AccScience Publishing / GTM / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/gtm.0379
Cite this article
129
Download
2084
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW

Inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation in acute lung injury using hydrogen: A preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis

Guoshen Zhong1† Yanhua Shi1 Lingyu Kong2† Kaixuan Lv3 Lichun Zhang1 Mei Yang1 Na Tian4* Nana Yang1*
Show Less
1 School of Life Science and Technology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261053, China
2 Physical Education and Sports School, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215021, China
3 State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650032, China
4 School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261053, China
Global Translational Medicine 2023, 2(3), 0379 https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.0379
Submitted: 30 March 2023 | Accepted: 12 July 2023 | Published: 11 August 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Acute lung injury (ALI) results from excessive inflammation and disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Hydrogen, known as a reducing substance, has been commonly used in preclinical trials of ALI. The present paper aims to summarize the effects of hydrogen on animal models of ALI and the possible antioxidant and anti-inflammation mechanisms of hydrogen. We conducted a thorough search of the relevant literature on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI. Data retrieved from 20 studies were analyzed to assess the beneficial effects of hydrogen therapy on ALI animal models. To evaluate the effects of hydrogen, commonly assessed outcome indicators include wet-to-dry ratio (W/D), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). The results demonstrate that hydrogen reduces pulmonary edema (W/D: 95% CI = −0.98 – −0.85, P < 0.001), mitigates hypoxia (PaO2: 95% CI = 6.08 – 22.30, P < 0.001), represses lipid peroxidation (MDA: 95% CI = −2.12 – −1.06, P < 0.001), scavenges free radicals (SOD: 95% CI = 10.12 – 30.07, P < 0.001), and inhibits inflammatory response (TNF-α: 95% CI = −5.52 – −1.72, P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed significant differences between interventions (MDA: P < 0.05; TNF-α: P < 0.05; SOD: P < 0.001). The meta-regression suggests that species may cause heterogeneity (P < 0.05). These results suggest the potential of using hydrogen in clinical trials. Different interventions with hydrogen can affect metabolic transport and distribution in vivo. Further studies should be conducted to validate and confirm these findings.

Keywords
Pharmacology
Inflammation
Acute lung injury
Preclinical study
Meta-analysis
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Province Natural Science Foundation of Shandong
Province Science and Technology Development Foundation of Shandong
Introduction Plan of Young Creative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province
Shandong Province Technology Contract
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
References
  1. Butt Y, Kurdowska A, Allen TC, 2016, Acute lung injury: A clinical and molecular review. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 140: 345–350. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2015-0519-RA

 

  1. Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, et al., 2019, Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 5: 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0

 

  1. Cardinal-Fernández P, Lorente JA, Ballén-Barragán A, et al., 2017, Acute respiratory distress syndrome and diffuse alveolar damage. New insights on a complex relationship. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 14: 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-728PS
  2. Matthay MA, Ware LB, Zimmerman GA, 2012, The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest, 122: 2731–2740. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI60331

 

  1. Williams AE, José RJ, Mercer PF, et al., 2017, Evidence for chemokine synergy during neutrophil migration in ARDS. Thorax, 72: 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208597

 

  1. Mi MY, Matthay MA, Morris AH, 2018, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med, 379:884-887.

 

  1. Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman RB, et al., 2006, Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med, 354: 1671–1684. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa051693

 

  1. Villar J, Zhang H, Slutsky AS, 2019, Lung repair and regeneration in ARDS: Role of PECAM1 and Wnt signaling. Chest, 155:587-594.

 

  1. Hu Q, Zhou Y, Wu S, et al., 2020, Molecular hydrogen: A potential radioprotective agent. Biomed Pharmacother, 130: 110589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110589

 

  1. Audi SH, Jacobs ER, Zhang X, et al., 2017, Protection by inhaled hydrogen therapy in a rat model of acute lung injury can be tracked in vivo using molecular imaging. Shock, 48: 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000872

 

  1. Zheng Y, Zhu D, 2016, Molecular hydrogen therapy ameliorates organ damage induced by sepsis. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016: 5806057. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5806057

 

  1. Aokage T, Seya M, Hirayama T, et al., 2021, The effects of inhaling hydrogen gas on macrophage polarization, fibrosis, and lung function in mice with bleomycin-induced lung injury. BMC Pulm Med, 21: 339.

 

  1. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, 2015, Saturated hydrogen saline attenuates endotoxin-induced lung dysfunction. J Surg Res, 198: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.055

 

  1. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Fu Z, 2022, Molecular hydrogen is a potential protective agent in the management of acute lung injury. Mol Med, 28: 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-022-00455-y

 

  1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al., 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339: b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

 

  1. Macleod MR, O’Collins T, Howells DW, et al., 2004, Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Stroke, 35: 1203–1208. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000125719.25853.20

 

  1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al., 2003, Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327: 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

 

  1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, 2022, Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3. Ch. 10. United Kingdom: Cochrane.

 

  1. Andrade C, 2020, Understanding the basics of meta-analysis and how to read a forest plot: As simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry, 81: 20f13698. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13698

 

  1. Chen H, Xie K, Han H, et al., 2012, Effect of hydrogen on acute lung injury in septic mice. Chin J Anesthesiol, 32: 195– 197. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Zhang H, Liu L, Yu Y, et al., 2016, Role of Rho/ROCK signaling pathway in the protective effects of hydrogen against acute lung injury in septic mice. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 28: 401–406. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Xie K, Yu Y, Pei Y, et al., 2010, Protective effects of hydrogen gas on murine polymicrobial sepsis via reducing oxidative stress and HMGB1 release. Shock, 34: 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181cdc4ae

 

  1. Li Y, Xie K, Chen H, et al., 2014, Effects of hydrogen on nuclear factorE2-related factor 2/antioxidant response element pathway in lung tissues in septic mice. Chin J Anesthesiol, 34: 852–855. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Liu G, Song D, Jiang Y, et al., 2015, Effect of hydrogen-saline on lung injury and heme oxygenase-1 expression in the lung tissue of acute paraquat-intoxicated mice. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi, 33: 337–341.

 

  1. Mao L, Luo X, Luo Z, 2015, Early protective effect of hydrogen-saturated saline on lipopolysaccharide induced acute lung injury in mice. J Pract Med, 31: 14–16. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Fang Y, Fu XJ, Gu C, et al., 2011, Hydrogen-rich saline protects against acute lung injury induced by extensive burn in rat model. J Burn Care Res, 32: e82–e91. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318217f84f

 

  1. Tian G, Liu F, Ji M, et al., 2012, Effect of hydrogen-rich saline on sepsis induced acute lung injury in a rat model of sepsis. Prog Mod Biomed, 12: 6225–6227+6224. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Bu Q, Yan Z, Li H, et al., 2015, Effect of hydrogen inhalation on aquaporin expression in lung tissue of rats with hemorrhagic shock. Shandong Med J, 55: 25–27. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Shi H, Zhou H, Jia Y, et al., 2013, The effect of hydrogen on hemorrhagic shock induced acute lung injury in rats. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 25: 6347–6350. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Xu H, Qi Q, Wang B, et al., 2019, Effects of high concentration hydrogen rich saline on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in rats. J Hebei Med Univ, 40: 1372–1376.

 

  1. Liang C, Liu X, Liu L, et al., 2012, Effect of hydrogen inhalation on p38 MAPK activation in rats with lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 32: 1211–1213.

 

  1. Song X, Wang K, Wang L, et al., 2016, Effect of hydrogen-rich saline on TLR4/MyD88 signaling pathway in rats with endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. Chin J Anesthesiol, 36: 120–122.

 

  1. Ying Y, Xu H, Yao M, et al., 2017, Protective effect of hydrogen-saturated saline on acute lung injury induced by oleic acid in rats. J Orthop Surg Res, 12: 134.

 

  1. Ying Y, He J, 2011, Protective effect of hydrogen-rich saline on lung injury induced by oleic acids. Chin J Crit Care Med, 31: 426–429. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Zhang HL, Liu YF, Luo XR, et al., 2011, Saturated hydrogen saline protects rats from acute lung injury induced by paraquat. World J Emerg Med, 2: 149–153. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2011.02.013

 

  1. Liu Q, Wang DW, Chen X, et al., 2013, Protective effects of hydrogen gas on acute lung injury induced by smoke inhalation in rats and its dose-effect relationship. J Tianjin Med Univ, 19: 445–448. (in Chinese)

 

  1. Zou R, Wang MH, Chen Y, et al., 2019, Hydrogen-rich saline attenuates acute lung injury induced by limb ischemia/ reperfusion via down-regulating Chemerin and NLRP3 in rats. Shock, 52: 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001194

 

  1. Liu W, Shan LP, Dong XS, et al., 2013, Combined early fluid resuscitation and hydrogen inhalation attenuates lung and intestine injury. World J Gastroenterol, 19: 492–502. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.492

 

  1. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, et al., 2010, Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess, 14: iii, ix–xi, 1–220. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14080

 

  1. Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, et al., 2003, The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess, 7: 1–90. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta7410

 

  1. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al., 2011, Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343: d4002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002

 

  1. Sun H, Chen L, Zhou W, et al., 2011, The protective role of hydrogen-rich saline in experimental liver injury in mice. J Hepatol, 54: 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.08.011

 

  1. Liu C, Kurokawa R, Fujino M, et al., 2014, Estimation of the hydrogen concentration in rat tissue using an airtight tube following the administration of hydrogen via various routes. Sci Rep, 4: 5485. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05485

 

  1. Yamamoto R, Homma K, Suzuki S, et al., 2019, Hydrogen gas distribution in organs after inhalation: Real-time monitoring of tissue hydrogen concentration in rat. Sci Rep, 9: 1255. https://doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38180-4

 

  1. Watanabe M, Kamimura N, Iuchi K, et al., 2017, Protective effect of hydrogen gas inhalation on muscular damage using a mouse hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion injury model. Plast Reconstr Surg, 140: 1195–1206.

 

  1. Sano M, Ichihara G, Katsumata Y, et al., 2020, Pharmacokinetics of a single inhalation of hydrogen gas in pigs. PLoS One, 15: e0234626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234626

 

  1. Hooijmans CR, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, 2013, Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research. PLoS Med, 10: e1001482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001482

 

  1. Pittet JF, Mackersie RC, Martin TR, et al., 1997, Biological markers of acute lung injury: Prognostic and pathogenetic significance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155: 1187–1205. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105054

 

  1. Grommes J, Soehnlein O, 2011, Contribution of neutrophils to acute lung injury. Mol Med, 17: 293–307. https://doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2010.00138

 

  1. Orfanos SE, Mavrommati I, Korovesi I, et al., 2004, Pulmonary endothelium in acute lung injury: From basic science to the critically ill. Intensive Care Med, 30: 1702–1714.

 

  1. Albelda SM, Smith CW, Ward PA, 1994, Adhesion molecules and inflammatory injury. FASEB J, 8: 504–512.

 

  1. Lum H, Roebuck KA, 2001, Oxidant stress and endothelial cell dysfunction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 280: C719–C741. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.4.C719

 

  1. Perkins GD, Nathani N, McAuley DF, et al., 2007, In vitro and in vivo effects of salbutamol on neutrophil function in acute lung injury. Thorax, 62: 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.059410

 

  1. Arnhold J, 2020, The dual role of myeloperoxidase in immune response. Int J Mol Sci, 21: 8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218057

 

  1. Schultze JL, Schmidt SV, 2015, Molecular features of macrophage activation. Semin Immunol, 27: 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.009

 

  1. Huang X, Xiu H, Zhang S, et al., 2018, The role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS. Mediators Inflamm, 2018: 1264913. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1264913

 

  1. Chen X, Tang J, Shuai W, et al., 2020, Macrophage polarization and its role in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inflamm Res, 69: 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-020-01378-2

 

  1. Liu Y, Zhou S, Xiang D, et al, 2021, Friend or foe? The roles of antioxidants in acute lung injury. Antioxidants (Basel), 10: 1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10121956

 

  1. Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, Biswal S, 2007, Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2- ARE pathway. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 47: 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141046

 

  1. Kim JH, Choi YK, Lee KS, et al., 2012, Functional dissection of Nrf2-dependent phase II genes in vascular inflammation and endotoxic injury using Keap1 siRNA. Free Radic Biol Med, 53: 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.04.019
Share
Back to top
Global Translational Medicine, Electronic ISSN: 2811-0021 Print ISSN: 3060-8600, Published by AccScience Publishing