. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.10.004
  21. Smith KJ, Murray IA, Tanos R, et al. Identification of a high-affinity ligand that exhibits complete aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;338(1):318-327. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.178392
  22. Cao L, Mooney DJ. Spatiotemporal control over growth factor signaling for therapeutic neovascularization. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(13):1340-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.012
  23. Fahimipour F, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Dashtimoghadam E, et al. 3D printed TCP-based scaffold incorporating VEGF-loaded PLGA microspheres for craniofacial tissue engineering. Dent Mater. 2017;33(11):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.016
  24. Matassi F, Nistri L, Chicon Paez D, Innocenti M. New biomaterials for bone regeneration. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011;8(1):21-24.
  25. Jafari M, Paknejad Z, Rad MR, et al. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering: a literature review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(2):431-459. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33547
  26. Kim SC, Heo SY, Oh GW, Yi M, Jung W-K. A 3D-printed polycaprolactone/marine collagen scaffold reinforced with carbonated hydroxyapatite from fish bones for bone regeneration. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(6):344. doi: 10.3390/md20060344
  27. Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(3):461-466. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063
  28. Momot KI. Hydrated collagen: where physical chemistry, medical imaging, and bioengineering meet. J Phys Chem B. 2022;126(49):10305-10316. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06217
  29. Lim HJ, Jang WB, Rethineswaran VK, et al. StemRegenin-1 attenuates endothelial progenitor cell senescence by regulating the AhR pathway-mediated CYP1A1 and ROS generation. Cells. 2023;12(15):2005. doi: 10.3390/cells12152005
  30. Kang D, Lee YB, Yang GH, et al. FeS(2)-incorporated 3D PCL scaffold improves new bone formation and neovascularization in a rat calvarial defect model. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(1):636. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.636
  31. Jang MJ, Bae SK, Jung YS, et al. Enhanced wound healing using a 3D printed VEGF-mimicking peptide incorporated hydrogel patch in a pig model. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/abf1a8
  32. Gurcan MN, Boucheron LE, Can A, Madabhushi A, Rajpoot NM, Yener B. Histopathological image analysis: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;2:147-171. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2009.2034865
  33. Gavet O, Pines J. Progressive activation of CyclinB1- Cdk1 coordinates entry to mitosis. Dev Cell. 2010;18(4): 533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.013
  34. Bancroft JD, Gamble M. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 6th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2008:105-134.
  35. Hankenson KD, Dishowitz M, Gray C, Schenker M. Angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Injury. 2011;42(6): 556-561. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.035
  36. Kim JH, Park M, Shim JH, Yun W-S, Jin S. Multi-scale vascularization strategy for 3D-bioprinted tissue using coaxial core-shell pre-set extrusion bioprinting and biochemical factors. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(4):726. doi: 10.18063/ijb.726
  37. Nasehi F, Karshenas M, Nardi S, Barati G, Salim A. Core-shell fibrous scaffold as a vehicle for sustained release of retinal pigmented epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) for photoreceptor differentiation of conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(12): 3514-3519. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36182
  38. Milojević M, Vihar B, Banović L, et al. Core/shell printing scaffolds for tissue engineering of tubular structures. J Vix Exp. 2019;(151). doi: 10.3791/59951
  39. Hassanpour M, Salybekov AA, Kobayashi S, Asahara T. CD34 positive cells as endothelial progenitor cells in biology and medicine. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1128134. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1128134
  40. Singh J, Chen ELY, Xing Y, Stefanski HE, Blazar BR, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC. Generation and function of progenitor T cells from StemRegenin-1-expanded CD34+ human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood Adv. 2019;3(20):2934-2948. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026575
  41. Rakkar K, Othman OA, Sprigg N, Bath PM, Bayraktutan U. Evaluation of endothelial progenitor cell characteristics as clinical biomarkers for elderly patients with ischaemic stroke. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2023;19(6):1856-1869. doi: 10.1007/s12015-023-10544-y
  42. Kamata S, Miyagawa S, Fukushima S, et al. Improvement of cardiac stem cell sheet therapy for chronic ischemic injury by adding endothelial progenitor cell transplantation: analysis of layer-specific regional cardiac function. Cell Transplant. 2014;23(10):1305-1319. doi: 10.3727/096368913X665602
  43. Wang X, Cooper S, Broxmeyer HE, Kapur R. Transient regulation of RNA methylation in human hematopoietic stem cells promotes their homing and engraftment. Leukemia. 2023;37(2):453-464. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01761-4
  44. Lewalle JM, Bajou K, Desreux J, et al. Alteration of interendothelial adherens junctions following tumor cell-endothelial cell interaction in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1997;237(2):347-356. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3799
  45. Newman H, Shih YV, Varghese S. Resolution of inflammation in bone regeneration: from understandings to therapeutic applications. Biomaterials. 2021;277:121114. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121114
  46. Marsell R, Einhorn TA. The biology of fracture healing. Injury. 2011;42(6):551-555. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031
  47. Schmidt-Bleek K, Schell H, Lienau J, et al. Initial immune reaction and angiogenesis in bone healing. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014;8(2):120-130. doi: 10.1002/term.1505
  48. Usuda K, Iwai S, Funasaki A, et al. Expression and prognostic impact of VEGF, CD31 and alphaSMA in resected primary lung cancers. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(7):4057-4063. doi: 10.21873/anticancers.12695
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept