AccScience Publishing / EER / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EER026210019
Cite this article
2
Download
165
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

A novel one-step simulation–optimization framework for multi-crop actual evapotranspiration estimation

Halil Karahan1*
Show Less
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Türkiye
Received: 18 May 2026 | Revised: 24 June 2026 | Accepted: 29 June 2026 | Published online: 15 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Accurate estimation of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) is essential for sustainable water management and irrigation planning. This study presents a simulation–optimization framework, integrated with the Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving (SAFER) model, for daily ETa estimation and applies it to a heterogeneous agricultural region with multiple crop types. Unlike conventional SAFER implementations that rely on linear regression or trial-and-error calibration, the proposed framework enables simultaneous calibration of model coefficients via a single optimization procedure while preserving the model’s nonlinear structure. Daily ETa was estimated using remote sensing inputs, including normalized difference vegetation ındex, land surface temperature (LST), surface albedo (αs), and meteorological data. The model was evaluated under two different training–testing scenarios to assess its robustness and generalization capability. Scenario I, which used only 38 satellite overpass days for calibration, achieved a test R2 of 0.8195 and an overall R2 of 0.8152. These results were consistent with Scenario II (test R2 = 0.8249; overall R2 = 0.8181), indicating stable predictive performance across different data partitioning schemes. The optimized coefficients remained highly consistent across scenarios (a ≈ 0.315, b ≈ −0.0012), demonstrating stable parameter convergence and robustness of the optimization process. Overall, the results indicate that reliable ETa estimation can be achieved even with limited calibration data, highlighting the practical applicability of the proposed framework for water management in data-scarce regions.

Keywords
Actual evapotranspiration
Simulation–optimization
Metaheuristic optimization
Remote sensing
Water resources management
Crop-based analysis
Funding
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Bastiaanssen WGM, Menenti M, Feddes RA, Holtslag AAM. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation. J Hydrol. 1998;212-213:198-212. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00253-4
  2. Allen RG, Tasumi M, Trezza R. Satellite-Based Energy Balance for Mapping Evapotranspiration with Internalized Calibration (METRIC)—Model. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2007;133(4):380-394. doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2007)133:4(380)
  3. Senay GB, Bohms S, Singh RK, et al. Operational Evapotranspiration Mapping Using Remote Sensing and Weather Datasets: A New Parameterization for the SSEB Approach. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2013;49(3):577-591. doi: 10.1111/jawr.12057
  4. Teixeira AH de C. Determining Regional Actual Evapotranspiration of Irrigated Crops and Natural Vegetation in the São Francisco River Basin (Brazil) Using Remote Sensing and Penman-Monteith Equation. Remote Sens. 2010;2(5):1287-1319. doi: 10.3390/rs0251287
  5. Roerink GJ, Su Z, Menenti M. S-SEBI: A simple remote sensing algorithm to estimate the surface energy balance. Phys Chem Earth B. 2000;25(2):147-157. doi: 10.1016/s1464-1909(99)00128-8
  6. Santos JEO, Cunha FF da, Filgueiras R, et al. Performance of SAFER evapotranspiration using missing meteorological data. Agric Water Manage. 2020;233:106076. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106076
  7. Coaguila DN, Hernandez FBT, Teixeira AH de C, Franco RAM, Leivas JF. Water productivity using SAFER - Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving in watershed. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient. 2017;21(8):524-529. doi: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n8p524-529
  8. Teixeira AH de C, Bastiaanssen WGM, Ahmad MD, Bos MG. Reviewing SEBAL input parameters for assessing evapotranspiration and water productivity for the Low- Middle São Francisco River basin, Brazil. Agric For Meteorol. 2009;149(3-4):462-476. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.09.016
  9. Teixeira AH de C, Takemura CM, Leivas JF, Pacheco EP, Bayma-Silva G, Garçon EAM. Water productivity monitoring by using geotechnological tools in contrasting social and environmental conditions: Applications in the São Francisco River basin, Brazil. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 2020;18:100296. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100296
  10. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1998. (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56).
  11. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA. Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature. Appl Eng Agric. 1985;1(2):96-99. doi: 10.13031/2013.26773
  12. Teixeira AH de C, Leivas JF, Hernandez FBT, Franco RAM. Large-scale radiation and energy balances with Landsat 8 images and agrometeorological data in the Brazilian semiarid region. J Appl Remote Sens. 2017;11(1):016030. doi: 10.1117/1.jrs.11.016030
  13. Teixeira AH de C, de Miranda FR, Leivas JF, Pacheco EP, Garçon EAM. Water productivity assessments for dwarf coconut by using Landsat 8 images and agrometeorological data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2019;155:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.07.006
  14. Nadeem AA, Zha Y, Shi L, et al. SAFER-ET based assessment of irrigation patterns and impacts on groundwater use in the central Punjab, Pakistan. Agric Water Manage. 2023;289:108545. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108545
  15. de Assis do Nascimento Leão F, Mercante E, Oliveira WKM, et al. Determination of evapotranspiration for citrus using SAFER algorithm in the Oriental Amazon. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 2025;38:101526. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101526
  16. Venancio LP, Mantovani EC, Amaral CH do, et al. Evapotranspiration mapping of commercial corn fields in Brazil using SAFER algorithm. Sci Agric. 2021;78(4). doi: 10.1590/1678-992x-2019-0261
  17. Souza JMF, Alves Jr J, Casaroli D, Evangelista AWP, Mesquita M. Validação do modelo SAFER na estimativa da evapotranspiração da cana-de-açúcar [Validation of the SAFER model for estimating sugarcane evapotranspiration]. Irriga. 2020;25(2):247-262. doi: 10.15809/irriga.2020v25n2p247-262
  18. Safre ALS, Nassar A, Torres-Rua A, et al. Performance of Sentinel-2 SAFER ET model for daily and seasonal estimation of grapevine water consumption. Irrig Sci. 2022;40(4-5):635-654. doi: 10.1007/s00271-022-00810-1
  19. Karahan H, Cetin M, Can ME, Alsenjar O. Developing a New ANN Model to Estimate Daily Actual Evapotranspiration Using Limited Climatic Data and Remote Sensing Techniques for Sustainable Water Management. Sustainability. 2024;16(6):2481. doi: 10.3390/su16062481
  20. Cetin M, Alsenjar O, Aksu H, Golpinar MS, Akgul MA. Comparing actual evapotranspiration estimations by METRIC to in-situ water balance measurements over an irrigated field in Turkey. Hydrol Sci J. 2023;68(8):1162-1183. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2023.2198649
  21. Cetin M, Karahan H, Golpinar MS, Alsenjar O, Can ME. Estimating actual evapotranspiration using the metric model and comparing it to in-situ hydrological measurements in an irrigated catchment. In: 5th International Conference on Research of Agricultural and Food Technologies (I-CRAFT 2025). Atlantis Press; 2026:153-163.
  22. Tasumi M, Trezza R, Allen RG, Wright JL. Operational aspects of satellite-based energy balance models for irrigated crops in the semi-arid U.S. Irrig Drain Syst. 2005;19(3- 4):355-376. doi: 10.1007/s10795-005-8138-9
  23. Didan K. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC; 2015. doi: 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006
  24. Wan Z, Hook S, Hulley G. MODIS/Terra Land Surface Temperature/Emissivity Daily L3 Global 1 km SIN Grid V061. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC; 2021. doi: 10.5067/MODIS/MOD11A1.061
  25. Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ. 2017;202:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
  26. Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, Papanicolaou P. A global-scale investigation of stochastic similarities in marginal distribution and dependence structure of key hydrological-cycle processes. Hydrology. 2021;8(2):59.
  27. Teixeira AH de C, Bastiaanssen WGM, Ahmad MD, Moura MSB, Bos MG. Analysis of energy fluxes and vegetation-atmosphere parameters in irrigated and natural ecosystems of semi-arid Brazil. J Hydrol. 2008;362(1-2):110-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.011
  28. de Queiroga Miranda R, Galvíncio JD, Moura MSB de, Jones CA, Srinivasan R. Reliability of MODIS Evapotranspiration Products for Heterogeneous Dry Forest: A Study Case of Caatinga. Adv Meteorol. 2017;2017:1-14. doi: 10.1155/2017/9314801
  29. Teixeira A, Leivas J, Takemura C, Garçon E, Sousa I, Azevedo A. Monitoring anomalies on large-scale energy and water balance components by coupling remote sensing parameters and gridded weather data. Int J Biometeorol. 2024;68(12):2597-2612. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02771-w
  30. Cheng MY, Prayogo D. Symbiotic Organisms Search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct. 2014;139:98-112. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007
  31. Khalifeh S, Esmaili K, Khodashenas SR, Khalifeh V. Estimation of nonlinear parameters of the type 5 Muskingum model using SOS algorithm. MethodsX. 2020;7:101040. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101040
  32. Rezaei-Estakhroueiyeh A, Jalalkamali N, Momeniroghabadi M. Data on optimal operation of Safarud Reservoir using symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm. Data Brief. 2020;29:105327. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105327
  33. Karahan H, Erkan Can M. A Novel Method to Forecast Nitrate Concentration Levels in Irrigation Areas for Sustainable Agriculture. Agriculture. 2025;15(2):161. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15020161
  34. Karahan H. Discussion of “Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Muskingum Models Using Nelder-Mead Simplex Algorithm” by Reza Barati. J Hydrol Eng. 2013;18(3):365-367. doi: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000667
  35. Karahan H. Discussion of “Improved Nonlinear Muskingum Model with Variable Exponent Parameter” by Said M. Easa. J Hydrol Eng. 2014;19(10). doi: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001045
  36. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
  37. Nelder JA, Mead R. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization. Comput. J. 1965;7(4):308-313. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
  38. Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical Optimization. 2nd ed. Springer; 2006.
  39. Wang K, Wang P, Li Z, Cribb M, Sparrow M. A simple method to estimate actual evapotranspiration from a combination of net radiation, vegetation index, and temperature. J Geophys. Res. 2007;112(D15). doi: 10.1029/2006jd008351
  40. Tegos A, Malamos N, Koutsoyiannis D. A parsimonious regional parametric evapotranspiration model based on a simplification of the Penman–Monteith formula. J Hydrol. 2015;524:708-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.024
Share
Back to top
Explora: Environment and Resource, Electronic ISSN: 3060-9046 Published by AccScience Publishing