Translating neuroscience-driven biomarkers into adult clinical practice: Challenges, opportunities, and pathways forward
Despite remarkable advances in neuroscience and high-throughput omics technologies, the translation of novel biomarkers into routine clinical use remains stubbornly slow and fragmented. While the volume of discovery data continues to grow exponentially, many candidate markers fail to cross the translational valley of death due to a profound clinical utility gap. This narrative review synthesizes recent progress in neuroscience biomarker discovery, evaluating the systemic bottlenecks that hinder clinical translation, ranging from pre-analytical variability and statistical overfitting to complex regulatory and reimbursement hurdles. We propose integrative, reverse-translational frameworks designed to accelerate implementation by beginning with the end clinical context in mind. Emphasis is placed on the shift toward multimodal biomarkers, including the integration of proteomic, metabolomic, advanced neuroimaging, and emerging digital phenotypic data. Through detailed, disease-specific case studies spanning Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, and neuropsychiatry, we illustrate both translational successes and persistent methodological pitfalls. We also examine the imperative of global health equity. We argue that biomarker scalability, economic viability, and point-of-care adaptability are just as vital as biological sensitivity in the democratization of precision neurology. Over-reliance on expensive, Western-centric validation pipelines risks exacerbating existing healthcare disparities. Ultimately, we advocate for collaborative, data-driven pipelines that bridge isolated laboratory innovation with pragmatic clinical needs, ensuring that precision neuroscience translates into tangible, accessible outcomes for diverse patient populations worldwide.
- FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Food and Drug Administration (US); 2016.
- Hampel H, Vergallo A, Perry G, Lista S; Alzheimer Precision Medicine Initiative (APMI). The Alzheimer Precision Medicine Initiative. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(1):1-24. doi: 10.3233/JAD-181121
- Seyhan AA. Lost in translation: the valley of death across preclinical and clinical research. Transl Med Commun. 2019;4(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41231-019-0050-7
- Ioannidis JP. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94(3):485-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210
- Gribkoff VK, Kaczmarek LK. The need for new approaches in CNS drug discovery: Why drugs have failed, and what can be done. Neuropharmacology. 2017;120:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.021
- Ioannidis JP, Khoury MJ. Improving validation practices in “omics” research. Science. 2011;334(6060):1230-1232. doi: 10.1126/science.1211811
- McShane LM, Cavenagh MM, Lively TG, et al. Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials. Nature. 2013;502(7471):317-320. doi: 10.1038/nature12564
- Drucker E, Krapfenbauer K. Pitfalls and limitations in translation from biomarker discovery to clinical utility in predictive medicine. EPMA J. 2013;4(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1878-5085-4-7
- Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, et al. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(14):1054-1061. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054
- Rapp T, Lin PJ. The Health Economics of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. Value in Health. 2025;28(4):495-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.02.002
- Hampel H, O’Bryant SE, Molinuevo JL, et al. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: mapping the road to the clinic. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2018;14(11):639-652. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7
- Khalil M, Teunissen CE, Otto M, et al. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(10):577-589. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z
- Gaetani L, Blennow K, Calabresi P, et al. Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neurological disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(8):870-881. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-320106
- Karikari TK, Pascoal TA, Ashton NJ, et al. Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(5):422-433. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30071-5
- Thijssen EH, La Joie R, Wolf A, et al. Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Nat Med. 2020;26(3):387-397. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0762-2
- Baldacci F, Lista S, Cavedo E, et al. Diagnostic function of the neuroinflammatory biomarker YKL-40 in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2017;14(4):285-299. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2017.1304217
- Suarez-Calvet M, Araque Caballero MÁ, Kleinberger G, et al. Early changes in CSF sTREM2 in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease occur after amyloid deposition and neuronal injury. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(369):369ra178. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1767
- Alemán-Villa KM, Armienta-Rojas DA, Camberos-Barraza J, et al. Neuroinflammation across the Spectrum of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Frontiers. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2025;32(1):278-305. doi: 10.1159/000548021
- Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Association of Plasma Neurofilament Light With Neurodegeneration in Patients With Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(5):557-566. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117
- Ashton NJ, Hye A, Rajkumar AP, et al. An update on blood-based biomarkers for non-Alzheimer neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(5):265-284. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0348-0
- De La Herrán-Arita AK. When sleep fails, brain clearance suffers: the role of glymphatic impairment in clinical neurology. Acta Neurol Belg. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s13760-025-02959-w
- Chen MK, Mecca AP, Naganawa M, et al. Assessing Synaptic Density in Alzheimer Disease With Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(10):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836
- Hamelin L, Lagarde J, Dorothée G, et al. Early and protective microglial activation in Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective study using 18F-DPA-714 PET imaging. Brain. 2016;139(4):1252-1264. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww017
- Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):306-319. doi: 10.1002/ana.20009
- Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):119-128. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6
- Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(3):186-198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575
- Monsour R. Neuroimaging in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Current Applications. Federal Practitioner. 2022;39(1):S14-S20. doi: 10.12788/fp.0231
- Llera A, Wolfers T, Mulders P, Beckmann CF. Inter-individual differences in human brain structure and morphology link to variation in demographics and behavior. eLife. 2019;8:e44443. doi: 10.7554/elife.44443
- Mintun MA, Lo AC, Duggan Evans C, et al. Donanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18):1691-1704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100708
- Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, et al. Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1286-1294. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2000
- Escott-Price V, Myers AJ, Huentelman M, Hardy J. Polygenic risk score analysis of pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2017;82(2):311-314. doi: 10.1002/ana.24999
- Torkamani A, Wineinger NE, Topol EJ. The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(9):581-590. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0018-x
- Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
- Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging. 2019;11(2):303-327. doi: 10.18632/aging.101684
- Marioni RE, Shah S, McRae AF, et al. DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6
- Balaji JN, Prakash S, Surapaneni KM. A narrative review on emergence of digital biomarkers as the future frontiers in medical practice. J Clin Diagn Res. 2024;18(10):BE1-BE5. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2024/65692.20154
- Lipsmeier F, Taylor KI, Kilchenmann T, et al. Evaluation of smartphone-based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson’s disease clinical trial. Mov Disord. 2018;33(8):1287-1297. doi: 10.1002/mds.27376
- Jacobson NC, Weingarden H, Wilhelm S. Digital biomarkers of mood disorders and symptom change. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0078-0
- Lombardo C, Esposito G, Carbone S, Serrano S, Mento C. Speech analysis and speech emotion recognition in mental disease: a scoping review. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1645860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645860
- Mandryk RL, Birk MV. The potential of game-based digital biomarkers for modeling mental health. JMIR Serious Games. 2019;6(4):e13485. doi: 10.2196/13485
- Coravos A, Khozin S, Mandl KD. Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0090-4
- Piau A, Wild K, Mattek N, Kaye J. Current state of Digital biomarker Technologies for Real-Life, Home-Based Monitoring of Cognitive Function for mild cognitive impairment to Mild Alzheimer Disease and Implications for Clinical Care: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(8):e12785. doi: 10.2196/12785
- Inan OT, Tenaerts P, Prindiville SA, et al. Digitizing clinical trials. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3(1):101. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0302-y
- Onnela JP. Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;46:45-54. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0771-3
- Torous J, Bucci S, Bell IH, et al. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(3):318-335. doi: 10.1002/wps.20883
- Diamandis EP. The failure of protein cancer biomarkers to reach the clinic: why, and what can be done to address the problem? BMC Med. 2012;10(1):87. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-87
- Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(21):1446-1452. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp335
- O’Bryant SE, Mielke MM, Rissman RA, et al. Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer disease: Current state of the science and a novel collaborative paradigm for advancing from discovery to clinic. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.014
- Sunde AL, Alsnes IV, Aarsland D, et al. Preanalytical stability of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;15(2):e12439. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12439
- Salvadó G, Janelidze S, Bali D, et al. Plasma phosphorylated TAU 217 to identify preclinical Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurology. 2025;82(11):1122. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217
- Andreasson U, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Update on ultrasensitive technologies to facilitate research on blood biomarkers for central nervous system disorders. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;3(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.05.005
- Lewczuk P, Riederer P, O’Bryant SE, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2018;19(4):244-328. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1375556
- Hewitt RE. Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011;23(1):112-119. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834161b8
- Vaught J, Kelly A, Hewitt R. A review of international biobanks and networks: success factors and key benchmarks. Biopreserv Biobank. 2009;7(3):143-150. doi: 10.1089/bio.2010.0003
- Califf RM. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med. 2018;243(3):213-221. doi: 10.1177/1535370217750088
- Faulkner E, Annemans L, Garrison L, et al. Challenges in the development and reimbursement of personalized medicine-payer and manufacturer perspectives and implications for health economics and outcomes research: a report of the ISPOR Personalized Medicine Special Interest Group. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1162-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.05.006
- Wimo A, Seeher K, Cataldi P, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.150
- Canestro WJ, Monane M, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM, Braunstein JB. The economic utility of an Alzheimer’s disease blood biomarker test in the evaluation of cognitively impaired patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(S6):e106232. doi: 10.1002/alz70860_106232
- Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
- Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Quiroz YT, et al. Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders. JAMA. 2020;324(8):772-781. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12134
- Janelidze S, Mattsson N, Palmqvist S, et al. Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer’s dementia. Nat Med. 2020;26(3):379-386. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0755-1
- Hansson O, Edelmayer RM, Boxer AL, et al. The Alzheimer’s Association appropriate use recommendations for blood biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(12):2669-2686. doi: 10.1002/alz.12756
- Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795-804. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202753
- Disanto G, Barro C, Benkert P, et al. Serum Neurofilament Light: A Biomarker of Neuronal Damage in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):857-870. doi: 10.1002/ana.24954
- Bittner S, Oh J, Havrdová EK, Tintoré M, Zipp F. The potential of serum neurofilament as biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2021;144(10):2954-2963. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab241
- Siller N, Kuhle J, Muthuraman M, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019;25(5):678-686. doi: 10.1177/1352458518765666
- Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, et al. Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet. 2007;370(9585):389-397. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5
- Bazarian JJ, Biberthaler P, Welch RD, et al. Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(9):782-789. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30231-x
- Wang KK, Yang Z, Zhu T, et al. An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018;18(2):165-180. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1428089
- Shahnawaz M, Tokuda T, Waragai M, et al. Development of a Biochemical Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease by Detection of α-Synuclein Misfolded Aggregates in Cerebrospinal Fluid. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(2):163-172. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4547
- Fairfoul G, McGuire LI, Pal S, et al. Alpha-synuclein RT-QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha-synucleinopathies. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3(10):812-818. doi: 10.1002/acn3.338
- Iranzo A, Fairfoul G, Ayudhaya AC, et al. Detection of α-synuclein in CSF by RT-QuIC in patients with isolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a longitudinal observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(3):203-212. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30449-X
- Fernandes BS, Williams LM, Steiner J, et al. The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0849-x
- Camacho-Zamora A, Rábago-Monzón ÁR, Armienta-Rojas DA, Camberos-Barraza J, De La Herrán-Arita AK. The gut– brain axis: Collective impact of psychosomatic conditions and gut microbiota on health and disease. J Clin Basic Psychosom. 2025;3(3):25. doi: 10.36922/jcbp025040008
- Raison CL, Rutherford RE, Woolwine BJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab for treatment-resistant depression: the role of baseline inflammatory biomarkers. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):31-41. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.4
- Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med. 2017;23(1):28-38. doi: 10.1038/nm.4246
- Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, et al. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236-1246. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx044
- Lundberg S, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
- Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
- Goetzl EJ, Kapogiannis D, Schwartz JB, et al. Decreased synaptic proteins in neuronal exosomes of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2016;30(12):4141-4148. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600816R
- Baez S, Hernandez H, Moguilner S, et al. Structural inequality and temporal brain dynamics across diverse samples. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14(10):e70032. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70032
