AccScience Publishing / GTM / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/gtm.3900
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Local anesthesia in 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery: A comparison of efficacy between retrobulbar and sub-Tenon’s injection

Fatemeh Golsoorat Pahlaviani1 Fardin Yousefshahi2 Hanieh Niktinat1 Ramak Roohipourmoallai3 Samaneh Davoudi4 Siva S. R. Iyer5 Samaneh Bourbour1 Nazanin Ebrahimiadib6*
Show Less
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Hospital Hôtel-Dieu de Sorel, CISSS de la Montérégie-Est, Quebec, Canada
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Morsani Hospital, University of South Florida, Florida, United States of America
4 Department of Ophthalmology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
5 Vitreoretinal Associates, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
6 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
Global Translational Medicine, 3900 https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.3900
Submitted: 9 June 2024 | Accepted: 21 October 2024 | Published: 14 November 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study aimed to compare sub-Tenon’s and retrobulbar blocks during vitreoretinal surgery in terms of postoperative pain and surgeon experience. This prospective study included 53 patients scheduled for 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy under local anesthesia. Patients were nonrandomly assigned to receive a xylocaine injection through either the transconjunctival sub-Tenon’s or retrobulbar routes, supplemented with intravenous (IV) sedation (midazolam + fentanyl). A sharp needle was used for both techniques. In the sub-Tenon’s group, anesthetic injection was initiated through subconjunctival administration after prepping and draping. Pain was assessed immediately postsurgery and the following day using a standardized questionnaire. Patient and surgeon satisfaction levels, along with complications in each group, were recorded. Of the 53 patients, 42 (79%) received the sub-Tenon’s block and 11 (21%) received the retrobulbar block. No statistically significant differences in pain scores, patient satisfaction, or surgeon satisfaction were found between the groups. Postoperative pain and surgeon satisfaction were negatively correlated in both groups (B = −0.465; P < 0.001), and a moderate-to-high correlation was observed between patient and surgeon satisfaction (B = 0.686; P < 0.001). Overall, sub-Tenon’s and retrobulbar blocks showed comparable effectiveness in terms of postoperative pain and patient and surgeon satisfaction in vitreoretinal surgery, with no significant differences in outcomes or complication rates.

Keywords
Retrobulbar block
Sub-Tenon’s
Vitreoretinal surgery
Local anesthesia
23-gauge vitrectomy
Ocular pain questionnaire
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Mavrakanas NA, Stathopoulos C, Schutz JS. Are ocular injection anesthetic blocks obsolete? Indications and guidelines. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328341426f

 

  1. Imarengiaye CO, Adamu SA, Isesele T, Tudjegb SO. Anaesthesia for ophthalmic procedures in a teaching hospital. Niger J Ophthalmol. 2008;16(1):1-4. doi: 10.4314/njo.v16i1.11948

 

  1. Hodgkins PR, Luff AJ, Morrell AJ, Botchway LT, Featherston TJ, Fielder AR. Current practice of cataract extraction and anaesthesia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76(6):323-326. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.6.323

 

  1. Tomanović N. Local anesthesia in ophthalmologic surgery. Med Arh. 2003;57(4 Suppl 1):37-40.

 

  1. Hamilton RC, Gimbel HV, Strunin L. Regional anaesthesia for 12,000 cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation procedures. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35(6):615-623. doi: 10.1007/BF03020350

 

  1. Ali-Melkkila T, Virkkila M, Leino K, Palve H. Regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: Comparison of three techniques. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77(12):771-773. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.12.771

 

  1. Stevens JD. A new local anesthesia technique for cataract extraction by one quadrant sub-Tenon’s infiltration. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76(11):670-674. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.11.670

 

  1. Fahmi A, Bowman R. Administering an eye anaesthetic: Principles, techniques, and complications. Community Eye Health. 2008;21(65):14-17.

 

  1. Adekoya BJ, Onakoya AO, Balogun BG, Oworu O. Current practice of ophthalmic anesthesia in Nigeria. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20(4):341-344. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.120022

 

  1. Klein ML, Jampol LM, Condon PI, Rice TA, Serjeant GR. Central retinal artery occlusion without retrobulbar hemorrhage after retrobulbar anesthesia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93(5):573-577. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)77371-4

 

  1. Young-Zvasara T, Winder J, Wijetilleka S, Wheeler L, Mcpherson R. Efficacy and safety of a novel blunt cannula trans-sub-Tenon’s retrobulbar block for vitreoretinal surgery. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019;26(3):163-167. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_151_18

 

  1. Buys YM, Trope GE. Prospective study of sub-Tenon’s versus retrobulbar anesthesia for inpatient and day-surgery trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(10):1585-1589. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(93)31440-5

 

  1. Turnbull CS. The hydrochlorate of cocaine, a judicious opinion of its merits. Med Surg Rep. 1884;29:628-629.

 

  1. Guise P. Sub-Tenon’s anesthesia: An update. Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:35-46. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S16314

 

  1. Athanasiov P, Henderson T. Ocular anaesthesia and the never-ending story. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(1):1. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.168831

 

  1. Kaini KR. Subtenon’s anesthesia in extracapsular cataract extraction. Nepal Med Coll J. 2003;5(2):69-72.

 

  1. Nouvellon E, L’Hermite J, Chaumeron A, et al. Ophthalmic regional anesthesia: Medial canthus episcleral (sub-tenon) single injection block. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(2):370-374. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00028

 

  1. Van Den Berg AA, Lambourne A, Clyburn PA. The oculo‐emetic reflex. A rationalisation of postophthalmic anaesthesia vomiting. Anaesthesia. 1989;44(2):110-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11157.x

 

  1. Alhassan MB, Kyari F, Ejere HO. Peribulbar versus retrobulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(7):CD004083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004083.pub3

 

  1. Villafranca Barba A, Mouslim S, De la Gala García FA, Reyes Fierro A. Sub-Tenon block for ocular globe anesthesia: A review. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011;58(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(11)70025-1

 

  1. Chuang LH, Wu WC, Yang KJ, Tsao YP, Chen TL, Lai CC. Sub-Tenon anesthesia for segmental scleral buckling and assessment of postoperative pain. Chang Gung Med J. 2002;25(1):16-22.

 

  1. Eke T, Thompson JR. Serious complications of local anaesthesia for cataract surgery: A 1 year national survey in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(4):470-475. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.106005

 

  1. Reichstein DA, Warren CC, Han DP, Wirostko WJ. Local anesthesia with blunt sub-Tenon’s cannula versus sharp retrobulbar needle for vitreoretinal surgery: A retrospective, comparative study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47(1):55-59. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20151214-08

 

  1. Ryu JH, Kim M, Bahk JH, Do SH, Cheong IY, Kim YC. A comparison of retrobulbar block, sub-Tenon block, and topical anesthesia during cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(2):240-246. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900211

 

  1. Khoo BK, Lim TH, Yong V. Sub-Tenon’s versus retrobulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996;27(9):773-777.

 

  1. Tokuda Y, Oshika T, Amano S, Inouye J, Yoshitomi F. Analgesic effects of sub-Tenon’s versus retrobulbar anesthesia in planned extracapsular cataract extraction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(3):228-231. doi: 10.1007/s004170050348

 

  1. Lai M, Lai J, Lee W, et al. Comparison of retrobulbar and sub- Tenon’s capsule injection of local anesthetic in vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):574-579. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.043

 

  1. Sohn HJ, Moon HS, Nam DH, Paik HJ. Effect of volume used in sub-Tenon’s anesthesia on efficacy and intraocular pressure in vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(6):414-421. doi: 10.1159/000161556

 

  1. Shaikh N, Srishti R, Khanum A, et al. Vitreous hemorrhage - Causes, diagnosis, and management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(1):28-38. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_928_22

 

  1. He X, Chen AF, Nirwan RS, Sridhar J, Kuriyan AE. Perioperative management of anticoagulants in ocular surgeries. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2020;60(3):3-15. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000316

 

  1. Alpay A, Güney T. Evaluating the effectiveness of localized sub-Tenon’s anesthesia in 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(1):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01566-3

 

  1. Franco F, Vicchio L, Barbera GR, Virgili G, Giansanti F. Patient and surgeon comfort in vitreoretinal surgery performed with sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2021;65(2):136-140. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2021.28

 

  1. Roman-Pognuz D, Scarpa G, Virgili G, Roman-Pognuz E, Paluzzano G, Cavarzeran F. Comparison of retrobulbar, sub- Tenon anesthesia and medial canthus episcleral anesthesia for 25-gauge posterior vitrectomy. Retina. 2022;42(1):19-26. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003260

 

  1. Xu Q, Ren M, Guan J, Shi G, Ni Y, Luan J. Efficacy and safety of trans-sub-Tenon’s retrobulbar anesthesia for pars plana vitrectomy: A randomized trial. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02507-7

 

  1. Haider MA, Sattar U, Mehak F, Ahmed I, Sagheer S. Comparison of pain in topical, sub-Tenon and retrobulbar anesthesia for 23g pars plana vitrectomy. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(1):622-625.
Share
Back to top
Global Translational Medicine, Electronic ISSN: 2811-0021 Print ISSN: 3060-8600, Published by AccScience Publishing