AccScience Publishing / EER / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EER026120005
Cite this article
13
Download
216
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Ecological sustainability challenges of large data centers: Environmental pressures, resource depletion, and sustainable digital infrastructure

Babu George1* Lamine Conteh1
Show Less
1 School of Business, Alcorn State University, Lorman, Mississippi , United States of America
Received: 16 March 2026 | Revised: 7 August 2026 | Accepted: 7 August 2026 | Published online: 19 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Large, energy-intensive data centers are expanding quickly as cloud computing, cryptocurrency mining, and artificial intelligence demand more computing power. That growth creates ecological risks that extend beyond electricity use and carbon emissions. Fossil-fuel electricity and on-site diesel generators release pollutants that degrade air quality and contribute to acid deposition; water-intensive cooling reduces freshwater availability and can stress aquatic habitats; continuous cooling noise affects nearby communities and may disturb wildlife; and hyperscale campuses convert land, fragment habitat, and intensify urban heat. Institutional analyses project that the annual public health burden of air pollution associated with United States data centers could approach US$20 billion by 2030, while direct water use is already estimated at more than 100 billion gallons a year. These burdens fall unevenly on ecologically vulnerable and socially disadvantaged communities, raising questions of sustainability justice. This article examines data center impacts through an ecological sustainability lens, drawing on environmental health, freshwater ecology, acoustic ecology, land-use science, and environmental justice research. It proposes a socio-ecological framework that links five interacting impact pathways, maps them onto the planetary boundaries, and grades the evidence behind each claim, separating established findings from modeled projections and untested hypotheses. It weighs these costs against the benefits of digital infrastructure, identifies research gaps, and sets out policy priorities for aligning data center growth with planetary limits and more equitable outcomes.

Keywords
Data centers
Ecological sustainability
Acoustic ecology
Habitat fragmentation
Environmental justice
Artificial intelligence
Carbon capture
Sustainable digital infrastructure
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Tao Y, Gao P. Global data center expansion and human health: a call for empirical research. Eco Environ Health. 2025;4(3):100157. doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100157
  2. Gour N, Ortiz L, Maibach E. Health implications of the rapid rise of data centers in Virginia: an exploratory assessment. Front Clim. 2026;8:1648912. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2026.1648912
  3. Ngata WM, Bashir N, Westerlaken M, Liote L, Chandio Y, Olivetti E. The cloud next door: investigating the environmental and socioeconomic strain of datacenters on local communities. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. July 22-25, 2025; Toronto, Canada. 2025:769-774. doi: 10.1145/3715335.3736324
  4. Lifset R, Raparla P, Stein A, Bridges L, McElfish J, Cywinski T. Local environmental impacts of data center proliferation. Environ Law Rep. 2025;55:10131-10145.
  5. Federation of American Scientists. Advance AI with cleaner air and healthier outcomes. Published June 26, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://fas.org/publication/advance-ai-with-cleaner-air-and-healthier-outcomes/
  6. Environmental Health Project. The dangers of data centers. Published February 27, 2026. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.environmentalhealthproject.org/post/the-dangers-of-data-centers
  7. International Energy Agency. Energy and AI. International Energy Agency; 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai
  8. Hankendi C, Coskun AK, Sovacool BK. Why transparency matters for sustainable data centers and carbon-neutral artificial intelligence (AI). iScience. 2025;28(11):113705. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113705
  9. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009;461(7263):472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
  10. Richardson K, Steffen W, Lucht W, et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci Adv. 2023;9(37):eadh2458. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
  11. Yanez-Barnuevo M. Data centers and water consumption. Environmental and Energy Study Institute. Published June 25, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption
  12. Kane JW. AI, data centers, and water. Brookings Institution. Published November 20, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ai-data-centers-and-water/
  13. Khatib L, Pham A, Ahmed K, Frenkel VS. Data centers and water: challenges and solutions for sustainable cooling. J AWWA. 2025;117(8):48-53. doi: 10.1002/awwa.2504
  14. Gorey J. Data drain: the land and water impacts of the AI boom. Land Lines. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Published October 17, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/land-lines-magazine/articles/land-water-impacts-data-centers/
  15. Thomson JC. Tragedy of the energy commons: how government regulation can help mitigate the environmental and public health consequences of cryptocurrency mining. Seattle J Technol Environ Innov Law. 2020;11(1):Article 4.
  16. Pitt D, Suen I-S, Plisko E. Localized Air Pollution Impacts from Data Centers in Northern Virginia. Virginia Commonwealth University Institute for Sustainable Energy and Environment; 2026. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/isee_pubs/3/
  17. Dandres T, Vandromme N, Obrekht G, et al. Consequences of future data center deployment in Canada on electricity generation and environmental impacts: a 2015-2030 prospective study. J Ind Ecol. 2017;21(5):1312-1322. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12515
  18. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhausts and Some Nitroarenes. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol 105. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.
  19. Next 10. An Assessment of California Data Centers' Environmental and Public Health Impacts. Prepared by researchers at the University of California, Riverside. Next 10; November 12, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.next10.org/publications/ai-environmental-public-health-impacts
  20. Dominici F, Vartziotis T. Integrating environmental health in the AI era: an urgent imperative. Harv Data Sci Rev. 2025;7(4). doi: 10.1162/99608f92.7d27980c
  21. Harvard Data Science Initiative, Dominici Lab. Public Health Impacts Analysis: Balico Gas Plant, Pittsylvania County, Virginia. Southern Environmental Law Center; April 12, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.selc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.12-Public-Health-Impacts-Analysis-Balico-Gas-Plant-FINAL-REPORT.pdf
  22. Guidi G, Dominici F, Steinsultz N, et al. The environmental burden of the United States' bitcoin mining boom. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):2970. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58287-3
  23. Henneman L, Mickley LJ, Zigler C. Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation. Science. 2023;382(6673):941-946. doi: 10.1126/science.adf4915
  24. Bluefield Research. Water for Data Centers: Market Trends and Forecasts, 2023-2030. Bluefield Research; June 9, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.bluefieldresearch.com/research/water-for-data-centers-market-trends-and-forecasts-2023-2030/
  25. Chung YY, Darakdjian F, Leahy T. When AI meets water scarcity: data centers in a thirsty world. MSCI; Published December 9, 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.msci.com/research-and-insights/blog-post/when-ai-meets-water-scarcity-data-centers-in-a-thirsty-world
  26. Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol. 2010;55(1):194-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x
  27. Barlow PM, Leake SA. Streamflow Depletion by Wells: Understanding and Managing the Effects of Groundwater Pumping on Streamflow. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1376. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey; 2012. doi: 10.3133/cir1376
  28. Thakre C, Vijay R. Impact of low-frequency noise on a residential zone due to commercial HVAC systems. J Build Eng. 2024;91:109616. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109616
  29. Baliatsas C, van Kamp I, van Poll R, Yzermans J. Health effects from low-frequency noise and infrasound in the general population: is it time to listen? A systematic review of observational studies. Sci Total Environ. 2016;557-558:163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.065
  30. van Kempen E, Casas M, Pershagen G, Foraster M. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and cardiovascular and metabolic effects. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020379
  31. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Biological Mechanisms Related to Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects by Environmental Noise. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2018. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2018-3009-42767-59666
  32. Münzel T, Sørensen M, Daiber A. Transportation noise pollution and cardiovascular disease: research needs for effectiveness of interventions and mechanistic studies. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(9):619-636. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00532-5
  33. European Environment Agency. Noise. Beating Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Europe's Environment. European Environment Agency; 2023. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/beating-cardiovascular-disease-the-role-of-europes-environment/noise
  34. Münzel T, Hahad O, Daiber A, Langewitz W. Transportation noise pollution and cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2024;134(9):1113-1135. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.323584
  35. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Night Noise Guidelines for Europe. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2009. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289041737
  36. Liang P, Li J, Li Z, et al. Effect of low-frequency noise exposure on cognitive function: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17593-5
  37. Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(3):180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002
  38. Shannon G, McKenna MF, Angeloni LM, et al. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biol Rev. 2016;91(4):982-1005. doi: 10.1111/brv.12207
  39. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems. Sci Adv. 2015;1(2):e1500052. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052
  40. Mullany A. The adverse health consequences of resource-extractive AI data centers: analyzing technological innovation and rurality with university students. Radic Teach. 2026;133:9-11. doi: 10.5195/rt.2026.1516
  41. Lerner S. Sacrifice Zones: The Front Lines of Toxic Chemical Exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.
  42. Sinistore J, Skov J, Fehrer D, Balsvik J, Dickinson J, Reitz R. Sustainable AI: an environmental sustainability perspective. In: Handbook of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Gateway East, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025:1-38. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-8440-0_103-1
  43. Fang T, Di Y, Xu Y, et al. Temporal trends of particulate matter pollution and its health burden, 1990-2021, with projections to 2036: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1579716. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1579716
  44. Li H, Zick ME, Trisukhon T, et al. Capturing carbon dioxide from air with charged-sorbents. Nature. 2024;630(8017):654-659. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07449-2
  45. Zhou Z, Ma T, Zhang H, et al. Carbon dioxide capture from open air using covalent organic frameworks. Nature. 2024;635(8037):96-101. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08080-x
  46. Karimi M, Shirzad M, Silva JAC, Rodrigues AE. Carbon dioxide separation and capture by adsorption: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2023;21(4):2041-2084. doi: 10.1007/s10311-023-01589-z
  47. Xiao T, You F. Leveraging deep reinforcement learning within optimal renewable energy strategies for sustainable AI data centers. Environ Sci Technol. 2026;60(1):522-536. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c09990
  48. Berger A. Artificial Intelligence Data Centers and United States Based Hyperscalers: Impacts and Solutions. Johns Hopkins University; 2025. Accessed April 30, 2026. https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/items/8792d5a5-91a3-4179-bc73-61fcc2ae1879
Share
Back to top
Explora: Environment and Resource, Electronic ISSN: 3060-9046 Published by AccScience Publishing